A no-confidence motion, an election and now another no-confidence motion. What happens next?
Premier Jeremy Rockliff was brought down by a no-confidence motion in June, but his unwillingness to step aside and Labor's refusal to govern with the support of the Greens sent the state to an early election.
It was an election held more than two and a half years earlier than expected.
After a lacklustre election campaign, Tasmanians voted for who they wanted to take the state forward.
The only catch? The make-up of the new parliament is essentially identical to the one elected last year, with the Liberals on 14 seats and Labor on 10 seats, both well short of a majority.
Mr Rockliff was re-commissioned as premier by Governor Barbara Baker on Wednesday, but it really only guaranteed him two more weeks in the top job.
On August 19, it will be déjà vu all over again, when Mr Rockliff faces a motion of no-confidence moved by Labor.
Is Labor really trying to form a government with just 10 of the required 18 seats?
They sure are.
Labor received a statewide first preference vote of just 25.9 per cent, a drop of 3.1 per cent.
And its leader Dean Winter received less than a quota in his own right, elected fifth [out of seven seats] to the southern seat of Franklin.
But that hasn't been enough to stop the party from dreaming of being in government for the first time since 2014.
Because the Liberals haven't signed supply and confidence deals with enough crossbenchers to lock in support on the floor of the lower house, Mr Winter has started aggressively courting the independents himself.
He argues Tasmania is better off under a Labor government.
He says Labor has a plan to restore the state's budget, rather than a Liberal government that until extremely recently had not even hinted there was a problem, despite Treasury's pre-election financial outlook predicting net debt would rise to almost $13 billion by 2027–28.
In short, we don't know.
The Greens, who supported the no-confidence motion in Mr Rockliff in June, said publicly they'd prefer to work with Labor than the Liberals.
But they've been largely frozen out by a Labor Party that keeps insisting it won't do deals with the Greens.
That lack of communication means there remains uncertainty about how the five elected Greens MPs will vote.
"We have to do our job of fighting for the people that put us in parliament and voted for us. They want change from business as usual."
If the Greens are on board, Labor needs three more of the remaining six crossbenchers to agree in order to form government.
Independent MP Craig Garland has previously said he would vote for a no-confidence motion in the re-elected premier, blasting the Liberals' "arrogant" approach over the Marinus Link undersea power cable project, but said late this week that the door wasn't completely shut on the Liberals.
"The Liberal Party may stand up. They may come to the table and say we got this wrong, we're willing to compromise, we're willing to sit down and make these concessions, and if that's the case, I'll support them," he said.
"If Labor want to do it, I'll support them."
The four other independents – Kristie Johnston, David O'Byrne, Peter George and George Razay — as well as incoming Shooters, Fishers and Farmers MP Carlo Di Falco have all yet to make up their minds.
Lots of the crossbenchers are calling for the major parties to compromise on policies, something they've so far flatly refused to do.
Every member of the lower house knows this parliament needs to last for the long term.
So the motion, likely to be moved by Labor, will do two things:
First, it will move no-confidence in Mr Rockliff's government.
Secondly, it will move confidence in a Labor government.
It's a bid to replace the government, not to send the state to another election.
The Liberals made some big changes this week as they try to neutralise one of the key issues for the crossbench: the state of the budget.
Deputy Premier Guy Barnett has been moved on from the treasury portfolio and replaced by former federal minister Eric Abetz.
Mr Abetz's first act was to announce a new multi-partisan budget panel, which will consult with all MPs and stakeholders about their plans to put the budget back in the black, and rein in the debt.
And while Mr Rockliff and Mr Barnett insisted the budget was "on a sensible pathway to surplus" and the debt at sustainable levels, Mr Abetz was much more circumspect.
His press conference on Friday was littered with phrases such as "budget repair" and bringing "the budget back into shape".
"Clearly the situation does require rectifying … I think all of us understand and realise that there is a budget imperative that needs to be addressed and that will be my challenge," Mr Abetz said.
Labor met with the five independents on Thursday, and is pointing towards policies it has in common with most crossbenchers, spruiking its new suite of policies to include integrity in politics, including replacing the Integrity Commission with a new anti-corruption commission, and strengthening right-to-information laws.
The party intends to release its plans on other policy areas in coming days.
It's likely we won't know which party has convinced enough crossbenchers to side with it until state parliament resumes on August 19.
And the nation again watches closely as parliamentarians debate who should lead the state going forward.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles

News.com.au
an hour ago
- News.com.au
‘Freaking out': Perth woman risks property portfolio to launch skincare brand
A young Aussie has recently done something most homeowners would never dare to – refinancing multiple mortgages to invest everything into her skincare brand LumiLift. Tegan Brown owns two investment properties in Perth, but she's made the bold decision to pour every ounce of equity she's built up into her beauty business. 'I have two investment properties. I bought the first one about four years and the other one about two years ago,' Ms Brown told The 28-year-old bought her first property for $380,000 just before the pandemic, getting in before 'prices increased' – having likely doubled in value in the years since. She then purchased a second home for around $450,000, funding both investments entirely on her own, thanks to her work in recruitment and years of saving. 'I'm always looking at opportunities to grow wealth, and property was the first and safest option to do that at the start,' she said. Both the properties are tenanted, Ms Brown said, and were essentially paying for themselves before she made the decision to take a chance and invest in her business. Ms Brown didn't have heaps of cash sitting around, so she refinanced both mortgages – a choice she admitted was daunting when she originally made it. 'It was scary but I did have mentors that said the best thing you can do with equity is either reinvest into more property or into building your own business,' she said. 'I invested about $100,000 initially.' That $100,000 was allocated towards the brand's inventory, marketing, and content creation, and also served as a financial buffer, as she had quit her job in recruiting to make it her sole focus. Ms Brown said that when she told people she planned to pull out the equity in both her investments, the reaction wasn't positive. Some were 'freaking out', but Ms Brown didn't let the concern deter her because she believed in the skincare brand she's created – in particular, its light therapy mask. Ms Brown claimed the device helps to create clearer skin and helps women avoid having to 'spend thousands' on treatments that don't offer the same results. 'I created LumiLift because I wanted other women to experience that same transformation without spending thousands or relying on quick fixes that don't last,' she said. 'For me, skincare isn't just about appearance. It's about confidence, freedom, and ease.' Ms Brown explained that her ultimate goal is for her customers to be so happy with their skin from using her product they won't feel reliant on make-up to feel good. She's also had some moments that have made the financial risk feel worth it. For her, the most 'rewarding' thing has been seeing skincare professionals buy her products and rave about the results. Ms Brown said she is also proud she had invested in herself and backed her idea, despite the risk involved. 'The biggest challenges have been sitting in the unknown, especially because I have invested so much money,' she explained. 'Sometimes the fear of failure can get to your head. But I think through these hard periods, not giving (up) feels like a huge win.' The business owner said that given her brand is still new and growing, it isn't yet at the profitable stage, meaning she's still waiting to see if her risk will pay off. 'It is getting there. It has been a journey and it is getting closer and closer to where I want it to be,' she said. 'The main thing for me is building a community and seeing the results and I know the money will come.'


SBS Australia
an hour ago
- SBS Australia
Victorian Parliament urged to amend guardianship gag laws
Victorian Parliament urged to amend guardianship gag laws Published 13 August 2025, 9:33 am A bill introduced to Victorian Parliament is seeking to change the way people with disabilities share their stories. The bill changes a previous clause which restricts individuals under guardianship orders from speaking out without permission from a Government Tribunal. Advocates say it left people silenced and disempowered.

The Age
2 hours ago
- The Age
Our students are our resource. They shouldn't be taxed
To submit a letter to The Age, email letters@ Please include your home address and telephone number. No attachments, please include your letter in the body of the email. See here for our rules and tips on getting your letter published. Ross Gittins (' PM cries poor as gas riches go untaxed ', 13/8) highlights the ridiculous situation in which the government takes more money from tertiary education students via HECS than we collect from the Petroleum Resource Rent Tax. This is an inherited situation from previous LNP governments. On the eve of the federal government's productivity roundtable, and given the government's huge parliamentary majority, now is the time to rectify these flawed policies and follow the example of Norway, which taxes its oil and gas companies and provides free higher education. What Australia needs is strong leadership and structural change to our tax system, not a tinkering around the edges to avoid upsetting parts of the electorate. David Conolly, Brighton Labor is on notice to act Another insightful piece by Ross Gittins on the failure of the government to collect the Petroleum Resource Rent Tax. Critics have been talking about this inequitable failure for some time, but nothing changes. Gittins asks why the federal government is 'giving our gas away to big companies?' He answers his own question and the reason is due to powerful lobbying by those companies. This disparity in power is at the heart of our current lack of productivity and general economic progress. Everyday workers and even students (as Gittins observes) are easy targets from which to extract tax. There is growing disquiet in the community about the stated intention of the Prime Minister Anthony Albanese of not tackling the big equality issues in the economic roundtable. If this forum turns out to be just a talkfest, it will demonstrate a lack of courage by Labor and a failure to listen to voters. We will all pay the price. Jan Marshall, Brighton We allow multinationals to pay a pittance The return taxpayers receive from the Petroleum Resource Rent Tax is half of 1 per cent. We are virtually allowing the petroleum companies to have our oil and gas for nothing. A person renting out a property would expect to get 2.5 per cent on the capital value of the property and yet we allow these multinationals to get away with paying a pittance. The treasurer and prime minister need to toughen up for the sake of future generations and impose a flat rate of $40 billion a year for them to have access to oil and gas. Oil and gas is a finite resource – once it's gone it's gone. Paul Chivers, Box Hill North Please, impose some sort of taxation Ross Gittins' article is jaw dropping. It is quite incomprehensible how we arrived at this position, although no doubt there are complex watertight contracts in place that would cost billions to get out of. Even a modest application of taxation would pay for the NDIS, among many other social needs. Fiona White, Alfredton Arguments need to be addressed The federal government needs to address the arguments made by Ross Gittins on the lack of a fair tax on gas exporters. Gittins shows that these tax rates stand in stark contrast to HECS charges paid by students. Mike Lawson, Adelaide We should not be subsidising this situation It is outrageous that our youth pay $50,000 for an arts degree, 56 per cent of our gas exports are given gratis to LNG exporters and the tax office describes the oil and gas companies as 'systematic non-payers' of tax. To make it even worse – currently every single Australian pays $548 a year to subsidise fossil fuels. Talk about room for improvement. Lesley Walker, Northcote THE FORUM Not so lucky The supposedly socially progressive Victorian Labor government is failing badly on at least two key measures of socio-economic wellbeing and fairness. As the Australian Education Union laments (Page 13 advertisement, 13/8), Victorian public schools are the lowest funded in Australia. Victoria ranks last in Australia for availability of social housing, with growing waiting lists. The government is not being brought to account by a divided opposition though incompetence and ideological blindness. The opposition is arguably worse federally. Liberal governments were primarily responsible for overseeing one of the most inequitable and segregated education systems in the developed world. They threaten scare campaigns against some urgent reforms to ease the housing crisis. Recent Labor governments have lacked the communication skills and courage to persevere with necessary change. Donald Horne's description of 'The Lucky Country' remains depressingly apt. Norman Huon, Port Melbourne