logo
Mass deportations could cost California in these surprising ways

Mass deportations could cost California in these surprising ways

As the federal government ramps up deportation efforts, a new study by Northern California researchers sought to quantify how much mass deportations would cost the state by measuring undocumented immigrants' economic contributions.
The study, conducted by researchers at the San Francisco think tank Bay Area Council Economic Institute and UC Merced, projected that mass deportations of California's almost 2.3 million undocumented immigrants could cost the state's economy $275 billion through a loss of labor, economic output, small business job creation and consumer spending among other impacts.
The Trump administration says it wants to deport an estimated 11 million undocumented immigrants who live in the United States to secure borders against immigrants who have committed crimes and because unauthorized immigrants are a drain on public resources, although people in the country illegally are generally ineligible for federal benefits.
Still, Trump initially struggled to get his agenda off the ground, with the number of deportations relatively flat before beginning to climb in March through May, partly because fewer people were nabbed at the border. Immigration arrests and detentions have spiked from January to May, however.
Anti-immigration advocates have argued that a large supply of undocumented labor depresses wages for some American workers, although there is substantial disagreement about the extent to which that's true. Supporters of immigration argue that undocumented laborers tend to take jobs Americans don't want, especially seasonal farmwork.
The report does not answer the question of whether undocumented immigrants cost the country more than they contribute to it. But it found that undocumented immigrants in California are more likely to be working age and employed than native-born residents, with an estimated 72% working compared to 67% for U.S.-born residents.
About 1.5 million undocumented immigrants work in California, constituting 8% of the state's workforce, the study estimated.
There is no official count of undocumented immigrants in the U.S. As such, researchers, including in this study, use what's called the 'residual method' to estimate it. That involves subtracting the estimated legally present foreign-born population in the U.S. from the total foreign-born population counted by the U.S. Census Bureau to get an estimated unauthorized population.
Used by the Department of Homeland Security for its official unauthorized population statistics, as well as research organizations Pew Research Center and the Migration Policy Institute, the method is generally accepted as the best way to estimate these populations.
The Bay Area Council Economic Institute is the research arm of the Bay Area Council, an advocacy organization for businesses across the Bay Area. Dennis Feehan, a UC Berkeley demographics professor and quantitative social science methodology expert, reviewed the report's methodology and said the methods used seemed reasonable and typical of this kind of work, although he said it is challenging to estimate the size of the undocumented population.
The researchers inferred that someone was likely present legally if they met certain criteria such as being born abroad to American parents, being employed in military or government positions, receiving government assistance such as food stamps or working in some jobs requiring professional licenses, such as engineers or nurses, explained the Institute's research director and report co-author Abby Raisz.
The undocumented immigrant population estimate includes both immigrants present without any kind of legal authorization and those with temporary legal protections that could be revoked, such as beneficiaries of the Obama-era program Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals and Temporary Protected Status, which is given to nationals of certain countries.
The researchers measured economic impact in three main ways: First, the direct impact through wages that undocumented workers earn and goods and services they produce. Second, indirect impact such as when employers purchase materials used by undocumented labor. Third, induced impact through consumer spending.
Researchers said undocumented workers generate 5% of the state's overall economic activity through their labor, a number that rises to 9% after factoring in ripple effects of their spending and labor.
'We have been reliant on immigration as a source of population growth and driver of labor force growth for many years,' Raisz said. The report found that California would have lost 85,000 people last year if not for immigration. The state instead gained about 40,000 people.
'One thing I want to drive home is how embedded folks are in the state and communities,' Raisz said, pointing to the report finding that almost half of undocumented immigrants in California have been in the U.S. for more than 20 years.
The study found that almost 11% of all small businesses are owned by undocumented immigrants.
Undocumented immigrants also pay an estimated $10.6 billion in state and local taxes annually and almost $13 billion in federal taxes, the report stated, despite being excluded from most federal benefits.
The economic impact of deportations won't be equally felt. It'll be most acute in regions with a greater share of undocumented immigrants — including the Bay Area, San Joaquin Valley, Inland Empire and Los Angeles — and in industries reliant on undocumented workers including housekeeping, agriculture, construction, food service, warehousing and manufacturing.
'Those are pretty staggering numbers,' Raisz said. 'If we lose this workforce, we're not harvesting crops, we're not building homes. These are things we need to survive as an economy and a society.'
Maria-Elena De Trinidad Young, an assistant professor of public health at UC Merced who co-wrote the report, said that the economic costs of mass deportation don't just come from the removal of individuals from the U.S. It also comes from absenteeism from schools and work and the loss in productivity due to fear after immigration raids on workplaces, she said.
That same chilling effect can apply to people going out to eat or heading downtown, Young said, thus reducing spending and economic activity.
'The term mass deportation leads people to think we're going to see one big workplace raid,' she said. But, she said, 'these economic hits would be the cumulative effect of lots of small enforcement actions… Overall, we stand to lose a lot because of increased enforcement even if we don't see it immediately happening in our backyard right now.'
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Why copper, aluminium and steel are at the core of Trump's MAGA ideology
Why copper, aluminium and steel are at the core of Trump's MAGA ideology

Yahoo

time36 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Why copper, aluminium and steel are at the core of Trump's MAGA ideology

Like the US government's country-specific tariffs, the hefty 50% levies on all steel, copper and aluminium imports go beyond economics — reflecting Trump's desire to reclaim once-dominant US industries and rally his blue-collar base. "Much of the motivation for tariffs on the base inputs of production, such as copper, is primarily a political motivation," David Stritch, a senior FX Analyst at Caxton, told Euronews. "Trump has on several occasions become frustrated at the reversal in the production of all three materials, away from the United States, which was the dominant global producer as recently as the 1980's, and towards Chile for copper and China for steel and aluminium," he continued. Trump has long framed steel and aluminium as the backbone of American strength, linking their production to economic survival as well as national security. During his first term in 2018, he underscored just how central he believes these industries are. "A strong steel and aluminium industry are vital to our national security. Absolutely vital," Trump said. "Steel is steel. You don't have steel, you don't have a country. Our industries have been targeted for years and years — decades, in fact — by unfair foreign trade practices leading to the shuttered plants and mills, the laying off of millions of workers, and the decimation of entire communities. And that's going to stop, right? It's going to stop," he declared at the time. When it comes to copper, the US currently imports around half of its resources, mostly from Chile and Canada. On Wednesday, copper prices fell sharply before the 1 August deadline for the implementation of new tariffs, with US copper futures sinking 20% to around $4.55 or €3.94 per pound, marking the largest intra-day fall on record. This came after US copper prices surged to new records in July when Trump first announced the levy. Again taking investors by surprise, the president then announced this week that the raw material — as opposed to semi-finished products — would be exempt from the duty, threatening less of a supply squeeze. Imports of copper concentrate and cathodes won't be affected by new levies, although shipments of wire, pipes, and sheeting will be. Meanwhile the doubling of steel and aluminium tariffs, to 50% from their previous 25% tariff rate, has significantly raised US domestic metal prices, cutting off cost-competitive imports and increasing volatility for manufacturers. Higher input costs and shrinking availability are forcing US companies to consider reshoring their investments and redesigning their supply chains. Whether or not tariffs will actually boost domestic production nonetheless remains to be seen, as levies imposed by Trump during his first term failed to do so. By 2024, US steel output was actually 1% lower than in 2017, before Trump's initial tariffs, while aluminium production had declined by nearly 10%. According to recent analysis, Trump's tariffs could raise manufacturing costs by up to 4.5%, squeezing narrow-margin sectors like EVs and appliances, as well as delaying investment in key manufacturing hubs across the country. Industries 'snatched away' from the US For most of the 20th century, the United States was the world's top copper producer until Chile took this title, marking the end of US dominance. Today, Chile remains the largest global producer of the metal. In terms of steel production, the US peaked in the early 1970s before the industry faced a prolonged collapse, deepened by a series of recessions. Cheaper and more efficient systems in Japan, South Korea, Europe and elsewhere undercut high-cost US integrated steel mills. A strong dollar also made foreign steel even cheaper, while domestic plants were burdened with aging equipment, high labour contracts and rising environmental costs. Steel towns — the ones Trump now wants to reinvigorate nearly 50 years later — collapsed economically, despite government interventions to keep them afloat. This is why the region from New York through the Midwest continues to be called the Rust Belt, referring to corroding mills and production sites that have long fallen out of use. Related Copper prices near an all-time high amid Trump's tariff threats, China's stimulus US copper prices soar after Trump threatens 50% tariff on imports In terms of aluminium, the US was the world's leading aluminium producer for much of the 20th century, largely due to the abundance of cheap electricity needed for smelting and strong domestic demand from defence, aerospace and automotive industries. In the early 2000s, China overtook the US as the leading producer of aluminium. "Trump's greatest base of support, primarily blue collar non-college educated men, has seen the largest drop in employment opportunities as a result of this offshoring," Stritch told Euronews. Increasing costs, especially in green-adjacent industries Trump's sweeping 50% tariffs on copper, steel and aluminium are likely to disrupt industries that rely heavily on these materials, from construction and defence and even green technologies. "Practically, all three materials are used extensively from solar panels to car batteries, one may assume that it would thus be the US manufacturing base that suffers to the largest extent," Stritch continued. Nowhere is this pressure felt more acutely than in sectors like electric vehicles and renewable energy, where these metals are essential and profit margins are already minimal. Stritch added: "We may further speculate that owing to the high tariff placed on these goods and the general fragility of the electric car market at present, the high inputs of all three materials and the thin average industry profit margin of 5%, EV producers may endure the worst of the increased input costs." Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data

US and Israeli officials float idea of ‘all or nothing' Gaza deal
US and Israeli officials float idea of ‘all or nothing' Gaza deal

Boston Globe

time38 minutes ago

  • Boston Globe

US and Israeli officials float idea of ‘all or nothing' Gaza deal

The Israeli government has also come under mounting international criticism over the mass hunger that has spread through Gaza's population of about 2 million people after Israel imposed strict restrictions in recent months on the entry of aid. Advertisement Israel has continued launching military strikes on Gaza, even as it has facilitated the entry of more aid into Gaza in recent days. The Palestine Red Crescent Society said on Sunday that Israeli artillery had hit its offices in Khan Younis, killing one of the aid group's staffers and injuring others. The Israeli military did not immediately comment. Steve Witkoff, the Trump administration's special envoy to the Middle East, who is visiting the region, met with families of Israeli hostages on Saturday and told them that President Donald Trump now wants to see all the living hostages released at once. Advertisement 'No piecemeal deals, that doesn't work,' he said, according to an audio recording of part of the meeting published by the Ynet Hebrew news site. 'Now we think that we have to shift this negotiation to 'all or nothing' -- everybody comes home,' he said. 'We have a plan around it,' he added, without elaborating. A participant in the meeting confirmed that Witkoff made such remarks. Israel and Hamas do not negotiate directly. Instead, negotiations for a ceasefire between the two sides have run through intermediaries: the United States, Qatar and Egypt. Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu of Israel and Trump are said to be working on a new proposal that would involve presenting Hamas with an ultimatum, according to reports in the Israeli news media that were confirmed Sunday by a person familiar with the matter. The White House was not immediately available for comment. Under the terms of the ultimatum, Hamas would have to release the remaining hostages in exchange for Palestinian prisoners and agree to terms to end the war that include the group's disarmament. Otherwise, the Israeli military would continue its campaign. Mahmoud Mardawi, a Hamas official, said the Palestinian armed group had yet to receive a formal Israeli proposal for a comprehensive deal from Arab mediators. He said that while Hamas supported such an agreement in principle, it would not disarm -- which has long been a core Israeli condition. 'This has been our demand from the beginning: an end to the war, the release of prisoners, and day-after arrangements in the Gaza Strip -- a clear and comprehensive deal,' Mardawi said in a phone interview. Advertisement The prospects of any rapid advancement toward such a deal appear dim. Hamas has consistently rejected Israel's terms for ending the war throughout the negotiations. On Saturday, the group said in a statement that it would not disarm unless a Palestinian state was established, despite a call from Arab states last week for the group to do so. The Israeli government opposes Palestinian statehood. On Sunday, Itamar Ben-Gvir, the Israeli national security minister, visited the Al-Aqsa Mosque compound, which Jews revere as the Temple Mount, long a tinderbox for Israeli-Palestinian tensions. Arab leaders denounced Ben-Gvir's ascent to the site -- during which he openly prayed -- as a provocation. 'It's important to convey from this place that we should immediately conquer Gaza, exercise our sovereignty there, and eliminate every last Hamas member,' Ben-Gvir said from the site, in a video shared by his office. Many Israelis say they support a comprehensive deal to return all the hostages and end the war. But many are skeptical that such a deal can be achieved under the conditions set by the hard-line Israeli government, which has vowed to continue fighting until Hamas surrenders or is destroyed. Many also doubt that Hamas would ultimately give up all the hostages, the only cards the group holds against Israel. On Sunday night, Netanyahu argued that Hamas 'does not want a deal' and vowed to press on in the attempt 'to release our captive sons, eliminate Hamas and ensure that Gaza no longer poses a threat to Israel.' Given the firm positions of both sides, an Israeli and American push for a comprehensive deal may not bring an agreement closer, according to analysts. Advertisement 'Hamas is essentially saying to Israel: 'If you want the 20 living hostages out, give us a full victory,'' said Ehud Yaari, an Israel-based fellow of the Washington Institute for Near East Policy, an independent research group. Hamas' terms are far beyond what Netanyahu would accept, Yaari said. But, he added, the prime minister 'has to keep convincing the Israeli public and his own voters that he is doing everything he can, and he has to reassure the families of the hostages.' Mardawi said that Hamas saw little reason to negotiate with Israel given the dire humanitarian situation in Gaza. 'What is the point of talks when people are dying of starvation?' he said. The hunger crisis worsened after Israel's government imposed severe restrictions on aid entering the territory. Israel has accused aid agencies of mismanaging supplies and Hamas of diverting aid. But some Israeli military officials said the military never found proof that Hamas had systematically stolen aid from the United Nations, the biggest supplier of emergency assistance to Gaza for most of the war. More than 60,000 Palestinians have been killed in Gaza since the war began, including thousands of children, according to the Gaza Health Ministry, which does not distinguish between civilians and combatants. The Hamas-led attack on Israel on Oct. 7, 2023, which ignited the war, killed about 1,200 people, according to the Israeli government, and about 250 people were taken captive to Gaza. More than 100 hostages were freed during previous ceasefires and Israeli forces operating in the enclave have retrieved the bodies of some others. Ruby Chen, the father of American-Israeli soldier Itay Chen, who was abducted by Hamas, attended the meeting Saturday with Witkoff. Chen's son is now presumed dead by Israeli authorities. Advertisement He said Witkoff had discussed the need for a comprehensive deal, rather than a partial deal. 'After six months, they've now come to the understanding that it's not possible to execute it,' said Chen. 'We lost six months on this.' This article originally appeared in

Trump says he'll name people to 2 jobs closely watched by Wall Street
Trump says he'll name people to 2 jobs closely watched by Wall Street

Business Insider

time39 minutes ago

  • Business Insider

Trump says he'll name people to 2 jobs closely watched by Wall Street

President Donald Trump says he will soon be naming a new Federal Reserve governor and Bureau of Labor Statistics commissioner. Trump was speaking to reporters on Sunday when he was asked about Federal Reserve Gov. Adriana Kugler's sudden resignation on Friday. Kugler, whose term was set to end in January 2026, said she would step down this week. "She left early, and I think she left because she agreed with me on interest rates, and yet they were on the other side of the ballpark. So I'll be announcing that probably over the next couple of days," Trump said of Kugler and his plans to replace her. Former President Joe Biden had nominated Kugler to the Federal Reserve Board of Governors in September 2023. She was to serve the rest of the term of former Federal Reserve Gov. Lael Brainard after Brainard left the central bank to lead Biden's White House National Economic Council. The White House did not respond to a request for comment from Business Insider. Kugler's abrupt departure comes amid Trump's ongoing beef with Federal Reserve Chair Jerome Powell. Trump has repeatedly called on Powell to cut interest rates and step down. Powell, however, said he won't and has not responded directly to Trump's attacks. Naming Kugler's replacement will allow Trump to reshape the Federal Reserve based on his preferences. The Board of Governors comprises seven members, three of whom were appointed in Trump's first term. They include Powell, Christopher Waller, and Michelle Bowman. Waller and Bowman had given a rare double dissent last week after the Federal Open Markets Committee voted to keep rates unchanged. In his interview on Sunday, Trump said that he will appoint a new Bureau of Labor Statistics commissioner "over the next three or four days." He fired the previous commissioner, Erika McEntarfer, on Friday after the BLS released a weak jobs report and made downward revisions to job numbers from May and June. "We had no confidence. The numbers were ridiculous, what she announced, but that was just one negative number," Trump said of the job numbers. "If you remember, just before the election, this woman came out with these phenomenal numbers on Biden's economy. Phenomenal numbers. And then right after the election, they announced that those numbers were wrong. And that's what they did the other day. So it's a scam in my opinion," he added. McEntarfer was appointed to the BLS by Biden in January 2024. The BLS may revise its job figures, as the bureau continues to collect additional data after it releases its initial estimates. The BLS said on Friday that its latest revisions were "larger than normal" after it lowered total nonfarm payroll employment by 125,000 and 133,000 for May and June, respectively. Kevin Hassett, the director of the White House National Economic Council, told NBC's "Meet the Press" on Sunday that Trump wasn't firing people because they were reporting data he disagreed with. "The president wants his own people there so that when we see the numbers, they're more transparent and more reliable," Hassett said. "And if there are big changes and big revisions, we expect more big revisions for the jobs data in September, for example, then we want to know why. We want people to explain it to us," he continued.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store