logo
Minister Healy-Rae claims he ‘personally championed' new planning exemptions

Minister Healy-Rae claims he ‘personally championed' new planning exemptions

The review forms part of the Implementation Plan for the Planning and Development Act 2024 with Minister Browne saying the changes create an ability to expand and improve existing planning exemptions to allow for the appropriate adaptation of dwellings to changing needs is a key consideration.
The minister explained the new changes would take many applications out of the system that don't need to be there, freeing up local authority planners' time and allowing more resources to be focused on larger projects.
Minister Browne explained that public submissions will be 'extremely important' as it is recognised, especially in urban areas, that some exempted developments may have unintended impacts on neighbouring properties.
A public consultation process will run for four weeks over the summer period. Following a review of all submissions, updated Exempted Development Regulations will be finalised as quickly as possible.
'Therefore, any proposed exemptions in relation to housing can only be improved by having full public consultation and I would encourage anyone with something to say to engage with the process when it opens up for contributions,' Minister Browne said.
Welcoming the announcement, Minister of State at the Department of Agriculture, Food and the Marine, Michael Healy-Rae said the proposal is practical and long-overdue and one he 'personally championed' during pre-government policy talks.
'This is something I've been pushing for over many years, in policy discussions before entering government and throughout my time in politics,' Minister Healy-Rae said.
"I've consistently called for more flexibility and clarity around planning exemptions, because these are the real-life issues that come up in every county and every parish. It's great to now see these proposals taking shape,' he added.
Minister Healy-Rae stated that too often people are caught up in red tape trying to do something as simple as converting a roof space or putting in a modular home for a family member.
He feels the review will cut through this and help people to move faster, adding that local authorities, especially in rural areas, will see direct benefits from the move.
'This change will ease a massive administrative burden on councils, particularly in rural counties like Kerry. It's about using common sense to improve housing delivery whether it's for an older parent, an adult child, or a family trying to make their home work better for their needs,' he said.
Minister Healy-Rae urged Minister Browne to 'move quickly' and complete the process. Once the regulations are finalised, he said it would bring clarity that is important for families, for planners, and for the overall efficiency of the housing system.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Tesco seeks High Court injunction to get horses off its Galway land
Tesco seeks High Court injunction to get horses off its Galway land

Irish Times

time2 days ago

  • Irish Times

Tesco seeks High Court injunction to get horses off its Galway land

Tesco is seeking a High Court injunction requiring a couple to remove horses on an eight-acre site it owns in Galway . Martin and Kathleen Donovan, who live in a caravan on a halting site at Túr Uisce, Doughiska, Galway, have been keeping the horses, and using buildings as makeshift stables on the site at Briarhill Junction, Galway City, the court heard. At a meeting with the couple last month, Tesco Ireland Ltd representatives were told they would get the horses off if they were 'financially compensated' so that they could buy or rent new land to keep the animals. Tesco refused. The Donovans also claimed they have been on the site for 15 years and could claim adverse possession (squatters rights). Tesco disputes this and say the claim is bound to fail. READ MORE Galway City Council has also notified Tesco that it had to render the land 'other than derelict' and the site had been placed on the derelict sites register. If works are not carried out, this could result in punitive levies and the possibility of a compulsory purchase order. It has not been possible for Tesco's contractors to access the land and do the necessary work due to safety concerns. The court also heard that the Department of Agriculture also issued a notice requiring the horses to be removed. Inspectors arrived to see if the notice was being complied with, but the animals were returned to the site after the inspectors left. Tesco has erected paladin fencing around the site boundary and secured the gates to the site with locks. However, these locks have been removed and new locks placed there, but not by Tesco. [ Galway farmer granted permission to challenge Greenway purchase decision 'splitting' his farm Opens in new window ] Tesco wants to develop the site; part of it has been compulsorily purchased for the N6 Galway Ring Road project. Mr Justice Brian Cregan, following a one-side-only application on behalf of Tesco, granted permission for service of the papers on the defendants at short notice. He said a 'plain English' notice should also be provided in the service notice and the defendants could be informed in this way, as well as through a phone number and email address Tesco has for one of them, that the case will return next week.

'Extraordinary public effort' as 7,500 people sign petition against mussel farm in Kinsale
'Extraordinary public effort' as 7,500 people sign petition against mussel farm in Kinsale

Irish Examiner

time2 days ago

  • Irish Examiner

'Extraordinary public effort' as 7,500 people sign petition against mussel farm in Kinsale

More than 7,000 people have backed what campaigners say is the largest aquaculture appeal the country has ever seen, as the fight against a controversial mussel farm project in Cork continues. Campaigners opposing the mussel farm proposed for Woodstown Bay in Kinsale Harbour have submitted an unprecedented 147 formal appeals to the Aquaculture Licences Appeals Board (ALAB), representing the voices of more than 7,500 individuals. The Department of Agriculture granted a licence in May to Waterford-based Woodstown Bay Shellfish Ltd, for a mussel farm across some 23-hectares next to Dock Beach, in an area used by swimmers, kayakers, sailors and crab fishers. A delegation of campaigners delivered a petition signed by more than 7,000 people to the department this week, calling for it to reverse its decision to grant the licence. Minister of state at the Department of the Marine Timmy Dooley accepted the petition and expressed an interest in exploring shorter licensing periods in future, but campaigners said he noted he would be unlikely to overturn a decision made by ALAB for legal reasons, even in the face of strong public opposition. A large turnout on Dock beach and flotilla of boats in the waters nearby protesting about the proposed mussel farm in Kinsale harbour last month. Picture: Eddie O'Hare The 147 appeals have been submitted to ALAB from individuals, marine users, environmental groups, and local organisations. One appeal includes a petition of 6,200 names, while others were submitted by groups representing more than 200 members each. The cost of appeal fees alone has exceeded €25,000, with many appeals including professional input, and some taking six weeks to complete. However, there is growing concern ALAB may treat them as a single objection, rolling them into one file. 'This process involved extraordinary public effort," said Marc O'Riain of Kinsale Harbour Watch. "To flatten it into a single case would not only diminish the voices of thousands but seriously misrepresent the scale of opposition." Campaigners argue this would undermine the democratic process, and risk breaching the Aarhus Convention — the international agreement, ratified by the EU, that guarantees the public's right to meaningful participation in environmental decision-making. They have called on ALAB to recognise the integrity of each submission, acknowledge the volume of public concern, and hold a formal oral hearing. 'We remain hopeful that the appeals process will deliver a fair outcome. But if necessary, we are prepared to pursue a judicial review to protect Kinsale Harbour,' he said.

Should road tolls be lifted for the All-Ireland final?
Should road tolls be lifted for the All-Ireland final?

The Journal

time2 days ago

  • The Journal

Should road tolls be lifted for the All-Ireland final?

AS THE ALL-IRELAND football final approaches this weekend, Michael Healy-Rae is suggesting that road tolls should be lifted to make it easier for Kerry and Donegal fans heading to Croke Park. Speaking to Newstalk Breakfast this morning, the Kerry TD proposed removing motorway tolls to reduce both traffic on the roads and the financial burden on supporters, calling it 'the right thing to do'. Advertisement Healy-Rae said that he wouldn't be as passionate about implementing a similar measure for other big events, such as concerts, arguing that they don't draw the same number of people travelling for the All-Ireland final. So, what do you think: Should road tolls be lifted for the All-Ireland final? Poll Results: No (480) Yes (162) It should happen for all big events (100) Unsure (13) Yes No It should happen for all big events Unsure Vote

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store