'Extraordinary public effort' as 7,500 people sign petition against mussel farm in Kinsale
Campaigners opposing the mussel farm proposed for Woodstown Bay in Kinsale Harbour have submitted an unprecedented 147 formal appeals to the Aquaculture Licences Appeals Board (ALAB), representing the voices of more than 7,500 individuals.
The Department of Agriculture granted a licence in May to Waterford-based Woodstown Bay Shellfish Ltd, for a mussel farm across some 23-hectares next to Dock Beach, in an area used by swimmers, kayakers, sailors and crab fishers.
A delegation of campaigners delivered a petition signed by more than 7,000 people to the department this week, calling for it to reverse its decision to grant the licence.
Minister of state at the Department of the Marine Timmy Dooley accepted the petition and expressed an interest in exploring shorter licensing periods in future, but campaigners said he noted he would be unlikely to overturn a decision made by ALAB for legal reasons, even in the face of strong public opposition.
A large turnout on Dock beach and flotilla of boats in the waters nearby protesting about the proposed mussel farm in Kinsale harbour last month. Picture: Eddie O'Hare
The 147 appeals have been submitted to ALAB from individuals, marine users, environmental groups, and local organisations.
One appeal includes a petition of 6,200 names, while others were submitted by groups representing more than 200 members each.
The cost of appeal fees alone has exceeded €25,000, with many appeals including professional input, and some taking six weeks to complete.
However, there is growing concern ALAB may treat them as a single objection, rolling them into one file.
'This process involved extraordinary public effort," said Marc O'Riain of Kinsale Harbour Watch.
"To flatten it into a single case would not only diminish the voices of thousands but seriously misrepresent the scale of opposition."
Campaigners argue this would undermine the democratic process, and risk breaching the Aarhus Convention — the international agreement, ratified by the EU, that guarantees the public's right to meaningful participation in environmental decision-making.
They have called on ALAB to recognise the integrity of each submission, acknowledge the volume of public concern, and hold a formal oral hearing.
'We remain hopeful that the appeals process will deliver a fair outcome. But if necessary, we are prepared to pursue a judicial review to protect Kinsale Harbour,' he said.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Agriland
7 hours ago
- Agriland
Muir: Stakeholder group to examine NAP proposals
Minister for the Department of Agriculture, Environment and Rural Affairs (DAERA), Andrew Muir has said that a stakeholder group will be appointed to examine proposals for the Nutrients Action Programme (NAP) in Northern Ireland. The minister made the comments today (Monday, June 30) as he issued an update on the ongoing public consultation for the revised NAP. "The Nutrients Action Programme, was introduced 18 years ago to fulfil our legal requirement to reduce water pollution from agricultural sources, with much good work undertaken to date by farmers," Minister Muir said. "The legally required NAP review is an important opportunity to shape the actions we can take together over the next four years," he added. Minister Muir said that "it is vital we take further actions to improve water quality in our rivers, lakes and loughs". "I am firmly committed to delivery of the Lough Neagh Action Plan and Programme for government commitments, and in doing so, an urgent and collective endeavour is critical," he said. The minister said that when the public consultation on the updated NAP closes at 11:59p.m on July 24, 2025, DAERA will set up "a timebound stakeholder task and finish group" This group will include an external facilitator and representatives from farming, agri-food, environmental groups and the department. "Working collaboratively and taking into account the consultation responses, plus any other potential solutions, the group will be asked to propose measures and actions, that are evidence-based and workable at farm level within realistic timeframes, as well as meeting legislative requirements," Muir said. The minister also said that as part of this process a draft Economic Impact Assessment will be prepared on the revised proposals. A further eight-week public consultation will then be carried out on the updated proposals and the draft Economic Impact Assessment. Minister for the Department of Agriculture, Environment and Rural Affairs for Northern Ireland, Andrew Muir Minister Muir reiterated that he "will work with everyone as part of the current NAP review and that no final decisions have been taken". "I extended the original public consultation period to give interested parties more time to consider the complex proposals and previously outlined my commitment to establishing a focused stakeholder group to help inform the way ahead. 'I have also made clear that some of the draft measures will of course require funding support and officials within my department are considering how we can meet that need in the time ahead. 'Following the work of the focused stakeholder group, I also intend to undertake a further eight-week consultation, in the spirit of openness and transparency, to give the public and wider stakeholders an opportunity to provide views on any updated proposals, before taking my final decisions on the updated NAP to the Executive for agreement," he said. Minister Muir encouraged anyone who has not yet responded to the NAP public consultation to do so. "We are also providing further clarification on the DAERA website in response to issues raised during the consultation process. "I am determined that we chart a way forward together to protect and improve our environment and support sustainable and successful farm businesses," he said.
Agriland
7 hours ago
- Agriland
MEP tells commission 'stop moving goalposts' on derogation
An Irish MEP has called on the European Commission to clarify the specific conditions required for Ireland to maintain its nitrates derogation. The Department of Agriculture, Food and the Marine (DAFM) yesterday (Monday, July 7) revealed that the commission has told Ireland it 'must demonstrate compliance' with the Habitats Directive when granting farmers a nitrates derogation. There are 600 sites in Ireland designated under the Habitats Directive and the Birds Directive. Sites range in size from 1 hectare up to 76,000ha. These sites are designated as either Special Conservation Areas (SAC) and or Special Protection Areas (SPA) and are generally referred to as Natura 2000 sites. Midlands North West MEP Ciaran Mullooly described the nitrates derogation as "essential to the viability of Ireland's grass-based farming model". The Independent Ireland MEP expressed frustration on behalf of Irish farmers for the additional European regulations that are now being demanded. 'The job of Irish farmers is getting tougher. After months of diligent work on water quality aimed at retaining our nitrates directive, comes yet another demand. "An assessment under the Habitats Directive was never part of this process up to now. It was never needed,' Mullooly said. The MEP said that in improving water quality and meeting existing environmental requirements, the Irish family farmers have delivered on those requests. He added that this has been confirmed by the latest water quality report from the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) showing "significant reductions in nitrate levels'. 'It is the clear understanding of the Irish farming sector that adopting new technologies and strategies to protect water quality, particularly in areas with higher stocking rates per acre, would be sufficient to meet the required standards to retain the derogation. "This derogation is not optional, it's vital for the livelihoods of thousands of farm families. 'Farmers need clarity. I'm calling on the Irish agriculture minister [Martin Heydon] to engage with the commissioner and seek clear, concise guidelines and stop this ridiculous charade that's going on, before the commission moves the goalposts again," Mullooly said.
Agriland
7 hours ago
- Agriland
Last Minute Surge in Submissions to Nap Public Consultation
There has been a last-minute surge in submissions to the Nitrates Action Programme (NAP) public consultation taking place in Northern Ireland. A Department of Agriculture, Environment and Rural Affairs (DAERA) spokesperson said: 'The number of responses received during this week has increased significantly.' The closing date for submissions was yesterday (Thursday, July 24). Recent days have seen the Ulster Farmers' Union encouraging every farmer in Northern Ireland to participate in the consultation. Northern Ireland's Minister of Agriculture, Environment and Rural Affairs, Andrew Muir, has confirmed that a stakeholder forum, to be independently chaired will shortly assess the views expressed courtesy of the consultation over an eight-week period. This will be followed by a further public consultation process. The make-up of the stakeholder forum and the identity of the independent chair have yet to be confirmed. Meanwhile, AgriSearch has published its initial assessment on the potential impact of the current NAP proposals across agriculture as a whole in Northern Ireland. Based on future phosphate loadings alone, the figures point to major losses being incurred in all situations According to the report, the losses will amount to £1.02 billion per annum under the 10kg/ha phosphate limit and £1. 56 billion per annum under the 8kg/ha limit. The findings indicate that the envisaged losses in each scenario will impact all sectors of agriculture . The report reveals that there would also be wider impacts on rural communities and businesses, with a strong risk of creating unintended social and environmental consequences. Jason Rankin, strategy manager at AgriSearch said: 'We fully recognise the importance of improving water quality and nutrient management. However, the findings of our analysis paint a stark picture of the potential consequences of current NAP proposals. "Without careful consideration of a full economic appraisal and industry input, the proposed environmental measures could inadvertently destabilise the very foundations of our rural economy and food supply chain. 'This evidence clearly points to the need for a more balanced, practical and fact-based approach combined with a full economic appraisal that protects the environment, the economy and rural livelihoods.' Professor Gerry Boyle, chair of AgriSearch said: 'This assessment underlines the critical role of ongoing, independent research in informing policy decisions that impact the entire agri-food industry and supply chain. "Evidence-backed policy making depends critically on having timely, accurate data that reflects the on-the-ground conditions.' Northern Ireland Food and Drink Association (NIFDA) executive director, Michael Bell, has confirmed the significance of the AgriSearch figures. He said: "AgriSearch's report lays bare the economic chaos that would unfold if the current NAP proposal were implemented. 'The agri-food supply chain would lose over £1.56 billion per year, before factoring in the collapse of vital organisations, infrastructure and facilities that simply wouldn't survive under these reductions. 'At the same time, government policy is already contributing to the rising food prices, pushing inflation even higher." Bell stressed that while the food and drink industry supports environmental improvements, any measures must be grounded in evidence and through collaboration between government departments and industry. He said: "No one is arguing against the need for improved water quality, but it must be practical, science led and economically viable, without increasing inflation. 'NIFDA members are showing strong commitment to sustainability. "While there's no silver bullet: innovation, collaboration, a farmer centric model, and supportive government policies will be key to delivering the change that is needed.'
