Cliff Asness: advisers should retire `very dumb' timing argument
Billionaire money manager Cliff Asness isn't buying it, bluntly saying such thinking is 'very dumb'.
Yes, missing the best days hurts, says Asness. But missing the worst days helps just as much. The effect is symmetrical. Yet, for some reason, only one side gets a chart.
In a 1999 paper, Asness also ran the numbers on missing the best and worst months: from 1970 to 1996, miss the 12 best months and your annual return drops from 12.3 per cent to 7.2 per cent. Omit the 12 worst months instead? Your return jumps to 18.1 per cent. The pattern holds in later decades, on monthly and daily data.
READ MORE
Does this mean you should time the market? No. Asness is still firmly in the 'don't try this at home' camp, saying most people – including himself – 'suck' at it. Timing is hard, expensive and usually ends badly. His point is just that the standard scare-story – miss a few good days, lose everything – is unserious.
If you're going to dissuade people from market timing, he suggests, try honesty. The truth is bad enough, rather than resorting to this 'terrible, silly, embarrassing argument'.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Irish Times
2 days ago
- Irish Times
US inflation held steady at 2.7% in July despite Trump's tariffs
US inflation held steady at 2.7 per cent in July, confounding economists' expectations of an acceleration driven by the tariffs Donald Trump has slapped on US trading partners. Tuesday's annual consumer price index figure was in line with June's reading and below expectations of 2.8 per cent among analysts surveyed by Bloomberg. The figure was dragged lower by weaker fuel prices, with the index for gasoline down 9.5 per cent over the past 12 months. Core inflation, which strips out volatile food and energy prices, rose to 3.1 per cent, surpassing expectations of a smaller rise to 3 per cent from June's 2.9 per cent. READ MORE The US dollar and Treasury yields slipped as investors bet on a faster pace of rate cuts by the Federal Reserve following the data release. Futures markets were pricing in a roughly 95 per cent chance of a quarter-point cut at next month's Fed meeting, compared with about 85 per cent before the inflation data. The two-year Treasury yield, which reflects interest rate expectations, fell 0.08 percentage points to 3.72 per cent. Trump has sought to use tariffs to reshape the US's trading relationship with the world, prompting warnings of a jump in domestic prices. Inflation ticked up in June in what economists cautioned were the first signs of the trade war seeping through to consumers. The data from the Bureau of Labor Statistics comes after Trump sacked the head of the agency earlier this month, following a July jobs report that showed a sharp slowdown in hiring over the summer. On Monday, the president announced he had chosen EJ Antoni, a loyalist from the rightwing Heritage Foundation, to lead the BLS. The US Senate will need to confirm him. The latest inflation reading also comes in the midst of a campaign by the president to pressure Fed chair Jay Powell into reducing interest rates, currently at 4.25 per cent to 4.5 per cent, by as much as 3 percentage points. Most members of the Fed's rate-setting committee have indicated a preference to hold off on any reduction in borrowing costs until the inflationary impact of tariffs becomes clear, but some have argued the impact of the levies on prices will be limited. - Copyright The Financial Times Limited 2025
Irish Times
2 days ago
- Irish Times
Is OpenAI really worth $500bn?
ChatGPT maker OpenAI is reportedly exploring a private share sale that could value the company at $500 billion (€430 billion). Is it worth it? The bullish argument: ChatGPT already has 700 million weekly users. OpenAI is pushing into search, cloud, software and hardware. It could become the foundational platform for the AI era, like Windows was for the PC. 'This is an AI revolution, and OpenAI is the golden child,' says high-profile Wedbush analyst and AI enthusiast Dan Ives. READ MORE If you are worried about valuations, says Ives, you'd have missed every technology rally in history. The bearish argument: you can't ignore valuation, and OpenAI's has shot up from $300 billion to $500 billion, valuing it at about 25 times sales. That's rich – very, very rich. Perhaps, but frothy valuations often signal that enthusiasm, not fundamentals, is calling the tune. Fund giant GMO notes the S&P 500 is up 27 per cent since sentiment flipped in early April, but more speculative corners have gone vertical. A basket of loss-making tech stocks is up 57 per cent; AI stocks, 60 per cent; highly-shorted stocks, 68 per cent; meme stocks, 77 per cent; and bitcoin-sensitive names, 112 per cent. Animal spirits are back, and momentum is driving prices more than profits. In that context, OpenAI's valuation isn't a bizarre aberration. Rather, it's a reflection of a wider market mood, with excitement trumping caution.
Irish Times
2 days ago
- Irish Times
Markets benign reaction to Trump's latest tariffs is puzzling
The so-far benign market reaction to Donald Trump's latest tariff announcements – which applied massive import levies to dozens of countries including up to 50 per cent on India and Brazil – is hard to comprehend. Despite the assault on global trade and the ongoing uncertainty around US policy , most major indices traded near record highs last week. Trump claimed his tariffs were having a 'huge positive impact on the stock market' while boasting about how much revenue the US would generate from them when, in fact, the levies represent a stealth tax on US consumers. On the back of a relatively positive results season in the US, when more companies reported figures that beat market expectations, the markets – at least in the US – seem to be suggesting that the tailwinds from Trump's tax cuts and deregulation are outweighing the potential headwinds from tariffs. READ MORE Or is it that markets have their collective head in the sand on tariffs and the reversing job numbers in the US? Back in April when Trump unveiled his so-called 'Liberation Day' tariffs and the weird economic calculations that underpinned them, a black hole opened up in front of White House. As stocks plummeted, investors sold US bonds when, historically, they should have been buying them. Investors typically flee to safe-haven US bonds when stocks weaken but this time it was different, the US was on a reckless path, a trade-wrecking, fiscally-irresponsible path, or so the markets told us. In what was dubbed 'America's Liz Truss moment', Trump blinked, putting a stay on his tariff plan. Now, Trump is back with the same plan and bigger-than-expected tariff rates on dozens of countries, including 15 per cent on EU imports, but the market reaction is benign. What has changed? Markets are all about future expectations. Do they now believe the US economy and the global economy can handle higher costs and Trump's uncertain economic narrative? Or are they frothy because they believe the Fed Funds will soon be cutting rates? Or is it, as many contend, that they believe Trump will back away from the worst of his agenda when the US economy starts to sour, the so-called Taco (Trump also chickens out) dynamic? No one knows and that makes it very hard to pin down the current market dynamic.
