US-backed ceasefire plan for Gaza under discussion, but optimism fading
US, Qatari and Egyptian mediators have been working to secure an agreement. However, initial optimism that a deal might be at hand has waned in recent days.
Here are the details of the ceasefire proposals, as outlined by an official who spoke on condition of anonymity, and a look at some political calculations in play:
HOSTAGES AND PALESTINIAN PRISONERS
A total of 10 hostages held in Gaza will be returned together with the bodies of 18 others, spread out over 60 days. The swaps will take place without ceremonies or parades. In exchange, Israel will release detained Palestinians. The exact number is not clear.
Israel said of 50 hostages held by Hamas and its allies, about 20 are believed to be alive.
AID TO PALESTINIANS
In accordance with a January 19 agreement, aid will immediately enter Gaza in sufficient amounts with the involvement of the UN and the International Committee of the Red Cross.
ISRAELI WITHDRAWALS
On day one, after an initial eight hostages are released, the Israeli army will withdraw from parts of northern Gaza as per maps that will be agreed.
On day seven, after receiving five bodies, Israel will withdraw from parts of the south as per the maps.
A technical team will work on drawing boundaries for withdrawals during rapid negotiations that will take place after agreement on the framework of the proposal.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
IOL News
an hour ago
- IOL News
Sudan's war is an economic disaster: here's how bad it could get
People walk past destroyed vehicles on the grounds of a hospital in Sudan's capital Khartoum in April 2025. Image: AFP In the two years of civil war in Sudan the country has lost more than 50% of it's economy. Image: AFP Video Player is loading. Play Video Play Unmute Current Time 0:00 / Duration -:- Loaded : 0% Stream Type LIVE Seek to live, currently behind live LIVE Remaining Time - 0:00 This is a modal window. Beginning of dialog window. Escape will cancel and close the window. Text Color White Black Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Background Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Transparent Window Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Transparent Semi-Transparent Opaque Font Size 50% 75% 100% 125% 150% 175% 200% 300% 400% Text Edge Style None Raised Depressed Uniform Dropshadow Font Family Proportional Sans-Serif Monospace Sans-Serif Proportional Serif Monospace Serif Casual Script Small Caps Reset restore all settings to the default values Done Close Modal Dialog End of dialog window. Advertisement Next Stay Close ✕ Ad loading My research applies economy-wide models to understand how conflict affects national development. In a recent study, my colleagues and I used this approach to answer the question: what will happen to Sudan's economy and poverty levels if the war continues through 2025? To assess the economic impact of the conflict, we used a Social Accounting Matrix multiplier model. This is a tool that captures how shocks affect different sectors and other agents of the economy, such as firms, government and households. Based on our modelling, the answer is devastating: the conflict could shrink the size of Sudan's economy by over 40% from 2022 levels, plunging millions more into poverty. We modelled two scenarios to capture the potential trajectories of Sudan's economy. The extreme scenario assumes a sharp initial collapse, with a 29.5% contraction in the size of the economy in 2023 and 12.2% in 2024, followed by a 7% decline in 2025, reflecting some stabilisation over time. The moderate scenario, based on World Bank projections, applies a 20.1% contraction in 2023 and a 15.1% drop in 2024, also followed by a 7% reduction in 2025, indicating a slower but more prolonged deterioration. We estimated the annual figures and report only the aggregate impacts through 2025 for clarity. We found that if the conflict endures, the value of Sudan's economy will contract by up to 42% from US$56.3 billion in 2022 (pre-conflict) to US$32.4 billion by the end of 2025. The backbone of livelihoods – agriculture – will be crippled. And the social fabric of the country will continue to fray. How we did it Our Social Accounting Matrix multiplier model used data from various national and international sources to show the impact of conflict on the value of the economy, its sectors and household welfare. We connected this to government and World Bank data to reflect Sudan's current conditions. This allowed us to simulate how conflict-driven disruptions affect the value of the economy, its sectors and household welfare. What we found Under the extreme scenario, we found: Gross domestic product collapse : Gross domestic product (GDP) measures the total value of all goods and services produced in a country within a year. It's a key indicator of economic health. We found that the value of Sudan's economy could contract by up to 42%. This means the country would be producing less than 60% of what it did before the conflict. This would affect incomes, jobs, government revenues and public services. The industrial sector – heavily concentrated in Khartoum – would be hardest hit, with output shrinking by over 50%. The value of services like education, health, transport and trade would fall by 40%, and agriculture by more than 35%. Job losses : nearly 4.6 million jobs – about half of all employment – could disappear. Urban areas and non-farm sectors would be worst affected, with over 700,000 farming jobs at risk. Incomes plummet : household incomes would decline across all groups – rich and poor, rural and urban – by up to 42%. Rural and less-educated households suffer the most. Poverty spikes : up to 7.5 million more people could fall into poverty, adding to the 61.1% poverty level in 2022. In rural areas, the poverty rate could jump by 32.5 percentage points from the already high rural poverty rate pre-conflict (67.6% of the rural population). Women, especially in rural communities, are hit particularly hard. Urban poverty, which was at 48.8% pre-conflict, increases by 11.6 percentage points. The agrifood system – which includes farming, food processing, trade and food services – would lose a third of its value under the extreme scenario. Why these findings matter Sudan was already in a fragile state before the war. It was reeling from decades of underinvestment, international sanctions and institutional breakdown. The war has reversed hard-won gains in poverty reduction. It is also dismantling key productive sectors – from agriculture to manufacturing – which will be essential for recovery once the conflict ends. Every month of continued fighting adds to the damage and raises the cost of rebuilding. Our projections already show major economic collapse, yet they don't include the full extent of the damage. This includes losses in the informal economy or the strain on household coping strategies. The real situation could be even worse than what the data suggests. What needs to be done First and foremost, peace is essential. Without an end to the fighting, recovery will be impossible. Second, even as conflict continues, urgent action is needed to stabilise livelihoods. This means: supporting agriculture in areas that remain relatively safe. Food production must be sustained to prevent famine. restoring critical services where possible – particularly transport, trade and retail – to keep local economies functioning protecting the most vulnerable, such as women in rural areas and the elderly, through expanded social protection and targeted cash assistance. Third, prepare for recovery. The international community – donors, development banks and NGOs – must begin laying the groundwork for post-conflict reconstruction now. This includes investment in public infrastructure, rebuilding institutions and re-integrating displaced populations. The bottom line Sudan's war is more than a political crisis. It is an economic catastrophe unfolding in real time. One that is deepening poverty, destroying livelihoods and erasing years of progress. Our research provides hard numbers to describe what Sudanese families are already experiencing every day. The country's economy is bleeding. Without a shift in the trajectory of the conflict, recovery could take decades – if it happens at all. | The Conversation Khalid Siddig is Senior Research Fellow and Program Leader for the Sudan Strategy Support Program, International Food Policy Research Institute (IFPRI)
The Citizen
an hour ago
- The Citizen
Hamas delegation travels to Turkey as Gaza ceasefire talks falter
The United States and Israel have withdrawn from the negotiations, blaming Hamas for the impasse. Hamas's negotiating team left the Qatari capital Doha for Turkey on Tuesday to discuss the 'latest developments' in the stalled Gaza ceasefire talks, a Hamas official told AFP. 'A high-level leadership delegation from Hamas, headed by Mohammed Darwish, president of the movement's leadership council, and including the negotiation team and its head, Khalil al-Hayya, is departing Doha heading to Istanbul', the source told AFP. 'The delegation will hold several meetings with Turkish officials regarding the latest developments in the ceasefire negotiations, which stalled last week', the source added. US and Israel exit the negotiation process For over two weeks, mediators in Qatar had been shuttling between Israeli and Hamas delegations in a bid to secure a breakthrough in indirect talks for a ceasefire and the release of hostages held in Gaza, nearly two years into the war. ALSO READ: Trump contradicts Netanyahu, Palestinians in Gaza facing 'real starvation' [VIDEO] The United States joined Israel last week in pulling its negotiators from the negotiations, with US Middle East envoy Steve Witkoff blaming the Palestinian militant group for the failure to reach a deal and saying Washington would 'consider alternative options'. Hamas politburo member Bassem Naim told AFP on Friday that the latest discussions focused on details of an Israeli military withdrawal from the Gaza Strip. Israel defiant amid famine warnings Israel has resisted international calls to agree a ceasefire in Gaza, with UN-backed experts warning on Tuesday that the Palestinian territory was slipping into famine. Israeli foreign minister Gideon Saar called the ceasefire demands 'a distorted campaign of international pressure against Israel' that would leave Hamas in power in Gaza. 'It ain't gonna happen, no matter how much pressure is put on Israel', he said at a press conference Tuesday. NOW READ: Food arrives in Gaza after Israel pauses some fighting
IOL News
3 hours ago
- IOL News
BRICS+ Series: Africa Embraces Financial Alternatives Through BRICS De-dollarisation
BRICS' de-dollarisation strategy aims to reshape Africa's financial landscape, potentially liberating the continent from dollar dependency and fostering economic independence. Image: / BRICS nations are accelerating de-dollarisation, reducing reliance on the US dollar in global trade and finance. This push for a new financial architecture, promoting local currencies and alternative payment systems, was spurred by the Ukraine conflict and Western sanctions. For example, over 80% of Russia-China trade in 2023 bypassed the dollar, using yuan and ruble. Launched in 2024, the BRICS Bridge Payment System offers an alternative to SWIFT, facilitating cross-border transactions in local currencies. By mid-2025, pilot testing was underway between China, Russia, and India, with South Africa and Egypt recently joining. This emerging system raises the question of whether it can free Africa from its long-standing reliance on the dollar. The dollar's costing Africa Africa's financial susceptibility to the US dollar is deeply rooted in both its structure and history. Over 60% of the continent's external debt is denominated in US dollars. In 2024, African nations spent an estimated $70 billion on debt servicing, a figure significantly inflated by rising US interest rates and a strong dollar, according to the African Development Bank. This substantial financial strain diverts crucial funds from vital sectors such as development, education, and healthcare. Furthermore, dollar dependency exacerbates external vulnerabilities, as evidenced by trade imbalances. Nigeria, Africa's largest oil producer, consistently struggles with dollar shortages, currency devaluations, and inflation. This is because while its oil exports are priced in dollars, the majority of its imported goods are also dollar-denominated, creating a persistent economic challenge. Video Player is loading. Play Video Play Unmute Current Time 0:00 / Duration -:- Loaded : 0% Stream Type LIVE Seek to live, currently behind live LIVE Remaining Time - 0:00 This is a modal window. Beginning of dialog window. Escape will cancel and close the window. Text Color White Black Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Background Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Transparent Window Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Transparent Semi-Transparent Opaque Font Size 50% 75% 100% 125% 150% 175% 200% 300% 400% Text Edge Style None Raised Depressed Uniform Dropshadow Font Family Proportional Sans-Serif Monospace Sans-Serif Proportional Serif Monospace Serif Casual Script Small Caps Reset restore all settings to the default values Done Close Modal Dialog End of dialog window. Advertisement Next Stay Close ✕ BRICS and the promise of monetary sovereignty African nations may regain monetary sovereignty through the de-dollarisation agenda. By trading in local currencies or a BRICS-backed settlement currency, they could mitigate exposure to dollar volatility. With intra-BRICS trade rapidly expanding to $422 billion in 2023, African BRICS members are well-positioned to leverage this transition. Several nations are increasingly adopting local currency trade to alleviate pressure on their foreign reserves. For example, Egypt entered a $2.5 billion bilateral currency swap agreement with China in late 2024, enabling it to use yuan for Chinese imports and thereby conserve its foreign exchange. Similarly, Ethiopia, grappling with persistent dollar shortages and a trade deficit exceeding $10 billion, is looking into conducting local currency trade with India, a significant exporter of pharmaceuticals and engineering products. As Africa's most industrialised economy, South Africa plays a crucial role in BRICS' financial integration initiatives. Its banking sector is currently testing cross-border settlements through the BRICS Bridge Payment System. By conducting a portion of its trade with China, Russia, and India in currencies other than the dollar, South Africa aims to protect itself from global monetary instability. A cautious road to financial independence De-dollarisation alone cannot solve all economic challenges. Many African currencies lack the necessary stability and liquidity for efficient trade, as seen with the persistent inflation and foreign exchange volatility of the Nigerian naira and Ethiopian birr amongst others. True monetary independence will remain elusive until domestic economies are strengthened and confidence in local institutions is re-established. To prevent a new form of dependency, African nations should prioritise diversifying their trade relationships, strengthening regional economic ties, and establishing strong financial governance. Building regional capacity BRICS provides African nations with significant leverage, offering them a crucial role in reshaping global financial regulations. To truly achieve liberation, however, African states must seize this opportunity to establish autonomous institutions. The African Continental Free Trade Area (AfCFTA), when integrated with BRICS mechanisms, can foster increased intra-African trade using local currencies. Furthermore, the Pan-African Payment and Settlement System (PAPSS) by the African Export-Import Bank, introduced in 2022, can work in conjunction with BRICS infrastructure to lessen the continent's reliance on the US dollar. Uganda and Nigeria are engaging with BRICS-related initiatives, signaling a shift away from dollar-denominated transactions. Uganda, while not a full BRICS member, signed a 2025 memorandum with India to investigate using the rupee for agro-processing imports, which would alleviate pressure on its dollar reserves. Nigeria is exploring membership in the BRICS Bank (NDB), aiming to access non-dollar loans that could finance energy infrastructure and mitigate foreign exchange risks. Liberation lies in leverage, not replacement BRICS' de-dollarisation strategy offers Africa a unique opportunity to redefine its position within the global financial system. It provides mechanisms, alternatives, and partnerships to lessen the dominance of the dollar. However, this strategy alone cannot secure Africa's financial independence. Achieving this liberation requires robust institutions, prudent macroeconomic policies, and unified regional cooperation. Instead of merely shifting its allegiance from Washington to Beijing, Africa must assert its independence. While BRICS can provide the framework, Africa itself must undertake the construction. Written By: Dr Iqbal Survé Past chairman of the BRICS Business Council and co-chairman of the BRICS Media Forum and the BRNN *Sesona Mdlokovana Associate at BRICS+ Consulting Group African Specialist ** MORE ARTICLES ON OUR WEBSITE ** Follow @brics_daily on X/Twitter & @brics_daily on Instagram for daily BRICS+ updates
