logo
UN climate chief calls on Labor to aim for more ambitious climate targets as Chris Bowen unveils massive investment in renewables subsidies

UN climate chief calls on Labor to aim for more ambitious climate targets as Chris Bowen unveils massive investment in renewables subsidies

Sky News AU5 days ago
The United Nations climate chief has lobbied the Albanese government to set its sights on passing higher 2035 emission reduction targets with Energy Chris Bowen massively beefing up the government's investment in renewables projects.
During the first parliamentary sitting week net zero and the government's climate targets have generated considerable tension and debate with numerous members of the Coalition and crossbench vehemently arguing against Labor's 'all renewables' approach.
Former Nationals leader Barnaby Joyce alongside a handful of colleagues tabled his own private member's bill that sought to completely overhaul net zero, while One Nation leader Pauline Hanson tabled an urgency motion in the Senate aimed at dumping all climate related measures.
The government brushed away criticisms of its energy policy with Energy Minister Chris Bowen saying in Question Time on Monday that 'appointing Senator Canavan to review net zero is like putting Coldplay in control of kiss cam. It doesn't necessarily lead to a happy marriage.'
However the United Nation's climate change executive secretary Simon Stiell piled on pressure on the Albanese government and insisted that Australia should 'not settle for what's easy' when determining its 2035 emission reduction targets.
Mr Stiell declared at an event hosted by the Smart Energy Council on Monday in Sydney that Australia was allowing the planet to 'overheat' and that fruits would be a 'once-a-year treat' if the government did not pass ambitious climate targets moving forward.
'Mega-droughts (will make) fresh fruit and veg a once-a-year treat. In total, the country could face a $6.8 trillion GDP loss by 2050,' Mr Stiell warned.
The climate boss, who is set to hold a face-to-face meeting with Mr Bowen on Tuesday also reiterated that lacklustre climate targets would result in a stark drop in Australia's 'high living standards.'
'Australia has a strong economy and among the highest living standards in the world. If you want to keep them, doubling down on clean energy is an economic no-brainer. Bog standard is beneath you. The question is: how far are you willing to go?
The federal government will be required in the coming month to legislate its 2035 emission reduction targets, which will be finalised once the Climate Change Authority chaired by former NSW Liberal Premier Matt Kean hands down its advice.
The CCA is expected to provide the government with its analysis in early September in concurrence with the commencement of the international summit season with Prime Minister Anthony Albanese hoping to tout the figure to secure hosting rights for the COP31 conference in 2026.
Numerous business and industry groups including the Australian chamber of Commerce have railed against the imposition of a 2035 target larger than 65 per cent.
The CCA previously indicated it was eyeing a figure between 65 and 75 per cent.
Mr Bowen also announced on Monday that Labor would be seeking to bolster its investment in the Capacity Investment Scheme by 25 per cent in a bid to fast track the roll out of renewables projects nationwide.
The Capacity Investment Scheme is the government's primary financial initiative aimed at accelerating private investment in renewable energy generation and clean dispatchable capacity by providing revenue guarantees for companies.
The major funding boost comes despite a raft of clean energy developments falling over in recent months, as supply chain woes, planning interruptions, labour shortages and inflation continues to delay and stymie the government's clean energy agenda.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Green light for cable, but premier's path to power dims
Green light for cable, but premier's path to power dims

Perth Now

time25 minutes ago

  • Perth Now

Green light for cable, but premier's path to power dims

A "transformative, nation-building" energy project has been given the environmental green light to proceed, but risks dimming a premier's electoral hopes. The multi-billion-dollar Marinus Link cable will boost electricity transmission between Tasmania and Victoria and is seen as pivotal in increasing green energy investment. Tasmanian Premier Jeremy Rockliff signed up to the joint Victoria and Commonwealth investment contract on Friday, while in caretaker mode and a day before the deadline. The federal government on Sunday lifted another hurdle for the construction and operation of the 1500 megawatt undersea electricity and fibre optics cable. "The Albanese government has given environmental approval to a transformative, nation-building project which will generate jobs and investment for Tasmania and Victoria while unlocking clean and reliable energy," Environment Minister Murray Watt said in a statement. Construction of stage one, a 750-megawatt undersea cable, is expected to start in 2026 and finish in 2030. It will have enough power to supply 750,000 homes and enhance internet connectivity. It comes as the final makeup of Tasmania's parliament was decided after a snap election, with 14 Liberals, 10 Labor, five Greens, one Shooters, Fishers and Farmers MP and five independents elected. Major parties are intensifying negotiations with the crossbench to form another minority government as they attempt to secure the required 18 parliamentary votes needed to govern. But Labor, the Greens and several independents have lashed Mr Rockliff over what they say was a "sham" process to green-light the Marinus Link. Non-Liberal MPs were given a confidential briefing on the project on Tuesday, while the whole-of-state business case was not released before the deal was signed. Craig Garland, one of four independents on the cross bench, has ruled out supporting a Liberal government over their "secret" rushed decision. Independents Kristie Johnston and Peter George were also critical of the process, with the latter saying Mr Rockliff was undermining the prospect of a full-term, well-run minority government. Greens leader Rosalie Woodruff said the premier's decision to proceed with one of the nation's biggest projects with little consultation showed he was incapable of genuinely working across the parliament. Labor's Sarah Lovell said the decision was at odds with the premier's promise of transparency. Mr Rockliff said the deal had capped Tasmania's equity share at $103.5 million - 4.27 per cent of the project's cost. However, the business case forecasts an increase in state net debt to $19 billion in 2031/32 as a result of the project.

Allan flags equal opportunity path to work-from-home proposal
Allan flags equal opportunity path to work-from-home proposal

The Age

time2 hours ago

  • The Age

Allan flags equal opportunity path to work-from-home proposal

Andrew Stewart, professor of work and regulation at Queensland University of Technology, said he saw two key ways the legislation could be structured: one through the Equal Opportunity Act with a narrowed employee scope, and another where the government passes a broader law which may not be enforceable in the private sector. Stewart said the proposed legislation was complicated by the fact that in 1996 the Kennett government handed its powers to regulate employment conditions to the Commonwealth – a deal that was renewed by state and federal Labor governments in 2009. Carve-outs in workplace law exist for certain other pieces of legislation which can be altered by the Victorian government, such as anti-discrimination laws and the Occupational Health and Safety Act. 'They could just go ahead and pass a law [enshrining work from home], understanding that it may not be enforceable in the private sector, and any attempt to enforce it might be met with a constitutional challenge,' Stewart said. 'Alternatively, they could include the right to work from home in the Equal Opportunity Act, but then there's a dilemma because it would be limited to workers for whom working from home is going to help with their caring responsibilities or managing a disability.' Victorian Chamber of Commerce and Industry chief executive Paul Guerra called the change 'perplexing', considering the federal government was currently focused on boosting productivity through an economic reform roundtable. 'If Victoria moves away from the legislated national system, businesses will move interstate and jobs will be lost,' he said. 'If we want businesses to be productive – and to raise the economic prospects of everyone in this state and this country – we need to get out of their way and let them operate in a way that best suits their model.' Guerra said the proposal could damage productivity and teamwork, and might create further inequity because only a small number of people would actually be able to work from home. Loading '[Working from home] certainly works well in some contexts, but that should be determined by the employer in consultation with the employee,' he said. Allan denied that the policy would create division within workplaces between those who could work from home and those that could not. She said many people who had to come into work benefited from these arrangements through partners or friends who could take advantage of the opportunity. Victorian Trades Hall secretary Luke Hilakari was supportive of the move, noting that 40 per cent of workers were already doing some variation of hybrid work, according to the Grattan Institute. 'Working from home is probably the greatest improvement to work-life balance since we won the weekend ... so for [Labor] to enshrine it, it's a big deal,' he said. 'There's some mistrust out there that people will be doing the wrong things [while working from home]. 'But the truth is, it just makes people's lives easier. That's especially so for women – women's participation in the workforce has gone up a whole notch.' Consultation on the laws will be led by the Department of Premier and Cabinet. It will consider the type and size of businesses covered by the scheme, who can reasonably do their job from home, and must also arrive at an acceptable definition of what constitutes remote working. Loading Daniel Victory, principal lawyer in employment and industrial law at Maurice Blackburn, called the topic of working from home a 'barbecue stopper' – it was the No.1 employment issue people wanted to talk about. He said it would likely be easier for the government to enshrine hybrid work in law for those in the public sector under current workplace laws. 'Trying to enshrine a right [to work from home] for the private sector might be open to challenge, but we'll just have to wait and see what the legislation is and how it's framed,' he said. 'Even if an employer could challenge it, I don't know why they would challenge a right like this if it's reasonable ... any employer who doesn't want to allow work from home, it sort of like feels like they want to go back to the dinosaur ages.' Gordon Legal head of industrial law Marcus Clayton said the legislation could be written in a way that covers a 'very substantial proportion' of the population, even if the provisions were woven into the anti-discrimination or health and safety laws. 'The key aspect about it is that it will put the onus on the employer to show that a person actually can't work from home, as opposed to just making it up and having an ideological objection to employees having the temerity to demand the right to work from home,' he said. Melbourne Lord Mayor Nicholas Reece told Nine's Today program it was clear that hybrid work arrangements were not going away but it was important not to lose 'collaboration and new ideas' that came with being physically present in the workplace. 'Family-friendly, flexible workplaces should absolutely be here to stay,' he said. 'But I also know that Melbourne's at its best when it's full of people, and I think workplaces are at their best when they're full of people.' The government expects to pass the laws next year, setting the stage for the 2026 state poll as the first major policy announcement to be debated in an election year. Loading After widespread outcry earlier this year, former federal opposition leader Peter Dutton backflipped mid-campaign on his election promise to end flexible work rules for public servants in Canberra. State Opposition Leader Brad Battin said the Victorian Liberals recognised that hybrid work arrangements had become a 'valuable' option for workers. 'We support measures that help Victorians enjoy a better work-life balance, and will review any legislation closely, to ensure it supports flexibility, productivity, and personal choice,' he said. The premier's appearance at Saturday's Labor state conference served as a quasi-launch for the 2026 state election campaign, with Labor speakers drawing attention to the fact the poll was less than 500 days away. A promotional video for Allan also debuted the political slogan 'Jacinta Allan: On your side'. Anthony Albanese adopted a similar slogan in 2021 as opposition leader. In her speech to the conference, Allan spoke about a worker who she had talked to about the difference working from home had made to her life. She said the worker, who she called Jane, had been told during a video meeting – by another employee who was working from home at the time – that it was no longer sustainable for her to work remotely. 'Losing that one day has taken a toll on her, on her kids and on her parents,' Allan said. 'She's had to cut back her hours. She's earning less and spending more, and she's stressed constantly. 'This isn't about whether the work gets done, it gets done. This is about power. It's about who gets to call the shots and who gets pushed around, and we will not stand by while workers, especially women, single mums and carers, get punished for needing balance in their lives.' Hilakari warned the Liberal Party should be 'very cautious' about opposing any legislation which enshrined working from home in law. 'They saw what happened at the last federal election ... If the Victorian Liberal Party goes against it, well, the trade union movement will be running on this all the way to the ballot box.'

Inaction on pokies harm is gambling with lives
Inaction on pokies harm is gambling with lives

Sydney Morning Herald

time7 hours ago

  • Sydney Morning Herald

Inaction on pokies harm is gambling with lives

The pokies article by Peter FitzSimons (' MPs servants to 'predatory' pokies ', July 27) emphasises the most important point of the pokies disaster. It can't be fixed because both sides of politics are so dependent on pokies donations that once in power they realise the pokies lobby is in charge, not them. And fixing that by increasing campaign funding for political parties from the budget means increasing taxes. It's easy for the pokies lobby and its media backers to stoke public outrage when increased taxes are suggested. There even is a term for it, 'state capture'. Whoever wins the election, lobby groups are still in charge. It's relevant more widely, such as the fossil fuel lobby slowing down climate action. It's a pernicious problem and the Herald is to be commended for running an anti-gambling campaign. It's hard to see a solution until someone is brave enough to have a policy calling for higher taxes to tackle some of the bigger problems we face. Maybe braver politicians? Gary Barnes, Mosman Take my advice Senator James Paterson says 'Labor would be judged on the results of proposed consultant cuts' (' Labor's splurge on advice revealed ', July 27). That's rich coming from anyone in the Liberal party. It's not the spending of money on consultants that I mind so much as the pretence practised by the Liberals that ditching public service jobs to do it, while ignoring the alternate costs, is somehow saving money. Equally objectionable is the sneakiness of hiring people – using eye-watering amounts of public funds – to tell you what you want to hear instead of what you should be told, while claiming it's somehow a 'partnership'. Driven by their own 'ideological obsession' of antipathy towards the public service dating as far back as the Howard era, the Liberals were avid practitioners of an identical reverse bias. And while Labor's pot so far seems decidedly tarnished at keeping its promise to negate it, they've got a long way to go to match the blackness of the Liberals' kettle. Adrian Connelly, Springwood The criticism of the Albanese government's use of consultants is misplaced. They have pledged to rebuild the capacity of the public service, laid waste by the previous Coalition. Does anyone really believe this will happen overnight? While there are green shoots, it will take years to restore an objective, expert public service. The damage wrought to good government by the previous Coalition administration, venal in its attempts to politicise the public service, promote mates and create a supine culture (remember robo-debt?), nearly destroyed it. As Labor rebuilds, of course consultants will be needed, especially as this government wants to achieve something. Hopefully, the best can be encouraged into an invigorated public service for the national good. Wayne Duncombe, Lilyfield False piety America likes to think of itself as a God-fearing nation of Christians, yet it puts up with Trump (' America's shame: Despite all the evidence Trump remains shameless ', July 27). There seems to be no shame that their president breaks all those Christian ideals they hold so dear. Their sin is not their lack of shame. It is their hypocrisy. Neville Turbit, Russell Lea Fertility lifeline The importance of IVF to many families cannot be underestimated, but to those with life-threatening genetic conditions it is especially important (' There have been 17 million IVF babies. Rebecca was one of the first ', July 27). For these families IVF can allow the possibility of a mutant gene to be isolated and sidelined and ultimately dismissed from the family line, allowing hope for a more positive future. We can only be grateful for the process. Janice Creenaune, Austinmer So fertility rates are 'nosediving'? Perhaps a truer word has never been used. It's well known that modern perfumes contain hormone disruptors such as phthalates, isn't it? And to say that perfumes are pervasive is an understatement. We live and move in a sea of fake scent. You can't even walk down a bush track without being nasally assaulted by the smell of the person (man or woman) 10 minutes ahead of you, whom you may not actually ever see. It must drive the wildlife, well, wild. Ironically, perfume formulas are designed to make the wearer more attractive, but may in fact result in lower fertility. Pass the nose peg, please. Carolyn Little, Mortdale

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store