The 2028 Republican Primary Will Be Over Economic Nationalism
The most dramatic of tariffs
are paused for now
, but a different trade war is already underway — the battle to use the tariff debate as a springboard to the GOP presidential nomination in 2028.
Consider Sen. Ted Cruz of Texas.
'I worry, there are voices within the administration that want to see these tariffs continue forever and ever,'
Cruz said recently on his podcast
. He said the goal of President Donald Trump's shock maneuvers should be to 'dramatically lower tariffs abroad and result in dramatically lowering tariffs here.'
With his comments, Cruz implicitly contrasted himself with trade hardliners in the new administration, such as Trumpist trade point man Peter Navarro and U.S. Trade Representative Jamieson Greer. But the ambitious Texan also broke ranks with some key, would-be 2028 contenders: J.D. Vance and Steve Bannon, the
top two vote-getters
in the recent Conservative Political Action Committee straw poll, for one.
Bannon, the former Trump adviser, has long assumed the role of vanguard '
economic nationalist
.' But the new vice president has also staked out his own distinctive turf, becoming the favorite of the 'new right' that rejects Reagan and Bush era economic dogma, and is anchored around institutions such as the protectionist-minded American Compass, Zoomer-filled
American Moment
, and the Buchananite
The American Conservative
magazine (which I edit).
Both Vance and Bannon
are likely to run
in the next presidential cycle, all bluster about a third Trump term aside.
With the trade nationalist market seemingly cornered, other aspirants have been buying real estate in the dilapidated ruins of free-market, movement conservatism.
Nikki Haley, the former South Carolina governor and U.N. ambassador, has been doing this for years. In a February 2024 op-ed,
Donald Trump's then-opponent ripped his tariff plan
as a joke: 'Imagine if a presidential candidate promised to raise taxes on every American. Imagine if he promised to make life even harder for the middle class and the least fortunate. That candidate … should be laughed off the stage and defeated at the ballot box.'
Well, Donald Trump was not defeated at the ballot box.
But that hasn't stopped Haley from being an
eminence grise
among that bastion of populism skeptics, the Wall Street Journal editorial board, possessed by the Trump frenemy Rupert Murdoch (who is also pushing war with Iran behind the scenes, one prominent Trump interlocutor told me recently). 'This is no time to go wobbly on capitalism,'
Haley wrote in Murdoch's vertical
as far back as February 2020.
This contingent is no doubt licking its chops to capitalize if economic nationalism is discredited amidst a massive recession. It's a delicate balance, however: The free marketeers don't want GOP chances in 2028 to be sabotaged outright.
The WSJ board this month is prattling on about the invincible relevance of the hundred-year-old Smoot-Hawley Tariff Act disappointment, and attacking its own, including Senate GOP leadership fixtures such as the ur-establishmentarian John Barrasso. The Wyomingian's crime?
'Barrasso … similarly pretends tariffs are a swell idea. Back in the day, he was one of many Hill Republicans to support the Trans-Pacific Partnership,'
writes the Journal
. 'Barrasso wore his free-trade credentials more lightly during Mr. Trump's first term, but he wore them. In his 2018 re-election campaign he distanced himself from Mr. Trump's tariffs — no easy thing in a state as red as Wyoming.'
Barrasso may not be in the presidential mix, but every other Republican who is understands the message the WSJ board is sending with its broadside against him: The bastions of traditional conservatism are looking for a showdown in the next GOP primary.
Without Trump's gravitational pull (presumably) on the stage in 2028, future contenders are desperate for the Journal and the old guard's favor, especially with Vance and Bannon monopolizing the new wing. And there is, of course, a new kid on the block more sympathetic to the golden age of global 'free' trade: Elon Musk, who recently assailed the White House's Navarro as an 'idiot.'
Musk's unreconstructed libertarian economics — and his penchant to spend like a real capitalist — is the 'free' traders' potential ace-in-the-hole.
Florida Gov. Ron DeSantis was, of course, Musk's
first choice
for president in 2024 before flaming out. DeSantis has mostly kept his powder dry on the tariff furor, but if anything, that he hasn't leaped to the White House's defense is telling enough. With no love lost with Trump, the doyen of Tallahassee is happy to see where the tide is going in 2028. That his political operation traditionally shared significant overlap with Cruz's — including the retention of political consultant Jeff Roe, who was the main consultant on arguably the three major 'Trump alternative' projects of the last 10 years — should be evidence enough of where DeSantis' sympathies truly lie. The Florida governor is a 'normie' Republican
on trade
.
Outgoing Virginia Gov. Glenn Youngkin occupies similar space — not as hardline as Vance and Bannon, but not as throwback as Haley and Cruz.
Given the chance to back the administration to the hilt, the most important man in Richmond (and ex-financier) told the
New York Times
this week that 'no one should be surprised' and 'there is a necessary rebalancing of our trade negotiations or trade relationships that needs to happen,' but declined to weigh in further — including on if the administration is taking the 'right' approach.
Former Vice President Mike Pence is out of the mix with the new Trump administration, but that's unlikely to deter him from disparaging it — and keeping his options open for 2028. Pence has a new think tank, and sees himself as not only a critic of Trump on social conservatism and militarist foreign policy, but as keeper of the flame on Friedmanite economic policy.
'The Trump Tariff Tax is the largest peacetime tax hike in U.S. history. These Tariffs are nearly 10x the size of those imposed during the Trump-Pence Administration and will cost American families over $3,500 per year,' Pence
posted on X
.
In response,
Trump's enforcer — Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick — replied
: 'Mike Pence is just bitter. These tariffs are the definition of America First, which is a concept he doesn't understand.'
Tariffs aren't the only area where the early cracks in the 2028 field are beginning to show. Retro Republicans like Haley and Pence also break sharply with the new wing's desire to achieve detente with Russia and Iran.
The battle to define America First, after Trump, has probably just begun.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles

Miami Herald
9 minutes ago
- Miami Herald
Elon Musk's public dispute sparks interest in Tesla from short sellers
Last week, a social media post from Elon Musk caused many people to stop what they were doing and look down at their phones. Even for the Tesla (TSLA) CEO, known for his controversial and bold opinions, what they saw seemed surprising. Musk had previously announced plans to cease his political spending. But only a few days later, he accused Trump of having direct ties to notorious criminal Jeffrey Epstein and alleged that without his help, the Republican president would not have won last year's election. Don't miss the move: Subscribe to TheStreet's free daily newsletter Since then, Tesla has been in the spotlight, as the dispute between two of the world's most powerful men continues. While TSLA stock initially plunged on news of the argument, it has since regained some of its momentum. Even as shares slowly trend upward, though, experts speculate that short sellers may regard the Musk-Trump fallout as an opportunity to bet against the stock. Over the past few months, Musk's behavior has sparked a global backlash against Tesla's brand, causing sales to fall across the U.S. and Europe. This clear indication of consumer sentiment toward him has caused some financial experts, including Tesla shareholder and fund manager Ross Gerber, to call for him to step down. Related: Elon Musk company reveals major leap forward When Musk announced that he would be stepping back from his role with the Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE), TSLA stock surged, and some investors speculated that the company's troubles were over. But now his falling out with Trump has generated further uncertainty. When a prominent company starts showing signs of weakness or instability, short sellers are likely to start closing in. So far, Tesla's recent declines have been highly profitable for those willing to bet against it. The Wall Street Journal reports that as TSLA stock plunged last week, short sellers pocketed up to $4 billion, noting: Betting against an industry-leading company like Tesla will always carry some risk, regardless of how bleak its prospects may appear. But experts see a case for shorting TSLA stock, provided investors understand its volatile nature, which includes surging unexpectedly. "I think Musk dragged Tesla into a political spectacle," Galileo FX CEO David Materazzi tells TheStreet. "That creates perceived instability. Short sellers don't need real damage, just the illusion of it. Volatility invites them in. When the CEO becomes the story, the stock turns into a target." Financial education platform First Information's CEO Vince Stanzione holds a short position in TSLA. He says his reasons are "business not personal," however, citing the company's high valuation and questionable market share over the feud between Musk and Trump. More Tesla News: The 'anti-Tesla' gives American buyers more good newsAnalyst sets eye-popping Tesla stock price targetElon Musk's feud with Trump is hurting an unexpected investment "The P/E ratio is over 100 and growth the last few years has been near zero," he says of Tesla. "The bulls will say you're paying for the future and Elon Musk's brilliance, and I am not disputing that Tesla could have some future hits in the pipeline, but Elon Must is very good at promising "jam tomorrow" which never seems to materialize, or if and when it does, it's not the flavour he promised." Stanzione also raises a concern regarding Tesla's foray into robotics, something on which Musk has hinged a lot of the company's prospects. This part of Tesla's business just became more complicated due to the abrupt departure of one of its leaders. Related: Heavily shorted AI stock is rapidly climbing the Fortune 500 "Unless robotaxis start showing up en masse by the end of this year, then investors will keep selling," states Stanzione. "I am very bullish on robotics. It's something I have been investing in for over a decade, especially in medical and military uses, however, Tesla is not the only game in town." He names rivals such as Hyundai Motor Group and Boston Dynamics, both of which are making notable advances in the robotics field that could threaten Tesla's progress. Chief Analyst Dan Buckley also highlights the potential valuation problem, stating "Tesla short sellers may see their edge in the long-term mismatch between its ~$1 trillion valuation and the current reality of its business – i.e., nearly all auto-based revenue – and the uncertain viability of its highly speculative emerging tech bets." That said, Buckley advises investors considering a Tesla short to "treat political feuds as a volatility amplifier rather than a directional signal" and highlights the importance of caution when betting against such an unpredictable stock. Related: Billionaire fund manager, skeptical of AI, backs shocking stock The Arena Media Brands, LLC THESTREET is a registered trademark of TheStreet, Inc.

Miami Herald
9 minutes ago
- Miami Herald
Fed official revamps interest-rate cut forecast for rest of this year
America, we need to chill out. Raphael W. Bostic, president and chief executive officer of the Federal Reserve Bank of Atlanta, wants us all to be patient when it comes to possible interest rate cuts in 2025. There's just a tad too many unknowns in the U.S. economy right now, including inflation numbers plus trade wars and tariffs, he said in a June 3 essay. The Federal Reserve's dual mandate targets low inflation and unemployment. These goals are often at odds because higher interest rates lower inflation but increase job losses, while lower interest rates lower unemployment but increase inflation. Post-pandemic, many express the same concern: interest rates on small business loans, consumer credit cards, and home mortgages are too high. Bloomberg/Getty Images Unfortunately, market participants remain downbeat about interest rate cut chances despite President Trump's multiple escalating demands directed at Federal Reserve Chairman Jerome Powell. The May jobs data from the Labor Department were slightly higher than expected but down from April. Unemployment is 4.2%, historically low, but up from 3.4% in 2023. Related: Billionaire fund manager sends strong message on Fed Chair Powell's future Absent a big uptick in unemployment, Fed watchers' attention is firmly on inflation. The Fed's unofficial goal is core inflation (inflation minus volatile energy and food prices) of 2%. PCE inflation is the Fed's favored measure. In April, core PCE was 2.5%. Inflation remains somewhat above the Federal Open Market Committee's (FOMC) target, and the labor market shows signs of slowing but is still broadly stable, Bostic said in his essay. "As of April, we had not yet seen clear signs of tariffs boosting inflation, though research by economists, including ours here at the Atlanta Fed, suggests we might see upward pressure on prices over the coming weeks," he wrote. Related: Looming inflation data may rock interest rate cut forecasts In a conference call with reporters, Bostic said it's "a tough call" whether the Fed would be cutting rates right now if all the trade uncertainty were out of the picture. He added that he's "very cautious about jumping to cuts at this point." In May, Bostic told reporters he was modeling for just one single interest rate cut this year. Bostic pointed to unsettled trade policy and Trump's tariffs as adding to economic gloom in April and May. And the congressional action on the Trump's "One Big, Beautiful Bill" has an unknown impact on future regulatory and fiscal policy. "There is a great deal of uncertainty out there, making it quite difficult to forecast the economy with confidence. Given that, I continue to believe the best approach for monetary policy is patience,'' Bostic wrote. "As the economy remains broadly healthy, we have space to wait and see how the heightened uncertainty affects employment and prices. So, I am in no hurry to adjust our policy stance,'' he concluded. The May CPI numbers will be released at 8:30 a.m. on June 11. TheStreet Pro's Chris Versace says the rate may be higher than expected despite lower gas prices. "We also have to wonder if Bostic's comment helps lay the groundwork for the Fed's upcoming set of economic projections that it will publish alongside its next policy decision on June 18,'' Versace said. Related: Veteran fund manager revamps stock market forecast The Arena Media Brands, LLC THESTREET is a registered trademark of TheStreet, Inc.
Yahoo
12 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Smithsonian affirms independence after Trump says he fired head of Portrait Gallery
The Smithsonian tried to affirm its autonomy from outside influences in a statement on Monday after President Donald Trump announced that he fired National Portrait Gallery head Kim Sajet for being a "highly partisan person." The institution, which is the world's largest museum, education and research complex, sent the statement after a Monday Board of Regents meeting with Vice President JD Vance and Chief Justice of the United States John Roberts, according to a document the Smithsonian sent ABC News on Monday. Board of Regent meetings are held at least four times a year. Vance and Roberts are both ex officio members, meaning they act in advisory roles. "All personnel decisions are made by and subject to the direction of the Secretary, with oversight by the Board," the Smithsonian said in its statement. "Lonnie G. Bunch, the Secretary, has the support of the Board of Regents in his authority and management of the Smithsonian." MORE: Trump signs executive order targeting monuments at parks, museums, zoo The panel is also comprised of senators appointed by the president, including Sen. John Boozman (R-AR), Sen. Catherine Cortez Masto (D-NV) and Sen. Gary Peters (D-MI); Representatives selected by the Speaker of the House, including Rep. Doris Matsui (D-CA), Rep. Adrian Smith (R-NE) and Rep. Carlos Gimenez (R-FL); and nine Citizen Regents, according to a document the Smithsonian sent ABC News on Monday. The Smithsonian's statement comes after Trump's May 30 announcement on social media that he fired Sajet, the Smithsonian's National Portrait Gallery director. He described Sajet as "a highly partisan person, and a strong supporter of DEI, which is totally inappropriate for her position." Sajet rejected artist Julian Raven's 2016 Trump painting for submission in the National Portrait Gallery, according to a statement from a Smithsonian spokesperson on Tuesday. She is still reporting to work at the Portrait Gallery, the spokesperson noted. "While the vast majority of our content is rooted in meticulous research and thoughtful analysis of history and facts, we recognize that, on occasion, some of our work has not aligned with our institutional values of scholarship, even-handedness and nonpartisanship. For that, we must all work to do better," Bunch, the board secretary, said in a message to Smithsonian staff on Monday after the board meeting. "Our institution must be a place where people feel inspired and challenged, but most importantly feel welcome. ... As always, we thank the President and Congress for their steady commitment to the Smithsonian and to preserving it for our visitors and our country." The museum also appeared to address the Trump administration's concerns about biased content and staff at the institution in its statement on Monday. "To reinforce our nonpartisan stature, the Board of Regents has directed the Secretary to articulate specific expectations to museum directors and staff regarding content in Smithsonian museums, give directors reasonable time to make any needed changes to ensure unbiased content, and to report back to the Board on progress and any needed personnel changes based on success or lack thereof in making the needed changes," the Smithsonian said in its statement Monday. The museum did not respond to ABC News' questions regarding deadlines for museum directors to make changes and report back to the board, and the vice president's office did not immediately reply to a request for a statement. MORE: Concerns at national parks ahead of spring break Trump signed an executive order last month placing Vance in charge of supervising efforts to "remove improper ideology" from all areas of the Smithsonian and targeted funding for programs that advance "divisive narratives" and "improper ideology," according to the Associated Press. The president also fired members of the John F. Kennedy Center for the Performing Arts' board of trustees and installed himself as chairman of the institution in February. ABC News' Kyra Phillips, April Williams, Molly Nagle and Lalee Ibssa contributed to this story.