Canadian canola dodges Trump tariff threat, but still faces economic uncertainty
The latest round of tariffs threatened by Trump would impose a 35 per cent levy on Canadian imports currently subjected to 25 per cent tariffs, effective Aug. 1.
Canadian-grown canola enjoys duty-free status when it travels across the border, but economic uncertainties associated with the ongoing trade dispute create what southern Alberta farmer John McKee calls "an air of anxiety" looming over the industry.
McKee, who grows oilseed crops southeast of Lethbridge, said while the tariffs don't directly hurt his canola exports, they're taking a toll on producers in other ways, including forcing farmers to deal with duties when ordering equipment from across the border.
McKee said when he looked at ordering "a very small insignificant piece" of equipment from the U.S., he was faced with "extra handling, the extra brokerage fees" and "several extra charges that went along with tracking the appropriate tariff."
He said buying a $20 part from the U.S. would have wound up costing him $100 had he not found a near-identical option locally.
Andre Harpe, chair of the Alberta Canola Producers Commission, said the U.S. tariffs are only one of several issues Canadian farmers are dealing with.
"I think we're almost starting to get used to it now," he said of Trump's recurring tariff threats.
Harpe, who grows canola and barley in northern Alberta, said he and many other producers are dealing with more pressing issues like dry growing conditions.
"We're looking at making sure we can get the best crop that we can get, so we can actually sell them," he said, pointing to diseases affecting crops across Canada, and a need for more rain.
He also said 100 per cent tariffs on Canadian canola oil and canola meal imposed by China in March has been more significant to producers than the country's trade dispute with the U.S.
While those duties do not apply to unprocessed canola seeds exported to China, which made up the bulk of Canada's $4.9 billion in canola exports to China in 2024, Harpe called them "probably the biggest concern right now," in terms of tariffs.
'A lot of uncertainty for canola growers'
The Canadian canola industry annually contributes an average of $43.7 billion to the national economy, according to the Canola Council of Canada.
The council's figures indicate there are approximately 40,000 canola farms nationwide, primarily located throughout Alberta and in southern Saskatchewan and Manitoba, as well as scattered locations in Ontario and British Columbia.
"The canola industry is a very significant contributor to economic activity in Alberta," said J.P. Gervais, chief economist with Farm Credit Canada.
The U.S. is Canada's largest market for canola exports, making any tariff talk problematic for producers and investors, Gervais said.
"This entire situation with the United States … creates a lot of uncertainty for canola growers that are looking to invest, to grow, and grow exports, generate economic activity across the country, across the province," he said.
"I do think that we have to wait and see, but recognizing as well that the unknowns, the uncertainty that is in the market right now … really has an impact on the ability of operations to actually invest in their bottom line."
He said canola prices took a hit when China first announced its tariffs, but that they have "rebounded quite a bit" this year.
"We thrive in an environment where borders remain open and we have free-flowing products between the United States and Canada, between Canada and China," Gervais said.
Prime Minister Mark Carney is scheduled to meet with his cabinet on Tuesday and with Canada's premiers on July 22 to discuss the latest developments in the U.S. trade dispute.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Globe and Mail
20 minutes ago
- Globe and Mail
World shares are mixed as investors focus on tariffs and earnings
BANGKOK (AP) — World shares were mixed on Monday as investors focused on tariffs and corporate earnings updates. An announcement over the weekend by U.S. President Donald Trump that he plans 30% tariffs on goods from Mexico and the European Union had a modest immediate impact, as analysts said they expected progress toward trade deals before an Aug. 1 deadline. Trump detailed the planned tariffs Saturday in letters posted to his social media account. The Mexican peso weakened slightly against the dollar, trading at 18.6 pesos to the dollar. Chinese shares advanced after the government reported that exports rose last month as a truce in a tariffs war prompted a surge in orders ahead of an Aug. 12 deadline for reaching a new trade deal with Washington. Hong Kong's Hang Seng gained 0.3% to 24,091.45, while the Shanghai Composite index also was up 0.3%, at 3,519.65. Tokyo's Nikkei 225 index slipped 0.3% to 39,459.62, while the Kospi in South Korea jumped 0.8% to 3,202.03. In Australia, the S&P/ASX 200 edged 0.1% lower to 8,570.40. Taiwan's benchmark lost 0.6%. On Friday, a modest pullback for U.S. stocks left major stock indexes on Wall Street in the red for the week. The S&P 500 closed 0.3% lower, at 6,259.75, a day after setting a record high. The Dow Jones Industrial Average dropped 0.6% to 44,371.51, and the Nasdaq composite gave up 0.2% to 20,585.53 after drifting between small gains and losses much of the day. The tech-heavy index was coming off its own all-time high on Thursday. The selling capped an uneven week in the market as Wall Street kept an eye on the Trump administration's rollout of new tariff threats against trading partners like Canada and looked ahead to the upcoming corporate earnings reporting season. Trump said in a letter Thursday that he will raise taxes on many imported goods from Canada to 35%, deepening the rift between the longtime North American allies. The letter to Canadian Prime Minister Mark Carney was an aggressive increase to the top 25% tariff rates that Trump first imposed in March. The administration had initially set Wednesday as a deadline for countries to make deals with the U.S. or face heavy increases in tariffs. But with just two trade deals announced since April, one with the United Kingdom and one with Vietnam, the window for negotiations has been been extended to Aug. 1. Trump also floated this week that he would impose tariffs of as much as 200% on pharmaceutical drugs and place a 50% tariff on copper imports, matching the rates charged on steel and aluminum. The initial rollout of Trump's tariff policies in the spring roiled financial markets. But they have been relatively stable in recent weeks, suggesting investors have adjusted to the unpredictability of his sudden policy shifts. Markets are set to shift their focus to quarterly earnings over the next few weeks. JPMorgan Chase, Wells Fargo and Citigroup are among big banks due to report their results on Tuesday. Shares in aviation company Red Cat Holdings jumped 26.4% Friday after Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth issued orders aimed at ramping up production and deployment of drones. Bitcoin climbed to another all-time high, rising 3.6% early Monday to $121,914, according to CoinDesk. Bitcoin's price has jumped amid bullish momentum across risk assets and coincides with Nvidia's surge to a $4 trillion valuation. The U.S. Congress' Crypto Week starts Monday. Lawmakers will debate a series of bills that could define the regulatory framework for the industry. In other dealings early Monday, U.S. benchmark crude oil gained 45 cents to $68.90 per barrel. Brent crude, the international standard, was up 44 cents at $70.80 per barrel. The dollar slipped to 147.22 Japanese yen from 147.38 yen. The euro fell to $1.1685 from $1.1692.


CTV News
21 minutes ago
- CTV News
Work-from-home starting to look more remote as companies get stricter on office time
TORONTO — It's not just students who will be commuting more this September. After years of experimentation with hybrid work, an increasing number of companies are whittling down days at home to one, or none at all. The push comes amid rising economic uncertainty that's leaving workers with less leverage and companies under pressure to boost productivity. Even as some experts point to a lack of evidence that more days in the office is good for business, corporate leaders are increasingly convinced it is. 'There are lots of clients who are slowly but surely increasing the in-office requirement,' said Alex Gallacher, managing director of Engage HR. Big banks including RBC, Scotiabank and BMO have mandated at least four days in office starting in September, while Canaccord Genuity is reportedly moving to five, mirroring moves earlier this year by U.S. giants Amazon and JPMorgan to also go all-in on the office. More moves are likely on the way, with 83 per cent of Canadian CEOs saying they expect to move back to full-time in the office within three years, according to a 2024 KPMG survey, a big jump from the 55 per cent who thought so in 2023. Companies have been citing all sorts of benefits to being in the office such as easier collaboration and teamwork, mentorship opportunities and better communication, while Gallacher sees it especially driven by companies trying to get workers on the same page. 'What's really driving it is culture,' said Gallacher. 'This desire to have a culture that is more cohesive, and that effectively supports what the business is trying to do strategically.' For customer-oriented services like banks, working together in person can help emphasize the people-oriented business they're trying to achieve, he said. Banks have said the same themselves, with RBC noting it was moving to more days in-office because it's a 'relationship-driven bank' whose in-person, human connection is core to its culture. Scotiabank noted the collaboration, engagement and career development benefits, as well as a stronger culture and sense of belonging as part of its reasoning. But companywide policies are a fairly blunt way to try and achieve results when location policies actually demand more nuance and specificity, said Linda Duxbury, chancellor's professor of management at Carleton University's Sprott School of Business. 'The decision makers are just making decisions, like the banks, everybody comes back, or the Government of Canada, three days ... it seems like very arbitrary decisions as opposed to doing the hard work necessary.' While companies aim to boost results, it's quite difficult to measure productivity or how well a return-to-office mandate, or home time, is working, said Duxbury. 'They don't have good performance metrics to measure the productivity of a lot of their knowledge workers,' she said. 'So to make the business case why this person can work from home and this one not, it takes a lot of work.' Some researchers have aimed to quantify the effects, such as a research paper out last year from Stanford University economist Nicholas Bloom that studied 1,600 workers at Chinese travel company It found employees who worked two days a week at home were just as productive and likely to be promoted as their fully office-based peers, while turnover among them fell by a third. But even as some data supports hybrid work, companies are making the move because they're convinced the experiment isn't working, said Duxbury. 'They're not just on a whim going, well, hey, I'm going to really make everybody who works for me mad by making people come back in for five days. There's something triggering it.' A sense of culture, of the spirit holding a firm together, has come up a lot in her research, though it can also come down to managers not being able to get in contact with employees too many times, she said. JPMorgan CEO Jamie Dimon didn't hold back when pointing to unreliable employees as one reason the firm moved back to fully in-office. He complained in a February town hall that he could never get ahold of anyone on Fridays, in a recording that was posted by Barron's. He also invited those who didn't like the policy to quit, underlining how retention is becoming less a concern than it was during the peak labour-shortage years of the pandemic. But while it might require broad policies to manage the more than 300,000 employees at JPMorgan, smaller firms seem to be finding it easier to navigate. The KPMG survey, for example, found that only 20 per cent of leaders of small- and medium-sized firms expect to go in-office full time. A big contributor to that trend is also the fight to find and keep talented staff, said Gallacher, noting the push toward more days in office isn't happening as much outside big cities, especially for firms needing more specialized positions. 'If you were to try and go hire a claims manager in the insurance world in southwestern Ontario right now, it is literally like pulling teeth.' But as trends shift and employee leverage fades, Gallacher said it's important to get clarity from any potential employer about what their plans are in terms of office work. 'It's probably as important as salary as a question in terms of, you know, can you manage your life.' This report by The Canadian Press was first published July 14, 2025. Companies in this story: (TSX:RY; TSX;BNS; TSX:BMO) Ian Bickis, The Canadian Press


National Post
29 minutes ago
- National Post
Patrick Lennox: A surefire way to increase oil production and lower emissions
If the Carney government is going to follow through on its plan to make Canada an 'energy superpower' and a world leader in 'responsible energy production,' it will need to take a more pragmatic approach to spurring private investment and innovation in cleaner energy production than its predecessor. Article content The Trudeau government's Bill C-59 received royal assent just before the Calgary Stampede kicked off last summer. It included the government's signature decarbonization policy initiative: a massive set of tax credits designed to reduce the upfront costs of investments in carbon-capture equipment. Over $12 billion has been earmarked to pay for these credits, making it one of the country's largest decarbonization outlays. Article content Article content Remarkably, one of the distinctive features of Bill C-59 was that it took pains to specifically exclude a tested and proven method of carbon sequestration that has the added benefit of extracting hard-to-reach oil and delivering it to the surface in a way that's significantly cleaner than oilsands development. Article content Article content The Trudeau government chose to exclude CO2-enhanced oil recovery (EOR), a process in which CO2 is pumped into oil reservoirs to increase production, from being eligible for its Carbon Capture Utilization and Storage Investment Tax Credit scheme because it did not want to support increased oil production with tax credits designed to incentivize emissions reductions. Article content In the oil and gas industry in western Canada, this approach is seen as the application of a 'purity test' against an industry that, while responsible for roughly a third of Canada's greenhouse gas emissions, remains vital to the Canadian economy. Article content The Carney government could easily remove this small exclusionary clause, which could unleash billions in investments in EOR and contribute massively to its energy superpower ambitions. For now, though, this potential capital — both foreign and domestic — is sitting on the sidelines. Article content Article content As an example of how EOR could help Canada reach both its climate and economic goals, consider that Saskatchewan's Weyburn-Midale fields stores an estimated three-million tonnes of CO2 annually from upstream emitters. Article content Article content Canada not only has the know-how and wherewithal to use these complex carbon-sequestration methods to further exploit depleted reservoirs, it is also home to some of the world's most amenable geology for it. According to the Canada Energy Regulator, it's theoretically possible to store hundreds of years' worth of the country's annual emissions using geological storage techniques. Article content Incentivizing carbon capture and storage across a range of energy sectors — including oil, gas, lithium and geothermal — would accordingly make a lot of pragmatic sense. Especially considering that EOR leverages existing wells, roads and infrastructure connected to legacy oil reservoirs and delivers low-carbon oil. Yet the current legislation allows for none of this.