New tool for cutting DNA: promising prospects for biotechnology
A few years ago, the advent of technology known as CRISPR was a major breakthrough in the scientific world. Developed from a derivative of the immune system of bacteria, CRISPR enables double strands of nucleotides in deoxyribonucleic acid (DNA) to be cut. This makes it possible to specifically modify a targeted gene in plant, animal and human cells. Ultimately, CRISPR became a preferred method in the search for treatments for acquired or hereditary diseases.
Recently, Professor Frédéric Veyrier at the Institut national de la recherche scientifique (INRS) and his team developed a new genetic tool based on a family of specific enzymes called Ssn that allows targeted cuts to be induced exclusively in single-stranded DNA.
The results of their work were recently published in the journal Nature Communications. This major breakthrough sheds light on a crucial genetic mechanism that could revolutionize a multitude of biotechnology applications.
A form of DNA with a key role
Single-stranded DNA is less common than double-stranded DNA. It is often found in some viruses and plays a key role in certain biological processes, such as cell replication or repair. Single-stranded DNA is also used in many technologies (sequencing, gene editing, molecular diagnostics, nanotechnology).
To date, no endonuclease – enzyme that cuts DNA – has been described as exclusively targeting a single-stranded DNA sequence, which has constituted a barrier to the development of technologies based on this type of DNA.
Now, for the first time in a laboratory, Professor Veyrier's team has identified a family of enzymes capable of cutting a specific sequence in single-stranded DNA: the family of Ssn endonucleases.
To achieve this, the research team at INRS's Armand-Frappier Santé Biotechnologie Research Centre first characterized a new family of endonucleases part of the GIY-YIG superfamily called Ssn. More specifically, researchers focused on one of these enzymes in the bacterium Neisseria meningitidis, also known as the meningococcus. The enzyme targeted in the study is crucial to the exchange and alteration of genetic material, which influences evolution.
"In studying it, we found that it recognizes a specific sequence that is found in many instances in its genome and plays a key role in the natural transformation of the bacterium. This interaction directly influences the dynamics of the bacterial genome," explains Professor Veyrier, a specialist in genomic bacteriology and evolution.
In addition to this fundamental discovery, INRS's research scientists identified thousands of other similar enzymes. "We demonstrated that they are able to recognize and specifically cut their own single-stranded DNA sequence. Thousands of enzymes therefore have this property with their own specificity," adds Alex Rivera-Millot, a postdoctoral fellow on Professor Veyrier's team and co-first author of the study.
An undeniable asset for health research
These results, which represent a new tool for DNA recognition and exchange, are significant. They pave the way to many novel applications in biology and medicine. On the one hand, understanding this mechanism could help better control the bacteria in question and the associated infections.
On the other, the discovery of enzymes specific to single-stranded DNA makes it possible to develop more precise and efficient genetic manipulation tools. This could namely improve methods of gene editing, DNA detection and molecular diagnosis. These enzymes could also be used to detect and manipulate DNA in various medical and industrial applications, such as pathogen detection or genetic manipulation for medical and therapeutic purposes.
All of these avenues hold significant promise for addressing many health issues. Currently, there is a patent pending for the results of this work.
About the study
Chenal, M.*, Rivera-Millot, A.*, Harrison, L.B. et al. Discovery of the widespread site-specific single-stranded nuclease family Ssn. Nat Commun 16, 2388 (2025). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-025-57514-1.
This work was funded by the Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada (NSERC), the Canadian Institutes of Health Research (CIHR) and the Fonds de recherche du Québec – Santé (FRQS).
About INRS
INRS is an academic institution dedicated exclusively to graduate research and training in strategic sectors in Quebec. For the past 55 years, it has actively contributed to Quebec's economic, social, and cultural development. INRS is first in Canada in research intensity. It is made up of four interdisciplinary research and training centres located in Quebec City, Montreal, Laval, and Varennes, which focus their efforts on strategic sectors: water, earth, and environment (Eau Terre Environnement Research Centre); energy, materials, and telecommunications (Énergie Matériaux Télécommunications Research Centre); urbanization, culture, and society (Urbanisation Culture Société Research Centre); and health and biotechnology (Armand-Frappier Santé Biotechnologie Research Centre). The INRS community includes over 1,500 students, postdoctoral fellows, and faculty and staff members.
SOURCE Institut National de la recherche scientifique (INRS)
View original content to download multimedia: http://www.newswire.ca/en/releases/archive/April2025/14/c8889.html
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
20 hours ago
- Yahoo
Gene that differs between humans and Neanderthals could shed light on the species' disappearance, mouse study suggests
When you buy through links on our articles, Future and its syndication partners may earn a commission. A protein that helps synthesize DNA is different in modern humans than it is in Neanderthals and Denisovans — our closest extinct relatives — and new experiments in mice genetically modified to express the modern human version hint that this may have made us behave differently. That discovery, in turn, could shed light on why Neanderthals and Denisovans vanished, researchers propose in a new study. But the significance of the findings for humans is still unclear. "It's too early to translate these findings directly to humans, as the neural circuits of mice are vastly different," study lead author, Xiangchun Ju, a postdoctoral researcher at the Okinawa Institute of Science and Technology in Japan, said in a statement. However, this work hints that the variant seen in modern humans "might have given us some evolutionary advantage in particular tasks relative to ancestral humans," such as competing for scarce resources. Key protein Previous research found that modern humans diverged from their closest evolutionary relatives, Neanderthals and Denisovans, about 600,000 years ago. It's not clear why modern humans survived while our closest relatives died off. To search for potential genetic clues to solve this mystery, the researchers analyzed the enzyme ADSL (adenylosuccinate lyase). This protein helps synthesize purine, one of the fundamental building blocks of DNA and other vital molecules. Related: A braided stream, not a family tree: How new evidence upends our understanding of how humans evolved "There are a small number of enzymes that were affected by evolutionary changes in the ancestors of modern humans. ADSL is one of them," study co-author Svante Pääbo, Nobel laureate, leader of the human evolutionary genomics unit at the Okinawa Institute of Science and Technology in Japan, and director of the Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology in Leipzig, Germany, said in a statement. ADSL is made up of a chain of 484 amino acids. The version of this enzyme found in virtually all modern humans differs from that seen in both Neanderthals and Denisovans by just one amino acid — the 429th amino acid in ADSL is valine in modern humans but alanine in our extinct relatives. The scientists noted the ADSL mutation is seen in modern humans and not our closest extinct relatives, and so likely appeared after we separated from the lineage that led to Neanderthals and Denisovans. This led the researchers to investigate the possible behavioral effects of this mutation. Previous research on lab-grown cells found that the ADSL variant seen in modern humans resulted in a more unstable version of the enzyme that broke down more quickly compared to the one in Neanderthals and Denisovans. Behavior changes The new study, published Aug. 4 in the journal PNAS, similarly found that, in mice, the modern variant leads to higher levels of the chemicals that ADSL normally acts on to synthesize purine in several organs, especially the brain. This finding supported the idea that the modern human version of ADSL is less active than the variant seen in Neanderthals and Denisovans. In experiments where mice learned they could get a drink of water following specific lights or sounds, female mice genetically modified to possess a version of ADSL similar to the kind seen in modern humans were better at getting water than their littermates without this variant were. This might suggest the human-like variant made female mice better at learning to connect the dots between the water and the lights or sounds, or more motivated to seek out the water in some way. The changes in behavior and ADSL levels seen in female mice with the modern-human variant of the enzyme was not seen in male mice. "It's unclear why only female mice seemed to gain a competitive advantage," study co-author Izumi Fukunaga, a researcher at the Okinawa Institute of Science and Technology, said in a statement. "Behavior is complex." Statistical tests analyzing Neanderthal; Denisovan; and modern African, European and East Asian DNA found that mutations in the ASDL gene appeared in modern human genomes at higher rates than random variations over time would suggest, making it likely that these mutations provided some evolutionary advantage. Perhaps running counter to the new findings, prior work found that genetic disorders leading to ADSL deficiency in modern humans can lead to intellectual disability, speech and language impairment, and other problems. This suggests that during evolution, modern humans had to balance the potential benefits of reducing ADSL activity with the problems that could occur from ADSL deficiency, study co-author Shin-Yu Lee, also of the Okinawa Institute of Science and Technology, said in a statement. Implications unclear Not everyone thinks the study has direct implications for why modern humans thrived or for why Neanderthals or Denisovans disappeared. These results in mice "don't say too much about human evolution at this stage," Mark Collard, a paleoanthropologist at Simon Fraser University in Burnaby, British Columbia who did not take part in this research, told Live Science. RELATED STORIES —What was the first human species? —2.6 million-year-old stone tools reveal ancient human relatives were 'forward planning' 600,000 years earlier than thought —'It makes no sense to say there was only one origin of Homo sapiens': How the evolutionary record of Asia is complicating what we know about our species However, the strategy of using mice to study the behavioral effects of genetic differences between modern humans and our closest extinct relatives "seems very promising as a way of investigating the evolution of our brain and behavior," Collard said. "I expect we'll see a cascade of studies like this one in the next few years." Future research can investigate the specific mechanisms by which changes in ADSL activity influence behavior. Scientists can also explore how changes in ADSL activity are associated with other behaviors and how multiple genetic changes might work in concert, the study authors wrote. Solve the daily Crossword
Yahoo
a day ago
- Yahoo
Scientists Found a Hidden Trigger That Could Make Your Eyes Regenerate
Here's what you'll learn when you read this story: Many groups in the animal kingdom have the remarkable ability to regenerate their eyes, but mammals are not one of them—at least, not yet. A new study analyzed the genetic mechanisms behind the ocular regenerative ability of the golden apple snail to see if a similar technique could be used in human eyes. Although separated by hundreds of millions of years of evolution, human eyes and apple snail eyes retain remarkable similarities, both physically and genetically. Talk to most freshwater biologists, and you likely won't find much love for the golden apple snail. An invasive species outside of South America, this freshwater snail (Pomacea canaliculata) is both extremely resilient and what is known as a prolific organism, meaning it makes a lot of babies. This is a one-two punch of bad news for conservationists. But in a strange twist of fate, these particular attributes of the golden apple snail—along with its impressive ability to regenerate its eyes when damaged—made it the perfect test subject for Alice Accorsi, an assistant professor of molecular and cellular biology at the University of California (UC) Davis. So much so, in fact, that Accorsi was surprised no other study had yet detailed exactly how these snails wield such impressive powers of regeneration. 'When I started reading about this, I was asking myself, why isn't anybody already using snails to study regeneration?' Accorsi, the lead author of the new study, said in a press statement. 'I think it's because we just hadn't found the perfect snail to study, until now. A lot of other snails are difficult or very slow to breed in the lab, and many species also go through metamorphosis, which presents an extra challenge.' In the experiment, Accorsi and her team developed methods to tweak the apple snail's genome, hoping to better understand why it can regrow its eyes—an enviable ability that vertebrates (including humans) can't seem to achieve. Although separated by more than 600 million years of evolution, humans and apple snails both have camera-type eyes that make use of a system of corneas, lens, and retinas. Accorsi also said that many of the genes that participate in human eye development can be found in these snails as well. An apple snail's ocular regeneration process takes a month from start to finish. In the first 24 hours, the amputated wound heals and unspecialized cells congregate in the area before building new ocular hardware. By day 15, all parts of the eye's structure (including the optic nerve) are present, but the snail requires a few more weeks to fully mature. During this incredible process, scientists analyzed gene expression in the snail's genome, and found that immediately upon amputation, 9,000 genes expressed themselves at different rates than they did in a normal apple snail. The team then used CRISPR/Cas9 techniques to edit a snail embryo's genome—specifically, a gene known as Pax6, which is also known to control the development of the brain and eye in humans. 'The idea is that we mutate specific genes and then see what effect it has on the animal, which can help us understand the function of different parts of the genome,' Accorsi said in a press statement. When the snail embryo had two non-functional copies of the gene—one from each parent—eyes didn't develop at all once the snail reached maturation. Future studies will investigate if the manipulation of the gene in adult snails similarly impacts regeneration. 'If we find a set of genes that are important for eye regeneration, and these genes are also present in vertebrates, in theory we could activate them to enable eye regeneration in humans,' Accorsi said in a press statement. The idea of regenerating human eyes isn't new. A study published earlier this year in the journal Nature Communications showed evidence of the 'first successful induction of long-term neural regeneration in mammalian retinas,' according to the researchers, by inhibiting the PROX1 protein that can block retinal cell types in animals, including ones that could help restore vision to those suffering from retinitis pigmentosa. Similarly, this research was inspired by the amazing eye-regenerating abilities of the zebrafish. We humans may be the one with the big brains of the animal kingdom, but the varied biology of Earth's incredible creatures still has so much to teach us. Get the Issue Get the Issue Get the Issue Get the Issue Get the Issue Get the Issue Get the Issue Get the Issue You Might Also Like Can Apple Cider Vinegar Lead to Weight Loss? Bobbi Brown Shares Her Top Face-Transforming Makeup Tips for Women Over 50 Solve the daily Crossword
Yahoo
a day ago
- Yahoo
Gene that differs between humans and Neanderthals could shed light on the species' disappearance, mouse study suggests
When you buy through links on our articles, Future and its syndication partners may earn a commission. A protein that helps synthesize DNA is different in modern humans than it is in Neanderthals and Denisovans — our closest extinct relatives — and new experiments in mice genetically modified to express the modern human version hint that this may have made us behave differently. That discovery, in turn, could shed light on why Neanderthals and Denisovans vanished, researchers propose in a new study. But the significance of the findings for humans is still unclear. "It's too early to translate these findings directly to humans, as the neural circuits of mice are vastly different," study lead author, Xiangchun Ju, a postdoctoral researcher at the Okinawa Institute of Science and Technology in Japan, said in a statement. However, this work hints that the variant seen in modern humans "might have given us some evolutionary advantage in particular tasks relative to ancestral humans," such as competing for scarce resources. Key protein Previous research found that modern humans diverged from their closest evolutionary relatives, Neanderthals and Denisovans, about 600,000 years ago. It's not clear why modern humans survived while our closest relatives died off. To search for potential genetic clues to solve this mystery, the researchers analyzed the enzyme ADSL (adenylosuccinate lyase). This protein helps synthesize purine, one of the fundamental building blocks of DNA and other vital molecules. Related: A braided stream, not a family tree: How new evidence upends our understanding of how humans evolved "There are a small number of enzymes that were affected by evolutionary changes in the ancestors of modern humans. ADSL is one of them," study co-author Svante Pääbo, Nobel laureate, leader of the human evolutionary genomics unit at the Okinawa Institute of Science and Technology in Japan, and director of the Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology in Leipzig, Germany, said in a statement. ADSL is made up of a chain of 484 amino acids. The version of this enzyme found in virtually all modern humans differs from that seen in both Neanderthals and Denisovans by just one amino acid — the 429th amino acid in ADSL is valine in modern humans but alanine in our extinct relatives. The scientists noted the ADSL mutation is seen in modern humans and not our closest extinct relatives, and so likely appeared after we separated from the lineage that led to Neanderthals and Denisovans. This led the researchers to investigate the possible behavioral effects of this mutation. Previous research on lab-grown cells found that the ADSL variant seen in modern humans resulted in a more unstable version of the enzyme that broke down more quickly compared to the one in Neanderthals and Denisovans. Behavior changes The new study, published Aug. 4 in the journal PNAS, similarly found that, in mice, the modern variant leads to higher levels of the chemicals that ADSL normally acts on to synthesize purine in several organs, especially the brain. This finding supported the idea that the modern human version of ADSL is less active than the variant seen in Neanderthals and Denisovans. In experiments where mice learned they could get a drink of water following specific lights or sounds, female mice genetically modified to possess a version of ADSL similar to the kind seen in modern humans were better at getting water than their littermates without this variant were. This might suggest the human-like variant made female mice better at learning to connect the dots between the water and the lights or sounds, or more motivated to seek out the water in some way. The changes in behavior and ADSL levels seen in female mice with the modern-human variant of the enzyme was not seen in male mice. "It's unclear why only female mice seemed to gain a competitive advantage," study co-author Izumi Fukunaga, a researcher at the Okinawa Institute of Science and Technology, said in a statement. "Behavior is complex." Statistical tests analyzing Neanderthal; Denisovan; and modern African, European and East Asian DNA found that mutations in the ASDL gene appeared in modern human genomes at higher rates than random variations over time would suggest, making it likely that these mutations provided some evolutionary advantage. Perhaps running counter to the new findings, prior work found that genetic disorders leading to ADSL deficiency in modern humans can lead to intellectual disability, speech and language impairment, and other problems. This suggests that during evolution, modern humans had to balance the potential benefits of reducing ADSL activity with the problems that could occur from ADSL deficiency, study co-author Shin-Yu Lee, also of the Okinawa Institute of Science and Technology, said in a statement. Implications unclear Not everyone thinks the study has direct implications for why modern humans thrived or for why Neanderthals or Denisovans disappeared. These results in mice "don't say too much about human evolution at this stage," Mark Collard, a paleoanthropologist at Simon Fraser University in Burnaby, British Columbia who did not take part in this research, told Live Science. RELATED STORIES —What was the first human species? —2.6 million-year-old stone tools reveal ancient human relatives were 'forward planning' 600,000 years earlier than thought —'It makes no sense to say there was only one origin of Homo sapiens': How the evolutionary record of Asia is complicating what we know about our species However, the strategy of using mice to study the behavioral effects of genetic differences between modern humans and our closest extinct relatives "seems very promising as a way of investigating the evolution of our brain and behavior," Collard said. "I expect we'll see a cascade of studies like this one in the next few years." Future research can investigate the specific mechanisms by which changes in ADSL activity influence behavior. Scientists can also explore how changes in ADSL activity are associated with other behaviors and how multiple genetic changes might work in concert, the study authors wrote. Solve the daily Crossword
