
Elon Musk is building ‘the world's biggest supercomputer.' It's powered with dozens of gas-powered turbines
Pollution
AI
Air quality
SustainabilityFacebookTweetLink
Follow
Last summer, an abandoned factory in southwest Memphis got a new life courtesy of the world's richest man. Elon Musk's artificial intelligence company xAI moved in to transform this unprepossessing building into the 'world's largest supercomputer.'
Musk named it Colossus and said it was the 'most powerful AI training system in the world.' It was sold locally as a source of jobs, tax dollars and a key addition to the 'Digital Delta' — the move to make Memphis a hotspot for advanced technology.
'This is just the beginning,' xAI said on its website; the company already has plans for a second facility in the city.
But for some residents in nearby Boxtown, a majority Black, economically-disadvantaged community that has long endured industrial pollution, xAI's facility represents yet another threat to their health.
AI is immensely power-hungry, and Musk's company installed dozens of gas-powered turbines, known to produce a cocktail of toxic pollutants. The company currently has no air permits, appearing to rely on a loophole for temporary turbines — but environmental groups say the exemption does not apply, and residents are angry.
'Our health was never considered, the safety of our communities was never, ever considered,' said Sarah Gladney, who lives 3 miles from the facility and suffers from a lung condition.
xAI did not respond to CNN's requests for comment.
This part of Memphis, home to 17 other polluting facilities — including an oil refinery, steel plant and gas-fired power plant — is used to fighting for clean air.
This time, however, not only are they up against the world's richest man, who happens to be one of President Donald Trump's closest advisors, but it's happening as the Trump administration takes an ax to pollution legislation, slashes environmental justice programs and throws its full-throated support behind AI.
What's unfolding in Memphis should be a warning to other communities, said Erika Sugarmon, a commissioner of Shelby County, which encompasses Memphis and the surrounding area. 'All these different safeguards are being taken away,' she told CNN. 'So where do you go?'
The new Memphis facility is part of Musk's quest to dominate AI, providing computing power to xAI's chatbot, Grok, which the company promotes as an 'anti-woke' version of OpenAI's ChatGPT. It has been under fire for loose guardrails, including allowing users to create Nazi Mickey Mouse images.
Memphis Mayor Paul Young has thrown his support behind xAI's arrival, emphasizing benefits including the promise of hundreds of high-paying jobs and around $30 million in tax revenues in the first year alone.
'What we are looking at is an opportunity to completely transform our economy,' Young said. It's 'game changing,' he told CNN.
Others see it very differently.
Some local lawmakers say they were kept in the dark about the facility's arrival, leaving them scrambling for information.
State Rep. Justin Pearson, a Democrat who lives 3 miles from the facility, said he was blindsided. His initial concern was how it would be powered. 'Our grid is already not stable enough' and the last three winters have seen rolling blackouts, he told CNN.
It turned out the answer is partly grid power. The facility receives 150 megawatts from the local public utility Memphis Light, Gas and Water — enough to power around 100,000 homes. MLGW said it had done an impact study to ensure this would not affect power availability and reliability for consumers. xAI is now awaiting approval for a further 150 megawatts.
But what really spiked Pearson's concerns were the turbines that started appearing at the facility last summer.
Gas-powered turbines produce pollutants, including nitrogen oxides, a key component of ozone pollution — also called smog — which can cause asthma attacks and chest pain and, in the longer-term, is linked to decreased lung function and premature death.
They also generate the carcinogen formaldehyde and tiny air pollution particles so small they can pass through lungs into people's bloodstream.
It's a big concern for a region already grappling with the impacts of air pollution. The cancer risk from industrial sources in southwest Memphis is 4.1 times higher than the EPA's acceptable risk, according to a ProPublica analysis. Shelby county has an F in air quality for ozone levels from the American Lung Association and the highest rates of children hospitalized for asthma in Tennessee.
Aerial images taken by the Southern Environmental Law Center and South Wings, an organization of volunteer pilots, in March showed xAI had 35 turbines at the facility.
These can generate a total of 420 megawatts, equivalent to a 'medium- to large-sized power plant,' said Patrick Anderson, a senior attorney at SELC. They can produce an up to 2,000 tons of nitrogen oxide pollution every year, which would make xAI one of the biggest sources in the county, according to SELC calculations.
Aerial pictures taken in April, this time with a thermal imaging camera, showed 33 turbines were producing heat, suggesting they were operating, Anderson told CNN.
What has inflamed the community further is xAI's lack of air permits.
It appears the company relied on a loophole which allows temporary turbines in one location for less than a year to operate without a permit.
The SELC, however, argues xAI's turbines don't fall within a permit exemption because of their size and the pollution they produce. 'Our position is (xAI is) without a permit, they should not be operating,' Anderson said.
In January, months after starting operations, xAI applied to the Shelby County Health Department for permits for 15 turbines. A health department spokesperson told CNN the application was currently under review and all community feedback would be 'carefully considered.'
Twelve of the remaining 20 turbines were removed in May, and the rest will go in the future, said Mayor Young, although the timeline is unclear.
The Greater Memphis Chamber of Commerce said the turbines for which permits have been requested 'will achieve industry-leading emission standards' once they are equipped with pollution reduction technologies.
For Rep. Pearson, however, the situation is bewildering. 'It's an actual gas plant in the middle of a neighborhood and you don't need any permitting?' he said. 'Something has failed drastically and significantly with our system of checks and balances.'
Some of xAI's supporters have accused those who oppose it of being motivated by animosity toward Musk.
It's a theory rejected by KeShaun Pearson, director of Memphis Community Against Pollution. Southwest Memphis has a long history of battling for clean air, soil and water, he told CNN.
Residents successfully fought off a crude oil pipeline in 2021 that would have crossed Boxtown and multiple other predominantly Black communities in southwest Memphis.
A medical sterilizing facility in south Memphis, which since the 1970s had been pumping out ethylene oxide, a toxic pollutant linked to blood and breast cancers, closed in 2023 after local campaigning.
xAI's facility 'is not a new fight; this is the most recent,' Pearson said. Southwest Memphis has long been seen as a 'sacrifice zone,' he added.
Pearson is wary of promises of hundreds of highly-paid jobs; data centers don't typically need large numbers of workers. He fears the majority of roles available to local people will be in janitorial and security.
xAI's taxes also won't make up for health impacts, said Pearson, whose grandparents both died of cancer in their 60s, losses he blames on long-term pollution.
What's happening in southwest Memphis reveals the tension between two very different narratives of what AI can bring US communities.
For some leaders and business groups, xAI offers an opportunity to bring investment to an area in desperate need. Young people will be trained for AI jobs, and xAI tax dollars will be reinvested in the community, including tackling indoor air pollution, Mayor Young said.
For environmental groups and many residents, this much-hyped, new technology brings the same old problems. 'If the innovation shackles you to fossil fuels like methane gas or coal, that's regression, right? That's not progress,' Pearson said.
There could be a rash of similar power-hungry data centers appearing across the US as Trump and tech companies pave the way for AI. The EPA has listed making the US the AI 'capital of the world' as one of the five pillars guiding its work.
An EPA spokesperson told CNN 'the Trump EPA will continue to implement its core mission of protecting human health and the environment while Powering the Great American Comeback' but did not answer specific questions about the xAI facility.
Rep. Pearson fears for the impacts. 'If you look at where these data centers are propping up, it's always in poor communities' he said. There is 'no hope' the federal government will help protect them, he added.
In southwest Memphis, the fight for clean air will continue, especially as xAI looks to expand its footprint with a new 1 million-square-foot facility. But it's exhausting, said Boxtown resident Sarah Gladney. 'It seems like we are constantly at battle,' she said.
'We deserve to breathe clean air.'

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Newsweek
10 minutes ago
- Newsweek
Parts of Trump Coalition 'Disillusioned' as Musk Rips 'Big, Beautiful Bill'
Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources. Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content. Billionaire Elon Musk sharply rebuked President Donald Trump's "big, beautiful bill" this week, sparking both praise and backlash. An analyst told Newsweek that a slice of Trump's coalition is now getting "disillusioned" by him, and Musk is the most recent example. Why It Matters Musk was chosen by Trump to lead the Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE) during the president's first few months of his second term in office. Since his January inauguration, Trump has enacted sweeping cuts across the federal bureaucracy, mainly through executive orders and the creation of DOGE. The SpaceX CEO pushed for DOGE to gain access to the most sensitive and confidential information about American taxpayers, leading to a slew of lawsuits. Musk has also faced fierce backlash amid his drastic cuts to the budget, including thousands of federal jobs, and the dismantling of entire agencies. Amid the uproar, Tesla cars and property have been targeted and torched across the United States as protesters demonstrated against Musk's appointment as an unelected official. Photo-illustration by Newsweek/Getty What To Know The reconciliation bill, or the "big, beautiful bill" as Trump calls it, is a key avenue for Republicans to push forward the White House agenda following widespread GOP election victories in November. Key GOP holdouts in the House and Senate have voiced opposition to the bill over fears of raising the national debt, among other concerns. In a post to X, formerly Twitter, on Tuesday, Musk ripped the piece of legislation, saying, "I'm sorry, but I just can't stand it anymore. This massive, outrageous, pork-filled Congressional spending bill is a disgusting abomination. Shame on those who voted for it: you know you did wrong. You know it." The White House reacted to Musk's condemnation on Tuesday, as press secretary Karoline Leavitt said in part, "Look, the president already knows where Elon Musk stood on this bill. It doesn't change the president's opinion." In a new post to X on Wednesday, Musk doubled down: "A new spending bill should be drafted that doesn't massively grow the deficit and increase the debt ceiling by 5 TRILLION DOLLARS." The Republican infighting is a distinct turn from Musk's MAGA loyalty and near constant presence alongside the president during his second term. "Musk's attacking Trump's bill that the House passed highlights the conflict among Republicans, especially now in the Senate, over passage of this reconciliation bill purposefully designed to avoid needing 60 votes and a Democratic filibuster. If it does not pass the Senate or otherwise not make it to Trump's desk by the summer, it will at minimum greatly embarrass the Trump administration," Columbia political science professor Robert Y. Shapiro told Newsweek via email Tuesday. "This embarrassment also puts Republicans in the Senate and the House in a tough spot, since this could affect Republican control of the House and also even put control of the Senate in jeopardy. This is all currently the Senate responsibility. And Trump needs this control of Congress to pass legislation and to prevent a Democratic controlled House especially from starting investigations of his unconstitutional acts as president and also blatant corruption in using the presidency to enhance his family's and his wealth," Shapiro added. He also said that Musk's jab at the bill "may make this only marginally more difficult" for Trump, while noting that he still has his MAGA base backing him. On the other hand, D. Stephen Voss, political science professor at the University of Kentucky, told Newsweek via email, in part, on Wednesday: "Parts of the Trump coalition are becoming disillusioned with the way he's governing. Elon Musk's defection from the White House is just one high-profile example of the disillusionment with Trump being seen among right-leaning libertarian types, who are bothered by Trump's willingness to grow government and increase executive power." "But that's not the only slippage," Voss added. "Consider, for example, disillusionment with Trump being expressed by the Hispanic voters who put him over the top in 2024. As Trump's public support slips, that's going to turn into less Republican party unity in D.C. The increasingly noisy opposition to Trump might not stop him from getting some version of his omnibus budget bill, but either way, it will make it harder for him to govern in the months ahead." Tesla CEO Elon Musk and President Donald Trump field a question from reporters in the Oval Office of the White House on May 30 in Washington, D.C. (Photo by) Tesla CEO Elon Musk and President Donald Trump field a question from reporters in the Oval Office of the White House on May 30 in Washington, D.C. (Photo by) What People Are Saying Republican Representative Marjorie Taylor Greene of Georgia posted to X on Tuesday: "Do I like the price tag of the One Big Beautiful Bill? No. But we're still stuck with Biden's CR that funds tons of foreign aid and woke garbage at home and abroad. Passing the OBBB is a critical step toward delivering the America First MAGA mandate voters gave us in November." Greene added, "I'm focused on passing the @DOGE cuts that Elon and his team helped craft and I'm grateful he launched this effort." Republican Senator Mike Lee of Utah, responding to Musk on X Tuesday: "Federal spending has become excessive The resulting inflation harms Americans And weaponizes government The Senate can make this bill better It must now do so" Republican Senator Rand Paul of Kentucky, also on X Tuesday in response to Musk: "I agree with Elon. We have both seen the massive waste in government spending and we know another $5 trillion in debt is a huge mistake. We can and must do better." Trump, on Truth Social Tuesday: "Rand Paul has very little understanding of the BBB, especially the tremendous GROWTH that is coming. He loves voting "NO" on everything, he thinks it's good politics, but it's not. The BBB is a big WINNER!!!" What Happens Next Trump has handed down a deadline for Senate Republicans to get the bill passed and on his desk before July 4th. It is unclear if Republican senators will garner enough votes to get it done in roughly one month.

15 minutes ago
Karine Jean-Pierre leaves Democratic Party after serving in Biden's 'broken White House'
Former White House press secretary Karine Jean-Pierre has left the Democratic Party and is now an independent, according to a press release announcing her new book, "Independent: A Look Inside a Broken White House, Outside the Party Lines." The release from Legacy Lit, an imprint of the Hachette Book Group, said Jean-Pierre has chosen to "look beyond party lines" and is embracing "life as an independent," a decision it indicated she did not come to lightly. Jean-Pierre, who served in the Biden administration, is somewhat vague about why she no longer identifies as a Democrat, writing that she feels the current political moment necessitates "freeing ourselves of boxes." "Until January 20, I was responsible for speaking on behalf of the President of the United States," Jean-Pierre said in a statement on Wednesday. "At noon on that day, I became a private citizen who, like all Americans and many of our allies around the world, had to contend with what was to come next for our country." Jean-Pierre became White House press secretary on May 13, 2022, after Jen Psaki left the role, and she served in that role through the end of former President Joe Biden's term, also becoming senior adviser to the president. She was the first Black woman and openly gay person in the position, and she worked in positions under former President Barack Obama and Vice President Kamala Harris as well. Her departure from the Democratic Party comes as the party looks to regain momentum following 2024 election losses. "I determined that the danger we face as a country requires freeing ourselves of boxes," she said in the release. "We need to be willing to exercise the ability to think creatively and plan strategically. We need to be clear-eyed and questioning, rather than blindly loyal and obedient as we may have been in the past." "Freeing ourselves of boxes is truly at the heart and soul of my new book, Independent," she added. Still, Jean-Pierre faced criticism in the lead-up to Biden's withdrawal from the 2024 presidential election amid questions about his health and ability to serve in office for another term. Publishers say that in the book, Jean-Pierre will provide a closer look into the White House as Biden stepped off the 2024 ticket due to "the betrayal by the Democratic Party that led to his decision." The book is set to come out on Oct. 21, nearly a year after the 2024 presidential election.
Yahoo
15 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Former Google CEO Eric Schmidt's AI Expo serves up visions of war, robotics, and LLMs for throngs of tech execs, defense officials, and fresh recruits
Drones buzz overhead, piercing the human hum in the crowded Walter E. Washington Convention Center. On the ground, tech executives, uniformed Army officers, policy wonks, and politicians compete for attention as swarms of people move throughout the vast space. There are pitches about 'next generation of warfighters,' and panels about winning the 'AI innovation race.' There are job seekers and dignitaries. And at the center of it all, there is Eric Schmidt. The former Google CEO is the cofounder of the non-profit that organizes the confab, known as the AI+ Expo for National Competitiveness. The Washington DC event, now in its second year, is a fascinating, real world manifestation of the Schmidt worldview, which sees artificial intelligence, business, geopolitics, and national defense as interconnected forces reshaping America's global strategy. If it was once the province of futurists and think tank researchers, this worldview is now increasingly the consensus view. From innovations like self-driving robotaxis circulating in multiple U.S. cities to Silicon Valley defense startups snagging large government contracts, evidence of change—and of the stakes involved—are everywhere. The AI+ Expo, hosted by Schmidt's Special Competitive Studies Project (SCSP), is ground zero for the stakeholders of this new world order: Thousands of Washington insiders, military brass, tech executives, policymakers, students, and curious professionals are drawn together under one stars and stripes-style banner—to ensure America leads the AI age. It's a kind of AI county fair, albeit one where Lockheed Martin stages demos, defense tech companies hand out swag, Condoleezza Rice takes the stage, and protesters outside chant 'No tech for genocide' during Schmidt's keynote. The event is free to attend, and lines to enter stretch around the block. The only thing missing? GPU corn dogs on a stick, perhaps. Soft lobbying is omnipresent at the event. Tesla, for instance, offers self-driving tech demos just as the company prepares to launch its first robotaxi service in Austin and as Elon Musk pushes lawmakers on autonomous vehicle regulations. OpenAI is also working the room, touting its o3 reasoning model, newly deployed on a secure government supercomputer at Los Alamos. 'The transfer of model weights occurred via highly secured and heavily encrypted hard drives that were hand carried by OpenAI personnel to the Lab,' a company spokesperson told Fortune. 'For us, today's milestone, and this partnership more broadly, represents more than a technical achievement. It signals our shared commitment to American scientific leadership.' It's not just about the federal government, either – even state leaders are angling for attention. Mississippi Governor Tate Reeves, who is publicizing his state's AI data center investments and gave a keynote at the Expo told Fortune, 'The leaders in this space are here, and I want to be talking to the leaders that are going to make decisions about where they're making capital investments in the future.' The Expo is hosted by The Special Competitive Studies Project (SCSP), a nonprofit Schmidt cofounded in 2021 and for which he remains the major funder and chair. SCSP operates as a subsidiary of The Eric & Wendy Schmidt Fund for Strategic Innovation, the Schmidt family's private foundation, and is an outgrowth of the now-defunct National Security Commission on Artificial Intelligence — the temporary federal advisory body Schmidt also led from 2018 to 2021. The Expo is about building a community that brings private sector, academia and government into one place, said Ylli Bajraktari, president and CEO of SCSP and Schmidt's co-founder, who previously served as chief of staff to National Security Advisor H.R. McMaster and joined the Department of Defense in 2010. 'Washington is not a tech city, but yet, this is a city where [tech and AI] policies are being developed,' he said. Still, all of this seems really about Schmidt's vision for the future of AI, which he shared in depth in a highly-publicized TED talk last month. In it, he argued that humans should welcome the advancement of AI because our society will not have enough humans to be productive in the future–while delivering a dire warning about how the race for AI dominance could go wrong as the technology becomes a geopolitically destabilizing force. He repeated his hypothetical doomsday scenario in his Expo keynote. Schmidt posits an AI competitor who is advancing quickly, and is only about six months behind the U.S. in developing cutting-edge AI. In other international competitions, this could mean a relatively stable balance of power. But the fear is that once a certain level of AI capability is reached, a steep acceleration curve means the other side will never catch up. According to Schmidt, the other side would have to consider bombing their opponent's data centers to stop them from becoming permanently dominant. It's a scenario – with a proposed doctrine called Mutual AI Malfunction that would slow down each side and control progress – that Schmidt introduced alongside co-authors Henry Kissinger and Daniel Huttenlocher in their 2021 book The Age of AI and Our Human Future. Schmidt shared a thought exercise about what he would do if he could build the U.S. military completely from scratch – no Pentagon, no bureaucracy, no old, obsolete technology – that would basically resemble a tech company: agile, software-driven, and centered around networked, AI-powered systems. 'I would have two layers of drones,' he said. 'I'd have a set of ISR drones [unmanned aerial vehicles used for intelligence, surveillance, and reconnaissance missions]. Those are ones that are high and they have deep looking cameras, and they watch everything. They're connected by an AI network, which is presumably designed to be un-jammable. And then I would have essentially bomber drones of one kind or another, the ISR drones would observe, and they would immediately dispatch the bomber.' With that kind of a defensive system, he added, 'it would be essentially impossible to invade a country by land,' and said that he wanted US assets to be protected by defensive 'drone swarms,' adding that 'there's an entire set of companies in America that want to build this…many of them are here at our show – I want a small amount of the government's money to go into that industry.' Schmidt's Expo is open to all, and there were those in attendance who would beg to differ with his gung-ho takes on the future of battle. The International Committee of the Red Cross, for example, showcased a booth with thought-provoking, graffiti-style questions like 'Does AI make wars better or worse?' Even student attendees well-versed in wargaming, like Luke Miller, a rising sophomore studying international relations at the College of William and Mary and a member of a wargames club, said that today's era of AI and national security is 'supposed to be a sobering moment.' For a country like Ukraine to deploy drones to attack Russian air bases — as they did with great effect just days before the conference— 'is something we should definitely be concerned about going forward,' he said. Still, it was Schmidt's vision of the future of warfare and national security that was front and center at an event 'designed to strengthen U.S. and allied competitiveness in critical technologies.' 'Have you all had a chance to go hang out at the drone cage?' he asked the audience, pointing out the young age of many of the competitors. '[They are] beating the much bigger adults,' he said. 'This is the future. They're inventing it with or without us, that's where we should go.' This story was originally featured on