Accusations of fraud: Charges laid against against Higher Education Minister Nobuhle Nkabane
Image: Facebook/DA
The Democratic Alliance (DA) has opened a criminal case against Higher Education Minister Nobuhle Nkabane, accusing her of lying to Parliament about the appointment of ANC-linked individuals to Sector Education and Training Authority (SETA) boards.
On Tuesday morning, DA Federal Chairperson Helen Zille and DA MP Karabo Khakhau, who serves on the Parliamentary Portfolio Committee on Higher Education and Training, laid the charges at the Cape Town Central police station.
Khakhau said the charges relate to Nkabane's alleged deliberate misrepresentation of the appointment process for SETA board members, during which she claimed an 'independent' evaluation panel was responsible for the selections.
'She falsely claimed an 'independent' panel made the appointments — including a chair who confirmed he wasn't involved,' said Khakhau.
'The DA has laid criminal charges against Minister Nkabane for lying to Parliament about ANC cadre appointments. We will vote against her department's budget and other budgets led by corrupt ANC ministers.'
Khakhau accused Nkabane of facilitating 'fraudulent' appointments by misleading the Parliamentary committee, and said the so-called independent panel had included her own Chief of Staff and an ANC Youth League leader.
'Most damningly, she falsely named Advocate Terry Motau SC as the chair of this panel, a claim he has unequivocally denied in writing. He made it clear he had no knowledge of, nor participated in, the process,' she added.
In a statement, the DA said: 'This is not a case of poor judgement; it is a flagrant and deliberate attempt to deceive Parliament and the South African people. Minister Nkabane has broken the law and violated her oath of office. The DA will not stand by while ministers who lie, manipulate processes, and protect ANC cronies remain in office.'
The party said it would not support the Department of Higher Education and Training's budget while Nkabane remains in office and vowed to oppose all budgets led by ministers 'under criminal investigation for corruption or misconduct'.
Zille said the party was taking this step because of President Cyril Ramaphosa's 'inaction' in the face of corruption within the executive.
'We're here today for the simple reason that President Ramaphosa refuses to be as good as his word and act against corruption, act against criminality in our Parliament,' Zille said.
'Serious fraud and the misleading of Parliament are somehow condoned by President Ramaphosa's government. That is an enormous double standard.'
Zille described the SETA appointments as a 'blatant lie to a committee of Parliament,' and added that in previous cases, such acts were treated as both fraud and a criminal offence.
She said an investigation by Khakhau had revealed that the people responsible for selecting board members included three senior employees from the Minister's department: 'We have the Minister's Chief of Staff, we had the Chief Director for the SETAs, accountable to the Minister, and we had the Director of Corporate Services who's very close to the Minister.'
Zille also criticised the inclusion of known ANC deployees on the selection panel and said the Minister's conduct amounted to misleading Parliament.
'This matter concerns Minister Nkabane of Higher Education. She announced certain appointments to the SETA boards, which are crucially important in the higher education sector of South Africa,' Zille said.
'Far from being independent people who had come in as experts, it turns out several of them were either her employees or deployed ANC cadres from various positions. This was a blatant lie to a committee of Parliament, which is considered to be a lie to Parliament. Misleading Parliament and fraud are two criminal contraventions.'
The DA called on Ramaphosa to act swiftly and remove Nkabane from office, warning that continued inaction would implicate him in enabling corruption.
Presidency spokesperson Vincent Magwenya and Nkabane's spokesperson Camagwini Mavovana had not responded to questions. This story will be updated when they comment.
mandilakhe.tshwete@inl.co.za
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
IOL News
25 minutes ago
- IOL News
Prasa revises fare structure after public outcry
Prasa's revised fare structure aims to provide affordable rates for South African commuters, following significant pressure from trade unions and community groups. Image: Picture: David Ritchie The Passenger Rail Agency of South Africa (Prasa) has made significant changes to its fare structure in response to intense objections from trade unions, commuter groups, and civil society organisations, just before the planned fare increase. This follows days of escalating pressure, with the United Commuters Voice (UCV) announcing that the new fares will now offer more affordable rates for working-class commuters, ensuring better access to public transport. The Congress of South African Trade Unions (Cosatu) was among those that voiced concern ahead of the increase, calling for fare adjustments to be tied to inflation and warning that steep hikes would alienate commuters still reeling from the high cost of living. 'While Cosatu welcomes the huge improvements Prasa has made to its infrastructure as well as the rollout of the new trains, the federation believes the proposed ticket price hike is high and will be burdensome to commuters who are already battling to cope,' said Tony Ehrenreich, Cosatu deputy parliamentary coordinator. The federation argued that Prasa should use this period to rebuild public trust by positioning itself as the primary transport option for the working class. 'To achieve this, the federation urges Prasa to limit the fare increase to the prevailing inflation rate,' it said. The new Prasa fares that came into effect on Friday. Image: Prasa It also cautioned that a sharp increase could reinforce negative perceptions from the past when Prasa was known for mismanagement and unreliable service. Instead of driving up ticket costs, Cosatu recommended attracting more passengers to improve revenue. 'Prasa should steer clear of implementing a price increase that will change the cost structure of rail transport fees,' Cosatu said. 'While mindful of the significant investment in infrastructure, the rail agency should aim to recoup costs by swelling the number of commuters rather than relying solely on increased fare contribution.' Cosatu added that any fare increases above inflation should only be implemented after public transport subsidy policies are finalised through Nedlac. UCV, which led coordinated objections with support from commuters, labour, and community groups, confirmed that Prasa has now backed down from its initial fare plan. 'The fare increase, originally scheduled for full implementation on 1 August 2025, has now been adjusted downwards to reflect more affordable rates that take into account the financial strain on low-income commuters,' said UCV National Chairperson Paul Soto. 'We thank all stakeholders who stood in solidarity with us against the initially proposed fare hikes that were threatening affordability and access to public transport,' Soto said. 'Your voices have made it clear that decisions affecting the poor must be made in consultation with the key stakeholders.' The new structure includes lower monthly ticket increases than those originally communicated, and discounts for school children, military veterans, and senior citizens. • Monthly ticket increases have been scaled down. • Pensioners and military veterans will retain their 50% off-peak discount• Schoolchildren in full uniform will receive a 50% discount at all times. • A 40% off-peak discount remains in place for general commuters travelling between 9am and 2pm. Prasa said the updated fares had been approved by the Minister of Transport and noted that this was its first fare adjustment in 10 years. 'Despite these adjustments, rail remains South Africa's most affordable public transport mode,' Prasa stated in its official announcement. The agency confirmed that the amendments were made after identifying discrepancies in the original fare table and following feedback from commuter stakeholders. It said the changes would support improved service delivery, safety, and reliability across the Metrorail network. Both Cosatu and UCV reiterated their commitment to advocating for an affordable, safe, and reliable public transport system. Cosatu also signalled its readiness to help fast-track policy processes at Nedlac that ensure fare increases are equitable and rooted in commuters' lived realities. Get your news on the go, click here to join the Cape Argus News WhatsApp channel. Cape Argus
The South African
25 minutes ago
- The South African
Carte Blanche: Deadly deliverance- WATCH
The 03 August episode of Carte Blanche investigates shocking allegations at a Christian rehabilitation centre where staff members are facing criminal charges and a resident was allegedly beaten to death. Behind its promise of healing through scripture, former residents describe a harrowing reality marked by abuse, torture, starvation, and coercive practices, including being cable-tied and denied basic care. While the centre claimed to offer spiritual restoration, disturbing reports suggest a deeply toxic environment hidden behind closed doors. Carte Blanche is a South African investigative journalism television series that airs on M-Net every Sunday at 19:00. Its first episode aired on 21 August 1988 and over the last 34-plus years has earned credibility among South African viewers for its investigation into corruption, consumer issues, and current events. Let us know by leaving a comment below, or send a WhatsApp to 060 011 021 1. Subscribe to The South African website's newsletters and follow us on WhatsApp, Facebook, X, and Bluesky for the latest news.
The Citizen
an hour ago
- The Citizen
SA's electricity price is soaring: Why protests are often the only way for people to be heard
Electricity prices have skyrocketed over the last twenty-five years at approximately four times the rate of inflation. Millions of unemployed South Africans, many of whom survive on a Social Relief of Distress Grant government grant of R370 (about US$21) per month, are not able to pay for electricity and still afford food and shelter. In the working class community of Thembisa in South Africa's industrial heartland of Gauteng, the local government recently tried to make all families pay a fixed monthly fee of R126 (US$7) for electricity. But the residents could not afford this and in late July, occupied roads and shut down the area. Within a day, the mayor scrapped the electricity fee. Luke Sinwell, a scholar of popular history and grassroots mobilisation in South Africa, explains how protests might just be the only way for working class South Africans to make their voices heard. Is electricity affordable in South Africa? No. Electricity prices have skyrocketed over the last twenty-five years at approximately four times the rate of inflation. It is also crucial to view electricity prices in a socio-economic context. For example, the cost of electricity needs to be assessed relative to the disposable income of the household buying it. Low-income families spend up to twenty percent of their household income on energy, making electricity very unaffordable. ALSO READ: Thembisa protest raises risk of national unrest About half of all South African households (approximately 15 million people) don't have nearly enough food to eat. This means that the heads of impoverished or working class households (mostly women of Colour) are forced to decide between putting ideally nutritious food on the table and lighting their houses at night. They're forced to choose between using energy for heating to keep warm during winter or ensuring that their limited fresh food supplies stay cold so that they do not spoil. I'm part of a group of researchers who use the term energy racism to describe the systemic oppression that prevents Black working class people from accessing the electricity they need to survive and prosper. South Africans have been protesting for decades about high electricity prices. Why hasn't the problem been solved? There are weaknesses in South Africa's democratic process. Municipalities (local government) responses to the concerns and demands of communities tend to be shortsighted and inadequate. Currently, the major political parties in South Africa focus mainly on obtaining consensus at the polls through elections every five years. The South African president, Cyril Ramaphosa, is overseeing a 'National Dialogue' which he claims will allow the voices of ordinary people to be heard in the corridors of power. It's been designed to appear as an inclusive and democratic process. However, based on my previous research, I believe that hidden beneath the surface, government has largely already decided the agenda and a set of policies that the dialogue will recommend. The South African government is continuing to rely on market-oriented, neoliberal policies which serve profit at the expense of the working class. READ MORE: Experts warn of unintended consequences of giving in to Thembisa demands This guarantees that electricity prices will remain extremely high. It also means that the government will continue to lack interest in proactively engaging those very communities about the cost of electricity. It is useful to remember what happened in September 2011 in Thembisa. About 2 000 residents went to the streets to protest against electricity cuts. Schools were closed, at least 100 residents arrested for public violence, and rubber bullets fired at protestors by police. When the residents of Thembisa shut down their area again recently, the mayor, undoubtedly aware of this history, wanted to avoid a similar situation. This gave residents an advantage – they were aware that protests would jolt the authorities into a favourable response. This means that when local government does not take the initiative to discuss important matters like the price of electricity with residents, communities will inevitably create their own formations through which to mobilise and influence local politics and beyond. How effective are protests against high prices of basic services? Protests are often an immediate response to desperate communities faced with an acute economic crisis. The recent protest in Thembisa is also part of a broader trend of protests and collective action around the lack of electricity in townships and informal settlements in other parts of Gauteng. For example, my research over six years in the informal settlement of Thembelihle in the south west of Johannesburg, found that people burned to death in their shacks because local government had failed to provide electricity. Residents had no alternative but to rely on imbawula (a homemade brazier). This was coal and wood in an oven or tin connected to a makeshift pipe to let smoke out. Many shacks caught fire as a result. They negotiated with authorities for more than 10 years. READ MORE: Traffic delays after residents shut down Thembisa over electricity tariff hike [VIDEO] Still, Thembelihle residents had no effective way to access the levers of decision-making authority which could electrify their homes. So they accessed power on their own terms, forcing authorities to the negotiating table using protest. Following a three-week occupation in 2015, the government conceded to the basic demands to formally electrify a relatively small piece of land where they lived. A sizeable amount of R323 million would electrify 7000 homes. The politics of a community struggle which had once been criminalised and excluded from the halls of power was now enshrined in policy. What does the recent Thembisa electricity price protest tell us? It demonstrates that the most effective way for people to get the government to implement pro-poor decisions is not by voting or attending national dialogues hosted by presidents and parliamentarians. It is by organising in communities and engaging in mass actions which force those in power to concede to the people's demands. The recent protest also tells us that impoverished and working class residents cannot and should not be forced to pay more than they can afford for basic services. READ MORE: Land invaders erecting shacks dispersed with rubber bullets and stun grenades near Makhanda The municipality held Integrated Development Plan and budget meetings with residents a few months before the protests where they revealed the new electricity prices. But these meetings did not seem to acknowledge that the people of Thembisa could not afford to pay. The mayoral decision to suspend the new electricity charges in Thembisa demonstrates that when basic services fail communities, protests work. They also just might be the only reliable means by which ordinary people can access the levers of government policy. This article was republished from The Conversation under a Creative Commons license. Read the original article here.
