Police left in 'hopeless position' after High Court vetting ruling, Met commissioner warns
The court ruled against the force in what has been described as a "test case" that will have major implications for the sacking of police officers accused of misconduct.
It was decided the force was wrong to remove the vetting of Sergeant Lino Di Maria, who had faced rape allegations.
Supported by the Metropolitan Police Federation, he brought a legal challenge claiming the process was unlawful.
On Tuesday, the High Court ruled the vetting clearance decision regarding Mr Di Maria be "quashed and reconsidered".
This means the UK's police forces cannot dismiss officers by removing their vetting after the High Court ruling.
This had been a key part of the Met's efforts to clean up the force after scandals like the murder of Sarah Everard.
Concerns have been raised that the ruling "opens the gates" to police officers "accused of horrific crimes", like rape and violence against women, remaining as officers.
'Hopeless position'
Sir Mark warned the ruling left policing in a "hopeless position" and said he would seek leave to appeal it.
He added: "We have no mechanism to rid the Met of officers who are not fit to hold vetting.
"It is absolutely absurd we cannot sack them."
Sky News correspondent Matthew Thompson described it as a "potentially seismic" case.
In the ruling, Mrs Justice Lang explained the decision, saying she did not believe the Met Police's powers extended to dismissing officers "by reason of withdrawal of vetting clearance".
She said an "anomaly" existed in the system that should be resolved by new government regulations.
Existing procedures she added were not "fit for purpose".
In his statement, Sir Mark repeated his calls for the government to introduce the new regulations with "extreme urgency", saying the judge had "identified a clear gap in the law".
A spokesperson for the Home Office said the government was working "rapidly" to introduce "new, strengthened rules that will help forces dismiss officers who cannot maintain vetting clearance."
London Mayor Sir Sadiq Khan said he was "really disappointed" by the ruling.
Operation Assure
The Met Police began reviewing the status of officers who were alleged to have committed sexually violent crimes under a system it called Operation Assure.
Assure was put in place after the Met suffered a series of scandals, including the murder of Sarah Everard by Wayne Couzens, to try and clean up the police.
Some were removed after the emergence of serious accusations, including one officer who is alleged to have tried to form a relationship with a 13-year-old girl in the US, though authorities were unable to prove this.
In some cases, officers had their vetting clearance removed and were dismissed from the force, without proving whether the allegations against them were true.
But the latest court ruling is a blow to the force's clean-up efforts.
Sir Mark said there were currently 29 officers who have had their vetting removed who remain on paid leave, and 96 who have been sacked or resigned under the clean-up efforts.
Around 100 were in the early stages of vetting reviews, he added.
Allegations against Mr Di Maria
Mr Di Maria will remain on vetting special leave Sir Mark said, describing it as a "ridiculous waste of money" but the "least bad option".
He joined the force in 2004, Mrs Justice Lang said, and was accused of rape in 2019, with a second allegation made in 2021.
In the same year, it was alleged he had also been inappropriate towards female colleagues.
Mr Di Maria had denied the allegations against him.
Due to insufficient evidence, he was found to have no case to answer regarding the rape allegations.
In a meeting in 2022, no action was taken against him, but some matters were recorded as "adverse information" the judge said.
His vetting was removed in September 2023 and his initial appeal against this was refused last year.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Scottish Sun
2 hours ago
- Scottish Sun
Teen killer who stabbed Brit mum to death has sentence REDUCED as heartbroken widower asks ‘how much is a life worth?'
A TEEN killer who stabbed a Brit mum to death will be released from prison more than one year early - sparking further heartbreak for the victim's family. Expat Emma Lovell, 41, was killed by a knife-wielding 17-year-old outside her home in Brisbane, Australia, on Boxing Day in 2022. 7 Emma Lovell was killed in 2022 during a home invasion 7 Emma and her husband Lee were stabbed during the attack Credit: SWNS Advertisement 7 Her widower has spoken out after the 'devastating' news Credit: 9News Her heartbroken widower Lee was left "devastated" by the news, saying that the initial sentence was insufficient to begin with. The teen previously pleaded guilty to stabbing Emma in the heart and her husband, Lee, in the back during the home invasion at North Lakes. The youngster, who cannot be named, was sentenced to 14 years in prison, the maximum sentence. Advertisement At the time, children found guilty of murder could only be sentenced to 10 years behind bars - unless the court deemed the crime especially heinous. But in December 2024, new Premier David Crisafulli brought in 'Adult Crime, Adult Time' laws, setting a minimum 20-year non-parole term. These new rules do not apply to old cases, and so an appeal made by the teen was heard under the old law. His lawyers argued the judge made mistakes, ignored his personal circumstances, and gave a sentence that was 'manifestly excessive'. Advertisement The state's new Attorney-General, Deb Frecklington, is now weighing up whether to make an appeal to the High Court. Emma's husband told Courier Mail: "I don't know what to say, I'm shocked that they can put more of a value to someone's freedom than someone's life. "I just don't feel justice has been served one bit for what happened to Emma." Husband hits out as teen burglar cleared of Brit wife Emma Lovell's Boxing Day murder & says 'we have a life sentence He added: "Seems like all you are doing now is saying to people to commit an offence and not much will happen. Lovell explained that he hoped the new laws would help to counter the state's youth crime wave. Advertisement He accused the justice system of "not doing its job", adding that the teen's appeal should have increased his sentence instead of decreasing it. Meanwhile the Attorney-General said the decision was "an unacceptable outcome". In 2024, chilling CCTV revealed the moment the two teen burglars broke into Emma's home before she was stabbed to death. Footage released by the Supreme Court of Queensland showed the first moments of the horror break-in, with one of the thugs testing the front door before signaling to his accomplice with a thumbs-up gesture. Emma and husband Lee were awakened by their dogs barking at around 11.30pm. Advertisement Confronting the intruders at their door, a physical struggle ensued outside, before the confrontation moved to the front lawn. 7 Lee was stabbed in the back during the attack but survived Credit: Facebook 7 Horror footage showed the moment the two teens broke into the property Credit: Supreme Court of Queensland During the fight, Lee was stabbed, and Emma knifed in her chest. In the footage audio, harrowing threats were also captured. Advertisement The phrase "I'll kill you" and the word "stop" were heard multiple times, as both Emma and Lee fought for their lives. According to court testimony, the defence claimed that the second teen was the one yelling "stop" during the incident, but the evidence painted a chilling picture of a violent attack. The main attacker who delivered the fatal blow admitted to the murder and received the 14-year prison sentence. The second teen was acquitted of murder and instead found guilty of burglary and assault causing bodily harm in company during a judge-only trial in October. Emma and Lee, originally from Ipswich, relocated to Australia in 2011 after first visiting the country in 2002. Advertisement The dad-of-two shared that his daughters' lives would never be the same and revealed he is now contemplating moving his family back to the UK. He previously said: "I feel like Boxing Day 2022 was like a sliding door moment for us. "Our life should have been going in one direction, and yet, here I am, because of the actions of you and your co-offender taking away my family's right to expect peace, security, and safety within our family home. "Now I am forced to play a role: the role of a grieving husband, a victim of assault, and a father, trying to make his family feel safe in our home again." 7 Lee previously speaking to reporters during the sentencing Credit: Alamy Advertisement
BBC News
2 hours ago
- BBC News
Murder arrest after woman found dead in Bethnal Green
A man has been arrested on suspicion of murder after a 73-year-old woman was found dead inside a property in east services were called to an address in Russia Lane in Bethnal Green at 21:00 BST on woman was found with a serious head injury and pronounced dead at the scene. The Met Police said a 45-year-old man, who was known to the victim, had been arrested and remains in custody. The force added that the woman's next-of-kin had been informed and were being supported by specialist Ch Supt Brittany Clarke, who leads the Central East Command Unit, said: "Our team of officers and forensic specialists are working at pace to establish the full circumstances that led to this woman's tragic death."This is believed to be an isolated incident, with no wider risk to the general public. However, residents can expect to see an increased police presence in the area over the coming days."
The Courier
2 hours ago
- The Courier
Shamed Fife architect jailed for attempted rape and abuse
A shamed architect who attempted to rape a woman in Fife during a catalogue of abuse has been jailed. David Dow, 53, is now subject to the sex offenders register for life, having been convicted of the offences last month. He denied abusing against the woman in a period spanning seven years. A jury at the High Court in Dundee rejected his version of events and found him guilty of six separate charges. Judge Gillian Wade KC said in sentencing: 'There was a significant degree of victim-blaming and no remorse. 'You have essentially maintained your position of denial. 'I have been provided with a victim impact statement which details the profound and lasting effect of your offending.' Some supporters of Dow, of Ceres, wept as the prison sentence was imposed on the offender, who viewed proceedings via video link from HMP Perth. Dow was convicted of shouting, swearing, acting abusively towards the woman, accusing her of infidelity and persistently accompanying her. The controlling abuser followed her around a property, accessed her emails and social media profiles. Jurors heard how he sent intimate messages and images of the woman to others, pretending they were sent by her. First offender Dow, director of Lucas Dow Design Studios Ltd, also punched and wrote on the walls of a property. He sexually assaulted the woman during the same time period and made abusive remarks. At times when she was asleep, Dow sexually assaulted her in an attempt to rape her. Another woman was also sent an image of 'nudity and bondage' between in 2019 by Dow, who was also convicted of making derogatory remarks about a child The first woman was also struck with a remote and had a pint glass thrown at her by Dow and suffered injury as a result. Defence counsel David Moggach KC produced a letter of support from Dow's family as well as a letter confirming his diagnosis of attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD). 'It's perhaps helpful in that it maybe explains some of his behaviour. 'I am not seeking to excuse it. There is an acceptance that he has to change. The advocate said Dow was prone to 'explosive' outbursts while feeling 'pressure'. Judge Wade sentenced Dow to seven years in prison and placed him on the sex offenders register for an indefinite period. A lifelong non-harassment order was also imposed. In October 2024, Dow was struck-off after being found guilty by the Architects Registration Board (ARB) of 'unacceptable professional conduct' over a botched house extension. Steel beams were incorrectly fitted with the house described as looking 'unsafe'. Dow was described as showing a 'persistent lack of insight' and 'sought to blame others' for the failings, as well as claiming complaints were made for 'malicious reasons'.
