Former policeman John Dewar revealed as Hamilton businessman convicted of theft, fraud charges
When he left the force in 1999, after 25 years, Dewar was given a $250,000-plus payout despite being investigated for over-claiming on travel expenses.
But in 2004, it emerged that he had been involved in covering up Nicholas' allegations against the officers.
The sentencing judge, Justice Rodney Hansen, said the aggravating features of Dewar's crime were overwhelming.
It had harmed Nicholas psychologically and financially, and had also damaged the reputation of several institutions.
'The cash cheques, weedkiller, and Hush Puppies shoes'
Now, Dewar has been back before the courts, spending eight days defending theft and obtaining by deception charges.
Dewar was on trial for three charges, each of theft by a person in a special relationship and of obtaining by deception, between 2015 and 2018.
The charges relate to his time as a chief executive of a company from which he stole about $111,000 to help pay off a personal loan and to buy weed killer, a spray unit, a toastie machine maker, and Hush Puppies shoes.
Part of his defence was that he was never told not to act in the way he did.
The jury began their deliberations at 4.40pm yesterday before returning with their verdicts at 4.25pm today.
Dewar was convicted and remanded on bail for sentencing in June.
'They didn't tell me not to do it'
In his closing to the jury, Dewar admitted he'd 'struggled' having to represent himself in the proceedings.
'I probably should have gotten a lawyer,' he said.
Throughout his closing, he admitted there was a 'blurring of lines', that his management of the company was 'chaotic' and 'inept'.
He said he was simply doing a 'good deed' for a finance broker who he'd offered to go 50-50 on fees as he was going 'through a hard time'.
Advertise with NZME.
'All I did was try to help [the broker] through a hard time by putting some work his way ... but it's not a crime.
'I helped him out because he was having trouble surviving ... and maybe that was a bad call from me, but I didn't obtain anything [fraudulently].
'I obtained nothing whatsoever.'
After listening to the witnesses – comprising board members, a staff member, and the finance broker – he accepted that it appeared as though he ran the company 'in an autocratic style'.
Dewar said the board never said he couldn't act in the way that he did and admitted making the purchases and cashing cheques.
'I am disappointed in myself that I let them down and didn't do a good job.
'That makes me a bad manager, but it does not make me guilty of these charges.'
He said he made all the purchases, including the weedeater and Hush Puppies shoes, but he never made any false representations.
He cited a former staff member's evidence, who confirmed that he did all the cleaning and maintenance.
'I cleaned the toilet and vacuumed.'
As for the cash cheques, Dewar said it was 'pretty obvious' he couldn't confirm where the money ended up.
'It doesn't look so good, but you heard the evidence of [a staffer] where the payments of cash and cheques being made to brokers and [others].
'I ran [the company] like it was my baby.'
'They're basic duties of a CEO'
But Crown solicitor Tom Sutcliffe said there 'clearly was' an expectation by the company's board of directors that their company would be run 'in an ethical way with best practice in mind'.
A board of director, in his evidence, earlier read out an excerpt from Dewar's employment contract to the jury stating that the employee shall comply with reasonable and lawful instructions.
The board expected the company to be run 'ethically, responsibly, and lawfully, and complying with the requirements of the industry'.
'For a man of [Dewar's] experience, you could not have expected them to think anything else,' Sutcliffe said.
Sutcliffe said the allegations were things that they wouldn't expect a CEO to do, and if he did, he should have kept a record of where the money went.
Advertisement Advertise with NZME.
'These are basic duties of the CEO of a finance company.'
The Crown didn't need to prove that the defendant benefited from money allegedly taken; it was simply the fact that he took it.
'[The board] should have been able to look at the ledger, and it should have told them where the money had gone.'
As for his defence that he was never told not to act in that way, Sutcliffe said: 'Why would you have to spell that out for a CEO of a company?'
As for the obtain by deception charges, relating to Dewar allegedly giving himself a benefit by cashing the $600 broker fee cheques, the board knew nothing of his deal with the finance broker.
'It was quite deliberate and intentional.'
The defendant would have known that using company money to put towards his own loan was a conflict of interest, Sutcliffe submitted.
'You just can't treat it like your own revolving credit facility.
'[Dewar] can't claim ignorance, he's an experienced operator and made conscious decisions to operate like that,' Sutcliffe alleged.
Paying company funds against his own loan 'beggars belief quite frankly', he said.
As for the Hush Puppies shoes and care kit, the defendant suggested they were 'safety boots'.
'How could Hush Puppies be a business expense for a finance company?' Sutcliffe said.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Otago Daily Times
02-06-2025
- Otago Daily Times
Man who killed German backpacker eligible for parole
It has been almost 20 years since a young German backpacker was murdered in a picnic area of a national park. The death of Birgit Brauer, whose body was found in Lucy's Gully, near Ōakura, southwest of New Plymouth, shocked two nations and led to an 18-day manhunt for her killer, Michael Scott Wallace. Wallace, then a 44-year-old drug-taking transient with an extensive criminal history, went on to deny the murder but was found guilty by a jury. He was sentenced in 2007 to life imprisonment with a non-parole period of 18 years. This month, he became eligible for parole and, despite the time that has passed, the 63-year-old is still refusing to admit to killing Brauer. Wallace made his first appearance before the Parole Board on May 14, at which he sought parole but was denied. The panel determined he had "a long way ahead to go" before he could be released. Wallace did not have an approved address at which he could reside if paroled, nor did he have a release proposal. The board's decision, released to NZME this week, stated Wallace has not been motivated to complete recommended treatments and was considered to still be in the rehabilitative phase of his sentence. It was also noted that he would undergo a formal assessment of psychopathy. Wallace recently refused to discuss his criminal history with a psychologist, and while the decision stated he had at some point claimed he could not remember the murder, he told the board that was no longer his stance. "He now says that he did not commit the offending," according to the decision, which was the position he took at trial. The fatal hitchhiking trip On September 20, 2005, Brauer and Wallace's paths fatally crossed in the tiny town of Waitōtara. There, she was picked up hitchhiking by Wallace as she travelled between Whanganui and New Plymouth. He drove her to Lucy's Gully in Te Papa-Kura-o-Taranaki, formerly known as Egmont National Park, and bludgeoned her with a metal bar before unbuttoning her jeans, likely with sexual intent. When Wallace was disturbed by a passing vehicle, he dragged Brauer into the bush and stabbed her in the chest. Her body was later found by a jogger. Wallace disposed of evidence and eventually made his way to the Manawatū area, where, almost three weeks later, he was arrested. He told police at the time that he did not want to hurt people, but he had, and he would be better off if police had shot him. Meanwhile, Brauer's body was returned to Germany. She was described by those who knew her as reserved yet open, honest and friendly. Brauer knew how to enjoy herself; she had a good sense of humour and was sometimes cheeky. She was drawn to New Zealand by a love of nature and geography and soon became a keen All Blacks fan. Brauer loved New Zealanders' down-to-earth attitude and believed she was safe hitchhiking. At Wallace's sentencing, Brauer's parents told the court that the events of 2005 would never leave them. "To this day, we cannot believe Birgit is not with us. A criminal like him does not deserve to live," they said in their victim impact statement. The unforgettable case A former top Taranaki detective said he wasn't surprised Wallace still denied killing the 28-year-old tourist, who had been on a working holiday in New Zealand when she was murdered. Grant Coward became a household name when he led the high-profile investigation into the murder, during which he made a "we will catch you" promise to the killer. Speaking to NZME this week, Coward, who received the Commissioner of Police's Silver Merit Award in 2008 for his role in the inquiry, recalled the murder as being callous and cold-blooded. Now retired, Coward said the case had been "a real whodunit", and it was a team effort to track Wallace and help bring him to justice. "It took longer than normal, but we got there in the end." He said it was difficult to know if, or when, Wallace should be released. But, he believed that if Wallace was not rehabilitative or admitting fault, he should have an extended period of imprisonment. Coward said he had not maintained contact with Brauer's family, but she would be in his thoughts forever. "I reflect on the cases that I've worked on, and she's right up there as someone who you remember, because of what happened." Brauer was also someone Caryl Blomkvist remembered from time to time. She and her husband, Fritz Blomkvist, hosted Brauer at their Whanganui farm in the final two weeks of her life, as part of the World Wide Opportunities on Organic Farms. When Brauer left, the Blomkvists dropped her off at the edge of Whanganui so she could begin her hitchhiking journey, but not without a warning. "We told her she shouldn't hitchhike," Blomkvist recalled when speaking to NZME this week. "Then a cop came and banged on our door at 11pm that night. We were pretty shocked." Blomkvist said Brauer's death was a traumatic time for everyone who knew her. "We still think about her," she said, describing Brauer as pleasant and hardworking. "She was no trouble. She spent her time quietly doing what we expected of her, very well. And she enjoyed reading her books and writing. "She wasn't living a party life at all; she liked the quiet life and enjoyed being on the farm." Blomkvist remained in contact with Brauer's mother, whom she said was a strong woman. Brauer's father has since died. Blomkvist preferred not to comment on Wallace, only to say that what he did to Brauer was undeserved. She said that she and her husband do not support him ever being released on parole. The unmotivated prisoner After Wallace's conviction for murder, it was revealed he had an extensive criminal history dating back to dishonesty offending in 1976, as well as arson and violence. In particular, he twice raped a woman in 1983, after attacking her husband and locking him in a closet. He served a five-year sentence of imprisonment for the home invasion and sex attack before later committing armed robbery and being sent back to prison. According to the recent parole decision, Wallace acknowledged at the hearing that he was guilty of his other crimes. "It would be useful to understand from him why he thinks he committed that offending, even if he continues to deny the index murder offence," the board's decision stated. While Wallace, who has not had any misconducts during his current sentence, was initially reluctant to speak with a psychologist in April for a risk assessment, he did, but refused to discuss his offending. The psychologist's report detailed a long history of alcohol and drug use and referred to a formal assessment of psychopathy to be conducted. Wallace, who has reimmersed himself in Te Ao Māori while in prison, has completed sessions with a one-to-one departmental psychologist, and a special treatment unit for high-risk violent offenders has been suggested. But there were impediments to Wallace entering such treatment, including his denial of the murder and his belief that he would not work well in a group setting. In the meantime, he will continue to undergo one-to-one treatment. The board found it was important Wallace also complete a drug treatment programme, despite not being motivated to do so. "Overall, Mr Wallace is still considered to be in the rehabilitative phase of his sentence, and therefore rehabilitation must be a priority." An updated psychological risk assessment was ordered before his next parole hearing, scheduled for next year. "So that the assessment is useful, we encourage Mr Wallace to discuss his offending history with the psychologist." - Tara Shaskey, Open Justice reporter
NZ Herald
28-05-2025
- NZ Herald
Whakatāne homicide: Women accused of killing 8-year-old Rickah'Shae Keefe-Haerewa face additional charges
She's now also charged with ill-treatment of a child and two charges of assault with a weapon, which she denies. The charge notice alleges she used a cord, and a pole or stick, as weapons. Timu faces six charges relating to Rickah'Shae – including manslaughter and two charges of assaulting a child, which she previously pleaded not guilty to. Pauline Timu (left) and Maya Hati, pictured at earlier appearances, face charges of violence, and the ill-treatment of a child. Composite image / Hannah Bartlett She's now also charged with ill-treatment of a child, and two charges of assault with a weapon, which she denies. She too is alleged to have used a cord, and a pole or stick, as weapons. Hati now faces three charges related to a further child, added to the same charge notice as the Rickah'Shae charges. They are assault of a child, assault with a weapon, and ill-treatment of a child. Timu also faces the same three charges, against the same child. An investigation into Rickah'Shae's death began after police were called to Whakatāne Hospital in November last year, after the child died following an alleged assault. A scene examination was carried out at a property in the small town of Te Teko. Rickah'Shae Keefe-Haerewa, also known as Joppy. Hati was charged first over Rickah'Shae's death, with Timu's charges following. Family members posted tributes to the young boy, who also went by the nickname Joppy, online. 'Mummy and Daddy love you. Forever 8 my son.' At earlier court appearances, supporters of Rickah'Shae wore 'Forever 8″ hoodies and T-shirts to the proceedings. At Hati's previous appearance in Tauranga, emotions ran high for both families; as Hati's family expressed their love and support for her as she left the dock, a single voice from the boy's family was heard to allege, 'You killed my baby'. Supporters for Hati, Timu and Rickah'Shae, were present in court on Wednesday. Hannah Bartlett is a Tauranga-based Open Justice reporter at NZME. She previously covered court and local government for the Nelson Mail, and before that was a radio reporter at Newstalk ZB.
NZ Herald
25-05-2025
- NZ Herald
Tenant pretended to be landlord, taking almost $800 week from couple
The new tenant told the tribunal he had paid $780 per week to Spriggs-Admore, believing she was the landlord. He noted Spriggs-Admore had introduced herself as the property owner and failed to provide a tenancy agreement. He told the tribunal when he moved in with two of his children Spriggs-Admore's belongings had been removed from the house. A few weeks later his partner moved in with her child and six dogs. She paid half the rent to her partner, who would forward the funds to Spriggs-Admore. His partner told the tribunal she had no idea who the landlord was until Spriggs-Admore turned up one day and introduced herself as the landlord. She said that when she requested a tenancy agreement, she was told it would be provided 'later' but never eventuated. The woman also told the tribunal about an experience where a gang member turned up one night demanding rent from her and her partner. The real landlord did not discover until February 2025 that Spriggs-Admore had moved out and had been subletting the property. They then filed to the tribunal for rent arrears and termination of tenancy. Spriggs-Admore filed her own application seeking a full refund of rent, claiming the property was unlawful and the landlord had breached her quiet enjoyment. Her basis for her claim was the address of the property did not exist because an internet company could not connect the fibre connection. The tribunal hearing held in April reportedly got so heated, court security staff were called, and tribunal adjudicator Mark Manhire was critical of Spriggs-Admore's claims. 'It is incumbent on a tenant to bring claims to the tribunal promptly. Not to wait – and then package all complaints up with a shopping list of details. 'I found the state of the tenant's evidence frankly hard to follow and all over the place. There was a voluminous amount of it, and little attempt on the part of the tenant to properly organise it. It was not chronologically sequenced and bounced around. 'A significant portion of her evidence was also filed moments prior to today's hearing. It is my view that the tenant must bear ultimate responsibility for the events leading up to today's hearing. It is the tenant who decided take action and move out of the premises in December last year without consulting with the landlord.' The adjudicator ordered immediate possession be granted to the real landlord, the sub-tenants who were still living at the address vacate the property and $3870 be paid by Spriggs-Admore in rent arrears. Shannon Pitman is a Whangārei-based reporter for Open Justice covering courts in the Te Tai Tokerau region. She is of Ngāpuhi/ Ngāti Pūkenga descent and has worked in digital media for the past five years. She joined NZME in 2023.
