Indonesia becomes first in Southeast Asia to deploy short-range ballistic missile system
Pictures of the KHAN missile, produced by Turkish manufacturer Roketsan, surfaced on the Sahabat Keris Facebook page last Friday (Aug 1) and have been widely reported by defence blogs, as well as Indonesian news portal Kompas.
Photos of the missile on a launcher were reportedly taken at the Indonesian Army's Raipur A facility in East Kalimantan.
The 7.1m missile has a diameter of 610mm and a range of up to 280km, according to Roketsan's website. It weighs 2,500kg and is armed with a 470kg high-explosive warhead.
It has an accuracy of sub-10m circular error probability, providing 'accurate and effective fire power on strategic targets in the battlefield', according to Roketsan.
Potential targets include artillery and air defence systems, radar sites and logistics facilities.
The range of the KHAN missiles extends Indonesia's strike radius into disputed maritime corridors, noted news site Defence Security Asia.
While Indonesia is not a claimant of the South China Sea, China's 'nine-dash line' claiming most of the waterway overlaps with Indonesia's exclusive economic zone (EEZ) near the oil- and gas-rich Natuna Islands.
Indonesia placed its KHAN missile order in November 2022 and is the first military force outside of Turkiye to have the missile in its inventory, Roketsan's deputy general manager Murat Kurtulus reportedly said at the time.
CNA has sent queries to the Indonesian military on how many KHAN missiles it acquired and where it is deploying them.
Southeast Asia's largest economy has been looking to modernise its ageing military hardware as well as diversify its defence suppliers in recent years.
In 2022, Indonesia purchased 42 Rafale jets from France for US$8.1 billion.
China has also reportedly offered to sell its J-10 fighter jets to Jakarta.
Indonesia has enhanced cooperation with Turkish defence manufacturers in recent months.
In June at the Indo Defence 2025 exhibition, it signed two contracts with Roketsan – one for the procurement of the ATMACA Anti-Ship Missile and the ATMACA Weapon System, and the second for a planned joint venture agreement to develop local capabilities in Indonesia for the 'assembly, domestic production, and sustainability of missile technologies', announced Roketsan.
Last month, Indonesia signed a contract to buy 48 KAAN fighter jets from Türkiye. The stealth twin-engine fighter, developed by the state-owned Turkish Aerospace Industries, is set to enter production soon with deliveries to the Turkish Air Force expected by 2028 or 2029.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Independent Singapore
5 hours ago
- Independent Singapore
Small states, big ideas: Singapore takes the lead in Estonia's Asian tech and startup expansion
SINGAPORE: Touching down in Singapore during the COVID-19 pandemic, it wasn't the easiest time to start a new job for Priit Turk. But he had a clear goal: establish Singapore as the link between his tiny Baltic country and the rest of the region, and open Estonia's first and only embassy in Southeast Asia. 'I didn't know much about Asia or Singapore before coming,' Ambassador Turk says with a smile. 'But very quickly, I saw how much we had in common—both small, ambitious countries that punch above our weight.' Four years on, as he wraps up his tenure in Singapore, Turk's legacy is more than diplomatic protocol. It's a story of how two small nations, both gateways to their respective regions, have found common ground in tech, innovation, and how they view the world A nation that lives online Estonia, with 1.3 million people, could be the most advanced digital society anywhere. The birthplace of Skype, people can vote online. And with a few clicks? They've gotten right into the meat of government services. 'Estonia has always believed that size shouldn't limit ambition,' Turk explained. 'And Singapore understands that. You've done the same with your Smart Nation vision.' A major chunk of Singapore-Estonia cooperation is motivated by their mutual belief that tech is the tool to address different problems. This ranges from cybersecurity and e-governance to startup assistance and education. Going beyond tech Although the digital side of things has received a lot of attention, Turk points out that traditional sectors are also being considered. Singaporean investors are drawn to Estonia's green energy industry. This includes electronics manufacturing, wind farms, and hydrogen technologies. He also cites the Estonian business Horizon Pulp & Paper, associated with Singapore's Tolaram Group, as an illustration of how business relationships can coexist peacefully with tech alliances. 'It's not just about digital services. There's a lot of potential in areas like maritime engineering, renewable energy, and precision manufacturing,' he said. Baltic hub, global ideas One of Turk's proudest projects? The Estonian Business Hub in Singapore, rooted right in the financial district. Since its launch, it has become a landing pad for Estonian startups eyeing Southeast Asia. 'Singapore is where our companies come when they look to Asia. The support here—from government agencies to tech partners—is world-class,' says Turk. With events like SWITCH and Singapore Maritime Week, the Hub's helped Estonian companies in health tech, maritime innovation, and even defence tech connect with local partners. As Turk explains: 'We don't just network—we've seen actual business deals signed right here'. See also Additional Registration Fee is punishment meted out to bike owners A European business from your laptop? Perhaps Estonia's best-known innovation is its e-Residency program. It's distinct appeal? It lets entrepreneurs anywhere in the world launch and run a European Union (EU) business entirely online. 'For a Singaporean startup, this means you can start doing business in Europe without even leaving home,' Turk explained. Some Singaporean entrepreneurs have already used it, but Turk believes many more could benefit. 'It's a real gateway. And our taxes are lower than most other EU countries,' he added with a chuckle. It's an appealing proposition for Singapore's small businesses. Turk says many are eyeing Europe. But they're cautious about the cost and complexity of entry, something the e-Residency addresses. The human connection What makes the relationship between the two countries so strong, Turk says, isn't just about tech or trade—it's about people. 'When our researchers, entrepreneurs, or government officials come here, they feel it immediately. There's a kind of click—same values, same work ethic, same drive to innovate.' It goes both ways. Singaporean nomads in Estonia discover a country that's warm, friendly, modern, and perhaps even a kindred spirit. Though the icy winters are a distinct difference. 'Yes, our climates are completely different,' Turk laughed, 'but somehow, we understand each other.' Learning from each other Estonia's innovation lab, Accelerate Estonia , works with startups to identify and fix outdated rules that slow innovation. According to Turk, it's not so different from Singapore's own Pro-Enterprise Panel, but it is designed for rapid change. 'The real secret sauce is flexibility,' he said. 'Technology changes fast. Governments need to keep up—and Estonia and Singapore are both doing that.' Turk also sees potential for closer ties between universities. While Estonia's institutions are too small to open campuses in Singapore, they've already partnered with NUS and NTU on research projects. 'Singapore is already a global education hub. We see a lot of potential for more joint research, student exchange, and innovation transfer.' Turk also believes that connecting universities with industry —something Singapore's done with government agencies like A*STAR—can turn academic research into commercially viable realities. A warm goodbye As he leaves Singapore, Turk reflects on what he's built. 'This has been one of the most meaningful postings of my career. I've seen how much can be achieved when two small countries believe in each other.' For him, it's a partnership that's about more than geography. 'We may be far apart on the map, but in mindset and ambition, Estonia and Singapore are very close.'
CNA
17 hours ago
- CNA
I made an investment mistake. How do I recover from it?
Have you ever made an investing mistake, one that you really regretted? One of my earliest and most painful investing lessons was when I bought into SingPost in 2015. I thought the company had solid fundamentals and growth potential, based on what my broker told me. He urged me to buy, saying it was such a no-brainer move that he had already persuaded his parents to invest in it as well. At around S$2 (US$1.55) a share, he made it sound like a steal. But shortly afterwards, the stock kept sliding. Today, it's worth around S$0.60, which is a staggering 70 per cent loss from when I first bought into it. Maybe you've been in the same boat as me. Perhaps you didn't act decisively enough in the recent market crash, and you're kicking yourself now when you see stocks fly and the indexes hitting new all-time highs. Or maybe you bought into a stock that tanked overnight or went all-in on a cryptocurrency project that collapsed overnight. Now you're staring at the red numbers in your portfolio, wondering what went wrong and asking yourself: "How do I bounce back from this?" LEARNING FROM INVESTMENT LOSSES The sinking feeling of sadness, frustration and despair when you lose money can be traumatising, but here's the truth you need to hear: no investor, no matter how experienced, has a 100 per cent win rate anyway. We've all made mistakes. When it comes to investing, those mistakes can be particularly painful, not just because it is our money on the line. Making the wrong investment choices can also hurt our confidence and make us question our beliefs in our own decision-making. Just ask the 700 investors who bought into a bogus cryptocurrency mining investment here, or the 947 investors who fell for the fraudulent nickel investment scheme – including venture capitalists and private bankers. But what matters from here is not harping on the mistake; instead, it is what you do next. With my SingPost experience, I took great pains to ask myself: "What is the lesson to be learnt here?" Reflecting deeply on this question, I realised that I had put too much trust in "stock tips" from professionals and failed to do my own in-depth research and analysis before I made a decision. I learnt that I had to pay more attention to competitors in the same space, because SingPost clearly was no match for them. I also realised that just because someone is licensed as a professional, doesn't mean that they can't get it wrong sometimes. The lessons I learnt from this mistake, as well as others I've made over the years, have helped me to become a better investor over time. STOP LIVING IN THE PAST In the aftermath of an investment gone wrong, it's tempting to slip into a downward spiral of regret and beat ourselves up for losing money. In trying to make sense of things, we can end up obsessing over all the "what ifs". We think over and over: "Why did I trust that advice? Why didn't I exit sooner? How could I be so foolish?" But hindsight is always 20-20. There's no point in always looking in the rear view mirror – we have to focus on the road ahead in order to keep moving forward. Our success will depend on our ability to invest for the future, while adapting and charting a new course of action whenever a failure occurs. That's why the far more productive approach is to extract the lessons from the losses. What does it reveal about ourselves as investors? Does it reveal biases and assumptions we didn't know we had, for instance? Does it show any gaps in our thinking and reasoning? In the wake of an investing mistake, here are some questions I now focus on: Was this a failure in due diligence? Did I blindly follow someone else's advice without doing my own homework? Was this something I could have predicted ahead of time, with the knowledge and information I had? There are some investment losses that can only be attributed to bad luck or a black swan event that no one can predict. For these scenarios, there is no point in beating yourself up over it. But when the loss occurred because of a gap in our process, then the onus is on us to learn to correct it. YOU ONLY NEED A FEW BIG WINNERS Remember: no one has a perfect track record in investing. Not American hedge fund manager Ray Dalio. Not investment fund founder Cathie Wood. Not even Warren Buffett. The investing legend has famously admitted to some big blunders, such as buying Dexter Shoe Company with Berkshire Hathaway shares, or losing hundreds of millions from holding onto computer giant IBM for too long, believing it would be able to reinvent itself. Just like us, the greatest investors in the world have taken hits to their portfolio. But what sets them apart is their ability to learn, adapt and stay in the game. Here's a secret: what matters isn't avoiding mistakes entirely but ensuring that your winners more than make up for your losers. Even if a few of our investing positions go to zero, we still have other positions in our portfolio. And the gains from these other counters can often overshadow the losses incurred by the rest. This was my own experience, as I watched stocks I own – like iFast, DBS and Meta – grow into multi-baggers over time. These multi-baggers are investments that multiply in value, delivering returns of two times, five times, or even 10 times our original capital. They're the outliers in our portfolio that can more than make up for past mistakes, and can significantly accelerate our wealth when held with conviction over the long term. I've owned iFast since it was S$1 a share, and DBS at under S$14. Today, they've increased in value by more than 800 per cent and 300 per cent respectively – and are still growing as we speak. These alone more than make up for what I lost with SingPost and other mistakes. STAY IN THE GAME This is the beauty of investing: your downside is capped, but your upside knows no bounds. If you invest S$1,000 in a company and it fails, you lose S$1,000. But if you invest S$1,000 in the next Apple, Nvidia or Tesla while it is still undervalued – something with the potential to grow five or 10 times bigger over time – that single investment can not only cover multiple losing counters but also put you ahead. That's why I choose to focus on fundamentally strong companies, buying into them when the market is pessimistic or irrational. And I don't lose sight of this even when luck turns against me, or when I get things wrong sometimes. At the end of the day, what matters is your entire investment portfolio rather than obsessing over the outcome of each individual position. So as Idina Menzel sings: "Let it go". Let your losers go, but not the lessons. Double down on your research. Look for opportunities. And keep your emotions in check. Investing isn't about getting it right every single time. It is about staying in the game, learning as you go, and making better and better plays as you grow. Not every loss is our fault. But if we don't take every opportunity to learn, we'll have no one to blame but ourselves.
Independent Singapore
18 hours ago
- Independent Singapore
‘6,060 Malaysians have given up their citizenship for Singapore so far in 2025' — Home Minister says, and that could be just the beginning…
MALAYSIA: The causeway exodus isn't slowing down. In fact, it's accelerating — and not just in weekend grocery runs, hawker food indulgence or petrol pit stops. According to the New Straits Times (NST), over 6,000 Malaysians have already packed up their bags and given up their blue passports in the first six months of this year, swapping them for Singapore's red one counterpart. Citing Home Minister Datuk Seri Saifuddin Nasution Ismail's written reply in Parliament, the NST reported that '6,060 people had done so as of June 30.' All have relinquished their Malaysian citizenship to take up Singapore citizenship instead. If that's a hefty number, it's indeed a lot, but it could also be just a warm-up taste of what could be a record-setting year to come. In 2024, a record-shattering 16,930 Malaysians officially switched allegiances to the Little Red Dot, blowing past the 11,500 figure in 2023. The figures show a migration trend that's anything but steady. The NST noted that 2022 saw 5,623 citizenship surrenders — slightly fewer than 7,956 in 2021 — before numbers skyrocketed during the post-pandemic period. The pre-COVID-19 peak came in 2019 with 13,362 cases, before tumbling to 5,591 in 2020 during the border-closure years. Saifuddin's written parliamentary reply, quoted by the NST , also took a walk down the historical and statistical memory lane: 'Earlier years saw 7,394 cases in 2015, 8,654 in 2016, 7,583 in 2017, and 7,665 in 2018.' The parliamentary question responded to by Saifuddin was posed by Datuk Seri Takiyuddin Hassan (PN–Kota Baru), who asked for a breakdown of Malaysians applying for Singapore citizenship from 2015 to 2025, essentially mapping a decade-long migration trend. Why the shift to the Little Red Dot? While the statistics speak for themselves, they also spark the same perennial debate: Why are so many Malaysians giving up their citizenship for Singapore? The statistics leave plenty of room for speculation. Singapore's strong currency (S$1 = RM3.50), higher salaries, and perceived career stability create an irresistible magnetic pull. In addition, the Little Red Dot's passport, among the world's most powerful, also adds to the pull's influence. For some, it's also about education opportunities, or securing a better future for their children or families. For others, it's a calculated career move, even if it means a bittersweet goodbye, a farewell to their home soil. See also Man caught urinating in HDB corridor says it was an "emergency" If the first half of 2025 is any indication, Malaysia could be on track to break last year's record. The only question is whether it's cause for concern as an economic red flag, a reflection of global mobility, or something to celebrate, or just another chapter in the Malaysia–Singapore migration history — that's a debate likely to continue well beyond the causeway.
