Is the EU doing enough to integrate Ukrainian defence tech?
'This is a major contribution to Ukraine's fight for freedom, as well as to the Danish and European armament,' Morten Bødskov, Denmark's minister of industry, business and financial affairs, said in a press release last month.
This first deal between Ukraine and Denmark will 'ensure a higher degree of integration' for Ukraine in Europe's wider rearmament, the statement continued.
The agreement comes a month after Ukraine launched an international joint weapons production programme with its allied countries to build 'licensed production lines for Ukrainian weapons in partner countries'. But do these recent efforts go far enough?
How are European countries building Ukrainian tech?
There are already several projects in play between Ukraine and private industry in Europe, such as the UK's production of the Raybird surveillance drone, a 'flexible fixed-wing' 20-kilogram drone that can be deployed in under 25 minutes and can fly for roughly 28 hours over a 2,500-kilometre range.
A French auto manufacturer will produce first-person view (FPV) drones in Ukraine, with France's armed forces minister Sebastien Lecornu calling it a 'win-win partnership' in French media. Le Monde reported that automaker Renault was approached for this work.
Sweden's SAAB, Norway's Kongsberg, French-German KNDS, Germany's Rheinmetall, and the US's Raytheon are reportedly expanding their presence on the ground, according to a June press release from Ukraine's ministry of defence.
Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy said on Monday that his country struck more deals with European allies and a leading US defence company to 'step up drone production'.
Zelenskyy didn't name the businesses in his address. Euronews Next has followed up with the Ukrainian government to find out more about the deals that have been signed but did not receive a reply at the time of publication.
Ukraine is also working on draft legislation for joint weapons production with allies that should be put to a vote in their parliament later this month, according to Rustem Umerov, Ukraine's defence minister.
The programme includes plans to create a special legal and tax framework to help Ukrainian defence manufacturers scale up and modernise production, including building new facilities at home and abroad, Umerov said.
'We are not included in the common planning'
These projects are a promising first step but Ukraine is still not included in the 'common planning' that the European Union is doing regarding its rearmament, said Olena Bilousova, senior research lead of military at the Kyiv School of Economics.
She added that American-made M982 Excalibur shells dropped in efficiency to reach their targets from 70 per cent to six per cent as Russia continues to advance its electronic warfare (EW). This is a form of artillery that the EU has sent to Ukraine in the past.
'There are a lot of cases like that when we understand that the weapons which were common and still common in procurement of the EU should be reviewed [or] at least … modernised,' she told Euronews Next.
Ukraine's reliance on drones as a 'cheap solution' in its offensives against Russia is also misunderstood by Ukraine's allies, Bilousova added, noting that the country should be able to build drone procurement strategies with its partners.
It doesn't mean that Europe should be focused only on procuring drones, Bilousova continued, but that Ukraine should develop with them 'new strategies around conventional weapons,' including how many are needed and how they can be protected against drones.
Bilousova said Ukraine could also teach Europe how to speed up the development of new battle-tested technologies based on their model.
Ukraine uses the 'Danish model' of military procurement to develop a new technology from idea to product testing on the battlefield, which takes anywhere from three to six months, compared to traditional weapons procurement, which usually takes up to 18 months.
Ukraine can do this through earmarking an estimated $30.8 billion (€29.4 billion) in 2023 for the war effort, a level that is 20 times higher than the pre-2022 invasion level, a recent report from the Stockholm International Peace Research Institute found.
Crowdfunding through platforms such as United24 has also raised over $1 billion (€950 million) and distributed approximately $930 million (€884.61 million) of that to the Armed Forces of Ukraine in the last three years.
Both pots of money are then redistributed to Brave1, a 'united coordinational platform' that provides more than 470 grants worth an estimated 1.3 billion hryvnias (€29 million).
Pan-European approach to Ukraine defence tech 'unlikely'
Bilousova said it's not clear what forum would be the best to bring in Ukraine as a 'consultant' for rearmament.
But a pan-European initiative to get Ukraine fully integrated into rearmament might not be possible because time is 'of the essence,' said Jacob Kirkegaard, senior fellow with the Bruegel think tank.
'The vast majority of this integration will happen at the bilateral level and will be driven by Ukraine's desperate need for more weapons and the willingness by many member states … to provide the money,' he told Euronews Next.
'That is not, unfortunately, a capability that the EU has as a whole'.
However, it doesn't stop the Commission from identifying 'target projects' that would be of shared interest with Ukraine, such as developing advanced air defence, drone surveillance for subsea internet cables or cybersecurity, Kirkegaard continued.
The EU has already activated a €150 billion "SAFE" loan instrument that lets states borrow money for joint defence projects. At least 65 per cent of the weapons' components have to be sourced from within the EU or Ukraine.
It's also launched a joint EU-Ukraine task force to integrate Ukraine into the 'defence-tech ecosystem'.
However, Bilousova said that if the Commission doesn't step back and create a longer-term plan, the weapons it invests in could be 'ineffective' and delayed for the next conflict.
'I think it is always a good time to make a strategy even if war is already in place,' she said.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Euronews
9 hours ago
- Euronews
Pushing Kyiv to give up land 'will force Ukrainians to the streets'
A possible deal to end Russia's war against Ukraine will include 'land swapping' from both sides, US President Donald Trump said, which in reality means territorial concessions for Ukraine. Kyiv forces do not occupy any of Russia's territory, meaning there could be no deal regarding returning Moscow its land. All of the land in question is the territory Russia has occupied in Ukraine since the first invasion in 2014 followed by Moscow's all-out war in 2022. If Trump pressures Ukraine to relinquish its territory, he would not be convincing Volodymyr Zelenskyy. Instead, he will have to persuade the people of Ukraine. And unlike Trump, Zelenskyy understands who will have the last word, just as he knows that even he cannot convince the Ukrainian people of what they reject. The county's civil society demonstrated it well enough, including just weeks ago. Anton Liagusha, Dean of the Graduate Department of Social Sciences and Humanities at the Kyiv School of Economics, told Euronews that if Ukrainian authorities are pressured into territorial concessions, 'it will force the Ukrainian people to take to the streets.' 'This will not so much be a story of protest against the authorities, but a cry from the Ukrainian people to the whole world to be treated as a great country in the centre of Europe, and not just viewed by the US as a piece of land," Liagusha said. "Ukrainians are a full-fledged nation, and Ukraine is a great state with its own legislation.' Liagusha explained that ever since Ukraine became an independent county, the society has clearly established its decisive power when 'during the Revolution of Dignity (in 2014), and before that the Orange Revolution (in 2004) and before that the Revolution on Granite in 1991, we saw that people do not accept power in terms of authoritarianism and clear hierarchy.' 'The president in Ukrainian society is not a king, meaning that his will does not determine the will of the entire Ukrainian people," he pointed out. 'We all hear what society says' Since the beginning of Russia's full-scale invasion in early 2022, this balance of power has crystallised even more clearly 'when we see in Ukrainian society that almost every family has been affected by this war, directly or indirectly," according to Liagusha. 'People are fighting against the aggressor, for democracy, and for our country to become a member of the European Union and be part of Europe," he said. And so, whatever decisions are made with the participation of the president, it means that these decisions can be confirmed by Ukrainian society through direct street demonstrations.' This was proven yet again in July when thousands of Ukrainians took to the streets to protest against the bill that could have effectively eliminated the independence of the country's anti-corruption institutions. Thousands of Ukrainians demonstrated until Zelenskyy proposed a new bill only days later to restore the independence of the anti-corruption bodies. Nationwide protests forced the government to overturn the initial bill in a move widely seen as a win for democracy in Ukraine, even during Russia's all-out war. Demonstrators made it clear that their anger was directed solely at the bill, and their demands were limited to restoring the independence of anti-corruption bodies. But after three revolutions in just over 30 years, one of which resulted in ousting the pro-Russian Victor Yanukovich in 2014, Ukrainian presidents and authorities are very sensitive to the voice of the street. Having signed a new bill, Zelenskyy himself said, 'We all hear what society says. We see what people expect from state institutions to ensure justice and the efficiency of each institution.' Zelenskyy surely knows what to expect from Ukrainian civil society should there be pressure to cede territories. But Ukraine's foreign partners, specifically the US, do not seem to comprehend it. When asked why, Liagusha said the reasons can be explained by the level of comfort of life. 'Life in the United States and many European countries is more or less stable and comfortable," he explained. "These societies have long lacked experience with large-scale protests and the high level of activity seen in Ukrainian civil society.' Liagusha also points out that Western democracies primarily view Ukrainian civil society as self-organised groups of people that are created or organised to solve specific tactical problems and issues. 'There is no understanding that the volunteer movement, civil society for the protection of human rights, and activists in various fields are truly such a society and are the creators of the new Ukrainian state.'
Euronews
11 hours ago
- Euronews
Trump-Putin Alaska summit: High stakes at historic meeting
As Donald Trump is hosting Vladimir Putin for a historic summit in Alaska, Ukraine and Europe are holding their breath for what the meeting can bring. For the US president, the summit represents an unprecedented opportunity to establish himself as a peacemaker and push Russia to a ceasefire. For Putin, this is a chance to change tack despite his unwillingness to engage in direct negotiations with his Ukrainian counterpart Volodymyr Zelenskyy. Ukraine's president has not been invited to the summit at the US military Joint Base Elmendorf-Richardson in Anchorage, but Trump hopes he will be present for the second round of talks. The question remains, will there be a second meeting after the negotiations in Alaska? Follow our live updates as Euronews journalists around Europe bring you the latest developments in the blog below:
Fashion Network
12 hours ago
- Fashion Network
Pandora second quarter operating profit in line with forecast, keeps 2025 outlook
By Reuters Danish jewellery maker Pandora posted second-quarter operating profit in line with expectations on Friday, and stuck to its full-year growth forecast. "In these turbulent times, we are satisfied with yet another quarter of high single-digit organic growth and strong profitability," CEO Alexander Lacik said in a statement. "Despite the macroeconomic challenges to top and bottom line, we are confident that we will deliver on our targets for the year driven by an exciting product pipeline, new marketing campaigns and operational agility," he said. Operating profit for the second quarter was 1.29 billion Danish crowns ($201.6 million), the same as forecast by analysts in a poll gathered by the company. Organic revenue growth stood at 8%, also in line with analyst expectations. The charm bracelet maker stuck to its full-year guidance of 7-8% organic sales growth and an operating profit margin at around 24%. © Thomson Reuters 2025 All rights reserved.
