HRCP slams discriminatory ban on Ismaili Butchers in Chitral, warns of threat to pluralism
The Human Rights Commission of Pakistan (HRCP) has voiced serious concern over what it describes as sectarian discrimination in Chitral, following a decision by the local administration in Garam Chashma to prohibit Ismaili butchers from supplying meat in the area.
In a strongly worded statement issued on Thursday, the HRCP condemned the move as a violation of the constitutional principle of equal economic opportunity for all citizens, regardless of sectarian affiliation.
The commission noted that the region has long been admired for its tradition of inter-communal harmony and warned that such one-sided measures risk inflaming sectarian tensions and inciting violence.
"Undermining fundamental rights due to religious pressure sets a dangerous precedent," the HRCP said.
"This threatens not only the livelihoods of a marginalised community but also the very fabric of pluralism in Pakistan."
The rights watchdog called on the district administration to fulfill its constitutional duty to treat all citizens equally and to ensure that administrative decisions are based on law and fairness, not appeasement.
Any failure to act impartially, the HRCP warned, could deepen existing divisions and further erode public confidence in the rule of law.
The statement comes amid growing concern from civil society over increasing intolerance and discriminatory practices targeting religious and sectarian minorities in various parts of the country.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Express Tribune
31-07-2025
- Express Tribune
Case for a living wage
Listen to article The call by the Human Rights Commission of Pakistan (HRCP) to raise the minimum wage to Rs75,000 is neither utopian nor excessive. It is a long overdue response to the crushing weight of inflation that has eroded the very notion of a living wage. In a country where essential commodities now seem to change prices as often as the weather, expecting a working-class family to survive, let alone live with dignity, on the current minimum wage is simply untenable. It is telling that while the ruling elite have over the years approved staggering increases in their own salaries and perks, labourers and daily wage earners continue to be denied even the most basic protections. This widening gap between privilege and penury reflects a moral failure of governance. The current minimum wage does not even begin to account for the real cost of living for a family of five. Expenses related to food, education, healthcare and transport have all spiralled beyond reach. And yet, workers are expected to absorb the shocks of inflation and regressive taxation — often justified under the guise of structural reforms dictated by international financial institutions. A society that deprives its labour force of decent living standards cannot expect sustainable growth, much less social cohesion. Raising the minimum wage to Rs75,000 must be paired with robust enforcement mechanisms to ensure compliance across sectors. Furthermore, such a revision must be based on empirical cost-of-living data, regularly updated, and accompanied by measures to formalise the vast informal labour sector. Without implementation, even the most progressive wage laws remain paper promises. Ultimately, a nation's priorities are laid bare in how it treats its most vulnerable.
Express Tribune
29-07-2025
- Express Tribune
Scourge of honour
Listen to article The recent honour killing in Balochistan has drawn fresh attention to the illegal, but culturally acceptable practice of murdering relatives at the whim of family or community elders. But as gruesome as the recent case was, it is hardly an anomaly. In fact, honour killing is so widespread that many cases may not even make it into the headlines on a busy news day — the Human Rights Commission of Pakistan estimated over 400 honour killings carried out in 2024, and this number is almost certainly erring on the low side. Tribal jirgas, despite being outlawed, are near-omnipotent in some parts of the country and continue ordering executions. The 2016 anti-honour killing law, celebrated as a milestone, has proven hollow. The law's requirement for life imprisonment, even if families pardon killers, was supposed to close a notorious loophole, but enforcement remains crippled by parallel justice systems. While the number of recorded honour killings is less than half of the 1,000-plus figures from the years preceding the passage of the law, the current figures are still unacceptable. Cultural and economic drivers fuel this crisis. Feudal power structures target women asserting marital or financial autonomy, particularly those inheriting property. Over the years, HRCP has linked conservatism to the surge in honour killings, while noting that religious groups have actively opposed provincial laws protecting women. Disturbingly, perpetrators are lauded as "guardians of honour", while victims are erased from public memory. One of the ways to do this is through the connivance of politicians and law enforcers. Police often register honour killings as ordinary murders or suicides, enabling "reconciliation" and acquittals. In a just society, any perceived 'honour' crimes should only be adjudicated in a court by judges whose loyalty is only to the Constitution, not any tribe, caste, or cultural practices. Those who take the law into their own hands should face the full force of the state. It should not take viral videos to force the state's hand.
Business Recorder
29-07-2025
- Business Recorder
Beyond honour: reclaiming justice and humanity in Pakistan
In the heart of Baluchistan, a crowd gathered, watching in silence as two young lives were ended in the name of 'honour.' Their only crime: being accused of bringing shame. This was not a hidden act, but a public spectacle, a chilling reminder that in Pakistan, 'honour' can still become a licence to kill. But my question is how many more lives must be lost before we admit that 'honour' has become a weapon, not a virtue? Each year, the silent toll of honour killings grows in lives cut short, families shattered, and justice denied. This is not just a statistic; it is a national emergency that demands our collective conscience and urgent action. Most often, it is women who pay the highest price. In Pakistan, the concept of 'honour' leads to the tragic loss of countless women each year, reflecting a persistent tradition that presents serious obstacles to justice and human rights. Honour killings, defined as the murder of women to protect family reputation, remain a troubling form of gender-based violence in Pakistan. Taking on responsibility often brings a sense of authority, as legal consequences are often insufficient and societal norms prioritize family reputation over individual rights. The Human Rights Commission of Pakistan recorded around 1,961 honour killings from 2004 to 2022, but the actual numbers are likely much higher due to underreporting. Section 299 of the Pakistan Penal Code defines honour killing as an offence aimed at preserving honour. Sections 300 and 302 categorize it as murder and specify the punishment. Despite the Criminal Law (Amendment) Act 2004 and the Anti-Honour Killing Act 2016 aiming to make these offences non-compoundable and state matters, notable loopholes remain. The Qisas and Diyat law illustrates this clearly, allowing pardons and reducing accountability, as seen in the Qandeel Baloch case. In various regions of Baluchistan and Khyber Pakhtunkhwa, informal justice mechanisms such as jirgas are crucial for resolving disputes, particularly in contexts where formal opportunities are restricted. Nonetheless, these forums are largely characterized by a male presence, with a notable lack of representation for women. This gap is more than just a theoretical idea. In March 1999, a troubling incident occurred involving a 16-year-old girl in Parachinar, who was sent back to her tribe after being raped. The jirga determined she had dishonoured her tribe, leading to her execution in front of tribal members. Honour killings occur in various settings, not limited to tribal or rural areas. Samia Sarwar, 29, was shot dead in her lawyer's office in Lahore while pursuing a divorce. Her own mother, a medical professional, was involved in the heartbreaking choice to end a life. Honour killings are wrongly justified by religion, yet neither the Quran nor Hadith endorses these actions. Islam strictly forbids the taking of innocent lives (Surah An-Nisa 4:93), and religious authorities consistently denounce honour killings, emphasizing that justice belongs to the legal system. The actions stem from enduring customs that emphasize patriarchal control over women's autonomy, rather than authentic religious beliefs, as shown by their absence in many Muslim-majority countries like Indonesia and Malaysia. The Constitution of Pakistan guarantees key rights, including the right to life and liberty (Article 9) and protections for women (Article 25). The leniency in honour killing cases dates back to British colonial rule. The 1990 amendments incorporated Islamic principles like Qisas and Diyat into the legal system, allowing for family pardons. The 2004 and 2016 Acts strengthened the judicial system by making honour killings non-compoundable. The legal system has flaws; courts sometimes grant exceptions, and victims' families may choose to forgive offenders. The Qandeel Baloch case illustrates ongoing challenges, as her brother was initially sentenced but later acquitted by the Lahore High Court due to procedural issues. This situation reveals ongoing problems in the criminal justice system, including blood pardons, poorly crafted legislation, and narrow legal interpretations. The Constitution of Pakistan ensures important rights, such as the right to life and liberty (Article 9), along with provisions for the protection of women (Article 25). Historically, the leniency observed in cases of honour killings can be traced back to the era of British colonial rule. The amendments of 1990 brought Islamic principles such as qisas and diyat into the legal framework, permitting family pardons. In contrast, the Acts of 2004 and 2016 reinforced the judicial system by rendering honour killings non-compoundable. Nonetheless, the legal system is not without its flaws, as courts occasionally grant exceptions or victims' families choose to forgive offenders. The Qandeel Baloch case, where her brother was initially sentenced but later acquitted by the Lahore High Court due to procedural issues, exemplifies these persistent challenges. This situation highlights persistent issues within the criminal justice system, such as blood pardons, inadequately developed legislation, and restrictive interpretations of the law. Pakistan has made commitments to numerous international conventions and treaties, which require the country to protect women's rights and tackle gender-based violence in a meaningful way. The Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Discrimination Against Women (CEDAW), the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights (ICCPR), and the Universal Declaration of Human Rights (UDHR) stand as essential pillars in the ongoing struggle for equality and justice worldwide. Pakistan must eliminate discriminatory practices and ensure equal protection for women as per these agreements. Pakistan, as an Islamic state, promotes spiritual equality for both men and women. Islam forbids intentional killing, including honour killings, asserting that justice belongs to Allah or the courts. Islam promotes ethical principles for all individuals and prohibits causing harm or taking the life of a woman for failing to fulfil expectations. The Quran's guidance is applicable to all genders. The antiquated notion that ties family honour exclusively to the behaviour of women and rationalizes violence needs to be reformed. These actions are a more significant wrongdoing than the one under scrutiny. Education, awareness, and open dialogue are crucial for dismantling these harmful conventions. Elders, teachers, and religious leaders must define the true meanings of Islam and the law. The recent tragedy in Baluchistan, the murder of Qandeel Baloch, and the killing of a 13-year-old girl in Bolan district highlight the critical necessity for justice in Pakistan to be both inclusive and compassionate. Honour killings should be firmly denounced, no matter where they originate, whether from a jirga, family, or misguided customs. To put an end to violence and ensure justice, it is essential to uphold the law, rectify existing gaps, and shift societal attitudes and beliefs. Copyright Business Recorder, 2025
