logo
Beyond honour: reclaiming justice and humanity in Pakistan

Beyond honour: reclaiming justice and humanity in Pakistan

Business Recorder12 hours ago
In the heart of Baluchistan, a crowd gathered, watching in silence as two young lives were ended in the name of 'honour.' Their only crime: being accused of bringing shame. This was not a hidden act, but a public spectacle, a chilling reminder that in Pakistan, 'honour' can still become a licence to kill.
But my question is how many more lives must be lost before we admit that 'honour' has become a weapon, not a virtue? Each year, the silent toll of honour killings grows in lives cut short, families shattered, and justice denied. This is not just a statistic; it is a national emergency that demands our collective conscience and urgent action.
Most often, it is women who pay the highest price. In Pakistan, the concept of 'honour' leads to the tragic loss of countless women each year, reflecting a persistent tradition that presents serious obstacles to justice and human rights. Honour killings, defined as the murder of women to protect family reputation, remain a troubling form of gender-based violence in Pakistan.
Taking on responsibility often brings a sense of authority, as legal consequences are often insufficient and societal norms prioritize family reputation over individual rights.
The Human Rights Commission of Pakistan recorded around 1,961 honour killings from 2004 to 2022, but the actual numbers are likely much higher due to underreporting.
Section 299 of the Pakistan Penal Code defines honour killing as an offence aimed at preserving honour. Sections 300 and 302 categorize it as murder and specify the punishment.
Despite the Criminal Law (Amendment) Act 2004 and the Anti-Honour Killing Act 2016 aiming to make these offences non-compoundable and state matters, notable loopholes remain. The Qisas and Diyat law illustrates this clearly, allowing pardons and reducing accountability, as seen in the Qandeel Baloch case.
In various regions of Baluchistan and Khyber Pakhtunkhwa, informal justice mechanisms such as jirgas are crucial for resolving disputes, particularly in contexts where formal opportunities are restricted. Nonetheless, these forums are largely characterized by a male presence, with a notable lack of representation for women.
This gap is more than just a theoretical idea. In March 1999, a troubling incident occurred involving a 16-year-old girl in Parachinar, who was sent back to her tribe after being raped. The jirga determined she had dishonoured her tribe, leading to her execution in front of tribal members.
Honour killings occur in various settings, not limited to tribal or rural areas. Samia Sarwar, 29, was shot dead in her lawyer's office in Lahore while pursuing a divorce. Her own mother, a medical professional, was involved in the heartbreaking choice to end a life.
Honour killings are wrongly justified by religion, yet neither the Quran nor Hadith endorses these actions. Islam strictly forbids the taking of innocent lives (Surah An-Nisa 4:93), and religious authorities consistently denounce honour killings, emphasizing that justice belongs to the legal system.
The actions stem from enduring customs that emphasize patriarchal control over women's autonomy, rather than authentic religious beliefs, as shown by their absence in many Muslim-majority countries like Indonesia and Malaysia.
The Constitution of Pakistan guarantees key rights, including the right to life and liberty (Article 9) and protections for women (Article 25). The leniency in honour killing cases dates back to British colonial rule. The 1990 amendments incorporated Islamic principles like Qisas and Diyat into the legal system, allowing for family pardons. The 2004 and 2016 Acts strengthened the judicial system by making honour killings non-compoundable.
The legal system has flaws; courts sometimes grant exceptions, and victims' families may choose to forgive offenders. The Qandeel Baloch case illustrates ongoing challenges, as her brother was initially sentenced but later acquitted by the Lahore High Court due to procedural issues. This situation reveals ongoing problems in the criminal justice system, including blood pardons, poorly crafted legislation, and narrow legal interpretations.
The Constitution of Pakistan ensures important rights, such as the right to life and liberty (Article 9), along with provisions for the protection of women (Article 25). Historically, the leniency observed in cases of honour killings can be traced back to the era of British colonial rule.
The amendments of 1990 brought Islamic principles such as qisas and diyat into the legal framework, permitting family pardons. In contrast, the Acts of 2004 and 2016 reinforced the judicial system by rendering honour killings non-compoundable. Nonetheless, the legal system is not without its flaws, as courts occasionally grant exceptions or victims' families choose to forgive offenders.
The Qandeel Baloch case, where her brother was initially sentenced but later acquitted by the Lahore High Court due to procedural issues, exemplifies these persistent challenges. This situation highlights persistent issues within the criminal justice system, such as blood pardons, inadequately developed legislation, and restrictive interpretations of the law.
Pakistan has made commitments to numerous international conventions and treaties, which require the country to protect women's rights and tackle gender-based violence in a meaningful way.
The Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Discrimination Against Women (CEDAW), the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights (ICCPR), and the Universal Declaration of Human Rights (UDHR) stand as essential pillars in the ongoing struggle for equality and justice worldwide. Pakistan must eliminate discriminatory practices and ensure equal protection for women as per these agreements.
Pakistan, as an Islamic state, promotes spiritual equality for both men and women. Islam forbids intentional killing, including honour killings, asserting that justice belongs to Allah or the courts. Islam promotes ethical principles for all individuals and prohibits causing harm or taking the life of a woman for failing to fulfil expectations. The Quran's guidance is applicable to all genders.
The antiquated notion that ties family honour exclusively to the behaviour of women and rationalizes violence needs to be reformed. These actions are a more significant wrongdoing than the one under scrutiny. Education, awareness, and open dialogue are crucial for dismantling these harmful conventions. Elders, teachers, and religious leaders must define the true meanings of Islam and the law.
The recent tragedy in Baluchistan, the murder of Qandeel Baloch, and the killing of a 13-year-old girl in Bolan district highlight the critical necessity for justice in Pakistan to be both inclusive and compassionate. Honour killings should be firmly denounced, no matter where they originate, whether from a jirga, family, or misguided customs. To put an end to violence and ensure justice, it is essential to uphold the law, rectify existing gaps, and shift societal attitudes and beliefs.
Copyright Business Recorder, 2025
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Punjab Assembly passes several bills amid brawl
Punjab Assembly passes several bills amid brawl

Business Recorder

time11 hours ago

  • Business Recorder

Punjab Assembly passes several bills amid brawl

LAHORE: In the absence of opposition members, the Punjab Assembly passed several significant bills on Monday, including the Punjab Agricultural Income Tax Bill 2025, the Punjab Prohibition of Narcotic Substances Bill 2025, the Punjab Autism Schools and Resource Centres Bill 2025, and the Punjab Immovable Property Tax (Amendment) Bill 2025. The Punjab Assembly session began two hours and nineteen minutes late on Monday under the chairmanship of Acting Speaker Malik Zaheer Iqbal. As soon as the proceedings started, opposition members launched a protest, chanting slogans as they entered the house. Treasury members retaliated with their own slogans. Parliamentary Minister Mian Mujtaba Shuja-ur-Rahman addressed the assembly, stating that the session would proceed under Rule 232. He criticised the opposition for bringing too many photographs into the house, calling it objectionable. Deputy Opposition Leader Moeen Qureshi; however, condemned what he called a politically motivated conviction of opposition leader Ahmed Khan Bhachar, stating that such injustice had no precedent in Punjab's history. He demanded that the session be paused to allow members to express solidarity with Bhachar. Qureshi further revealed that the PTI's parliamentary party had written to the Chief Justice of Pakistan, alleging human rights violations due to expedited trials running from 9 AM to 3 AM. Meanwhile, government member Waseem Ran protested against the Dolphin Police's brutal assault on a child, citing CCTV evidence of the incident. He accused the force of harassing citizens through unnecessary checkpoints, particularly referencing an incident at Pul Barkatabad where four officers allegedly beat a minor. Acting Speaker Malik Zaheer Iqbal condemned the violence, calling it unacceptable and demanding strict action. Deputy Opposition Leader Moeen Qureshi pointed out that several high-profile figures, including Andaleeb Abbas, Firdous Ashiq Awan, Murad Raas, and Fayyaz-ul-Hasan Chohan, had been acquitted after press conferences, implying political bias in prosecutions. Opposition member Rai Ijaz lamented the discouragement faced by their members, while Mujtaba Shuja-ur-Rahman countered that Ahmed Khan Bhachar's conviction was a judicial decision, not a political one. He emphasised that the courts had independently ruled on the May 9 cases, and the government had no role in the sentencing. The opposition staged a walkout, chanting slogans, while another opposition member, Sheikh Imtiaz, pointed out the lack of quorum—leading to his suspension for 15 sittings. Amid the chaos, PML-N Chief Whip Rana Muhammad Arshad lashed out at the PTI, calling them a 'disruptive force' and warning that 'if the May 9 agitators raise their hands against us, we will cut them off.' The session took a violent turn when Opposition MPA Khalid Nisar Dogar slapped Treasury MPA Hassan Riaz, triggering a brawl between lawmakers. Acting Speaker Zaheer Iqbal Channar adjourned the session temporarily and summoned members to his chamber for mediation. After discussions, Dogar was suspended for 15 sittings— a decision the opposition rejected, arguing that the matter should have been referred to the Ethics Committee instead. As opposition members continued protesting, another MPA, Sheikh Imtiaz, raised the quorum issue, resulting in his suspension as well. Law Minister Sohaib Bharath defended the treasury's stance, stating that the opposition's behaviour was undermining democracy. He expressed regret over the need to invoke religious symbols in legislative disputes, urging political dialogue instead. Meanwhile, government member Amjad Ali Javed revealed that patients were dying due to doctors' refusal to prescribe outside medicines in government hospitals—a policy enforced under Chief Minister Maryam Nawaz's orders but poorly implemented, leading to shortages. Following repeated disruptions, the assembly passed key bills before adjourning. The session, marred by physical clashes, suspensions, and heated exchanges, highlighted the deepening political divide in Punjab's legislature. Acting Speaker Zaheer Iqbal condemned the violence, calling it a 'black day' for democracy, while the opposition vowed to continue resisting what it termed as government oppression. Copyright Business Recorder, 2025

Beyond honour: reclaiming justice and humanity in Pakistan
Beyond honour: reclaiming justice and humanity in Pakistan

Business Recorder

time12 hours ago

  • Business Recorder

Beyond honour: reclaiming justice and humanity in Pakistan

In the heart of Baluchistan, a crowd gathered, watching in silence as two young lives were ended in the name of 'honour.' Their only crime: being accused of bringing shame. This was not a hidden act, but a public spectacle, a chilling reminder that in Pakistan, 'honour' can still become a licence to kill. But my question is how many more lives must be lost before we admit that 'honour' has become a weapon, not a virtue? Each year, the silent toll of honour killings grows in lives cut short, families shattered, and justice denied. This is not just a statistic; it is a national emergency that demands our collective conscience and urgent action. Most often, it is women who pay the highest price. In Pakistan, the concept of 'honour' leads to the tragic loss of countless women each year, reflecting a persistent tradition that presents serious obstacles to justice and human rights. Honour killings, defined as the murder of women to protect family reputation, remain a troubling form of gender-based violence in Pakistan. Taking on responsibility often brings a sense of authority, as legal consequences are often insufficient and societal norms prioritize family reputation over individual rights. The Human Rights Commission of Pakistan recorded around 1,961 honour killings from 2004 to 2022, but the actual numbers are likely much higher due to underreporting. Section 299 of the Pakistan Penal Code defines honour killing as an offence aimed at preserving honour. Sections 300 and 302 categorize it as murder and specify the punishment. Despite the Criminal Law (Amendment) Act 2004 and the Anti-Honour Killing Act 2016 aiming to make these offences non-compoundable and state matters, notable loopholes remain. The Qisas and Diyat law illustrates this clearly, allowing pardons and reducing accountability, as seen in the Qandeel Baloch case. In various regions of Baluchistan and Khyber Pakhtunkhwa, informal justice mechanisms such as jirgas are crucial for resolving disputes, particularly in contexts where formal opportunities are restricted. Nonetheless, these forums are largely characterized by a male presence, with a notable lack of representation for women. This gap is more than just a theoretical idea. In March 1999, a troubling incident occurred involving a 16-year-old girl in Parachinar, who was sent back to her tribe after being raped. The jirga determined she had dishonoured her tribe, leading to her execution in front of tribal members. Honour killings occur in various settings, not limited to tribal or rural areas. Samia Sarwar, 29, was shot dead in her lawyer's office in Lahore while pursuing a divorce. Her own mother, a medical professional, was involved in the heartbreaking choice to end a life. Honour killings are wrongly justified by religion, yet neither the Quran nor Hadith endorses these actions. Islam strictly forbids the taking of innocent lives (Surah An-Nisa 4:93), and religious authorities consistently denounce honour killings, emphasizing that justice belongs to the legal system. The actions stem from enduring customs that emphasize patriarchal control over women's autonomy, rather than authentic religious beliefs, as shown by their absence in many Muslim-majority countries like Indonesia and Malaysia. The Constitution of Pakistan guarantees key rights, including the right to life and liberty (Article 9) and protections for women (Article 25). The leniency in honour killing cases dates back to British colonial rule. The 1990 amendments incorporated Islamic principles like Qisas and Diyat into the legal system, allowing for family pardons. The 2004 and 2016 Acts strengthened the judicial system by making honour killings non-compoundable. The legal system has flaws; courts sometimes grant exceptions, and victims' families may choose to forgive offenders. The Qandeel Baloch case illustrates ongoing challenges, as her brother was initially sentenced but later acquitted by the Lahore High Court due to procedural issues. This situation reveals ongoing problems in the criminal justice system, including blood pardons, poorly crafted legislation, and narrow legal interpretations. The Constitution of Pakistan ensures important rights, such as the right to life and liberty (Article 9), along with provisions for the protection of women (Article 25). Historically, the leniency observed in cases of honour killings can be traced back to the era of British colonial rule. The amendments of 1990 brought Islamic principles such as qisas and diyat into the legal framework, permitting family pardons. In contrast, the Acts of 2004 and 2016 reinforced the judicial system by rendering honour killings non-compoundable. Nonetheless, the legal system is not without its flaws, as courts occasionally grant exceptions or victims' families choose to forgive offenders. The Qandeel Baloch case, where her brother was initially sentenced but later acquitted by the Lahore High Court due to procedural issues, exemplifies these persistent challenges. This situation highlights persistent issues within the criminal justice system, such as blood pardons, inadequately developed legislation, and restrictive interpretations of the law. Pakistan has made commitments to numerous international conventions and treaties, which require the country to protect women's rights and tackle gender-based violence in a meaningful way. The Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Discrimination Against Women (CEDAW), the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights (ICCPR), and the Universal Declaration of Human Rights (UDHR) stand as essential pillars in the ongoing struggle for equality and justice worldwide. Pakistan must eliminate discriminatory practices and ensure equal protection for women as per these agreements. Pakistan, as an Islamic state, promotes spiritual equality for both men and women. Islam forbids intentional killing, including honour killings, asserting that justice belongs to Allah or the courts. Islam promotes ethical principles for all individuals and prohibits causing harm or taking the life of a woman for failing to fulfil expectations. The Quran's guidance is applicable to all genders. The antiquated notion that ties family honour exclusively to the behaviour of women and rationalizes violence needs to be reformed. These actions are a more significant wrongdoing than the one under scrutiny. Education, awareness, and open dialogue are crucial for dismantling these harmful conventions. Elders, teachers, and religious leaders must define the true meanings of Islam and the law. The recent tragedy in Baluchistan, the murder of Qandeel Baloch, and the killing of a 13-year-old girl in Bolan district highlight the critical necessity for justice in Pakistan to be both inclusive and compassionate. Honour killings should be firmly denounced, no matter where they originate, whether from a jirga, family, or misguided customs. To put an end to violence and ensure justice, it is essential to uphold the law, rectify existing gaps, and shift societal attitudes and beliefs. Copyright Business Recorder, 2025

Permission to KE to recover Rs50bn: Sindh PA speaks in unison against Nepra
Permission to KE to recover Rs50bn: Sindh PA speaks in unison against Nepra

Business Recorder

time13 hours ago

  • Business Recorder

Permission to KE to recover Rs50bn: Sindh PA speaks in unison against Nepra

KARACHI: The Sindh Assembly on Monday witnessed strong cross-party consensus against Nepra's recent decision allowing K-Electric to recover Rs50 billion from Karachi residents through electricity bills. The move sparked protests from both the treasury and opposition benches, as lawmakers argued that the decision amounted to 'collective punishment' for power theft committed by a few. The issue was raised through a resolution presented by Muttahida Qaumi Movement (MQM) lawmaker Muhammad Aamir Siddiqui, who told the House, 'Nepra decided on July 18 that K-Electric would recover Rs50 billion from the public. This is unjust. Nepra has no right to penalize an entire area for the fault of one individual.' K-Electric write-offs: NEPRA allows Rs50 billion as 'full and final claim' Aamir Siddiqui said the failure of K-Electric to collect dues or curb theft was now being blamed on honest bill payers. 'They failed to stop electricity theft and couldn't collect the dues, but now they want to punish those who do pay. We wrote to Nepra, but instead of corrective action, they passed an illegal order. It must be withdrawn. This additional burden will start appearing in August bills,' he said. Senior Minister for Information Sharjeel Inam Memon supported the resolution, saying, 'This isn't just K-Electric. The same issue exists with HESCO and SEPCO. These companies punish people collectively, which is unconstitutional. When one person makes a mistake, the whole city is punished. In rural areas, one meter serves an entire village.' He recalled that he had filed a petition in the high court five years ago against such practices, which is still pending. 'Our responsibility is to protect the human rights of our people. We support this resolution fully,' Memon said. Zia-ul-Hasan Lanjar said, 'This matter will be debated in detail tomorrow.' Acting Speaker Anthony Naveed gave his ruling that discussion on the resolution would be held on Tuesday. The Assembly was then adjourned until 1:30 pm the next day. Earlier during the session, the Sindh Control of Narcotics (Amendment) Bill was passed. Zia-ul-Hasan Lanjar presented the bill, explaining that a new narcotics control department had been established in 2024 and that several related matters had reached the courts. 'Each district now has a designated narcotics judge. Earlier, such cases were handled by session or additional session judges. After this amendment, police will be empowered to handle narcotics cases under the new law,' he said. Zia-ul-Hasan Lanjar added that independent courts would now be set up for these cases and that legislative loopholes had been addressed through the latest amendments. The Assembly rejected a call-attention notice moved by Aamir Siddiqui regarding an additional toll tax being collected between Karachi and Bahria Town. 'Citizens are paying Rs240 just to travel to and from Bahria Town. The federal government is collecting this toll, and it should be stopped,' Siddiqui urged. Zia-ul-Hasan Lanjar opposed the motion, and Deputy Speaker Anthony Naveed advised the member to bring a resolution instead. 'If you table a resolution, we will pass it and send it to the federal government,' he said. Meanwhile, during the question hour related to the Planning and Development Department, Parliamentary Secretary Sadia Javed responded to various queries from lawmakers. She provided updates on development schemes across the province and answered questions about the pace of ongoing projects. Responding to another call-attention notice raised by MQM's Shariq Jamal regarding rising crime in Model Colony, Zia-ul-Hasan Lanjar assured the House that maintaining public safety was the government's responsibility. 'We are trying to bring down crime rates. Despite criticism on social media, we have engaged with the community and business leaders to improve the situation,' he said. He added that reforms in traffic laws and policing were underway. 'We want citizens to feel safe when they visit a police station. We will also establish a model police station in Model Colony,' Lanjar announced. Later, in response to a notice by MQM's Rashid Khan concerning the closure of classes at Government College Kali Mori in Hyderabad, Education Minister Syed Sardar Shah said, 'This college is of historical significance. It was established in 1917. In 2018, the Assembly passed an act that the college would be upgraded to university level.' He clarified that although the college had been separated from the Colleges Department, it continued to function. 'There's a misconception on social media that the college is being shut down. That is not true. The act clearly states that the college will be managed by the university,' he said. Copyright Business Recorder, 2025

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store