Changing opinions on the assisted dying bill
Had you asked my opinion of assisted dying eight, five or three years ago, I might have responded very differently. My views then would have been shaped by pain, the mental toll of illness, the isolation it brings and the deep sense of guilt over the burden I felt I placed on those close to me, and over the NHS resources I consume.
Medical opinions often differ, and I've witnessed how care can shift depending on how a patient presents – mood, appearance and speech all have an effect on our treatment. In an unequal society, how can we ensure that a decision as final as assisted dying is truly free from undue influence or even prejudice?
The risk is that the bill could unintentionally set us on a path where choosing to die becomes seen as a selfless or responsible act, disproportionately affecting the poorest and most vulnerable in our society, and safeguards will be eroded as society becomes 'trained' to see assisted dying as just another life option. Current societal norms of compassion for the weakest and the poorest in society will become eroded as assisted dying replaces improved funding for compassionate and comprehensive palliative care.David GibbonCardiff
The Royal College of Psychiatrists' position risks underestimating both the safeguards in the assisted dying bill and the capacity of terminally ill people to make autonomous, informed decisions about their lives (Royal College of Psychiatrists says it cannot yet support assisted dying bill, 14 May). Kim Leadbeater's bill applies only to mentally competent adults with a terminal diagnosis and a prognosis of six months or less. It includes clear protections to ensure that choices are freely made and not influenced by untreated mental illness. Suggesting that psychiatrists are unable to assess this not only undermines our expertise but risks denying dying individuals the right to make decisions about their own bodies in their final days.
Autonomy in healthcare is a fundamental principle. Every day, patients make complex, life-altering choices about surgery, treatment refusal, even palliative sedation. That the same liberty should be withheld at the end of life is not only inconsistent but deeply unjust.
With more than 25 years' experience of supporting families in their most challenging and vulnerable moments, I know that compassion and clinical rigour can and must coexist. Other countries have shown that it is possible to create safe, ethical systems of care for terminally ill patients who may be considering assisted dying. In this country, only those with the means to travel to Dignitas can exercise this choice. We have, in effect, a two-tier system: access to assisted dying is available, but only to the wealthy. That is not a safeguard, it is an elitist injustice.Dr Sabina DosaniChild and adolescent psychiatrist; visiting researcher and ambassador for medical and health humanities, University of East Anglia
We should not be surprised that MPs are changing their minds on the assisted dying bill (At least five more MPs decide to vote against England and Wales assisted dying bill, 14 May). In the House of Commons, assisted dying may present as a 'for or against' voting issue, but the reality of decision-making is far less straightforward. Besides aye and nay, other valid positions can easily be overlooked – for example, 'yes if', 'no unless', 'not yet', 'don't know'.
Dividing lines run through the cabinet, parliament, the medical profession, the charitable sector, communities and families. They also run through individuals, not least those who are or may become terminally ill. The lines move as circumstances change; people change their minds – often.
The legislative process has catalysed debate around assisted dying. Regrettably, the debate has been unduly affected by the process, especially since a private member's bill is being considered. More time for wider deliberation and discussion, without the pressure of parliamentary timetables, would have been welcome. Given the subject, any legislation would always be controversial – some would say rightly so – but legislation should follow a broader, more deliberate national discussion. Here, the horse appears to have found itself behind the cart.
Full disclosure: I am living with an incurable illness. Before and since diagnosis, I have been firmly against assisted dying, in principle and in practice. If media coverage is anything to go by, stark realities surrounding end-of-life issues seem to be overshadowed by exchanges of sincerely held but stridently expressed views. It feels as if people are in danger of losing out to process; we must do better.Name and address supplied
Thank you for Lucy Webster's measured piece on assisted dying (The assisted dying lobby isn't being honest with you – disabled people are at risk from this bill, 14 May). As a person with complex health problems, including multiple sclerosis and brain haemorrhage, I believe that the passing of this bill will be the very thin edge of a terrifying wedge.
With disabled people's rights under attack by successive governments, who is to say that in 10 or 20 years' time, the supposedly 'economically inactive' will not be encouraged to cease being a burden on their families and society. I am not economically inactive – I receive personal independence payment, and I spend it; I enjoy my life immensely, despite its limitations. I never, ever thought that a Labour government would decide to consign people unable to work to the scrapheap or, potentially, open the door to an even worse outcome.Harriet ConnidesEast Finchley, London
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
South Wales Argus
an hour ago
- South Wales Argus
Blood matching test to be offered to patients with rare conditions
The move will allow donor blood to be matched to these patients more closely, to reduce the risk of severe reactions. The new test uses genetics to generate detailed blood group information. It is the first time it has been used for patients with rare inherited anaemias – with around 300 people eligible for testing, according to NHS Blood and Transplant (NHSBT). The programme has been backed by the family of toddler Woody Mayers, aged 22 months, who has a rare inherited anaemia called congenital dyserythropoietic anaemia (CDA) type 1. The condition causes the bone marrow to struggle to produce healthy red blood cells, which carry oxygen around the body. Woody Mayers, now 22 months, was born with an extremely rare blood disorder (NHSBT/Family handout) It is estimated to affect between one to five out of every million babies. Patients have low haemoglobin levels, meaning Woody relies on blood transfusions every four weeks to stay alive. However, the donor blood must be carefully matched to reduce the risk of patient's developing antibodies against certain blood types, which can cause severe reactions and make transfusions more difficult in the future. The new genotyping testing programme, a partnership between NHSBT and NHS England, uses genetics to identify more of the rarer blood groups. Samples are collected at routine hospital appointments, with patients' DNA tested to find out their blood types. About 300 people with transfusion dependent, rare inherited anaemias, are eligible for the test. All patients with sickle cell disorder and thalassaemia are also eligible, even if they do not rely on blood transfusions. Kate Downes, head of genomics at NHSBT, said: 'The new genotyping test can test blood groups faster and more extensively than standard testing methods.' Professor Dame Sue Hill, chief scientific officer at NHS England, said: 'The power of genomics is transforming medicine, with extended blood group genotyping now being utilised to help patients, especially those requiring regular transfusions. 'This is an exceptional example of an evidence-based innovation, developed from genetic data, being used to drive forward improvements that will make a huge difference across the NHS. 'Blood donations can be lifesaving for patients, and the NHS needs a constant flow of donations to provide people with the best possible care, so I'd encourage anyone who can donate to do so.' Woody's family were alerted to potential health conditions at a 20-week pregnancy scan. He was born prematurely at 34 weeks with haemoglobin levels around a quarter of what they should have been. Woody's mother Polly was alerted to her son's health condition at a pregnancy scan (NHSBT/Family handout) Woody's mother Polly Mayers, 35, from Robertsbridge in East Sussex, said: 'When he was born, he was very poorly and pale. He didn't cry for a few minutes. He needed ventilation breaths. It was really frightening. 'The first few days were very critical for Woody. He was extremely unwell. Nobody knew the cause for his haemolytic anaemia.' The toddler has now being having regular transfusions fore more than a year, receiving 140mls of red blood cells every four weeks to boost his haemoglobin. Despite this, his family describes him as an energetic little boys who likes trips to the park and riding his bike. His mother added: 'Woody will need the blood to be well-matched so that his transfusions don't become too difficult or risky. 'The test will help him and anyone else with a similar condition. I hope everyone eligible gets it.' Woody, who is 22 months, enjoys trips to the park and riding his bike (NHSBT/Family handout) Ms Downes said: 'Woody has very rare disorder and he relies on blood transfusions to stay alive but these need to be well matched. 'We want everyone eligible, like Woody, to be tested so they can get better matched blood. We also need more people to donate, so we can supply the matched lifesaving blood to Woody and people like him.' Woody's family are also urging people to donate blood. Mrs Mayers, a community matron, said: 'There's no way to sugar-coat it – if it wasn't for blood donors, Woody would not be alive. 'I'm incredibly grateful to blood donors for ensuring blood is available when he needs it.'
South Wales Guardian
an hour ago
- South Wales Guardian
Blood matching test to be offered to patients with rare conditions
The move will allow donor blood to be matched to these patients more closely, to reduce the risk of severe reactions. The new test uses genetics to generate detailed blood group information. It is the first time it has been used for patients with rare inherited anaemias – with around 300 people eligible for testing, according to NHS Blood and Transplant (NHSBT). The programme has been backed by the family of toddler Woody Mayers, aged 22 months, who has a rare inherited anaemia called congenital dyserythropoietic anaemia (CDA) type 1. The condition causes the bone marrow to struggle to produce healthy red blood cells, which carry oxygen around the body. It is estimated to affect between one to five out of every million babies. Patients have low haemoglobin levels, meaning Woody relies on blood transfusions every four weeks to stay alive. However, the donor blood must be carefully matched to reduce the risk of patient's developing antibodies against certain blood types, which can cause severe reactions and make transfusions more difficult in the future. The new genotyping testing programme, a partnership between NHSBT and NHS England, uses genetics to identify more of the rarer blood groups. Samples are collected at routine hospital appointments, with patients' DNA tested to find out their blood types. About 300 people with transfusion dependent, rare inherited anaemias, are eligible for the test. All patients with sickle cell disorder and thalassaemia are also eligible, even if they do not rely on blood transfusions. Kate Downes, head of genomics at NHSBT, said: 'The new genotyping test can test blood groups faster and more extensively than standard testing methods.' Professor Dame Sue Hill, chief scientific officer at NHS England, said: 'The power of genomics is transforming medicine, with extended blood group genotyping now being utilised to help patients, especially those requiring regular transfusions. 'This is an exceptional example of an evidence-based innovation, developed from genetic data, being used to drive forward improvements that will make a huge difference across the NHS. 'Blood donations can be lifesaving for patients, and the NHS needs a constant flow of donations to provide people with the best possible care, so I'd encourage anyone who can donate to do so.' Woody's family were alerted to potential health conditions at a 20-week pregnancy scan. He was born prematurely at 34 weeks with haemoglobin levels around a quarter of what they should have been. Woody's mother Polly Mayers, 35, from Robertsbridge in East Sussex, said: 'When he was born, he was very poorly and pale. He didn't cry for a few minutes. He needed ventilation breaths. It was really frightening. 'The first few days were very critical for Woody. He was extremely unwell. Nobody knew the cause for his haemolytic anaemia.' The toddler has now being having regular transfusions fore more than a year, receiving 140mls of red blood cells every four weeks to boost his haemoglobin. Despite this, his family describes him as an energetic little boys who likes trips to the park and riding his bike. His mother added: 'Woody will need the blood to be well-matched so that his transfusions don't become too difficult or risky. 'The test will help him and anyone else with a similar condition. I hope everyone eligible gets it.' Ms Downes said: 'Woody has very rare disorder and he relies on blood transfusions to stay alive but these need to be well matched. 'We want everyone eligible, like Woody, to be tested so they can get better matched blood. We also need more people to donate, so we can supply the matched lifesaving blood to Woody and people like him.' Woody's family are also urging people to donate blood. Mrs Mayers, a community matron, said: 'There's no way to sugar-coat it – if it wasn't for blood donors, Woody would not be alive. 'I'm incredibly grateful to blood donors for ensuring blood is available when he needs it.'
Daily Mail
an hour ago
- Daily Mail
Physiotherapist reveals why you should NEVER cross your legs on a flight
It can be difficult to get comfortable during plane journeys, with small seats and little leg room there is often not much room for movement. Many passengers cross their legs on flights, but AXA Health physiotherapist Bethany Tomlinson has warned against the common seating position. According to research, more than one in 10 adults in the UK experience joint issues. However, this pain could be worsened by long periods of inactivity sitting on aeroplanes. Bethany explains the risks that can come with sitting cross-legged during a flight. She warns: 'Avoid crossing your legs in your plane seat as this will impact blood flow and increase the risk of developing deep vein thrombosis (DVT).' Instead, the expert advises keeping legs elevated and choosing different relaxing positions. 'If there's a footrest under the seat in front of you, use this to keep your legs slightly elevated,' she adds. 'Make sure to relax your shoulders and support your back by sitting back into the plane seat whilst you wait.' To the millions of Brits jetting off this summer, Bethany urges travellers to prepare for the journey to avoid causing strain on joints. One in three Brits experience stiffness in their knees, and lack of movement or staying in the same position can only worsen this. Bethany says: 'Catching flights this summer could turn into an endurance test for our joints, so prepare for every flight like it could be long-haul. 'Knowing how to position your body and doing exercises when seated to keep your joints moving is essential.' Another way to ease joint discomfort is by standing in a certain position, Bethany explains. She adds: 'When standing up, shift weight between your feet, keep knees slightly bent and do light stretches to avoid too much pressure on your lower body.' For longer flights, Bethany shares what routine passengers should keep to in order to ensure their joints are healthy. Bethany warns passengers: 'Avoid crossing your legs in your plane seat as this will impact blood flow and increase the risk of developing deep vein thrombosis (DVT).' (stock) 'Flyers need to move their body every 1-2 hours on flights to keep joints mobilised. 'Being in the same position for hours can lead to stiff and swollen joints, particularly the knees, ankles and hips. 'Seated exercises whilst in the air will help boost circulation, and reduce the risk of DVT, a common type of blood clot that can form during long periods of sitting.' The physiotherapist shared a range of mobilising exercises that passengers can easily do from their plane seat, including neck stretches, shoulder rolls and knee hugs.
