logo
Returns On Capital At Hiap Teck Venture Berhad (KLSE:HIAPTEK) Paint A Concerning Picture

Returns On Capital At Hiap Teck Venture Berhad (KLSE:HIAPTEK) Paint A Concerning Picture

Yahoo30-06-2025
If you're not sure where to start when looking for the next multi-bagger, there are a few key trends you should keep an eye out for. Ideally, a business will show two trends; firstly a growing return on capital employed (ROCE) and secondly, an increasing amount of capital employed. If you see this, it typically means it's a company with a great business model and plenty of profitable reinvestment opportunities. In light of that, when we looked at Hiap Teck Venture Berhad (KLSE:HIAPTEK) and its ROCE trend, we weren't exactly thrilled.
Trump has pledged to "unleash" American oil and gas and these 15 US stocks have developments that are poised to benefit.
For those that aren't sure what ROCE is, it measures the amount of pre-tax profits a company can generate from the capital employed in its business. Analysts use this formula to calculate it for Hiap Teck Venture Berhad:
Return on Capital Employed = Earnings Before Interest and Tax (EBIT) ÷ (Total Assets - Current Liabilities)
0.00092 = RM1.4m ÷ (RM2.0b - RM492m) (Based on the trailing twelve months to April 2025).
Therefore, Hiap Teck Venture Berhad has an ROCE of 0.09%. In absolute terms, that's a low return and it also under-performs the Metals and Mining industry average of 7.3%.
See our latest analysis for Hiap Teck Venture Berhad
Above you can see how the current ROCE for Hiap Teck Venture Berhad compares to its prior returns on capital, but there's only so much you can tell from the past. If you'd like, you can check out the forecasts from the analysts covering Hiap Teck Venture Berhad for free.
On the surface, the trend of ROCE at Hiap Teck Venture Berhad doesn't inspire confidence. Around five years ago the returns on capital were 4.2%, but since then they've fallen to 0.09%. And considering revenue has dropped while employing more capital, we'd be cautious. This could mean that the business is losing its competitive advantage or market share, because while more money is being put into ventures, it's actually producing a lower return - "less bang for their buck" per se.
In summary, we're somewhat concerned by Hiap Teck Venture Berhad's diminishing returns on increasing amounts of capital. Yet despite these concerning fundamentals, the stock has performed strongly with a 79% return over the last five years, so investors appear very optimistic. In any case, the current underlying trends don't bode well for long term performance so unless they reverse, we'd start looking elsewhere.
If you're still interested in Hiap Teck Venture Berhad it's worth checking out our to see if it's trading at an attractive price in other respects.
If you want to search for solid companies with great earnings, check out this free list of companies with good balance sheets and impressive returns on equity.
Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Senate Democrats urge Trump to walk back Nvidia, AMD deal
Senate Democrats urge Trump to walk back Nvidia, AMD deal

The Hill

time15 minutes ago

  • The Hill

Senate Democrats urge Trump to walk back Nvidia, AMD deal

Several top Senate Democrats are urging President Trump to walk back a deal with Nvidia and AMD that would allow the companies to sell artificial intelligence (AI) chips to China after they agreed to share 15 percent of revenue from sales. Senate Majority Leader Chuck Schumer (D-N.Y.) and Sens. Mark Warner (D-Va.), Jack Reed (D-R.I.), Jeanne Shaheen (D-N.H.), Chris Coons (D-Del.) and Elizabeth Warren (D-Mass.) argued in a letter sent Friday that the move runs counter to U.S. national security interests and could violate the law. Warner is the vice chair of the Senate Intelligence Committee, while Reed, Shaheen and Warren are the top Democrats on the Senate Armed Services, Foreign Relations and Banking panels, respectively. 'This 'negotiated deal,' allowing American semiconductor manufacturers to pay a 15 percent fee for the ability to sell critically sensitive technology to our adversary, blatantly violates the purpose of export control laws,' they wrote. Nvidia and AMD have each agreed to share 15 percent of revenue from the sales of their H20 and MI308 chips in order to secure export licenses from the Trump administration, which had imposed new licensing restrictions effectively blocking sales earlier this year. The deal has raised legal questions, as federal law prohibits fees on export licenses, while the Constitution bars export taxes. However, it's unclear whether the agreement would be considered a formal fee or tax and whether anyone would challenge the move. It has also provoked national security concerns, as the U.S. seeks to outpace China on AI and prevent Beijing from using the technology to boost its military capabilities. 'Our national security and military readiness relies upon American innovators inventing and producing the best technology in the world, and in maintaining that qualitative advantage in sensitive domains,' the senators said. 'The United States has historically been successful in maintaining and building that advantage because of, in part, our ability to deny adversaries access to those technologies.' 'The willingness displayed in this arrangement to 'negotiate' away America's competitive edge that is key to our national security in exchange for what is, in effect, a commission on a sale of AI-enabling technology to our main global competitor, is cause for serious alarm,' they added. The Democratic lawmakers pressed Trump for information about who participated in the negotiations, what legal standards were applied, how the 15 percent will be determined and collected, what the funds will be used for and what other companies are under consideration for such a deal. White House press secretary Karoline Leavitt suggested last week that the administration could pursue similar agreements in the future, even as the legality and mechanics of the Nvidia and AMD deal are 'still being ironed out' by the Commerce Department. 'Right now, it stands with these two companies. Perhaps it could expand in the future to other companies,' she said. 'I think it's a creative idea and solution.'

Trump's economy is here. Where it goes next, nobody knows.
Trump's economy is here. Where it goes next, nobody knows.

Boston Globe

time15 minutes ago

  • Boston Globe

Trump's economy is here. Where it goes next, nobody knows.

➡️ The Latest The three sisters of sidelined Market Basket chief executive Arthur T. Demoulas have removed Dr. Anne Klibanski, CEO of Mass General Brigham, was In Dedham, a company is putting together plans for a 😬 High anxiety Instead, the Uncertainty about tariffs and their impact on inflation. About employment and whether July's slowdown in hiring — combined with sharp downward revisions to the numbers for May and June — are a sign of things to come. About the effects of tight immigration restrictions and mass deportations on the labor market. About the Federal Reserve's next move on interest rates. Federal Reserve Governor Lisa Cook said the economy is being held back as business leaders struggle to cope with the many unknowns. 'This is deadweight loss,' she said during a panel discussion earlier this month sponsored by the Federal Reserve Bank of Boston. Advertisement Boston Fed President Susan Collins, speaking on the same panel, called it an 'uncertainty tax.' It's a rare moment as President Trump's unconventional policies collide with conventional economic wisdom. President Trump announced tariff rates — later revised — on April 2. Mark Schiefelbein/Associated Press ⏪ Recap Trump has moved quickly to put his stamp on the economy. In just 211 days, his administration has: Imposed steep import taxes. Tightened the borders and begun mass deportations of immigrants living in the country illegally. Pushed a sweeping tax cut and spending bill through Congress. Dismantled government agencies. Cajoled corporations including 'It is too early to discern much effect on the economy,' But, it added that 'strains are starting to show: retail sales are weakening, housing starts have dropped to their lowest since mid-2020 and an immigration crackdown is tightening labor supply.' Advertisement 🔍 Closer look Other indicators also point to economic crosswinds. The economy Tariffs are starting to push up inflation, but the increase hasn't been as big as economists anticipated. The core Consumer Price Index, which excludes often volatile food and energy costs, rose 3.1 percent in June from a year earlier — the fastest pace since February. Import-dependent companies, including Ford and John Deere, are reporting big losses tied to tariffs. Employers added just 73,000 jobs in July, falling well short of forecasts, and the totals for the previous two months were revised lower. After the revisions, payrolls increased by a paltry monthly average of 35,000 from May through July, compared with 126,000 in the prior three months. Consumer confidence has tumbled since Trump took office, according to the University of Michigan survey of consumer sentiment. 👉 Why it matters Taken together, the data underscore the growing risk of stagflation — the dreaded combination of slowing growth, rising unemployment, and escalating prices. 'We have gotten ourselves from an economy that was rip-roaring — just let it go, inflation coming down, the strongest economic recovery out of the pandemic — to an S-word adjacent economy by a set of policy choices that have been made that didn't have to be made this way,' Natasha Sarin, cofounder of the Budget Lab at Yale, Advertisement The prospect of stagflation puts the Fed in a bind. When the job market weakens, its typical move is to lower interest rates to make it easier for businesses to borrow and expand. But when prices climb too quickly, the central bank boosts rates to cool off inflation. 'The Fed's under a tremendous amount of pressure,' Scott DiMaggio of investment firm AllianceBernstein 🔮 What's ahead Despite the uncertainty, US stocks are trading near record highs, suggesting that investors expect things to work out for now. After a sharp April sell-off triggered by Trump's 'Liberation Day' tariff announcement, the Standard & Poor's 500 index rallied. The index is up 9.7 percent for the year. Investors are betting that Fed officials will begin easing rates when they next meet on Sept. 16-17. That, combined with resilient corporate earnings and strong enthusiasm — 🤔 Final thought Economic uncertainty is high thanks to Trump's aggressive policies, which have fueled both optimism and anxiety. Growth is slowing and prices are edging higher. There's a whiff of stagflation in the air, leaving the Federal Reserve with no easy path forward. AI enthusiasm is powering a surge in capital investment. But if the bubble bursts, a rerun of the dot-com market collapse and recession could follow. The outcome, regardless of what anyone says, is still very much in play. 🎙️ On the Record 'We've been here almost 130 years and our goal is to be here for the long run.' — Signature Healthcare vice president Beth MacNeill, after the parent company of Brockton Hospital said it would and end its bariatric surgery and cardiac rehabilitation service lines due to financial pressures. Advertisement 🏗️ Housing & Development 🔬 Biotech 📺 Media 🌿 Cannabis 💲 IPOs 🔢 By the Numbers 13 — The number of residential properties in Bourne's Round Hill neighborhood that the state plans to to build the Sagamore Bridge replacement. Three commercial properties will also be taken. Advertisement 🐄 The Closer Chief Daniel Humm in 2017. Benjamin Norman/New York Times When Eleven Madison Park in New York Chef Daniel Humm made the shift when he reopened after the pandemic, citing the environmental impact of meat and a desire to reimagine fine dining around plant-based cooking. 'The way we have sourced our food, the way we're consuming our food, the way we eat meat, it is not sustainable,' Last week, the chef said he was bringing some meat back — a decision made for financial reasons and as an act of hospitality. 'I very much believed in the all-in approach, but I didn't realize that we would exclude people,' he told The new menu, debuting on Oct. 14, will be mostly vegan but include a few meat and seafood options. The price will remain at $365 for seven to nine courses, and diners can still choose an all-vegan meal. 'When people come in and maybe they had one fish or a lobster or the duck but they also had 80 percent vegetable dishes,' Humm said, 'they might even like the vegetable dishes more.' 🗳️ On this date in 1920, when the 19th Amendment was ratified. 🙏 Thanks for reading. Trendlines will be back on Thursday. Advertisement If someone sent you this newsletter, you can Larry Edelman can be reached at

How global tensions are complicating tariff-fueled inflation risks
How global tensions are complicating tariff-fueled inflation risks

Axios

time15 minutes ago

  • Axios

How global tensions are complicating tariff-fueled inflation risks

Economists are considering a new inflation risk: geopolitical tensions that keep upward pressure on prices, especially on the energy front. The big picture: Despite messaging to the contrary over the weekend, a top White House official confirmed Monday that the administration will still impose heavy tariffs on India, a major buyer of Russian oil, second only to China. That comes as the administration considers whether to impose even more economic penalties on Russia as its war against Ukraine drags on — a move that could reverberate across the global economy. Driving the news: That uncertainty is part of the backdrop as European leaders and Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky arrive in Washington, D.C., for talks about a path to end the war. The high-stakes Trump-Putin summit in Anchorage concluded without a ceasefire agreement or peace deal, an outcome that President Trump previously warned would bring severe consequences. Bloomberg reported last week that the Trump administration was considering the possibility of sanctions on Russia's largest oil producers, an action that officials hoped would be short-lived, given the possible impact on prices. But after the summit, Trump said he wouldn't think about the possibility of sanctions for "two or three weeks." Secretary of State Marco Rubio said Sunday that additional sanctions might further delay peace talks. Yes, but: Top Trump adviser Peter Navarro said Monday that the White House would move to hit Russia indirectly with secondary tariffs targeting India. "India's dependence on Russian crude is opportunistic and deeply corrosive of the world's efforts to isolate Putin's war economy," Navarro wrote in an op-ed published in the Financial Times. Navarro, an influential voice on trade and tariffs, said the Trump administration's plans to double tariffs on Indian goods to 50% — set to take effect next week — was a "two-pronged policy." It will "hit India where it hurts — its access to US markets — even as it seeks to cut off the financial lifeline it has extended to Russia's war effort," Navarro wrote in the op-ed. What they're saying:"The U.S. adviser's sharp words on India's Russian crude imports, paired with postponed trade talks, revive concerns that energy flows remain hostage to trade and diplomatic frictions," Priyanka Sachdeva, an analyst at Singapore-based firm Phillip Nova, told CNBC. Between the lines: Energy prices have been stable since Trump took office, offsetting some of the tariff-related price hikes. Crude prices are below the recent peak in June after tensions flared between the U.S. and Iran. Energy prices are down 1.6% from a year ago, while gasoline prices are 9.5% lower, according to the July Consumer Price Index. Global oil demand has been tepid; any knock to supply might not be particularly meaningful. The Department of Energy's independent statistics agency expects lower oil prices next year. Flashback: The opposite dynamic prevailed during the Biden era. Energy prices soared as Russia invaded Ukraine and officials took steps to cut off the world's supply of Russian oil. The move was seen as necessary from a geopolitical standpoint. Economically, it ignited inflation that was already on the upswing.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store