Actor Kim Soohyun Sued For RM8mil By Advertisers Over Recent Controversies
According to reports, two companies, A and B, had recently filed lawsuits against Kim Soohyun and his agency, Gold Medalist. The two companies had advertising contracts with the star and are now seeking the return of modelling fees and damages. While the exact amount is unknown, the combined amount that A and B are seeking as compensation reportedly exceeds KRW 3 billion (approximately RM8.6 million).
More advertisers are also expected to join the legal battle against the actor. Another company, C, is considering filing a lawsuit against Kim Soohyun, citing breach of trust as the grounds for terminating their advertising contract. The company is seeking either the return of modelling fees or penalties. Before his scandal, the 'Queen of Tears' actor was reportedly one of South Korea's highest-paid actors and advertising models.
A South Korean lawyer explained the situation, saying, 'Kim Soohyun has signed advertising model contracts with 15 brands, each valued between KRW 1 billion (approximately RM2.9 million) and KRW 1.2 billion (approximately RM3.6 million). Usually, companies are reluctant to make it known that they were the first to file a lawsuit against a model. However, once one company files a lawsuit, more will join.'
There were previous allegations that the actor would face lawsuits for breaching contracts with his recent controversies. However, this is the first instance of an advertising company directly suing Kim Soohyun and his company. There's no telling how much the actor will be sued for. However, based on the figures, the total amount involved in the entire lawsuit could exceed KRW 10 billion (approximately RM30.1 million).
We're sure these companies have their reason for taking Kim Soohyun to court. What are your thoughts on this?
Source: YTN
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Sun
5 hours ago
- The Sun
South Korea's top court clears Baby Shark of plagiarism claims
SEOUL: South Korea's Supreme Court ruled on Thursday that the global children's hit 'Baby Shark' does not constitute plagiarism. The decision dismissed a copyright infringement lawsuit filed by US-based composer Johnny Only against South Korean education firm SmartStudy. The viral 'Baby Shark Dance' video remains YouTube's most-viewed content with over 16 billion views, surpassing Luis Fonsi's 'Despacito'. Johnny Only, legally named Jonathan Wright, had claimed SmartStudy's 2015 release copied his 2011 composition's bassline and rhythm. He sought 30 million won ($21,700) in compensation through his 2019 Seoul lawsuit against the Korean company. SmartStudy, now rebranded as The Pinkfong Company, maintained their version adapted a traditional children's tune in the public domain. A Seoul district court originally cleared Pinkfong of copyright violations in 2021 due to insufficient evidence. The appellate court upheld this verdict in 2023 before Thursday's Supreme Court confirmation. Court documents stated 'All appeals were dismissed and the lower court's rulings were upheld' in the final judgment. Pinkfong celebrated the ruling, stating it validated their creative adaptation of a traditional chant into a pop phenomenon. The company credited their success to adding 'an upbeat rhythm and catchy melody' to the public domain material. Only previously told CBC he had rewritten the original shark attack song into a child-friendly version in 2011. He claimed Pinkfong's version followed his creative approach during the 2019 interview. The composer had not responded to AFP's request for comment following Thursday's verdict. - AFP
Barnama
7 hours ago
- Barnama
South Korean Supreme Court Approves Rulings Against US Composer In Suit Over 'Baby Shark'
SEOUL, Aug 14 (Bernama-Yonhap) -- The Supreme Court on Thursday confirmed lower courts' rulings against an American composer in a plagiarism suit he brought against the producer of the popular South Korean children's song "Baby Shark" six years ago, Yonhap News Agency reported. New York-based composer Johnny Only, whose legal name is Jonathan Wright, filed the lawsuit in Seoul in March 2019, claiming that "Baby Shark," the world-famous song released by South Korean education startup SmartStudy in 2015, copied his 2011 song. SmartStudy, now renamed The Pinkfong Company, has said its song was a recreation of a traditional North American children's song that has no valid copyrights.
New Straits Times
7 hours ago
- New Straits Times
South Korean top court rules 'Baby Shark' not plagiarised
SEOUL: South Korea's top court ruled Thursday that the globally popular South Korean children's song "Baby Shark" was not plagiarised, rejecting a copyright claim filed by a US-based composer. With its catchy lyrics, the "Baby Shark Dance" video is the most viewed on YouTube, with more than 16 billion views, roughly double those of the runner-up, "Despacito", and third-place "Wheels on the Bus". In 2019, New York composer Johnny Only, whose legal name is Jonathan Wright, filed a lawsuit in Seoul, alleging that the 2015 hit "Baby Shark" by South Korean education startup SmartStudy copied a song he had released in 2011. Only demanded 30 million won (US$21,700) in compensation, accusing the firm of copying elements of his work, including its bassline and rhythm. SmartStudy, now known as The Pinkfong Company, argued that its version was an adaptation of a classic North American children's tune that is not protected by copyright. A South Korean lower court initially cleared the company of the charges at a trial in 2021, finding that there was insufficient evidence of copyright infringement. That ruling was upheld by an appeal court in 2023. Only then challenged the 2023 decision, but South Korea's Supreme Court affirmed the lower court rulings on Thursday. "All appeals were dismissed and the lower court's rulings were upheld," according to court documents seen by AFP. The Pinkfong Company said in a statement Thursday that the Supreme Court's decision confirmed "Baby Shark" was "based on a traditional singalong chant that has entered the public domain". The company said it had given "a fresh twist to the chant by adding an upbeat rhythm and catchy melody, turning it into the pop culture icon it is today". Only did not immediately reply to an AFP request for comment. He told Canadian public broadcaster CBC in 2019 that he had created a toddler-friendly version of "Baby Shark" in 2011, revising the original song, which was about a gory shark attack.
