
Tariff trap: Trump targets India to pressure Putin - But US may pay the price
US President Donald Trump on Wednesday signed an executive order slapping an additional 25% tariff on Indian goods in retaliation for New Delhi's continued purchase of Russian oil.
The move doubles existing tariffs, raising India's total levy to 50%, and marks Trump's latest pressure tactic to force Russian President
Vladimir Putin
to end the war in Ukraine.
But while the tariffs are meant to cripple Russia's oil revenues, analysts warn the biggest blow may land closer to home - on US consumers, businesses, and inflation.
'The punishment for those countries that continue to take big volumes of Russian energy… would also hurt the United States' economy in a material way,' Clayton Seigle, senior fellow at the Center for Strategic and International Studies, told CNN.
TL;DR: In short, Trump's tariff blitz could
Complicate anti-inflation efforts in the US
Undermine global oil market stability
Alienate a key democratic ally in Asia
Increase prices for US consumers
Erode America's diplomatic leverage with both Russia and China
For a strategy meant to isolate Moscow, it may instead isolate Washington - from its allies, supply chains, and the global economic consensus.
Why it matters
Trump's tariff strategy is not just a foreign policy maneuver - it's a high-stakes economic gamble that could hurt American wallets and businesses while destabilizing key alliances.
The decision to punish India - a vital US trade partner and a strategic counterweight to China in the Indo-Pacific - risks undermining years of diplomatic and economic engagement. India was the ninth-largest trading partner for the US in 2024, exporting over $86 billion worth of goods and services. Tariffs at 50% could wipe out billions in annual trade and fracture a relationship Washington has long cultivated to counterbalance China.
Back home, the US economy is vulnerable. Many of the Indian exports targeted by the tariff - including textiles, auto parts, electronics components, and chemicals - are inputs for American industries or consumer staples. Raising costs on these items doesn't just squeeze margins for US businesses - it raises prices for everyday Americans, especially amid stubborn inflation and rising borrowing costs.
'The prospective tariffs would lead to more inflation in the US,' warned Seigle of CSIS. 'They would saddle American businesses with higher import costs.'
And then there's the energy domino effect. India's massive purchases of Russian oil - which Trump seeks to curb - have helped keep global prices relatively stable. Forcing India to pivot away too quickly could reduce global supply, driving up oil prices at the pump. That could reverse recent gains in curbing inflation - and create a political problem for Trump ahead of the 2026 midterms.
There's also risk to America's credibility. Targeting India for buying Russian oil while overlooking larger importers like China - or US allies in Europe - opens the US to charges of hypocrisy and selective enforcement. That undermines global trust in US trade policy, particularly among developing nations.
It is extremely unfortunate that the US chose to impose additional tariffs on India for actions that several other countries are also taking in their own national interest. We reiterate that these actions are unfair, unjustified and unreasonable. India will take all actions necessary to protect its national interests.
MEA spokesperson Randhir Jaiswal
The big picture: India in Trump's crosshairs
India is now the second-largest buyer of Russian oil after China.
Following Russia's full-scale invasion of Ukraine in 2022, Western sanctions prompted Moscow to sell its crude at a discount. India jumped in, increasing Russian oil's share from under 2% to over 35% of its total imports by 2024. The US, meanwhile, continued importing Russian uranium, palladium, and other critical goods for its energy and defense sectors.
'It is revealing that the very nations criticizing India are themselves indulging in trade with Russia,' the MEA said onMonday.
'It is unjustified to single out India.'
India also insists that its purchases of discounted Russian oil helped keep global crude prices stable - preventing surges to $120-$130 per barrel.
Trump's anger isn't just about trade or oil - it's personal. Frustrated with Putin's refusal to negotiate peace, Trump is now turning that anger toward countries still buying Russian crude. India, despite being a US strategic partner, has become an outlet for that frustration.
'If Putin were not ignoring Trump's calls… Trump likely wouldn't be going after India so hard,' tweeted Michael Kugelman of the Wilson Center.
But there's a strategic angle too. Trump wants India to buy more - and pricier - American oil instead.
In 2021, before the Ukraine war, India was the top destination for US crude exports. Now, Trump seems determined to reverse India's pivot to Russian energy and bring it back into America's economic fold - with tariffs as leverage.
Backlash at home
For Trump, the backlash may also come from within. If tariffs drive up prices in the run-up to an election year, consumer sentiment could sour quickly. 'The US consumer would get upset with that,' UBS analyst Giovanni Staunovo said plainly.
Meanwhile, American companies are already warning of lost competitiveness. EEPC India, representing engineering exporters, estimates that US-bound Indian exports could drop by $4–5 billion.
That supply gap won't vanish-it'll be filled by cheaper competitors like Vietnam, Bangladesh, or China.
Even US military contractors are watching nervously. Beijing, in a parallel pressure campaign, has throttled critical minerals needed for defense systems. 'More than 80,000 parts used in Defense Department weapons systems rely on Chinese-controlled minerals,' reported the Wall Street Journal. The US can't afford to be squeezed from both sides-yet that's exactly what this dual-front strategy risks.
'Russia is too big to fail'
At the core of Trump's strategy is the belief that choking off Russian oil exports-especially via pressure on third-party buyers-will starve Putin's war chest. The logic sounds clean. The reality is messy.
'Russia is too big to fail,' Giovanni Staunovo, commodity analyst at UBS, told CNN. 'Russia exports 7 million barrels per day of crude and refined products. These are massive amounts that you cannot so easily replace.'
According to Vortexa, Russia now provides 13.5% of China's crude imports and 36% of India's. And while China might be too powerful to punish outright-given its control over critical minerals and defense supply chains-India, it seems, is the more convenient target.
But squeezing Russian oil off the market means driving up global prices. That affects the US, which still imports significant volumes of crude. 'Despite being a massive oil producer, the US is not immune to global price shocks,' said Kieran Tompkins of Capital Economics.
If Brent crude spikes, American gas prices will follow.
Geopolitics in a pressure cooker
This isn't just an economic story-it's a geopolitical flashpoint. Trade talks with India have stalled. The Biden-era goodwill, carefully rebuilt, is evaporating. The Modi government, previously aligned with Trump, now finds itself economically threatened.
Meanwhile, the US also faces a precarious balancing act with China.
Even as Trump pressures Beijing with tariff threats and warnings of secondary sanctions, his administration continues trade truce talks. Treasury secretary Scott Bessent reportedly told Chinese officials last week that the US was serious about enforcing sanctions. But few believe Trump can afford a full-scale economic war with both China and India simultaneously.
Even within Washington, there's skepticism.
'Draconian levels… will just be perceived as a bluff-because they'll hurt (the US), just like they'll hurt the other guys,' Seigle told CNN, arguing that more moderate tariffs between 10% and 30% 'would carry more weight' diplomatically.
India's economy may take a hit
For India, the stakes are equally high. The 50% tariff puts it at a competitive disadvantage compared to Vietnam, Bangladesh, and Pakistan, who face US tariffs of 15%-30%. Indian exports - particularly in textiles, leather, chemicals, and seafood - risk being priced out of the American market.
'Post this order, bilateral tariffs will rise to 50%, which would be the highest applied from August onwards,' said Gaura Sen Gupta, economist at IDFC First Bank. 'This definitely increases the downside risk to 2025-26 GDP estimates.'
'If the tariffs persist till March 2026, the total downside risk is estimated at 0.3% to 0.4%,' she added.
Sakshi Gupta at HDFC Bank warned that without a breakthrough in negotiations, India may have to lower its FY26 growth forecast below 6%, citing a potential 40-50 basis point hit to GDP.
What's next:
* A US delegation is expected in Delhi later this month for fresh talks.
* India may offer to gradually reduce Russian oil imports if the US offers price parity and energy security.
* The Indian government is reportedly considering relaxing dairy access and boosting US defense imports to revive talks.
Meanwhile, India is bracing for impact. The commerce ministry is exploring ways to support affected exporters - from easing loan norms to cutting compliance costs. But subsidies are off the table.
The real test may come in US domestic politics. If consumer prices climb and business leaders balk, Trump may be forced to recalibrate - again.
Mark Linscott, former US trade representative, said that without a direct Modi-Trump channel, 'we are in a lose-lose.' But he still believes 'there is real potential for a win-win trade deal.'
Stay informed with the latest
business
news, updates on
bank holidays
and
public holidays
.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Economic Times
5 minutes ago
- Economic Times
Can Trump's Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac IPO plan slash mortgage rates? Bill Ackman says...
Synopsis Donald Trump is reportedly planning to IPO Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac, potentially the largest IPO in history. Billionaire Investor Bill Ackman suggests merging the two mortgage giants to reduce mortgage rates and government oversight costs. Ackman believes privatization could yield substantial gains for the government, citing their improved capitalization and government backing. AP American hedge fund manager Bill Ackman took to X, formerly known as Twitter, and one way to reduce mortgage rates would be to merge government-sponsored enterprises Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac US President Donald Trump Saturday seemed to acknowledge reporting by The Wall Street Journal on Friday that he plans to IPO Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac by the end of this year. The President and his economic advisers are planning a historic sale of stock in Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac, the government-owned mortgage giants that help provide stability and affordability to America's home loan market. Reacting to the development, American hedge fund manager Bill Ackman took to X, formerly known as Twitter, and one way to reduce mortgage rates would be to merge government-sponsored enterprises Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac. He suggested the merger move would help reduce mortgage rates and achieve huge synergies both in their operations and in the trading price. ALSO READ: 'Ban Gay sex, end women's voting': Pete Hegseth sparks controversy for re-posting pastor's radical message Bill Ackman said Fannie and Freddie merger would also reduce the costs and risks of government way to reduce mortgage rates would be to merge Fannie and Freddie. A merger would enable them to achieve huge synergies both in their operations and in the trading price and spreads of their MBS, savings which could be passed along to consumers in the form of reduced mortgage rates, Ackman wrote in his post. "A merger would also reduce the cost and risks of government oversight as there would be only one institution that would require FHFA oversight. I suspect that this is @realDonaldTrump 's idea as implied by his post below. It's a really good one," his post read. US-government owned twin giants, Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac are tasked with expanding credit availability in the American market by securitising mortgages. Their shares surged over 20 per cent on Friday after the Wall Street Journal reported that the Trump administration may privatise the two institutions this year. ALSO READ: Powerball jackpot rises to $479 million: Who won lottery jackpot last night? Lotto results, drawing time US President Donald Trump has previously met the top leadership of US investment banks such as Citigroup, the Bank of America, Goldman Sachs and JPMorgan Chase to explore potential public offerings of the twin mortgage giants, Reuters reported, citing an the plans have not been finalised yet, and Trump continues to weigh various options, according to a senior administration official. But the White House believes an initial public offering of up to 15% of the two companies' shares could raise $30 billion, which could make it the largest IPO in has been weighing an IPO for years now. During his first term, Trump attempted — but ultimately failed — to privatize Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac, removing them from government conservatorship. Now, in his second term, he has revived the push. In May, he wrote on Truth Social that he was 'giving very serious consideration to bringing Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac public,' adding that he would consult with his Cabinet before making a decision 'in the near future.'Trump has argued for the monetisation of these two institutions, which were brought under US government control in the aftermath of the 2008 financial crisis. In May this year, Trump floated the idea while emphasising that the government will maintain its implicit guarantees for the securities issued by the two institutions. ALSO READ: Last planet parade of 2025 happening today? How to watch the rare planetary alignment in the US Trump backer Bill Ackman, a long-time shareholder in the twin behemoths, has repeatedly called for their privatisation. Ackman, founder, Pershing Capital Management, told Forbes magazine last month that the US government is the preferred stockholder of the twins, and in a position to realise gains worth $300 billion. He argued that the two institutions were 'vastly better capitalised' today than for the past 60 two institutions are not banks, but tap creditworthy mortgage buyers and pack the mortgages in securities to be sold on the market, Ackman explained. Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac have guarantees worth $7 trillion coupled with enormous cash flows, apart from a government backing, underlining their ability to weather any future crisis, Ackman added.


Economic Times
5 minutes ago
- Economic Times
'Sab ke boss to hum hain…': Rajnath Singh's veiled dig at Trump over tariffs, saying "some" are jealous of India's rapid growth
Synopsis Defence Minister Rajnath Singh took a subtle dig at US President Donald Trump over recent tariffs on Indian goods, accusing global powers of jealousy and trying to disrupt India's rapid economic growth. Speaking at a bhoomi pujan ceremony for a new rail coach factory in Madhya Pradesh, Singh praised India's dynamic economy and highlighted its rise to a top-four global economy since 2014. He also emphasised India's growing defence exports and condemned terrorism, affirming India's strong stance against those who threaten the nation. Defence Minister Rajnath Singh took a subtle dig at US President Donald Trump on Sunday over the recent tariff increases on Indian goods. Without naming Trump, Singh said, "Some 'boss' is jealous, unable to accept India's growth; trying to disrupt the country's economy."He added, "There are some people who are not happy with the speed at which India is developing. They are not liking it. 'Sabke boss toh hum hain' (We are everyone's boss), how is India growing so fast?"These remarks came after the US imposed a 25% tariff on Indian goods and an additional 25% penalty due to India's continued purchase of Russian oil. President Trump also threatened more tariff hikes, called India's economy 'dead,' and New Delhi criticised the US after some aides accused India of supporting Russia's war in Singh described India's economy as the world's most 'dashing and dynamic.' He said that some people with the attitude of 'we are everyone's boss' are unhappy with India's rapid growth. Speaking after a bhoomi pujan (groundbreaking ceremony) of a rail coach manufacturing unit of Bharat Earth Movers Limited (BEML) in Raisen district, Madhya Pradesh, Singh said, 'Today, if any country has a dashing and dynamic economy, it is India's economy.' He said no global power can stop India from becoming a big power due to the speed at which the country is moving pointed out that some people want to make Indian products more expensive when they reach other countries. This would stop people worldwide from buying Indian goods. He said, 'They think that we are everyone's boss and how is India moving forward so fast?'He mentioned that in 2014, India was ranked 11th in terms of economy size, but today it is counted among the top four.'If any country has a rapidly growing economy, it is our India,' he said. 'It means that the country is moving forward and its people are also moving ahead, because if the countrymen do not move forward, India cannot move forward.'Singh also spoke about defence production. Earlier, India bought defence equipment from other countries. But now, many things are made in India by Indian hands. India not only fulfils its own needs but also exports defence products to other said, 'When Narendra Modi became Prime Minister in 2014, only Rs 600 crore worth of defence products were exported. Now, we are exporting defence products worth more than Rs 24,000 crore. This is the power of India. This is the new defence sector of the new India.'Singh also referred to the terrorist attack in Pahalgam, Jammu and Kashmir, in April, where 26 people were killed. He said India responded strongly with Operation Sindoor. He said terrorists killed people after asking their religion, but India does not believe in such killings.'We do not even kill ants,' he said. 'We have resolved that we will kill people (terrorists) not by their religion but by their deeds.'He added, 'India will not spare anyone who instigates us.'On the rail coach unit, Singh said it would be a big gift for Raisen and Vidisha regions in Madhya Pradesh and provide jobs for 5,000 said Madhya Pradesh is rapidly developing in industries, having recently received investment proposals of more than Rs 30 lakh crore.'If the leadership is excellent, development happens rapidly. I think that after a few years, people will start calling Madhya Pradesh a modern state,' he said the area around the rail coach unit would also develop quickly once it is he performed the bhoomi pujan for the BEML rail coach unit at Umaria village in Raisen district. The project is called BRAHMA (BEML Rail Hub for Manufacturing) and will cost Rs 1,800 crore. Its initial capacity will be 125 to 200 coaches a year, which is planned to increase to 1,100 coaches a year in five Pradesh Chief Minister Mohan Yadav, Union Agriculture Minister Shivraj Singh Chouhan, and other officials attended the ceremony. A video message from Railway Minister Ashwini Vaishnaw was also shown. Inputs from agencies


Hans India
5 minutes ago
- Hans India
India's energy sector is rising through global uncertainty: Hardeep Puri
Petroleum and Natural Gas Minister Hardeep Singh Puri said on Sunday that India's energy sector is rising through global uncertainty with the reforms that have been rolled out in the oil and gas sector. "While the world faces fuel volatility, India is moving ahead with reforms. Oil refining capacity in the country has increased from 215 to 258 million metric tonnes per annum (MMTPA), and Jamnagar is now Asia's largest refinery, exporting petroleum products to 100+ countries," the minister said in a post on X. Highlighting the reforms in the upstream oil & gas exploration and production segment, the minister said that the open acreage licensing policy (OALP) Round 10 has unlocked 2.5 lakh sq km for further exploration and production. The clearances required for exploration have also been reduced from 37 to 18 to facilitate the ease of doing business. "Prime Minister Narendra Modi's vision is driving India's energy security through resilience with over $1.3 billion having been invested in the upstream segment to increase oil exploration and production," he said. The minister has also recently highlighted in the Parliament that India is witnessing a renewed surge in oil and gas exploration with the opening of nearly one million square kilometres of erstwhile 'No-Go' offshore areas in 2022. Since 2015, Exploration and Production (E&P) companies operating in India have reported 172 hydrocarbon discoveries, including 62 in offshore areas. Puri highlighted the geological significance of the AN basin, which lies at the junction of the Andaman and Nicobar Basins within the Bengal-Arakan sedimentary system. The tectonic setting, located at the boundary of the Indian and Burmese plates, has led to the formation of numerous stratigraphic traps that are conducive to hydrocarbon accumulation. This geological promise is further amplified by the basin's proximity to proven petroleum systems in Myanmar and North Sumatra. The region has attracted renewed global interest following significant gas discoveries in South Andaman offshore Indonesia, underlining the geological continuity across the region, the minister explained. In a significant development, ONGC and Oil India Ltd (OIL) have launched an ambitious exploration campaign in the Andaman ultra-deepwater region. For the first time, drilling operations are targeting depths of up to 5,000 metres. One such wildcat well, ANDW-7, drilled in a carbonate play in the East Andaman Back Arc region, has yielded encouraging geological insights. These include traces of light crude and condensate in cutting samples, heavy hydrocarbons like C-5 neo-pentane in trip gases, the minister further stated. These findings establish, for the first time, the existence of an active thermogenic petroleum system in the region, comparable to those in Myanmar and North Sumatra. While commercial reserves remain to be established, this campaign has validated the presence of a working petroleum system and laid the foundation for focused exploration in the area, the minister said. Providing an overview of the exploration outcomes so far, the Minister informed that ONGC has made hydrocarbon discoveries in 20 blocks, with an estimated reserve of 75 million metric tonnes of oil equivalent (MMTOE). Oil India Ltd., on its part, has made seven oil and gas discoveries over the past four years, with reserves estimated at 9.8 million barrels of oil and 2,706.3 million standard cubic meters of gas.