Why Americans can still expect higher prices even after Trump temporarily lowered tariffs on China
A temporary pause on sky-high tariffs between China and the US isn't really giving consumers much of a break from trade war chaos.
Five supply chain experts told Business Insider that, even with the recent reduction in Chinese tariffs, they expect to see continued disruption in the supply chain at least through the end of the year.
And, they said, the higher prices consumers are seeing on everything from fast fashion to electronics are probably only going to increase.
"While tariffs can be enacted with a pen stroke, it takes years to rewire global supply chains," John Lash, group vice president of product strategy at connected supply chain platform e2open, told Business Insider. "How this all plays out will be a complex formula full of surprises, with the general theme of higher consumer prices."
President Donald Trump has said that his trade strategy, while it may cause "short-term" pain for American consumers, will lead to more balanced trade relationships with our global partners, reducing or eliminating persistent trade deficits, and strengthening the US manufacturing industry.
Here's what supply chain experts said about what to expect in the meantime.
The 'bullwhip effect'
The bullwhip effect is a supply chain term used to describe how small disruptions create larger ripples throughout the chain of consumers, manufacturers, distributors, wholesalers, and retailers. It causes inefficiencies, inventory fluctuations, and price instability.
It's most often caused by unusual variations in demand, usually stemming from poor forecasting or bulk ordering — both of which the sector is dealing with now.
"We are in the bullwhip effect, but this would be what I call a policy-induced bullwhip effect," Nick Vyas, the founding director of the University of Southern California Marshall's Randall R. Kendrick Global Supply Chain Institute, told BI.
Businesses prepared for Trump's tariffs ahead of his inauguration by frontloading their shipping and stockpiling inventory. Then, when Trump's aggressive tariff strategy was announced in early April, they started holding shipments back to avoid paying higher fees. Ocean freight bookings to US ports from China decreased dramatically, restocking slowed, and jobs were cut across the shipping sector, Business Insider and other outlets have previously reported.
Now, Vyas said, we're in a "90-day refuel" where businesses will try to bring in as much stock as they can before the holiday season — and before the trade tensions have the chance to heat up again at the end of the temporary pause. But don't expect the supply chain snarls to clear up right away.
"I think this fluctuation, this back-and-forth cycle, the bullwhip is going to last us for at least the foreseeable future," Vyas said.
Continued shipping disruptions
Following a period of slowed-down activity at the ports, companies are now going to try to bring in as much inventory as they can over the next 90 days "because they don't know what'll happen" once the pause runs out, Chris Tang, a University of California, Los Angeles professor and expert in global supply chain management, told BI.
"So the port was empty, but now all of a sudden there's a big surge coming," Tang said.
That rush creates a new set of issues that will lead to increased prices, Bob Ferrari, a supply chain executive and managing director of the Ferrari Consulting and Research Group, told BI.
"Now, if this turns out to be as it has in the past, when all this activity comes in at once, then the container shipping lines scramble to handle all that volume in that short period of time," Ferrari said. That makes container shipping rates go up, raising the overall cost of transporting goods, he said.
Under the 145% tariffs, supply chain experts warned that Americans would see higher prices, empty shelves, and shortages within weeks. And while the lowered tariffs will reduce the extent of those impacts, the new tariffs and increased transportation costs will still lead to higher-than-normal prices, Ferrari said.
"You're going to see maybe double-digit price increases," he said.
Already increasing prices
Walmart, the biggest retailer in the US, has already started preparing its clients for continued price hikes. CEO Doug McMillon said in a Thursday earnings call that, though the temporary tariffs deal with China is a great start, it's not enough to keep prices down.
"Even at the reduced levels, the higher tariffs will result in higher prices," he said, adding that there needs to be a longer-term agreement between the two countries that lowers the tariffs even further.
Lisa Anderson, a supply chain expert and president of LMA Consulting, told BI she expects the overall effect of the tariffs to be "mildly inflationary," with some of the worst economic effects tempered by the recent trade deal, but ultimately "each industry or company could have a wildly different outcome."
But, she said, "over time, I'd expect for prices to stabilize after a near-term bubble." That's because "as companies move supply chains to the US, Mexico, India, Latin America, and other countries, they will offset the impacts of tariffs and be able to bring down prices," she said.
As for what kinds of goods this will affect, John Lash said discretionary products will see price hikes faster than staple items.
"And some goods we are used to buying may no longer be available," he added.
More trade turmoil on the horizon
Since they were first announced on April 2, Trump's sweeping tariffs — including a 10% baseline tariff and significantly higher tariffs on certain countries — have roiled the markets, wreaked havoc on the supply chain, and worried global leaders.
Trump's moves to increase the tariff on China to 145%, pause many country-specific tariffs for 90 days, and exempt certain electronic products from tariffs left business leaders concerned about continued uncertainty in the market.
Now, even after the first major trade talks between the dueling superpowers over the weekend, in which the US and China agreed to significantly lower their tariffs on each other, the uncertainty has persisted, since the US-China deal has another 90-day deadline.
As more tense negotiations creep across the horizon, Tang told BI that companies across the supply chain, which had already suffered a lot of damage following Trump's "Liberation Day" tariffs announcement, are still scrambling to catch up.
And it'll continue to be difficult for businesses to prepare for the future when they have no idea what Trump's next move will be.
"A complete trade deal is very difficult to pinpoint because, right now, I think the announcement is only a blanket statement — they still have to break down the details," Tang said.
"It's very important for the US government and work it out with China to have a really stable agreement — one way or the other, either high or low, just stick to it — so at least businesses know what they're working with," he said. "They don't need to be lovely-dovey to each other; you can cooperate and compete at the same time, but that's what's most important."
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


The Hill
6 minutes ago
- The Hill
Vance on LA unrest: Newsom should ‘look in mirror' and stop blaming Trump
Vice President JD Vance on Tuesday tore into California Gov. Gavin Newsom (D) for suggesting the unrest in Los Angeles is a consequence of federal involvement in state and local law enforcement efforts. 'Gavin Newsom says he didn't have a problem until Trump got involved,' Vance wrote in a post on X, attaching two photos that he said were taken before Trump ordered the National Guard to protect border patrol agents in California. One depicted rioters appearing to attack a 'border patrol' van, and another depicted a car set ablaze. The Hill was not able to verify the authenticity of the photos. 'Does this look like 'no problem'?' Vance asked. Vance suggested Newsom and Los Angeles Mayor Karen Bass 'fomented and encouraged the riots,' with the goal of promoting mass migration into the U.S., adding, 'It is their reason for being.' 'If you want to know why illegal aliens flocked to your state, stop accusing Donald Trump. Look in the mirror,' Vance said. 'If you want to know why border patrol fear for their lives over enforcing the law, look in the mirror.' Vance pointed to California's Medicaid expansion last year to low-income undocumented immigrants as an example of a policy that has 'encouraged mass migration into California.' Newsom has since proposed ending new Medicaid enrollment for undocumented adults, but his proposal faces resistance from the state legislature. 'Your policies that protected those migrants from common sense law enforcement. Your policies that offered massive welfare benefits to reward illegal immigrants. Your policies that allowed those illegal migrants (and their sympathizers) to assault our law enforcement. Your policies that allowed Los Angeles to turn into a war zone,' Vance continued. 'You sure as hell had a problem before President Trump came along. The problem is YOU,' Vance added. Vance's post is the latest in a back-and-forth between the administration and Newsom, who has resisted Trump's extraordinary steps to deploy 4,000 National Guard troops to the area and mobilize 700 active-duty marines. Newsom has insisted that the situation was under control before the Trump administration escalated tensions by making a provocative show of force. He accused Trump of 'intentionally causing chaos, terrorizing communities and endangering the principles of our great democracy.' After Trump suggested his border czar arrest Newsom, the California governor responded by saying, 'The President of the United States just called for the arrest of a sitting Governor. This is a day I hoped I would never see in America.' 'I don't care if you're a Democrat or a Republican this is a line we cannot cross as a nation — this is an unmistakable step toward authoritarianism,' Newsom added Monday afternoon. Vance then replied to Newsom, saying, 'Do your job. That's all we're asking.' 'Do YOUR job. We didn't have a problem until Trump got involved. Rescind the order. Return control to California,' Newsom responded, prompting Vance's latest response.


Axios
9 minutes ago
- Axios
Newsom denies Trump spoke to him before deploying more National Guards
California Gov. Gavin Newsom (D) on Tuesday said President Trump did not speak with him, despite deploying national military personnel to respond to Los Angeles protests. Why it matters: Trump claimed that he had spoken with the governor and criticized his handling of the rallies against Immigration and Customs Enforcement's actions. "There was no call. Not even a voicemail," Newsom said on X. "Americans should be alarmed that a President deploying Marines onto our streets doesn't even know who he's talking to." Driving the news: Trump, speaking to the media on Tuesday, said he last talked with Newsom "a day ago." "Called him up to tell him, got to do a better job," Trump said. "He's doing a bad job, causing a lot of death and a lot of potential death." Reality check: California authorities have not reported any deaths during the protests. A total of 72 people have been arrested over the past weekend, with five police officers being injured, according to local media report on Monday Context: The Marines deployed to LA have not yet responded to immigration protests.


Axios
9 minutes ago
- Axios
Black Caucus chair says Trump's actions on L.A. are impeachable
Congressional Black Caucus chair Yvette Clarke (D-N.Y.) said Tuesday she believes President Trump mobilizing the National Guard and deploying Marines to Los Angeles rises to the level of an impeachable offense. Why it matters: It's a break with House Democrats' general aversion towards impeachment from the head of one of their most powerful groups. The comment comes amid growing animosity between Democrats and the Trump administration over the president's use of law enforcement to carry out a campaign of mass deportations. The White House did not immediately respond to a request for comment. Driving the news: During a press conference, Clarke was asked if Trump's actions to quell protests in L.A. rise to the level of an impeachable offense "I definitely believe it is," she responded, "But we'll cross that bridge when we get to it." Clarke and other Democrats have argued that Trump has violated the U.S. Constitution by mobilizing the National Guard over Newsom's objections. Reality check: Democrats are highly unlikely to pursue an organized impeachment effort against Trump any time soon. Two rank-and-file members, Reps. Shri Thanedar (D-Mich.) and Al Green (D-Texas), have spearheaded their own rogue impeachment initiatives, but most Democrats have dissociated themselves with those efforts. Most Democrats are clear-eyed that impeachment would be doomed to failure with Republicans in control of Congress — and they often note that Trump won in 2024 despite previously being impeached twice. What they're saying: House Democratic Caucus chair Pete Aguilar (D-Calif.) told reporters at a subsequent press conference, "I've said before that ... House Democrats aren't focused on impeachment today."