Conclave mystery as African cardinal claims he 'hasn't been invited' to join voting for new Pope - while Vatican insists his non-attendance is due to 'poor health'
Cardinal John Njue, 79, is eligible to join the other 133 cardinals, from 70 countries, who are gathering in the Vatican for the start of the secretive process which begins this afternoon in the Sistine Chapel.
But in an interview the Kenyan clergyman suggested dark forces were at work in a scenario that could have come straight out of Ralph Fiennes papal blockbuster Conclave.
Speaking to Kenyan newspaper Daily Nation cardinal Njue said:' Those who go there for the election are usually sent official invites, and that has not happened on my part.
'The fact is that I have not been invited. I don't know why I've been excluded, if I'm not there it's not because I am in poor health.'
Italian media immediately jumped on his comments and said it had 'sparked mystery and intrigue'.
Cardinal Njue, who is Archbishop of Nairobi, has been at the forefront of preparations for the conclave after he and another African cardinal had their 'official ages' revised by the Vatican.
Earlier this month the Vatican updated its directory to say that Cardinal Njue was born in 1946 – changing it from 1944 – making him eligible to vote in the conclave.
While cardinal Philippe Quedraogo had his date of birth listed initially as January 1945 making him too old as the cut off is 80 for the conclave but it was then revised to December 1945 meaning he could vote.
In a statement Cardinal Njue's diocese in Nairobi appeared to contradict him as they insisted he was 'unable to take part because of ill health' adding 'let us pray for his good health'.
Cardinal Njue was made a cardinal by Pope Benedict in 2007 and is seen as a conservative, strong on family values and traditional Church teachings and not cut from the same cloth as the more liberal Pope Francis.
A Vatican spokesperson insisted that cardinal Njue had 'been invited but was not attending because of poor health'.
One commentator said:' It's a intriguing situation – the cardinal claims he isn't ill and the Vatican says he is – who is telling the truth ? Does someone not want him at the conclave?'
Cardinals will gather this morning at 10am local time for a mass inside St Peter's Basilica led by cardinal Giovanni Battista Re, before heading off to the Sistine Chapel this afternoon for the first vote to decide who will succeed Pope Francis who died last month aged 88.
Once at the Chapel the master of papal liturgical ceremonies, Archbishop Diego Ravelli, will shout out in Latin 'Extra omnes,' 'all out,' and anyone not eligible to vote leaves, the doors close, and the process will begin.
On Tuesday the 133 cardinals who are eligible to vote gathered at the Santa Marta guest house in the Vatican where they will stay for the duration of the conclave cut off from the outside world.
They will not have access to any electronic communication and the Sistine Chapel has also been swept for bugs to ensure no one can listen in as the cardinals debate who should lead the Catholic Church.
The telephone signal will also be jammed from 3pm so that no one can contact them as they debate under the hallowed, frescoed ceiling of Michelangelo's Sistine Chapel, 'guided only by God and the Holy Spirit' as to who should be Pope.
The first votes will be cast this evening, and the world will know the outcome when smoke is seen coming from the roof of the Sistine Chapel – white smoke means a Pope has been chosen while black means the jury is still out.
The winner is whoever gets two thirds of the votes, and tonight's first smoke is expected to be black while some Italian. Media is speculating a decision could come as early as Thursday night.
To get the colour of the smoke the ballot papers are burnt and chemicals are added and there are two votes in the morning and two in the afternoon with the cardinals returning to Santa Marta in between for meals.
Wine is allowed but spirits are banned and the favourite at the moment is said to be Pietro Parolin, Pope Francis number two and Vatican Secretary of State, who is said to have around 50 cardinals backing him.
In the last Conclave to elect Pope Francis, cardinals took two days, and it was the same length of time for Pope Benedict. The shortest Conclave was ten hours while the longest was just under three years in 1294.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Spectator
2 hours ago
- Spectator
The Romans would have been baffled by the Gaza protests
Why are people in the UK protesting about the situation in Gaza? Surely it should be because the helpless Gazans cannot protest about their plight, caused by Hamas, because if they did, Hamas would kill them. But in that case, why isn't it Hamas that people are protesting against? Or are they in favour of Hamas and therefore hate Israel for wanting to destroy Hamas? But wouldn't that free Gazans? The whole situation would have baffled the Romans. Romans protested only when their own interests were at stake. On one occasion around ad 50, the emperor Claudius was confronted by a mob in the forum, cursing him and pelting him with bread crusts because of a grain shortage. He immediately took steps to bring in supplies and organise grain rationing, distribution and even burial of the dead. Since it was important for social cohesion that the wealthy were seen to play their part, local patronage networks sprang into action. This, naturally, could cause problems of its own, as people flooded into areas where they heard such aid was on offer. Political protests were a feature of Roman life for some 250 years while the plebeians, making up nearly 90 per cent of the population (assuming slaves made up about 10 per cent), battled with the tiny senatorial elite in a 'conflict of the orders' to gain an equal say in the running of the state. The plebs' main weapon was the strike – the refusal to sign up for the military levy at times when the Romans were threatened by hostile Italian clans – unless concessions were made. Their representatives, the sacrosanct tribunes working through the Assembly of Plebs, ran the campaign, monitoring Senate proceeds, vetoing senatorial laws, presenting pro-pleb bills, intervening against rulings and so on. The situation was resolved in 287 bc because both sides knew what the problem was – the unity and stability of the state against dangerous enemies – and the elite saw that co-opting pleb power was in their own interests. But Hamas and Israel cannot even agree what the problem is in the first place (other than hating each other). Narcissistic protestors screaming 'genocide' simply prove the point.
ITV News
4 hours ago
- ITV News
At least 26 people killed as boat carrying migrants capsizes off Italy
At least 26 people were killed after a boat carrying nearly 100 migrants capsized in international waters off the Italian island of Lampedusa, authorities say. Italy's coastguard said the death toll was still 'provisional and being updated" as rescuers continued to search for survivors. UNHCR, the United Nations' refugee agency, said 60 survivors were brought to a centre in Lampedusa following Wednesday's capsizing. Based on survivor accounts, about 95 migrants left Libya on two boats, International Organization for Migration spokesperson Flavio Di Giacomo said. When one of the two vessels started to take on water, all the passengers were transferred to the other boat — made of fiberglass — which then capsized because of overloading, he added. It wasn't immediately known how long the migrants had been at sea. Lampedusa Mayor Filippo Mannino said that the shipwreck happened 'presumably at dawn'. So far this year, 675 migrants have died making the perilous central Mediterranean crossing, not counting the latest sinking, according to the UN refugee agency. 'Deep anguish over yet another shipwreck off the coast of Lampedusa, where UNHCR is now assisting the survivors,' Ungaro said on X. In the first six months of 2025, 30,060 refugees and migrants arrived in Italy by sea, a 16% increase compared to the same period last year, according to UNHCR. The migration route from northern Africa to southern Europe is considered one of the most dangerous in the world, with almost 24,500 people dying or disappearing on the Mediterranean crossing in the past decade, according to the UN's International Organisation for Migration. Most of the deaths have been attributed to small boats setting off from the coasts of Tunisia and Libya. The deadliest shipwreck off the coast of Lampedusa occurred on October 3, 2013, when a boat carrying over 500 migrants from Eritrea, Somalia, and Ghana caught fire and capsized, killing at least 368 people. Italian prime minister Giorgia Meloni – who made combating illegal immigration a top priority of her right-wing government – pledged on Wednesday to continue fighting 'unscrupulous traffickers" by preventing irregular departures and managing migration flows. 'That today's tragedy occurred despite a ready and operational international response warns us that the necessary rescue effort is not sufficient and, above all, does not address the root causes of this tragic problem,' she said.
The National
10 hours ago
- The National
Scottish Government panned for lack of Israel-linked arms firm checks
A Freedom of Information request has revealed that two major arms companies in receipt of Scottish Enterprise grants – Italian arms giant Leonardo and American multinational Raytheon Systems – haven't received a human right due diligence check since October 2019 This funding comes despite both firms continue to supply Israel with weapons amid its genocide in Gaza. In that timeframe, both firms have also been in receipt of Scottish public money – Leonardo received £786,125 in 2023 while Raytheon Systems, which has a factory in Glenrothes, was given £500k in the first half of 2024. Leonardo produces laser targeting systems for Lockheed Martin, which sells the F-35 jets Israel, and Raytheon makes Paveway II guided missiles which are also used by Israel. READ MORE: JD Vance panned for 'lies about Scotland' ahead of luxury Ayrshire holiday The last time a check was performed on French arms firm Thales was July 2021, while Babcock was last checked in March 2022 and Chemring Energetics in December 2021. Bae Systems received a check in February 2024. In response, human rights charity Amnesty International told The National that the 'more we learn' about the checks 'the more concerning it becomes' that Scottish Enterprise and Scottish ministers are defending the process. Scottish Greens co-leader Lorna Slater, meanwhile, said it was 'shocking', adding: 'There is no point in having human rights checks at all if they are never carried out.' In total, Scottish Enterprise has given £8 million to 13 companies involved in weapons manufacturing since 2019. The Scottish Government has repeatedly insisted that no public funding goes towards the manufacturing of munitions specifically but other areas these companies operate in, including research, training and apprenticeships. Scottish Enterprise, meanwhile, has strongly denied its human rights checks are not adequate. However, that has been called into question given that, of the 199 human rights checks between 2021 and 2023, no firm has ever failed. When pressed on the issue in an exclusive interview with The National last weekend, First Minister John Swinney defended the grants. 'We won't support the production of munitions. That's our hard line. And we get criticised for taking that hard line, and I'm very confident that hard line is applied,' he said. The First Minister was then pressed on the argument that any funding – even if ring-fenced by the Scottish Government – will directly help a company's cash flow and could, hypothetically, free up money to be used elsewhere, including in the building of munitions. 'I understand that point. But there are also defence requirements of Scotland. Scotland is part of an island nation. We require, for example, shipbuilding resources to support the maritime defense of the United Kingdom because nobody wants to see us vulnerable to an attack from Russia. I certainly don't want to,' he responded. An Amnesty International spokesperson said: "Amnesty is aware from our own research that payments were made to companies known to supply Israel without a new check being triggered by the unfolding genocide in Gaza. 'Alarmingly, that is the process Scottish Enterprise and the Scottish Government attempted to characterise as robust and well aligned to international standards. The recent in-house review of the human rights checks recommended some improvements, but unsurprisingly they don't go far enough. We will be meeting with Scottish Enterprise in the coming weeks to take these concerns forward." Slater, meanwhile, said it 'flies in the face of any kind of due diligence'. "These are some of the biggest arms companies in the world. They have armed human rights abusers and dictatorships and some have directly enabled and profited from the genocide in Gaza,' she said. "They should not be receiving public money in the first place, and the Scottish Government absolutely should not be setting up tests to win favourable headlines while refusing to actually implement them. "How can we trust a word they say on ensuring they are applying human rights standards when they are refusing to even ask the right questions of those they are giving public money to?" Scottish Enterprise has been approached for comment.
