Silver Soars 32% In 2025: ETFs See Record Inflows Amid 13-Year High, Time To Buy?
Silver ETFs: Silver has turned out to be one of 2025's most exciting stories in the commodities space, jumping over 32% this year and crossing $38 per ounce—levels not seen since 2011. Behind this rally is a powerful mix of industrial demand, tightening global supply, and investor appetite, which is also driving a surge in silver-focused Exchange-Traded Funds (ETFs). Indian retail investors are increasingly joining this global wave through simplified access on platforms.
'This isn't just a commodity cycle—it's a structural shift," says Subho Moulik, CEO & Founder of Appreciate. 'Over 50% of silver demand now comes from solar panels and electronics. Pair that with five consecutive years of supply deficits, and you get sustainable price momentum. Silver is uniquely placed as both an industrial metal and a safe-haven asset, making it a rare dual-purpose investment."
US-listed silver ETFs like SLV and SIVR have rallied 28% YTD, while silver mining ETFs such as SIL and SILJ have jumped over 50%. Indian investors can now access these global instruments directly, with minimal barriers.
He adds, 'In INR terms, silver has strong support around Rs 1,09,450. If global momentum continues, Rs 1,13,000 isn't far."
Analysts believe silver's role in clean energy—especially solar installations, EVs, and 5G—will only grow. With that, silver is increasingly moving from being a tactical trade to a strategic portfolio allocation, especially through ETFs that offer direct, cost-effective exposure.
Aksha Kamboj, VP at India Bullion & Jewellers Association (IBJA) and Executive Chairperson of Aspect Global Ventures, echoes the view. 'Silver has reached a milestone today, breaching Rs 1,12,000 per kg. The record points to increasing demand from the industry and investors. The Rs 1.12 lakh benchmark is not just a number—it reflects silver's growing appeal in a tech-driven, sustainable economy," she says. 'Long-term investors can consider staggered entries or SIPs in silver ETFs."
view comments
First Published:
Disclaimer: Comments reflect users' views, not News18's. Please keep discussions respectful and constructive. Abusive, defamatory, or illegal comments will be removed. News18 may disable any comment at its discretion. By posting, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
&w=3840&q=100)
Business Standard
9 minutes ago
- Business Standard
SCL fabricates 20 indigenous semiconductor chips designed by students
36 more chips designed by students in the pipeline Aashish Aryan New Delhi Listen to This Article The Semiconductor Lab (SCL) at Mohali has completed the fabrication of 20 semiconductor chips designed by students from across 17 Indian engineering institutes, including the Indian Institute of Technology at Jammu and Indore, sources said. These chips are now ready for tape-out and will soon be tested, the sources told Business Standard. In addition to these, 36 more chips designed in India by students are at various stages of fabrication at SCL, and are likely to be ready for tape-out in the next six months, they added. SCL Mohali had started offering end-to-end fabrication, testing and packaging support for chip
Time of India
23 minutes ago
- Time of India
Substance vs form: All eyes now on Tiger Global case after SC's verdict on global hospitality leader Hyatt International
Mumbai: After the Supreme Court verdict last week on the global hospitality leader Hyatt International, all eyes are on the high-stake Tiger Global case , whose outcome, expected in August, could sway the fortunes of many foreign investors and force them to change the way they run their shops to bet on India. But, can the Hyatt ruling have a rub-off on the verdict on Tiger? With the same bench of judges that ruled on Hyatt to decide on Tiger-the question has cropped up among legal eagles, tax experts, and MNCs as the battle between Tiger, an offshore investor, and India's tax office nears a closure. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like Villas For Sale in Dubai Might Surprise You Dubai villas | search ads Get Deals Undo The question stems from the court's observation that "legal form does not override economic substance". This single observation, according to several practitioners, may link the two cases, even though they pertain to different issues. THE COMMON LINK Live Events The Hyatt feud was over whether the foreign firm, acting as a consultant to an Indian hotel group, had a ' permanent establishment ' (PE) in India. The court-while observing that "legal form does not override economic substance" -said it did as Hyatt was not a typical consultant but was deeply involved in running the hotel in India, thanks to the terms of the deal. A 'PE' status means the foreign party would pay tax here on the portion of its global earnings attributable to India - and not just the tax deducted from its fees. The Tiger case, on the other hand, relates to 'capital gains' on sale of stocks - whether a Mauritius entity could escape tax in India merely on the back of the ' tax residency certificate ' (TRC) it obtained from the Mauritian authorities under the treaty the country has with India. Here is how the 'substance versus form' argument comes up: is TRC, a piece of paper, good enough to avoid tax by a shell entity which has no office, hires few or no employees, and has no power to make decisions? While the TRC gives it 'legal form', in reality, it may just be a paper outfit lacking 'substance'. "The Hon'ble SC regarded utmost importance to 'substance over form principle' and in doing so did a deep dive into the documents to ascertain 'control of operations', actual activities of employees and commercial agreements (like revenue linked service fees) in the Hyatt International matter. Substance over form , control and management and commercial substance are important factors that take centre stage even in treaty eligibility cases and a ruling in the case of Tiger Global is expected soon," said Ashish Mehta, partner at the law firm Khaitan & Co. A COURT REMINDS It's widely believed that armed with TRCs, many overseas private equity houses save tax on sale of shares (acquired before 2017) while foreign portfolio investors avoid tax on profits from equity derivatives as their investing arms are incorporated in treaty jurisdictions like Mauritius and Singapore. Many such arrangements would come unstuck, if the SC points at inadequate substance to rule against Tiger. "Recent rulings, from Formula One to Nestle SA to Hyatt International, demonstrate a consistent judicial approach: for any tax structure, the legal framework must align with the actual, factual substance of the arrangement. If not, the court may not grant tax relief in such cases," said Ashish Karundia, founder of the CA firm Ashish Karundia & Co. He feels that post Hyatt, chances are that non-residents may also be required to satisfy a 'substance' test in addition to holding a TRC when seeking treaty benefits. "Considering the greater scrutiny faced nowadays, it is essential to understand that the degree of reliability assigned to TRC is that of sufficient evidence rather than an irrebuttable evidence. It is sufficient, to begin with, but neither sacrosanct nor infallible!," said Karundia. The tax office had questioned Tiger Global's stand of not paying tax when it sold shares of Flipkart Singapore (holding shares of an Indian company) to another foreign investor (linked to Walmart) on the grounds that Tiger's Mauritius arm (the actual seller owning the Singapore entity) was only a vehicle used to avoid tax. Agreeing on the possibility of the court putting matters under the 'substance' lens, Rahul Garg, managing partner of Asire Consulting, which advises MNCs on tax, finance, assurance, and regulatory matters, said, "The court examined the commercial and operational realities to evaluate the degree of control and supervision by the foreign entity. It reiterated that legal form does not override economic substance. Since it's a fundamental requirement that tax treaties need to be availed in good faith, these observations could further support the Revenue's case if it can prove that the parent was an active participant with significant control and supervision in the decision making on investments by the entity which recorded the capital gains." It isn't the first time the court held substance over form. But that it chose to give a subtle reminder in the Hyatt ruling is lending itself to interpretation.
New Indian Express
32 minutes ago
- New Indian Express
Tariffs loom, talks linger as India holds ground on US deal
The recent India-UK trade agreement has shifted focus back to another lingering conversation — the trade deal between India and the United States. With August 1 approaching fast, and with it the threat of new US tariffs, the spotlight is back on whether the two sides can finally close a deal. President Donald Trump has called the deal 'very near'. Commerce Minister Piyush Goyal says negotiations are making 'fantastic' progress. However, market watchers firmly believe that a mini or an interim trade deal is unlikely in the next few days. In contrast, Trump has signed pacts with more than a handful of countries, including Japan, Vietnam, Indonesia, and the Philippines, in the past few days, besides dispatching tariff letters to over 20 more with effective rates from August. However, India isn't in a hurry, and as Goyal mentioned, negotiations are rarely successful when constrained by timelines. The delay in the India-US deal comes down to real differences. One is America's push for deeper access into India's farming and dairy sectors. India isn't ready to make those concessions, knowing their local impact could be serious. On the other hand, India has asked the US to ease duties on steel, aluminium and car exports — a request that remains on the table.
