Disney's LILO & STITCH Remake Sparks Fan Fury Over the Ending; What Happened to Ohana? — GeekTyrant
Disney's live-action remake of Lilo & Stitch is now playing in theaters. It had a strong Memorial Day opening weekend, and while the studio made an effort to recapture the emotional core of the original, one big change has longtime fans calling foul.
For a lot of fans, the way the movie ends is not just a creative liberty, it's a betrayal of what the original film was all about… ohana.
At first glance, the remake plays it safe. The dynamic between Lilo and Nani, sisters holding onto each other after their parents' death, remains central. Nani is still nineteen, still fiercely protective, still trying to keep her fractured family together despite the looming pressure from child services.
If you're watching with nostalgia goggles, you might be lulled into thinking, 'Okay, they kept the heart.' But, then the third act hits.
In the original animated film, the emotional climax hinges on Nani refusing to give up custody of Lilo. It's not just a plot point; it's the entire emotional spine. Her willingness to fight for her sister, to sacrifice her own dreams to preserve their bond, is what made their relationship so powerful.
In the live-action version, though, that bond ends with a handshake and a goodbye.
Lilo stays in Hawaii with neighbors as Nani heads off to college in San Diego. It's a major rewrite of the original ending, and for many fans, it completely undercuts what made Nani such a beloved character.
'Nani not giving up custody of Lilo and fighting for her WAS the point,' one fan, @inkfycreates, posted online. 'Nani and Lilo [bonding] due to Stitch WAS the point.'
Another fan, @JemStarGold, critisized the change as a misguided attempt to modernize Nani, saying: 'This feels like an attempt to girlboss Nani by giving her more ambitions, but they so easily could have just expanded on what the original implied.
'Show that she was an aspiring professional surfer before she had to take care of Lilo, then have her pursue it again at the end.'
They're not wrong. This isn't about hating on ambition or character growth, about how they went about doing it. The original film didn't need to show Nani giving up everything forever. But it did make it clear that her first priority was Lilo.
The live-action version flips that dynamic, and in doing so, loses the very thing that made Nani such a hero to so many.
Yes, the movie is doing well at the box office. Yes, audiences are showing up. But that doesn't mean fans aren't allowed to be disappointed when the soul of a story is stripped away in the name of reinvention.
The live-action Lilo & Stitch is in theaters now, and if you're curious, it's worth seeing for yourself. Just don't be surprised if the ending leaves a sting.
Let us know what you think! Did Disney make the right call, or did they miss the ohana mark entirely?
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
CBS News
31 minutes ago
- CBS News
Tarrant County citizens file lawsuit against new redistricting map
Less than a day after Tarrant County commissioners approved a controversial redistricting proposal, a group of citizens filed a lawsuit claiming intentional discrimination. According to the Lone Star Project, the lawsuit claims that Tarrant County Judge Tim O'Hare and his followers engaged in intentional racial discrimination in violation of the Voting Rights Act and the U.S. Constitution by drawing the new district lines. "Intentional discrimination is still against the law," said lead legal counsel for the citizen plaintiffs, Chad Dunn. "The map they drew, the process they used to draw it, and the animosity shown to the citizens of Tarrant County violate the Voting Rights Act and the Constitution." Hundreds of residents speak out for, against the redistricting More than 200 people spoke out about redrawing boundary lines during public comment Tuesday night. The majority who spoke were against redistricting, including the mayors of Arlington, Mansfield and Forest Hills. There were still several speakers who expressed their support. Several used the phrase "don't Dallas my Tarrant." Tarrant County "I want to say that I fully support deterring redistricting efforts. These lines haven't been updated since 2010," said Carlos Turcios, the community development committee chairman for the Tarrant Republican Party. Commissioners moved into executive session around 3 p.m. on Tuesday after some tense moments between the two Democrats and the three Republicans. As Commissioner Alisa Simmons expressed all the reasons she is against redistricting, Judge Tim O'Hare abruptly moved to executive session in an effort to limit her comments. O'Hare is spearheading this process and has been clear that it's about partisan politics. He wants another Republican seat on the court to ensure conservative leadership for the next decade. "It's a very divided country and the parties, I'm not sure, have never been further apart in their beliefs," O'Hare said. "I don't apologize for being a Republican. I don't apologize for being a conservative." "It's not partisan. It is racism." Critics believe the redistricting is racial gerrymandering, saying it goes beyond partisan politics and say it dilutes the voting power of minorities. "Absolutely, it's not partisan. It is racism," Simmons said during the meeting. The new map does appear to take areas with high Black and brown populations from precinct two and put them in precinct one. SMU political science professor Calvin Jillson said what the court did is not unusual, but the legality of the new lines comes down to intentions. "Oh, this absolutely gerrymandering – it is the redrawing of electoral boundaries for partisan purposes," Jillson said. "The question is whether the purposes behind the redrawing were actually political, in which case gerrymandering is legal, or racial discrimination, in which case it would not be legal." Check out more on the CBS News Texas YouTube page: contributed to this report.
Associated Press
35 minutes ago
- Associated Press
Ukraine releases footage of recent drone attack on Russian airfields
The Associated Press is an independent global news organization dedicated to factual reporting. Founded in 1846, AP today remains the most trusted source of fast, accurate, unbiased news in all formats and the essential provider of the technology and services vital to the news business. More than half the world's population sees AP journalism every day.
CBS News
35 minutes ago
- CBS News
8 charged after game wardens take down poaching ring in Cambria County
Eight people pleaded guilty to dozens of charges after the Pennsylvania Game Commission said wardens took down a poaching group in Cambria County. The Game Commission said a lengthy investigation into the taking of 11 white-tailed deer and a gray fox in Cambria County between 2023 and 2024 resulted in 35 charges and more than 70 years' worth of license revocations. Authorities said the investigation began when a game warden checked the license of one of the suspects while they were fishing in Indiana County. When the warden asked about the guns and ammunition found in the vehicle, the Game Commission said the suspect admitted to shooting deer at night using a spotlight. After serving three separate search warrants, investigators determined eight people were poaching deer at night while using spotlights. They also failed to tag deer, took bucks that didn't meet antler restrictions, used tags from other states and exceeded the legal limits, the Game Commission said. Jason Wise, Sandra Wise, Daniel Wise, Issac Keith, Dan Sodomont, Marina Morgan, Dennis Corson and Levi Corson all pleaded guilty to summary counts. They were ordered to pay $35,000 in restitution and they lost their hunting and trapping privileges for a combined 70 years. "Great work by all wardens involved in ensuring these senseless crimes didn't go unpunished, helping to uphold the law and protect our wildlife for current and future generations," the Pennsylvania Game Commission's Southwest Region wrote on Facebook. People are encouraged to report wildlife crimes by calling Operation Game Thief at 1-888-PGC-8001 or by going online.
