logo
She faced $500 daily HOA fines for an unapproved door in her home. A new state law saved her

She faced $500 daily HOA fines for an unapproved door in her home. A new state law saved her

Jinah Kim's HOA said she couldn't fix a doorway inside her condo. She did it anyway.
She figured it was fine. After all, the doorway was completely inside her home, separating an office and dining room. But when the complex's manager peeked into her place through the open garage door one day in March and saw the renovation, she received a notice the next day.
The privacy intrusion was shocking, but the cost of noncompliance was even worse: a single $100 fine at first, then up to $500 per day — $3,500 per week — starting July 10 until she changed the doorway back.
But on July 1, when Gov. Gavin Newsom signed Assembly Bill 130 into law, her HOA nightmare vanished with the stroke of a pen, and her fee for defiance was capped at $100.
'It's a game changer,' Kim said. 'For years, HOAs have been able to bend entire communities to their will on a whim. This stops that.'
Industry experts and HOA lobbyists were taken by surprise in June when Newsom pushed AB 130 through the state Legislature and signed it into law — not because it passed, but because it included a last-minute update redefining HOA law in California. The overall goal of the bill is to expedite housing by easing California Environmental Quality Act regulations for many projects, but it also amends the Davis-Stirling Act, the framework that governs homeowners associations.
The biggest change? HOA fines are now capped at $100 per violation unless there are health or safety impacts. Want to paint your house neon green? $100. Erect a giant Halloween skeleton on your front lawn year-round? $100.
The bill also bans interest and late fees on violations and prohibits HOAs from disciplining homeowners as long as they address violations before the hearing. It allows homeowners to request internal dispute resolution if they don't agree with the board's findings at hearings.
It's a massive win for disgruntled homeowners, who have long claimed that California HOAs are too aggressive, stringent and overbearing. It's a startling blow for HOAs, which were left blindsided by the changes.
Dyanne Peters, an attorney with Tinnelly Law Group who practices HOA law, said her firm was tracking the legislation, but in a different bill. The HOA language was originally part of Senate Bill 681, a housing bill authored by state Sen. Aisha Wahab (D-Hayward).
Peters said HOA lobbyists were making headway negotiating the bill and coming to a mutual agreement, but on June 27, the HOA language from SB 681 was added into AB 130 and passed three days later, leaving the HOA industry reeling.
'As an industry, this came as a shock,' she said. 'Everyone is scrambling to get a handle on the changes.'
Peters said no one likes paying fines, but noted that fines aren't a money-making tool for HOAs. Instead, they're used as deterrents for actions that disrupt communities.
For example, if a neighborhood doesn't allow homes to be used as short-term rentals such as Airbnbs, but a homeowner shirking the rules only has to pay $100 one time, they'll probably just pay the fine and keep renting out their home. Or if a resident wants to build a huge fence but doesn't want to deal with the architectural approval process, they'll just eat the $100 and build whatever they want.
'It's frustrating because these new rules are handcuffing homeowners associations,' Peters said. 'It takes away the ability for HOAs to govern their own communities. Clients are calling us asking, 'What's the point?''
However, the bill added a lifeline for HOAs by specifying that fines can be greater than $100 if they 'result in an adverse health or safety impact on the common area or another association member's property.'
Peters said associations should go through their current rules and see which could be health or safety violations, and then adopt resolutions that specify in writing that certain actions, such as speeding or having aggressive pets, have health or safety impacts and therefore qualify for fines greater than $100.
Luke Carlson, an attorney who represents homeowners in HOA disputes, called the bill a 'long-overdue course correction.'
'AB 130 is more than a law — it's a signal that Sacramento is finally starting to hear the voices of homeowners who've suffered in silence for too long,' said Carlson, who authored the book 'Bad HOA: The Homeowner's Guide to Going to War and Reclaiming Your Power.'
Carlson said HOAs in Southern California are uniquely aggressive because of soaring home prices. Property values are high — and so are the stakes for maintaining a problem-free community that keeps those values high.
But he said when an association is bad, it tends to feed off its own power, making arbitrary decisions or giving out preferential treatment until someone pushes back.
'Everyone agrees bad HOAs are a bad thing, and it takes legislative reform to stop them,' he said.
HOA horror stories abound in California, the state with the most HOAs (more than 50,000) and the most homes within HOAs (4.68 million) in the country — roughly a million more than Florida, the state with the second most. More than a third of Californians live in HOA communities, and nearly two-thirds of homeowners are a part of HOAs, according to the California Assn. of Homeowners Assns.
In San Ramon in Contra Costa County, a woman was fined for replacing her lawn with drought-tolerant plants. In Oakland, HOAs are installing surveillance cameras to track cars and sharing the data with police. Last year, a Times investigation dove into allegations of grand theft and money laundering inside a Santa Monica co-op.
Kim, a resident of Shadow Ridge in Oak Park in Ventura County, wanted to remove a blockage in the doorway between her office and dining room. The previous owner had filled the top of the entry with drywall to cover up plumbing pipes, but Kim grew tired of ducking to get under it.
The HOA denied her initial request to fix it since the work required briefly shutting off shared water and rerouting pipes. But Kim had her contractor do it anyway.
It was an hourlong fix.
A few months later, the complex's general manager spotted the unauthorized renovation. The next day, she received four violation letters: one for the door, one for installing an EV charger in her garage, one for having her dog off-leash and one for an unpermitted rug on her balcony.
'It's a door within my home that no one else sees and no one else is affected by,' Kim said. 'It felt like accidentally tapping someone in the hallway and getting the death penalty.'
She resolved the dog and rug violations and is appealing the EV charger one. But she refused to change the doorway back.
On June 27, Kim received a letter saying that since the renovation rerouted shared plumbing lines, she'd have to pay to fill the doorway back in, plus pay $100. If she didn't resolve the issue by July 10, she'd get slapped with fines of up to $500 for every day it wasn't fixed.
But after AB 130 went into law, the deadline came and went. She hasn't heard a peep from her HOA, which didn't respond to a request for comment.
'It was a big relief. Having a daily $500 fine hanging over my head was a huge source of anxiety,' Kim said.
She acknowledged that the new blanket of rules will probably allow homeowners to get away with things they shouldn't. But for now, she's just happy to stop banging her head on drywall every time she walks through her dining room.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Utah debates in limbo as Utah Debate Commission founder exits blasting GOP
Utah debates in limbo as Utah Debate Commission founder exits blasting GOP

Yahoo

timean hour ago

  • Yahoo

Utah debates in limbo as Utah Debate Commission founder exits blasting GOP

SALT LAKE CITY () — One of the founding members of the Utah Debate Commission (UDC) has announced his departure from the organization, alleging that it is 'under attack' from the GOP-controlled Utah state legislature. 'Since the legislature now seeks to become involved (in debates), thanks to efforts of our former governor and current Republican legislative leaders, the UDC is under attack,' wrote founding UDC member Richard Davis in a letter to 24 of his fellow board members on Monday announcing his departure. 'Obviously, now the Republican officials will have the power to determine the venues, the questions, the moderators, the thresholds for participation, and so on. So, it makes sense to them to take charge. It is a travesty for Utah voters,' Davis wrote. But multiple current and former board members who spoke to ABC4 say that behind the scenes, the decade-old organization that has executed Utah's federal and statewide general election debates, and more recently primary ones, has faced a messy history of being disorganized, excluding a Republican from its board, and accusations of being biased against the state's dominant party. Davis' departure also comes as the group's future, and the future of debates in Utah, is somewhat uncertain after the legislature decided not to fund the UDC anymore, instead giving to the University of Utah and the Hinckley Institute of Politics to join with Utah Valley University's Herbert Institute for Public Policy, run by Governor Gary Herbert, to 'establish a statewide non-partisan debate organization.' 'I knew partisanship would rear its ugly head, although I did not anticipate how much that would occur as well in Utah,' wrote Davis. 'I knew it would take vigilance to resist the governing party's effort to co-opt the UDC,' he added. Former Governor Gary denied that he or Republicans were trying to usurp control of the UDC in any way; rather, he said, that his idea was that if the legislature wanted a better debate organizing system, then they should fund it. 'Rather than control it, they're trying to make sure it's fair,' said Herbret. The goal that Richard has to make it fair is the same, and they'll fund it,' he said. A BYU Political Science Professor, Davis also founded the United Utah Party and has been openly critical of Republicans, including in his 2022 Deseret News Op-ed, where he first accused them of trying to 'strip away independence' from the commission. Davis told ABC4, and he outlines in his email, that the UDC fallout with Republicans escalated that year, after the decision to participate in primary debates and the Republican Party's backlash, which led to its refusal to have its candidates participate. 'I think a lot of the folks in the state were following the lead of their national counterparts who were saying don't participate in (the Commission on Presidential Debates), debates where you have supposed, what they considered supposed non-partisan settings because their board includes Democrats,' Davis told ABC4. But Republicans have alleged biases too, citing some of the moderators chosen by the commission. Like, in 2022, when Congressman Burgess Owens skipped his general election debate, citing a 'racist cartoon' from the Salt Lake Tribune, whose editor, Lauren Gustus, was the moderator. 'Since 2014, the Utah Debate Commission has proudly provided Utahns with fair, independent, and nonpartisan candidate debates,' said current GOP Co-Chair Becky Edwards via a statement. The commission has also faced criticism over its polling methods, which have allowed several third-party candidates to qualify for the stage despite the political reality that they likely wouldn't have a chance of winning in Utah. Davis maintains that the threshold was meant to balance fairness for voters outside the two-party system while weeding out non-serious contenders, and that he was in no way trying to unfairly benefit his third party. 'This threshold was set in 2013 or 2014, long before there was a United Utah Party, ' Davis said. 'And when I did become involved with the UUP, I stepped away from UDC.' Board rejects Republican Chief of Staff With those issues as the backdrop, in 2024, the board members who spoke to ABC 4 say Mark Thomas, the Utah Senate's Chief of Staff, had been asked several times by another founding member, Democrat Scott Howell who resigned in March after serving for 12 years, to join the board because of his experience in Utah elections and relationship with the legislature. Thomas was hesitant at first because of 2022, but ultimately agreed and began attending board subcommittee meetings. With approval from the board's executive committee, Thomas, a Republican, was then brought forward for a vote of ratification. But the board ultimately chose not to ratify Thomas, but did approve former Governor Gary Herbert in the same meeting. Davis took issue with Thomas's ability to be independent because he was appointed by Senate President Stuart Adams (R-Layton). But Thomas's actual role is Chief of Staff for the entire Senate, Democrats included, just as Adams is the President over the entire Senate. 'It wasn't that he was Republican, it was that he was a state government employee who was working directly for politicians,' Davis said, citing a board bylaw that prohibited politicians from being on the board. Rumors then started swirling among board members that Howell had offered Thomas a spot on the board in exchange for legislative funding. 'I never, ever, even once made reference to anything like 'help us get an appropriation and we'll give you a seat on the board,'' Howell said emphatically. 'Never. Ever.' 'I felt bad about the situation that Thomas had been misinformed that he was already on the board,' Davis said. But the experience left a sour taste for other board members who felt Thomas was treated poorly, made to wait on Zoom for 40 minutes while Davis and others debated his eligibility. Some also believed that Thomas wasn't let in because he was too conservative, and there was a double standard of allowing public university employees funded by the legislature, and other members with ties to politicians, but not Thomas. Future of the Utah Debate Commission The following legislative session, in 2025, the legislature stripped UDC of its funding in favor of the two universities, which did not even submit a formal appropriations request for the money. And despite the criteria for appointees to serve on the future debate committee outlined anywhere in state law, Herbert maintains that the Herbert and Hinckley Institutes will be able to create a non-partisan system. 'Our goal is to make sure there's a fair and balanced debate commission to make sure they're run professionally without bias,' he said. Davis believes the legislature gave the funding to the universities to dismantle UDC. '(The legislature) is expecting that we'll just fold and that their version, because it's got to be well funded by the legislature, will just be the prominent debate organization in the state,' Davis said. With the state funding of the UDC now gone and the new system not yet created, Davis urged the media coalitions to take over running the UDC for federal and statewide races. 'The media is the one organization left of the group that is truly independent,' Davis said. His outlook on the UDC's fate, however, was grim. Davis believes that the universities that have now been funded by the legislature will be controlled by the GOP purse strings. 'With no money, I'm not sure that there's a future there, which is very sad for me.' Edwards says the UDC will continue its mission of 'elevating political discourse and empowering voters,' though presumably they'll have to find private donors. Edwards said they are moving toward debates in 2026. 'The Utah Debate Commission continues its work and is actively preparing for the 2026 elections. We believe Utahns deserve fair and substantive debates, and we are proud to serve that public interest.' Editor's note: ABC4 is a member of the Utah Debate Commission with two company representatives on the board. The information for this story did not come from them. Latest headlines: Miss United States accuses GOP Rep. Cory Mills of threatening to release explicit videos of her School Guardian Program: State security chief explains Utah's newest approach to security and safety Utah debates in limbo as Utah Debate Commission founder exits blasting GOP Federal judge sides with a Utah religion that uses 'magic mushrooms,' citing new state law The longest winning streak in baseball history happened in SLC, and is now a film Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.

Thompson secures new term in special election
Thompson secures new term in special election

Yahoo

time2 hours ago

  • Yahoo

Thompson secures new term in special election

TUPELO — Incumbent Democrat Rickey Thompson has defeated his opponent and will continue to represent District 16 in the Mississippi House of Representatives following a special election that saw low turnout across four counties. Thompson defeated his challenger, Brady Davis, during Tuesday's primary election. Following a redistricting that mandated the election, District 16 covers portions of Chickasaw, Lee, Monroe and Pontotoc counties. 'I'm feeling like it is time to make things happen for Northeast Mississippi and we are already on the way,' Thompson said. 'I want to thank from the bottom of my heart the people of District 16. I am deeply honored. This victory does not belong to me. It belongs to the neighbors who opened up their door for me. It is about the people.' District-wide, Thompson secured 1,325 votes (79%) to Davis' 348 votes (21%) according to unofficial results provided by circuit court clerks in Lee, Chickasaw, Monroe and Pontotoc counties. With no Republican or third-party challengers, Thompson secured his seat for a new term. This will be Thompson's third term. His second was cut short by this special election, which was forced by the redistricting. In Chickasaw County, Thompson beat out Davis by securing 62 votes to Davis' six. In Lee County, where the bulk of the electorate lives, Thompson received 1,109 votes to Davis' 288. In Monroe County, Thompson secured 110 votes while Davis received 17, and in Pontotoc County, Thompson earned 44 votes while Davis tallied 37. Voter turnout was lean, with the lowest in Pontotoc County showing just 4.4% of eligible voters taking part in the election. Chickasaw County saw an almost 19% turnout, Lee County had a 12% turnout and Monroe County had a 9% turnout. With the dust settled, Thompson said he again wants to focus on healthcare, education and infrastructure in the coming legislative session, noting that he also plans to begin employing more townhall meetings to 'keep the citizens abreast of the goings on in Jackson.' Monroe County Journal Managing Editor Ray Van Dusen contributed to this article. Solve the daily Crossword

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store