How the new welfare bill affects PIP and universal credit payments
With just over an hour before a crunch vote that an under-fire Keir Starmer was in danger of losing, disabilities minister Stephen Timms announced no cuts would be made to PIP until he conducted and concluded a review of the disability benefit.
It followed previous concessions to PIP and universal credit announced last week as ministers initially tried to appease Labour rebels.
The chaotic changes come some three months after the controversial reforms were first announced by the government and are likely to leave many claimants trying to catch up with what the latest changes mean for them.
The Universal Credit and Personal Independence Payment Bill was introduced by the government in March of this year with the aim of stabilising welfare spending as well as getting more people claiming benefits back into work.
Initially, the government proposed £5bn worth of cuts to the health element of universal credit, as well as limiting who would be eligible for PIP. It also proposed axing any kind of disability payments for those under 22.
Now, the bill has radically changed following widespread backlash from disabled people, at least 86 charities, and a swell of Labour backbenchers.
However, cuts to universal credit still feature. While the health top-up amount was set to be frozen until 2028 and the payments for new claimants halved, the benefit top-up will now be raised in line with inflation.
The PIP changes have now been shelved by the government until the disabilities minister, Stephen Timms, conducts a review into the impact of the cuts in 2026.
The Timms review is a comprehensive review of the PIP assessment system and is aimed at ensuring the PIP system is fair, supportive, and reflects the realities of modern life.
The review will be co-produced with disabled people, organisations representing them, and MPs, with the goal of delivering better experiences and outcomes for disabled people and those with health conditions.
The review will be the first comprehensive report into the disability benefit in a decade, and is expected to be published in autumn 2026.
Under the government's last-minute concession, PIP claimants will no longer have to score four points or more in a single category of their benefit assessment in order to qualify for the benefit.
Now, the implications of the decision — and how the benefit payment works at large — will be reviewed by Timms.
The findings of the review are expected late 2026, meaning payments will not be affected until at least this date — if at all.
Under the government's initial welfare reform proposal, around 800,000 people were estimated to lose out on the daily living component of PIP by 2029/30.
Now, no one will be affected at least until the review takes place and it seems likely the government will struggle to push through similar reforms.
Even after a series of concessions, the health top-up element of universal credit will still be frozen — to an extent — for current claimants, and halved for new claimants.
However, under one of the concessions the government made last week, it will now rise in line with inflation year-on-year.
The freezing of the universal credit health element and reductions for new claimants are expected to impact 2.25 million existing and 730,000 future claimants.
The government will save some money overall, but a drastically smaller amount than it first calculated at £5bn.
Before the inflation announcement, the government was expected to make over £1.1 billion in net savings by 2029/30 from the combined measures of freezing the universal credit health element for existing claimants and halving it for most new claimants from April 2026.
Now, the figure is expected to be lower.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
8 hours ago
- Yahoo
Iceland blames Rachel Reeves for price rises
Iceland has blamed Rachel Reeves for fuelling higher food prices, months after its Labour-backing chairman told businesses to stop complaining about the Budget. Bosses said the supermarket 'will inevitably have to pass [some cost increases] on to consumers' after food makers were struck by an increase in both employers' National Insurance contributions and the National Living Wage. Iceland said: 'We are doing our utmost to offset the growing input cost pressures caused by suppliers seeking to recover the increase in their own labour costs arising from last autumn's Budget, but will inevitably have to pass some of these on to consumers, where we can do so without weakening our own price position in the marketplace.' In accounts published this week and signed off in July, the company said it was now expecting UK food price inflation to peak at between 4pc and 5pc in the next six months. The comments follow warnings over the rising cost of the weekly shop, with the Bank of England this week saying it was expecting increases for the rest of the year. Officials said supermarket price rises had been fuelled by government policy, pointing to the increase in the minimum wage, the Chancellor's tax raid and a net zero packaging levy. Faster than expected increases in food prices are set to send the overall rate of inflation to a peak of 4pc in September. The higher prices at Iceland come after the supermarket's chairman Richard Walker previously urged rival grocery bosses to stop 'wallowing' and 'complaining' about Ms Reeves' tax raid. Mr Walker, a former Tory donor who changed allegiance in January 2024, said in December: 'This isn't a time for businesses to wallow… The Government isn't going to change its mind. It was a tough Budget, but we adapt.' Credit rating agency Fitch recently raised concerns over Iceland's profitability, suggesting the supermarket chain would have to invest in price cuts this year at a time when it is battling higher costs. It said the supermarket, which employs more than 30,000 people, would face 'momentary profit pressure'. Broaden your horizons with award-winning British journalism. Try The Telegraph free for 1 month with unlimited access to our award-winning website, exclusive app, money-saving offers and more.
Yahoo
19 hours ago
- Yahoo
Nine MPs in Birmingham and Black Country make money renting out homes - is yours one of them
Smethwick's Labour MP Gurinder Singh Josan is the second biggest housing landlord in Parliament, co-owning eight homes in Birmingham and Sandwell that are rented out. The MP co-owns three of the properties with relatives and is a co-owner in five others, with each of the homes bringing in rental income of at least £10,000 a year. Birmingham Perry Barr Independent MP Ayoub Khan co-owns three properties in Birmingham. READ MORE: Homelessness minister Rushanara Ali resigns after 'ejecting tenants and hiking rent' Light has been shone on the housing interests of sitting MPs following the resignation of Labour's homelessness minister Rushnara Ali after she was found to have evicted tenants from her London property, and then later re-listed the property with a higher rent. Campaigners have said it undermines the government's credibility in its efforts to reform the rental sector. In Birmingham and the Black Country, there is desperate concern particularly about the rocketing number of HMOs and exempt properties, with thousands of former family homes converted into units housing six or more individuals so landlords can max out their rental income. Thousands of children are currently living in B&Bs and temporary housing because of a shortage of family homes, while thousands more families are on council waiting lists because they can't meet private rents. Josan, elected last year, has a housing portfolio equal to former chancellor Jeremy Hunt, Cons. They both boast eight rental properties. Only one MP, Jas Athwal, MP for Ilford South, has more - he rents out 15 residential and three commercial properties in London. Of all Westminster MPs, one in eight declared a rental income from property in the last year, according to a recent Guardian analysis. The official register of interests, which shows any additional earnings and interests held by MPs, reveals that Josan owns five properties in Sandwell and Birmingham, and also co-owns with relatives another three properties in Sandwell. We have reached out to Josan to ask him if any of the properties are either HMOs or are leased as exempt supported accommodation - we had not received a response at the time of publication. But we can also reveal that several other MPs in Birmingham and the Black Country are in the private rentals business. Tahir Ali, Labour MP for Hall Green and Moseley, owns a rental property that he declares makes a rental income of more than £10,000 a year. It is a single property in Birmingham, according to the register. Saqib Bhatti, Conservative MP for Meriden and Solihull East, declares ownership of a property in Walsall that he has a 25% share in, and a second property in Walsall. Al Carns, Labour MP for Birmingham Selly Oak, declares a property in Aberdeen that he co-owns with his spouse that generates rental income to him. Sarah Coombes, Labour MP for West Bromwich, declares a flat she rents out in London. Warinder Juss, Labour MP for Wolverhampton West, declares owning two rental properties - a flat and a house - in Wolverhampton. Ayoub Khan, Independent MP for Birmingham Perry Barr, declares his co-ownership of three properties, all in Birmingham. He says one is co-owned by him and his company; and two others are 'co-owned with a family member'. Sonia Kumar, Labour MP for Dudley, also declares a single property, in Birmingham, that she rents out. Wendy Morton, Conservative MP for Aldridge-Brownhills, does not own rental housing but does declare receiving rental income from small industrial units on a business park in North Yorkshire owned by a company DM Electronics.
Yahoo
21 hours ago
- Yahoo
Council staff told how to address fake news online
A council has given its staff advice about how to tackle "fake news and misinformation" being spread across its constituency. A report detailing South Tyneside Council's new communications strategy said new guidance has been provided to staff about when to "correct misinformation" online and when to "hide posts that contravene the guidance". It said the council's e-newsletter and social media pages were its main communication platforms and had "significant followers and subscribers". Labour council leader Tracey Dixon said the council monitored its own social media feeds but admitted there were challenges when dealing with external voices. "It's very difficult to actually deal with others from outside the organisation," she said. "But, when we can, we actually put the facts out there and make sure it is factual. We try and monitor it the best we possibly can within our channels, but obviously externally, it's very, very difficult." The report also noted "managing the narrative on social media is not without its challenges", according to the Local Democracy Reporting Service. It said its social media guidance had been developed to "challenge misinformation and managing unacceptable behaviour" and support staff using the channels. Follow BBC North East on X, Facebook, Nextdoor and Instagram. More stories 'Google AI presented my April Fools' story as real news' News app shows fake bloodied Alex Jones AI advert Related internet links South Tyneside Council