Five arrested after man injured in Crofton machete attack
The injured man was assaulted after a collision involving two cars on High Street near Lo's Pharmacy.Det Insp Fiona Allan said West Yorkshire Police were continuing to investigate the incident.She said: "Colleagues in our local neighbourhood policing remain in the area today and I would encourage anyone with concerns or information to share, to speak with them."
Listen to highlights from West Yorkshire on BBC Sounds, catch up with the latest episode of Look North.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Daily Mail
a minute ago
- Daily Mail
Ex-minister Liam Fox probes Chinook disaster over his 'deep concerns'
Former Defence Secretary Sir Liam Fox is carrying out an investigation into the 1994 RAF Chinook disaster on the Mull of Kintyre after voicing 'deep concerns' about the crash. He intervened as families of the victims accused the Ministry of Defence (MoD) of 'gaslighting' them by refusing to answer unresolved questions. Relatives of senior British intelligence personnel killed in the helicopter tragedy are suing the MoD in a bid to end what they describe as three decades of secrecy. As Defence Secretary back in 2011, Sir Liam published the results of an independent review which recommended that an earlier finding that the pilots were negligent to a gross degree should be 'set aside'. Now Sir Liam has spoken of 'very deep concerns' about the circumstances surrounding the crash which killed 25 senior intelligence experts and four Special Forces crew. Campaigners say the MoD's decision to seal the Chinook files for 100 years had 'further heightened suspicions of a cover-up'. Sir Liam has held a private meeting with some of the 47 children of those who were killed on June 2, 1994 in a Chinook Mk 2. Calls for a public inquiry have been rejected both by the Prime Minister and the MoD and the families are now pursuing a judicial review at the High Court under Article II of the Human Rights Act, which protects the right to life. Sir Liam said: 'It was my pleasure to meet some of the members of the Chinook Justice Campaign and to listen to their harrowing stories and their suspicions about what may have happened. 'I share their very deep concerns about the circumstances surrounding the crash and I have committed to a full investigation to ensure that the truth is laid before the British people. 'As the Defence Secretary who, after the conclusions of the Mull of Kintyre Review, cleared the two pilots of blame, I have assured the families that I will give this my full attention and help to establish the truth about what happened.' According to campaigners, evidence which has been leaked to the families – and is available on the Chinook Justice Campaign website – confirms that the aircraft was not airworthy and should never have taken off on that fateful flight. Andy Tobias, whose father, Lieutenant Colonel John Tobias, 41, was killed, said the 'support of Sir Liam Fox means a huge amount to all of the families'. He said: 'The MoD keeps telling us that no new inquiry is necessary, and points to the judge-led inquiry set up by Sir Liam which was established solely to discover whether the pilots were to blame. 'They were cleared; given Sir Liam supports our case – then the MoD's argument is void. 'They must stop trying to gaslight the families of the dead.' Flight Lieutenants Jonathan Tapper and Richard Cook were both UK Special Forces pilots with exemplary service records. Two RAF Air Marshals ruled the pair were 'grossly negligent', effectively overturning a previous inquiry. It took nearly 17 years for the pilots' families to clear their names. An MoD spokesman said: 'It's unlikely that a public inquiry would identify any new evidence or reach new conclusions on the basis of existing evidence.'
The Guardian
a minute ago
- The Guardian
Man charged with murder after ice-cream seller stabbed in Wembley
A man has been charged with murder after an ice-cream seller was stabbed to death in north-west London. Shazad Khan, 41, was pronounced dead at the scene after officers responded to reports of an altercation in Monks Park, Wembley, at 6.10pm on Tuesday. Zaher Zaarour, 26, of Brent, north-west London, has been charged with murder and possession of a bladed article, the Metropolitan police said on Thursday. He is due to appear at Willesden magistrates court on Friday. A 31-year-old woman who was arrested at the scene on suspicion of conspiracy to murder had been bailed pending further inquiries, the force said.
Telegraph
a minute ago
- Telegraph
‘Gay' Nigerian criminal can stay in UK despite using wife to claim asylum
A Nigerian jailed for violence has won a legal battle against deportation after claiming to be gay despite having been married to a woman and fathering a child by another. The man who arrived in Britain in 1983 made a series of initial asylum claims unrelated to his sexuality. Originally he claimed he would face persecution because of his political opinions. But when this was rejected, he sought leave to remain on the basis that he had married a woman living in the UK. After this argument was dismissed by the Home Office, he sought the right to remain after fathering a son. He claimed his removal from the UK would be a breach of his rights to a family life under article 8 of the European Convention on Human Rights (ECHR). Jailed for violence Soon after he was jailed for four years for violent disorder, leading to the Government issuing an order for him to be deported. Once out of jail, he said he entered into a three-year relationship with a man, after which he submitted a claim to remain in Britain on the basis that he would be persecuted for being gay if returned to his home country. After a final appeal hearing, immigration judges ruled that they were 'satisfied to the lower standard' that he was gay, which would expose him to the 'real risk of persecution' if he was returned to his African homeland. 'Accordingly the appellant has a well-founded fear of persecution and he therefore qualifies for protection under the Refugee Convention,' they ruled. 'We are also satisfied that the appellant's removal would breach his rights under articles 3 and 8 of the ECHR.' Article 3 of the ECHR protects against persecution, torture and ill treatment. The case has been revealed in court documents, obtained by The Telegraph, and is the latest where migrants or foreign criminals have used human rights legislation to avoid deportation. Yvette Cooper, the Home Secretary, is proposing to restrict judges' powers to grant asylum under the ECHR articles 3 and 8 amid concerns a third of cases are now being approved for 'exceptional' reasons. The man, granted anonymity by immigration judges, claimed he had a gay relationship with a friend while at school in Africa. He came to Britain in 1983 but overstayed and left in 1992 before re-entering the UK in 1996, when he unsuccessfully claimed asylum on the basis of his political opinion. Marriage ends in divorce After unsuccessfully applying to stay on the basis of his marriage to a Portuguese woman in 2000, the couple divorced. According to the man he was 'in denial about his sexual orientation' when he started another relationship with a woman. They had a son in 2001. Two years later, he was convicted of violent disorder, after which he mounted a legal effort to avoid deportation, culminating in an appeal in 2015 based on the fact that he was gay. In evidence, he cited communications from his family in Nigeria over his relationship with a man from 2010 to 2013. He told the court they had told him to end it, saying he was 'bringing the family into ridicule and shame'. They said they would inform the security services of his sexuality. After his case was initially rejected, it was put before an upper tribunal where the judges accepted he had made 'numerous unsuccessful attempts to regularise his stay in the UK' and had 'a clear motivation for maintaining his claim to be gay and to fabricate having had a further relationship with a man'. 'However, we consider that the appellant's account should not be rejected solely because of his immigration history or because he did not rely on his sexual orientation to remain in the UK prior to 2015,' they said. They also found his evidence to be 'plausible and internally consistent,' ultimately ruling that his appeal should be upheld.
