Nearly half of Japanese workforce engages in 'quiet quitting': survey
Around 45% of full-time employees in Japan are 'quiet quitting,' a practice where workers do only what their roles require, without extra effort, according to a recent survey of 3,000 workers by job-matching company Mynavi.
Younger workers lead work attitude shift
The poll found that 46.7% of respondents in their 20s identify as quiet quitters — the highest rate among age groups. Overall, 45.3% of full-time employees reported doing only the minimum required at work.
The trend marks a clear departure from Japan's postwar salaryman model, which prized loyalty, long hours and self-sacrifice. Among younger workers, it signals changing values and a move toward prioritizing personal boundaries over traditional corporate loyalty.
Trending on NextShark:
Why workers are stepping back
Japan's workplace culture discourages open criticism, making quiet quitting a subtle form of resistance. Rather than protest openly, employees pull back discretionary effort while still meeting expectations. Experts say this reflects growing dissatisfaction with rigid hierarchies and outdated norms.
Respondents cited protecting personal time and limited career prospects as key reasons for disengagement. Many younger workers say they no longer see value in going beyond their job scope without clear rewards.
Trending on NextShark:
'People no longer see the point in exhausting themselves for companies that don't invest in their growth,' one participant told Mynavi.
Addressing the issue
A 2024 Gallup report found that only 6% of Japanese workers are actively engaged — the lowest rate worldwide. Analysts warn that continued disengagement could weaken productivity, innovation and talent retention if companies fail to adapt.
Trending on NextShark:
Experts recommend that employers respond by offering flexible schedules, clearer career paths and meaningful recognition. Without change, the gap between old work norms and new expectations may continue to grow, posing long-term risks to workforce stability.
This story is part of The Rebel Yellow Newsletter — a bold weekly newsletter from the creators of NextShark, reclaiming our stories and celebrating Asian American voices.
Trending on NextShark:
Subscribe free to join the movement. If you love what we're building, consider becoming a paid member — your support helps us grow our team, investigate impactful stories, and uplift our community.
Subscribe here now!
Trending on NextShark:
Download the NextShark App:
Want to keep up to date on Asian American News? Download the NextShark App today!
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
38 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Social Security at 90: Where the program stands and how to fix it
Social Security is a vital source of income for millions of Americans, but after 90 years, the program faces significant financial challenges that could reshape it for future generations. If Congress fails to act, retirees could see their monthly checks cut by 23 percent in less than a decade — slashing thousands of dollars from the average person's annual benefits. Lawmakers are unlikely to let that happen, but so far, they've opted to kick the can down the road, avoiding politically unpopular solutions and complicating eventual fixes. President Franklin D. Roosevelt (D) signed Social Security into law on Aug. 14, 1935, as a way to give 'some measure of protection to the average citizen and to his family against the loss of a job and against poverty-ridden old age.' Here's what to know about the state of the program 90 years later: How many people receive Social Security? Nearly 70 million people received Social Security benefits in July, with the average check totaling $1,863. Retired workers made up the largest share — roughly three-quarters, or about 53 million. The program also supports other groups: Nearly six million people received survivor benefits last month, while more than eight million collected disability insurance. Most people aged 65 and older receive the majority of their income from Social Security, making it a vital lifeline for millions of adults — and children — who would otherwise fall below the poverty line. Without Social Security benefits, 37 percent of older adults would have had incomes below the official poverty line in 2023 — instead, only 10 percent did, according to the Center on Budget and Policy Priorities. More Americans now expect to rely on Social Security than in the past. In a recent Gallup poll, 37 percent of non-retirees said it will be a 'major source' of income in retirement — up from 28 percent two decades ago. When Social Security benefits could be cut Social Security isn't going away, but in less than a decade, millions of Americans could see their monthly retirement checks shrink if Congress doesn't intervene. The program's retirement trust fund is expected to run out by 2033, at which point Social Security would only be able to pay 77% of promised benefits. For today's average retired worker, that would mean a cut of about $460 a month — more than $5,500 a year. That said, experts caution against claiming Social Security benefits early out of fear that the program may not be around in the future, as doing so results in permanently lower monthly checks. Federal lawmakers are expected to act before the cuts take effect, but the main concern is that the longer they wait, the more complicated the fix will become. Social Security is so widely supported that, until now, politicians have largely avoided moves that could prove unpopular with voters. The last major overhaul came roughly 40 years ago when the federal government gradually raised the full retirement age from 65 to 67. When that happened in 1983, Social Security insolvency was just months away. Why Social Security is facing a financial shortfall The program's financial shortfall largely stems from the nation's changing demographics, which have resulted in fewer workers supporting more retirees. In 2010, there were 43 million people age 65 and older, and by 2024, that number had grown to 59 million, according to the Peter G. Peterson Foundation. At the same time, the number of workers contributing to the program has fallen — from 2.9 covered workers per beneficiary in 2010 to 2.7 in 2024 — a ratio projected to decline further to 2.3 by 2044, the foundation said. That imbalance is a concern because Social Security is primarily funded through a payroll tax, which accounts for about 90 percent of the trust fund's income. Fewer workers mean less payroll tax revenue. The good news is that the demographic shift isn't a surprise, giving policymakers time to prepare. The bad news is that it's not easily reversed, and major policy changes may be needed to shore up the program for generations to come. Something else to keep in mind: Despite raising the income cap over time, a smaller share of wages is now subject to the payroll tax compared to the '80s and '90s. The portion of wages and salaries covered by the payroll tax has fallen to about 82 percent, down from 90 percent in 1983, according to the Tax Foundation. Part of that is due to a rise in employer-provided benefits, like health insurance, which is tax-deductible, and thus faces neither the income nor payroll tax, the Tax Foundation said. What can be done to fix Social Security? Lawmakers have a few options: increase Social Security revenue, reduce costs or, most likely, some combination of both. Democrats want to raise more money by making high earners pay Social Security taxes on income above the current cap. For 2025, the tax only applies to the first $176,100, so any earnings above that aren't taxed. Gradually increasing the payroll tax rate is another way to raise revenue. Right now, the Social Security tax rate is 12.4 percent total — split evenly between employees and employers at 6.2 percent each. The combined rate has been steady since 1990. While raising taxes is rarely popular, polling suggests boosting revenue is generally more acceptable to the public than cutting benefits. A 2024 Pew Research survey found that wide majorities of both Republicans (77%) and Democrats (83%) do not support Social Security benefit reductions. President Trump has repeatedly promised not to cut Social Security benefits and even suggested eliminating federal income taxes on retirement checks — though that move would worsen the program's financial shortfall. Like his predecessors before him, Trump has offered little concrete policy direction for fixing Social Security. Tech billionaire Elon Musk's efforts to root out widespread waste, fraud and abuse fell short of expectations and sparked significant confusion. Earlier this year, Brookings released a bipartisan blueprint for fixing Social Security. The proposal included tax-based revenue boosts like increasing the maximum taxable ceiling and raising the payroll tax from 12.4 percent to 12.6 percent. It also suggested benefit reductions, like increasing the retirement age for high earners, among other changes. Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
Los Angeles Times
3 hours ago
- Los Angeles Times
Shohei Ohtani ‘focused on what the team is doing,' not distraction of Hawaii real estate lawsuit
Shohei Ohtani's name is in headlines again. And, for the second time in two years, not for baseball reasons. News emerged this week that Ohtani, the Dodgers' two-way star and reigning National League MVP, was being sued along with his agent in Hawaii by a real estate investor and broker. The claim: That Ohtani and his representative, Nez Balelo of Creative Artists Agency, had the plaintiffs fired from a $240 million luxury housing development that Ohtani had been contracted to help endorse. The contours of the case are complicated; relating to contract law, tortious interference and two years of alleged disputes between Balelo and the plaintiffs, developer Kevin J. Hayes Sr. and real estate broker Tomoko Matsumoto, leading up to their termination from the project. But as it pertains to Ohtani and this current Dodgers season, only one question really matters: Will the situation create any distraction for him off the field? When pressed on that Wednesday, he quickly shut the idea down. 'I'm focused on what the team is doing,' Ohtani said through interpreter Will Ireton. 'And doing everything in my power to make sure we bring a W on the field.' According to the lawsuit, Hayes and Matsumoto reached an endorsement deal with Ohtani in 2023 for their luxury housing development on Hawaii's Big Island. The Japanese star was not only to be a spokesperson for the project, but also a resident committed to purchasing one of the development's 14 residences as an offseason home. However, the lawsuit claimed, Balelo increasingly demanded unspecified concessions (the details of which were redacted in the filing) over the last two years from Hayes and Matsumoto — becoming what it described as a 'disruptive force' who 'inserted himself into every aspect of the relationship.' Last month, the lawsuit alleged, Balelo went to Hayes' and Matsumoto's business partner, Kingsbarn Realty Capital, and threatened litigation if the two weren't terminated from the project. 'Kingsbarn openly admitted … that Balelo had demanded the terminations and that they were being done solely to placate him,' the lawsuit said. 'Specifically, Kingsbarn acknowledged that Balelo had threatened to drag Kingsbarn into a separate lawsuit unless it terminated Hayes and Matsumoto.' The lawsuit also claims that Balelo's supposed threat of litigation — which pertained to the use of Ohtani's name, image and likeness rights being used to promote a seperate real estate project on Hawaii's Big Island — was 'baseless,' amounting to an 'abuse of power' by Ohtani's longtime agent to 'force a business partner to betray its contractual obligations and strip Plaintiffs of the very project they conceived and built.' A Kingsbarn spokesperson told The Athletic this week that the allegations 'are completely frivolous and without merit,' and that 'Kingsbarn takes full responsibility for its actions regarding Kevin Hayes and for removing Tomoko Matsumoto as the project's broker.' Ohtani's direct involvement in the dispute appears limited. According to a person with knowledge of the situation who wasn't authorized to speak publicly, the plaintiffs dealt almost exclusively with Balelo, who has represented Ohtani since he came to the major leagues from Japan before the 2018 season. Still, because Balelo was acting on behalf of Ohtani, the superstar was included as a defendant as well. That means — just like in March 2024, when scandal swirled around Ohtani after his former interpreter was found to have stolen money from his bank accounts to pay off illegal gambling debts — Ohtani has another potential disturbance to navigate off the field. Granted, Ohtani hardly seemed affected by last year's controversy, helping the Dodgers win the World Series while winning the third MVP award of his career. And this current lawsuit, according to attorney and legal expert Arash Sadat of Mills Sadat Dowlat LLP, presents a much more standard type of legal dispute often seen around real estate deals. 'This kind of stuff happens all the time,' Sadat said. 'They're not rare at all.' Sadat noted that, based on the lawsuit, it's not clear 'what Shohei knew and didn't know' when it came to Balelo's alleged interactions with the plaintiffs. 'All of the allegations in the complaint relate to conduct by his agent,' Sadat said. 'If the plaintiffs in this case could show any direct involvement by Ohtani, you can bet that would have been included in the complaint.' If the case were to proceed without a resolution, it is possible Ohtani could eventually be required to give a deposition detailing his knowledge of the alleged events. That, however, is not something that would happen imminently. And even if it did, Sadat added, it's unclear whether his testimony would even be released publicly, given that large swaths of redactions in the original lawsuit of seemingly proprietary business information. Sadat speculated the chances of the case ever going to trial as slim. The overwhelming majority of such lawsuits are typically settled or dismissed well before then. 'Real estate tends to bring out emotions in people,' Sadat said. 'You have a high-profile real estate developer. You have a high-profile real estate agent. You have a sports agent over at CAA. You're talking about big egos here. And when that happens, and someone feels slighted, oftentimes… litigation is the result.'
Chicago Tribune
4 hours ago
- Chicago Tribune
Wall Street quiet ahead of meeting between President Donald Trump and Russian President Vladimir Putin
Markets are largely unchanged early Thursday ahead of a key meeting between U.S. President Donald Trump and Russian President Vladimir Putin this week. Futures for the S&P 500, Dow Jones Industrial Average and Nasdaq all ticked down less than 0.1% before the opening bell. Shares of Deere & Co. slid 7.5% after the heavy equipment manufacturer cut its forecast despite beating Wall Street's third-quarter sales and profit targets. Deere's sales and profit fell significantly from a year ago and the company cited 'near-term uncertainty' in its earnings release. Deere said that it has been focusing on inventory management with inventories remaining high. Tapestry, the parent of Kate Spade and Coach, saw its shares tumble more than 6% on a weak outlook. The company said it expects a tiny increase in sales for the upcoming year, while forecasting a 60-cents-per-share hit on profit due to tariffs. Tapestry says that about 70% of its products are made in Vietnam, Cambodia and the Philippines. Later Thursday, the government will release its report on inflation at the wholesale level, before products reach consumers. Economists expect it to show inflation ticked up to 2.4% in July from 2.3% in June. The U.S. also releases its weekly report on applications for jobless benefits, which serves as a proxy for U.S. layoffs. On Friday at Joint Base Elmendorf-Richardson outside Anchorage, Putin and Trump as well as a meeting of the delegations, will convene a meeting. In Europe at midday, Britain's FTSE 100 was unchanged after the government reported that the UK economy grew at a faster than expected 1.2% annual pace in the last quarter. In quarterly terms, the economy grew 0.3%, slowing from a 0.7% expansion in January-March. Germany's DAX rose 0.6% and the CAC 40 in Paris added 0.5%. Europe is bracing for Trump's encounter with Putin, though the U.S. president has said he will prioritize trying to achieve a ceasefire in Ukraine when he meets with Putin on Friday in Anchorage. The Trump-Putin meeting could have major implications for energy markets, potentially leading to an easing of sanctions against Moscow, or an escalation if no progress is made on ending the war in Ukraine. Early Thursday, U.S. benchmark crude rose 23 cents to $62.88 per barrel. Brent crude, the international standard, added 25 cents to $65.88 per barrel. During Asian trading, Tokyo's Nikkei 225 fell nearly 1.5% to 42,649.26 as investors sold to lock in recent gains that have taken the benchmark to all-time records. The Japanese yen rose against the dollar after U.S. Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent said in an interview with Bloomberg that Japan was 'behind the curve' in monetary tightening. He was referring to the slow pace of increases in Japan's near-zero interest rates. Low interest rates tend to make the yen weaker against the dollar, giving Japanese exporters a cost advantage in overseas sales. The dollar fell to 146.53 Japanese yen Thursday, down from 147.39 yen. The euro slid to $1.1691 from $1.1705. In Chinese markets, Hong Kong's Hang Seng index shed 0.4% to 25,519.32, while the Shanghai composite index slid 0.5% to 3,666.44. South Korea's Kospi rose less than 0.1% to 3,225.66. In Australia, the S&P ASX 200 index added 0.5% to 8,873.80. Taiwan's Taiex fell 0.5% and India's Sensex edged 0.2% higher. Bitcoin briefly rose more than 3% to a new record of over $123,000, according to CoinDesk. It later fell back below $121,000.
