
Trump's Medicaid cuts to Planned Parenthood blocked
More: Donald Trump's megabill could mean closure for a third of Planned Parenthood clinics
The U.S. Department of Justice argued that "the bill stops federal subsidies for Big Abortion" and urged Talwani not to let Planned Parenthood and its members "supplant duly enacted legislation with their own policy preferences."
Talwani, an appointee of Democratic President Barack Obama, said the law's text and structure made clear that it was crafted to cover every member of Planned Parenthood Federation of America, the parent organization, even if they were not named.
That specificity likely transformed the provision at issue into an unconstitutional "bill of attainder," an act of Congress that wrongly seeks to inflict punishment without a trial, the judge said.
More: Supreme Court sides with South Carolina in effort to cut Planned Parenthood funding
"Plaintiffs are likely to establish that Congress singled them out with punitive intent," Talwani wrote.
She said the law also violated Planned Parenthood members' equal protection rights under the U.S. Constitution's Fifth Amendment and burdened the right of some who do not provide abortions to associate with their parent organization in likely violation of the First Amendment.
The White House did not respond to a request for comment.
The judge last week had issued a partial injunction that only covered some Planned Parenthood members. Because an earlier temporary restraining order was expiring, Planned Parenthood said many health centers were forced to stop billing for Medicaid services ahead of Monday's ruling.
Planned Parenthood has said the law would have "catastrophic" consequences for its nearly 600 health centers, putting nearly 200 of them in 24 states at risk of closure.
"We will keep fighting this cruel law so that everyone can get birth control, STI testing and treatment, cancer screenings, and other critical health care, no matter their insurance," Alexis McGill Johnson, Planned Parenthood Federation of America's president, said in a statement.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


BBC News
23 minutes ago
- BBC News
Watch: Eric Trump not ruling out White House family 'dynasty'
The son of US President Donald Trump says a family member other than his father could consider running for the White House in future. In a wide-ranging conversation, Eric Trump told BBC Sport's Dan Roan that a relative "could… certainly" make a bid for the presidency – but the harder question was whether they would do so. Asked if he would consider a run of his own, he said: "I very much doubt I would even consider in '28," emphasising that he saw politics as "brutal". Sports Editor: Dan Roan Producer: Eoin Hempsall Camera: Dave Cheeseman


Daily Mail
23 minutes ago
- Daily Mail
Donald Trump brands Nicola Sturgeon a 'terrible first minister' as he reignites feud with ex-SNP leader... and she swipes back 'feeling is mutual, Donnie'
Donald Trump has branded Nicola Sturgeon a 'terrible first minister' as he reignited his bitter feud with the ex-SNP leader. The US President made the comments on Air Force One as he travelled back to Washington DC following his five-day visit to Scotland. During his stay, he had a two-hour dinner on Monday with current First Minister John Swinney, alongside Prime Minister Sir Keir Starmer. Mr Swinney, who also met Mr Trump on Tuesday morning, said he had used the talks to push the US President to exempt Scotch from US tariffs. Speaking to reporters on his flight home, Mr Trump was asked if he offered to drop the levy on the drink. He replied: 'No. We really didn't discuss it much. But I have a lot of respect for him [Mr Swinney].' Journalists began asking questions again, before Mr Trump interjected: 'I didn't have a lot of respect for the woman that preceded him. 'I thought she was terrible as a first minister of Scotland. But I think John is doing a very good job of First Minister.' Ms Sturgeon responded on her Instagram account: 'Feeling was mutual, Donnie. Forever proud to represent all the things that offend your view of the world' A source close to Ms Sturgeon responded: 'Trump's lack of respect for women is hardly news. That said, the feeling was entirely mutual.' Ms Sturgeon added on her Instagram account: 'Feeling was mutual, Donnie. Forever proud to represent all the things that offend your view of the world.' In a follow-up post, Ms Sturgeon said she was 'raging' that she had been unable to put Mr Trump's 'endorsement' on the front cover of her new book. The politician's memoir, Frankly, is being published next month. Mr Trump criticised Ms Sturgeon, who became first minister in 2014, during her resignation in 2023. He described her as a 'failed woke extremist' and a 'crazed leftist' who 'symbolises everything wrong with identity politics'. When he was first elected as US President in 2016, Ms Sturgeon described Mr Trump's behaviour and rhetoric as 'abhorrent'. During his recent five-day visit to Scotland, Mr Trump also ranted about London mayor Sadiq Khan - another British politician he has frequently clashed with. As he sat next to Sir Keir, the US President branded Sir Sadiq a 'nasty person' who has done 'a terrible job' as the capital's mayor. At this point, the PM stuck out a hand and interjected to say: 'He's a friend of mine, actually.'


The Herald Scotland
37 minutes ago
- The Herald Scotland
How much more will it take for these so-called leaders to take action?
This is forced starvation. The World Health Organisation reports that in this month 63 deaths were caused by malnutrition and that the position of [[Gaza]] is on a 'dangerous trajectory'. More than 100 non-Government organisations across the world have, rightly, called this mass starvation and pleaded for world-leaders to put pressure on Israel. Read More: How much more will it take for these so-called leaders to take action? Instead of the necessary and radical interventions we need – we are thrown a few crumbs to give the illusion of decisive action from Donald Trump and Sir Keir Starmer when they feel public opinion turning too far and too quickly. A few crumbs whilst Gaza starves. Donald Trump managed to call it 'real starvation' during another bumbling press conference. But what he failed to say was that this is a man-made horror that America and Israel are responsible for. The 'Gaza Humanitarian Foundation' is an American 'non-profit' working with the Israeli Government, and it has enabled aid to be used as a weapon of war. Israeli forces have killed almost 1000 people who were desperately queuing for aid and who assumed they are entering a safe zone. Many Gazans leave to search for food for their families who are waiting in make-shift shelters, but never return to them. The failed Gaza Humanitarian Foundation issued a 'women-only' aid pick-up invitation to desperate civilians this week, in an attempt to prevent scenes of chaos, and to manufacture the idea that chaos and deaths were being caused by Gazan men. But it did not stop the killing. Pepper spray and stun guns were used on the women queuing, some with their children. Multiple women were killed as security forces shot directly at them. Perhaps now will be the time when those individuals and groups who purport to care about women's lives across the world will raise their voices for the women of Gaza? Given some of their silence for 21 months, perhaps not. The chaos is not caused by desperate and starving civilians, it is caused by an aid agency that has never fully met the needs of the desperate and starving and a Government pursing any means available to them to erase the Palestinian people. Keir Starmer has called it 'unspeakable and indefensible' despite having repeatedly defended Israel's action; he stated that Israel had the right to stop Gazans having access to life-saving clean water in October 2023. Starmer has announced that 30 children in need of emergency care will be evacuated by the UK. The United Nations estimated that 33,000 children have been injured. The Prime Minister has also announced that the UK will be facilitating air drops of aid, which humanitarian charities have called a 'grotesque distraction' and a method that will do nothing to curb the growing levels of starvation. Israel has issued a 'pause' in high populated areas of Gaza for 10 hours a day since Sunday to allow air dropped aid to enter. But aid agencies have warned this will be a negligible amount gives the scale of starvation, especially whilst the hundreds of trucks needed for daily aid continue to be blocked at the border. In a moment that felt particularly cruel, Starmer announced that the UK will recognise Palestine as a state, unless [[Israel]] takes moves on a ceasefire; using statehood as a negotiation tool and a threat. Starmer said to Labour members in an email released last night 'I've always said that [[Palestine]] statehood is the inalienable right of the Palestinian people' Really? Then why is that right based on conditions linked to its oppressor? If world leaders want to take decisive action, the answers have been in front of them since the start. End arms sales to Israel, recognise Palestine as an independent state, demand a permanent ceasefire, apply pressure on Israel through trade and economic sanctions. These are evidenced and proportionate responses that have been applied to other nations, why not now? During apartheid in South Africa, the UK repeatedly vetoed UN resolutions calling for immediate economic sanctions, it was not until the late 1980s that the UK and US passed laws in support of trade sanctions against South Africa. The UK and US appear to have learnt no lessons, and are repeating the same mistakes. Whilst they may be ignorant of their own histories, neither the UK nor the US can say that they were unaware of the realities on the ground in Gaza. Beyond the devastating pictures released daily, the language from Israeli officials has been clear in their intention from the start. In the International Court of Justice hearing on probable genocide by Israel, over 500 statements were entered into the record as evidence of 'intention' of genocide. These public statements were from Israeli officials and included Israel's president, Isaac Herzog, who stated that 'It's [Palestine] an entire nation out there that is responsible.' Netanyahu has himself said that the 'war' will continue until all of Gaza is under Israeli military control. The intention has been clear, and the perpetrators have been able to continue with impunity as a consequence of the cowardice of so-called 'world leaders.' As author Omar El Akkad said; "One day, when it's safe…when it's too late to hold anyone accountable, everyone will have always been against this." Talat Yaqoob, is an independent consultant, researcher and campaigner, see