logo
EU fails to approve new Russia sanctions; ball now in Slovakia's court, says EU foreign chief

EU fails to approve new Russia sanctions; ball now in Slovakia's court, says EU foreign chief

Japan Today15-07-2025
FILE PHOTO: European Union High Representative for Foreign Affairs and Security Policy Kaja Kallas arrives at the 5th EU-Southern Neighbourhood Ministerial meeting in Brussels, Belgium, July 14, 2025. REUTERS/Yves Herman/File Photo
The European Union did not approve the 18th Russia sanctions package on Tuesday, the EU's foreign chief Kaja Kallas said after a meeting with EU foreign ministers in Brussels.
She said she was "really sad" the sanctions did not get approved, but hopeful a deal will be reached on Wednesday, adding that the ball is in Slovakia's court. Slovakia has been blocking the EU's latest sanctions package until its concerns are addressed over a separate EU proposal to phase out imports of Russian gas by January 1, 2028.
Sources told Reuters on Monday that all elements of the package had been agreed, although one member state still had a reservation about a proposed lower price cap on Russian oil.
The European Commission last month proposed the 18th package of sanctions against Russia for its invasion of Ukraine, aimed at Moscow's energy revenue, its banks, and its military industry.
The new package proposes banning transactions with Russia's Nord Stream gas pipelines, as well as banks that engage in sanctions circumvention.
It also proposes a floating price cap on Russian oil of 15% below the average market price of crude in the previous three months, EU diplomats have said.
© Thomson Reuters 2025.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Trump plans Putin meeting as soon as next week, NY Times reports
Trump plans Putin meeting as soon as next week, NY Times reports

Nikkei Asia

time8 minutes ago

  • Nikkei Asia

Trump plans Putin meeting as soon as next week, NY Times reports

Russian President Vladimir Putin and U.S. President Donald Trump talk during the family photo session at the APEC Summit in Danang, Vietnam, in November 2017. © Reuters WASHINGTON (Reuters) -- U.S. President Donald Trump plans to meet in person with Russian President Vladimir Putin as early as next week, the New York Times reported on Wednesday, citing two people familiar with the plan. Trump then plans to meet with Putin and Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy, the newspaper reported, adding that the plans were disclosed in a call with European leaders on Wednesday. The White House did not immediately respond to the report, but earlier on Wednesday Trump acknowledged that he spoke with European leaders after U.S. envoy Steve Witkoff's "highly productive" meeting with Putin in Russia. While noting that "great progress" was made during the meeting, Trump wrote on Truth Social: "Everyone agrees this War must come to a close, and we will work towards that in the days and weeks to come." Trump, who promised to end Russia's war in Ukraine on "day one" during his presidential campaign, has held several phone calls with Putin and has met with Zelenskyy since returning to the White House in January. However, in recent weeks, he has become increasingly frustrated with Moscow over a lack of progress toward ending the three-year conflict.

Why Cambodia Is Losing the Information War With Thailand
Why Cambodia Is Losing the Information War With Thailand

The Diplomat

time6 hours ago

  • The Diplomat

Why Cambodia Is Losing the Information War With Thailand

The lack of an independent press has made it hard for the government to communicate its side of the story. In the latest conflict along the Cambodia-Thailand border, nationalism has once again spilled into cyberspace. In Cambodia, social media personalities have mobilized to challenge what they see as a global narrative tilted in Thailand's favor, arguing that international media portray Bangkok more sympathetically simply because it is more powerful, better connected, or more geopolitically popular. 'Just because Thailand is bigger and has more media coverage, Cambodia is a villain now?' asked beauty and lifestyle influencer SreyNea Nea. Pop singer and songwriter Sinora Roath echoed the sentiment in a viral video, in which she said, 'Thailand is invading Cambodia because they want more of our temples. Why are you so greedy, Thailand? Your country is bigger than us, you're way more populated, your food is all over the world, you are one of the most visited countries in Southeast Asia, and you still want more? From a country like us? Your media coverage is so big that when you told the world that we're the one invading, the world believed you.' Content creator Chris Dyna added, 'As a small country, it is very difficult for our voices to be heard. Many news outlets are only reporting from or within Thailand, with some news outlets reporting using Thai nationals, showing clear bias in their reports.' From memes to commentary, the dominant tone online is one of frustration with the focus of the international press. But the skew in global perception stems from a fact closer to home: namely, that Cambodia doesn't have a free press. Despite its history of frequent military coups, Thailand is still considered a 'flawed democracy' by the Economist Intelligence Unit and is rated 'partly free' by Freedom House. The country holds regular elections, supports an active civil society, and maintains a relatively diverse media environment, even though all of these operate under notable constraints. The press contends with self-censorship and strict legal limits, especially those imposed by the lese-majeste law, yet critical reporting persists, particularly in English-language and online outlets. For example, Bangkok, unlike Phnom Penh, hosts regional bureaus or correspondents for major international outlets like Reuters, the BBC, the Associated Press, Al Jazeera, the Financial Times, NBC, and others, many of which are associated with the Foreign Correspondents' Club of Thailand (FCCT) in central Bangkok. In Cambodia, by contrast, none of this is true. Despite still holding periodic elections, the country is now widely regarded as an authoritarian one-party state under the control of the Cambodian People's Party (CPP). Over the past decade, the government has systematically dismantled the independent media, culminating in the 2023 shutdown of Voice of Democracy (VOD), one of the last major newsrooms willing to challenge official narratives. Radio Free Asia (RFA) shuttered its Phnom Penh bureau back in 2017, citing 'unprecedented' levels of government intimidation. That same year, authorities closed more than two dozen local radio stations — many of which rebroadcast RFA programs –effectively silencing critical voices on the airwaves. The English-language Cambodia Daily, a longtime pillar of investigative reporting, was also forced to shut down after being hit with a sudden, crippling tax bill. The following year, the Phnom Penh Post was sold under pressure to government-friendly investors. By the time of the 2018 election, when the CPP won all 125 seats in the National Assembly, the country's independent press had been all but extinguished. Journalists who persist in exposing uncomfortable truths – especially around land seizures, corruption, or political abuses – often face surveillance, harassment, exile, or imprisonment. Take the case of Uon Chhin and Yeang Sothearin, two former RFA reporters arrested and charged with providing information to a foreign state, a crime that carries a sentence of up to 15 years. Then there is the case of Mech Dara, a Cambodian investigative journalist known for uncovering online scams and government corruption. In September 2024, he was charged with incitement to commit a felony or cause social disorder over posts he made online. In January, Gerald Flynn, a British environmental reporter with Mongabay, learnt that he had been blacklisted and denied re-entry to Cambodia, apparently in retaliation for his reporting on environmental crimes tied to powerful elites. So if one wonders why there is so little reporting from inside Cambodia during this war with Thailand – why no major outlet seems to be covering our side of the story – this is why. As a Cambodian, I have watched my fellow countrymen grow used to the idea that speech is dangerous, and that certain things simply are not said in public. For years, no one I knew seemed particularly concerned about press freedom. But now, suddenly, there is a nationwide outrage over 'misinformation' and 'foreign media bias,' all because of a perception that the narrative is coming out of Bangkok instead of Phnom Penh. But Cambodia will not win the PR war in the information age by handing influencers identical scripts, without third-party verification or independent journalism. We cannot ask the world to hear us while our government silences every voice that dares to speak independently. As such, this war should be a wake-up call for Cambodian leaders, alerting them to the truth-telling functions of an independent press. By silencing these voices, the Cambodian government has forfeited the credibility needed for others to believe its version of events.

India's Modi plans first China visit in 7 years, as tensions with US rise
India's Modi plans first China visit in 7 years, as tensions with US rise

Nikkei Asia

time7 hours ago

  • Nikkei Asia

India's Modi plans first China visit in 7 years, as tensions with US rise

NEW DELHI (Reuters) -- Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi will visit China for the first time in over seven years, a government source said on Wednesday, in a further sign of a diplomatic thaw with Beijing as tensions with the United States rise. Modi will go to China for a summit of the multilateral Shanghai Cooperation Organization that begins on Aug. 31, the government source, with direct knowledge of the matter, told Reuters. India's foreign ministry did not immediately respond to a request for comment. His trip will come at a time when India's relationship with the U.S. faces its most serious crisis in years after President Donald Trump imposed the highest tariffs among Asian peers on goods imported from India, and has threatened an unspecified further penalty for New Delhi's purchases of Russian oil. Modi's visit to the Chinese city of Tianjin for the summit of the SCO, a Eurasian political and security grouping that includes Russia, will be his first since June 2018. Subsequently, Sino-Indian ties deteriorated sharply after a military clash along their disputed Himalayan border in 2020. Modi and Chinese President Xi Jinping held talks on the sidelines of a BRICS summit in Russia in October that led to a thaw. The giant Asian neighbors are now slowly defusing tensions that have hampered business relations and travel between the two countries. Trump has threatened to charge an additional 10% tariff on imports from members -- which include India -- of the BRICS group of major emerging economies for "aligning themselves with anti-American policies." Trump said on Wednesday his administration would decide on the penalty for buying Russian oil after the outcome of U.S. efforts to seek a last-minute breakthrough that would bring about a ceasefire in the war in Ukraine. Trump's top diplomatic envoy, Steve Witkoff, is in Moscow, two days before the expiry of a deadline the president set for Russia to agree to peace in Ukraine or face new sanctions. Meanwhile, Indian national security adviser Ajit Doval is in Russia on a scheduled visit and is expected to discuss India's purchases of Russian oil in the wake of Trump's pressure on India to stop buying Russian crude, according to another government source, who also did not want to be named. Doval is likely to address India's defense cooperation with Russia, including obtaining faster access to pending exports to India of Moscow's S400 air defense system, and a possible visit by President Vladimir Putin to India. Doval's trip will be followed by External Affairs Minister Subrahmanyam Jaishankar in the weeks to come. U.S. and Indian officials told Reuters a mix of political misjudgment, missed signals and bitterness scuttled trade deal negotiations between the world's biggest and fifth-largest economies, whose bilateral trade is worth over $190 billion. India expects Trump's crackdown could cost it a competitive advantage in about $64 billion worth of goods sent to the U.S. that account for 80% of its total exports, four separate sources told Reuters, citing an internal government assessment. However, the relatively low share of exports in India's $4 trillion economy is expected to limit the direct impact on economic growth. On Wednesday, the Reserve Bank of India left its GDP growth forecast for the current April-March financial year unchanged at 6.5% and held rates steady despite the tariff uncertainties. India's government assessment report has assumed a 10% penalty for buying Russian oil, which would take the total U.S. tariff to 35%, the sources said. India's trade ministry did not immediately respond to a request for comment. The internal assessment report is the government's initial estimate and will change as the quantum of tariffs imposed by Trump becomes clear, all four sources said. India exported goods estimated at $81 billion in 2024 to the U.S.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store