DNC chair unloads on David Hogg in Zoom call: ‘It's really frustrating'
In the audio recording, Martin lays the blame on the party's continued infighting at the feet of one of his youngest colleagues, March for our Lives co-founder David Hogg, and claimed that Hogg had 'destroyed' his ability to lead the party out of an electoral abyss it found itself in after 2024.
'I don't think you intended this, but you essentially destroyed any chance I have to show the leadership that I need to. So it's really frustrating,' Martin told Hogg on the Zoom call, according to Politico, after stating:'No one knows who the hell I am, right?'
'I'm trying to get my sea legs underneath of me and actually develop any amount of credibility so I can go out there and raise the money and do the job I need to to put ourselves in a position to win,' claimed the chair on the call.
On the same Zoom, Martin would go on to make a frank admission: that he'd faced his first doubts about his desire to hold his job any longer.
'I'll be very honest with you, for the first time in my 100 days on this job … the other night I said to myself for the first time, I don't know if I wanna do this anymore,' said Martin on the May 15 call.
The Independent reached out to the Democratic National Committee for comment.
A spokesperson for the party released a statement from Martin to Politico, in which Martin said he was 'not going anywhere.'
'I took this job to fight Republicans, not Democrats,' said the chair, according to Politico. 'As I said when I was elected, our fight is not within the Democratic Party, our fight is and has to be solely focused on Donald Trump and the disastrous Republican agenda. That's the work that I will continue to do every day.'
Martin's gripes are at least somewhat grounded in reality. The relatively unknown Minnesota Democrat-Farmer-Labor party chair was selected to lead the party after 2024 over several other candidates including at least one with arguably better name recognition: Ben Wikler of neighboring Wisconsin's Democratic Party. Since his election, Martin has not been timid from news cameras but has still struggled to step out of the shadow of Hogg, whose activism in the wake of the Parkland school shooting propelled him to national prominence long before Martin.
Hogg, as well, continues to generate headlines — further complicating Martin's position. The brash, young DNC vice chair vowed earlier this year to support primary challenges against the party's graying electeds in Congress, drawing immediate and visceral anger from the party's chastened yet still powerful establishment.
Hogg and Martin personally clashed over this issue, and have apparently not reached an amicable compromise.
There's also the issue of the party's overall brand, which is in tatters after the 2024 election. A botched campaign season saw former President Joe Biden, wracked by physical and mental decline, run for re-election until the summer, well past any viable point for his party to hold a primary to select his replacement. He then was unceremoniously jettisoned from the Democratic ticket in favor of his former running mate, Kamala Harris, after he appeared lost and confused onstage during a debate with Donald Trump — who'd go on to win the general election.
Martin and others face questions about why those closest to Biden, including Martin's predecessor, insisted for months (years, even) that Biden's decline was a right-wing conspiracy and a result of journalists ginning up a fake story. Harris's defeat in 2024 also saw the party fail to make gains in the House while losing multiple seats in the Senate, ending a Democratic Senate majority.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Independent
6 minutes ago
- The Independent
Retired Army General says Trump needs to convince Putin that Russia can't win in Ukraine
Ahead of Donald Trump 's summit with Vladimir Putin in Alaska on Friday, retired U.S. Army Gen. Wesley Clark has said it is vital for the president to convince the Russian leader that he cannot win the war in Ukraine. Speaking on The Record with Greta Van Susteren on Newsmax on Wednesday, Clark, a former Democratic presidential candidate in 2004, warned that Putin would not respond to conventional diplomatic threats. 'We've made so many threats to Russia over the last six months about consequences, and they mostly get postponed,' Clark said. 'And so, I don't know – I hope the consequences will be a restart of U.S. military assistance from the Trump administration to Ukraine. Because really, when you get right down to it, I think the only way you're going to really halt President Putin's territorial ambitions is to convince him he cannot win.' He continued: 'Administration after administration has tried sanctions. Obama tried it. Biden tried it. It hasn't stopped anything and makes it more difficult. The Russians learn to live with it. 'And so putting sanctions on again – it sounds rough and tough. It avoids the threat of use of force, but ultimately it doesn't accomplish much.' As preparations for the Anchorage summit continue, Kremlin aide Yuri Ushakov has stated that the meeting at Joint Base Elmendorf-Richardson will be a one-on-one between Trump and Putin, with translators present, and that 'sensitive matters' will be discussed. In addition to the prospect of ending the war, which has raged since February 2022, enhanced economic cooperation and trade between the U.S. and Russia will also be on the table, Ushakov said. Both leaders will take part in a news conference once the summit is concluded, he added, as well as wider talks with their delegations and a working breakfast. On Wednesday, Trump attended a virtual meeting with European leaders, including Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky, to discuss the goals of the summit and establish red lines that cannot be crossed. According to French President Emmanuel Macron, the American emphatically ruled out the prospect of Kyiv being invited to join NATO, a step that Moscow would have interpreted as a deliberate provocation. Trump himself warned afterwards that Russia would face 'very severe consequences' if Putin does not agree to a ceasefire but hinted that a follow-up meeting could be swiftly arranged if Friday's summit proves a success. Zelensky has since joined British Prime Minister Sir Keir Starmer in London, with the latter reiterating: 'International borders must not be changed by force and Ukraine must have robust and credible security guarantees to defend its territorial integrity as part of any deal.' Putin said on Thursday that Washington was making 'sincere efforts' to resolve the conflict in Ukraine and suggested that a new deal on nuclear arms control between Moscow and Washington could be on the cards.
The Independent
6 minutes ago
- The Independent
Trump told cops to do ‘whatever the hell they want' to fix DC. Here's why that's ‘extremely dangerous'
As he deployed the National Guard and surged federal law enforcement agencies into the nation's capital, President Donald Trump gave local police in Washington, D.C. permission to retaliate against a population under federal occupation. Trump, seizing on images of a beaten former Department of Government Efficiency staffer to justify his takeover, announced a 'crime emergency' to put the Metropolitan Police Department under the administration's control. 'See, they fight back until you knock the hell out of them, because it's the only language they understand,' Trump said from the White House on August 11. 'You spit and we hit,' the president said. 'And they're standing there and people are spitting in their face and they're not allowed to do anything. But now they are allowed to do whatever the hell they want.' Civil rights groups and legal experts fear the president's remarks will embolden police officers to abandon constitutional guardrails — and signal to Americans that those protections are meaningless. 'It's very scary that the president felt the license to say this,' said Insha Rahman, vice president of advocacy and partnerships at the Vera Institute of Justice and the director of Vera Action. His remarks appear to endorse police 'running roughshod over constitutional rights and due process protections,' she told The Independent. That language is 'extremely dangerous' and shows a 'blatant disregard to the constitutional mandates that the president and every government entity is bound to,' according to Kristin Henning, Georgetown Law professor and director of the Juvenile Justice Clinic and Initiative. No, police cannot do 'whatever the hell they want,' Rahman added. But officers 'will feel emboldened to do things that we know are not only legally unsound and questionable but also unpopular — like sweep away people and forcibly move people who are homeless, or tell people that they can't be in certain public places.' Civil rights groups fear the administration is using the city's police force for a political power grab, while putting American troops on the ground as an occupying force that's not trained to perform basic law enforcement tasks like responding to 911 calls. Instead, D.C. has become 'political theater' using 'blatantly phony justification for abuse of emergency powers,' according to Monica Hopkins, executive director of the ACLU of the District of Columbia. Trump is 'using the word 'emergency' as a blank check for asserting federal control whenever it suits his agenda – abusing emergency powers while militarizing our communities and endangering the very people he is sworn to protect,' according to Mike Zamore, national director of policy and government affairs at the ACLU. The Independent has requested comment from the Metropolitan Police Department. Trump has a vivid history of dogwhistle calls to action. Proud Boys were inspired by Trump's call to 'stand back and stand by.' His call for a 'big protest' that 'will be wild' fueled a mob of his own supporters on January 6, 2021, when he encouraged a crowd to 'fight like hell' before they stormed the Capitol. He also routinely threatens heavy-handed tactics in other Democratic-majority cities. At his White House press conference this week, he singled out Baltimore, Chicago, Los Angeles, New York and Oakland — all of which have Black mayors and large minority populations that have overwhelmingly voted against him. In his remarks, Trump suggested teenagers were 'randomly attacking' citizens and called for trying children as young as 14 as adults to 'lock them up for a long time.' Jeanine Pirro — the former Fox News personality recently confirmed as U.S. Attorney for Washington, D.C. — raged against 'young punks' and demanded laws be changed to send teenagers to adult prisons. Those threats are 'counterproductive and ineffective,' according to Henning, author of The Rage of Innocence: How America Criminalizes Black Youth, which draws on her experience representing young Black people in Washington's juvenile courts. 'They don't use these words, but they are definitely blaming all Black kids in the city for these problems,' Henning said. '[Residents] are living with a state of fear that has been concocted, and that's all a part of a larger strategy. … It's not even that deeply veiled, because it's been done over and over again.' The Independent has requested comment from the White House. Black and Latino youth are facing 'extraordinary psychological trauma in contact with police,' with reported high rates of fear, anxiety, depression and hopelessness, according to Henning. 'When they go out on the streets and they encounter police, they see these federal agents, the anxiety is real, and the reaction is an adolescent response,' she said. 'They might assert their First Amendment right to say, 'I don't want your presence.' All of the things that teenagers do … They can go from zero to 100 in an instant.' Thousands of people flooded streets across the country throughout the summer of 2020 for daily demonstrations against police brutality and racism, including in the streets of Washington, D.C. 'Can't you just shoot them?' Trump said at the time, according to his former Defense Secretary Mark Esper. 'Just shoot them in the legs or something?' Trump also demanded law enforcement officers 'crack skulls' and 'beat the f*** out' of protesters, according to the book Frankly, We Did Win This Election: The Inside Story of How Trump Lost by The Wall Street Journal' s Michael Bender. In his second administration, Trump is no longer moored by a handful of advisers who could curb his impulses. He was surrounded by the nation's top law enforcement officials as he announced 'liberation day' for D.C. this week. Trump invoked Section 740 of the District of Columbia Home Rule Act, which grants the federal government authority to run the locally controlled police department. He needs congressional authority to extend that control beyond 30 days. On August 13, Trump said he wants 'long-term extensions' of his federal occupation. 'I don't want to call a national emergency. If I have to, I will,' he said. Trump also called for Congress to pass a 'crime bill' that's 'going to initially pertain to D.C.' but serve as a 'very positive example' for other cities. Despite the administration's claims that crime is 'out of control' in D.C., the data shows the opposite: 2024 saw the lowest violent crime rates in the capital in more than 30 years, while reports of violent crime within the first seven months of 2025 have plunged 26 percent from last year. Those rates mirror national downward trends, according to FBI crime data released during Trump's administration. 'Trump has a long history of weaponizing fear about crime,' according to Rahman, highlighting the president's campaign rhetoric of American cities under siege and an 'invasion' at the U.S.-Mexico border. 'People are supportive of police, but they want police to focus on responding to the most serious cases, being responsive, and investigating and solving serious crime,' she said. 'What they do not want — that we have had a long history of seeing in this country — is police overreach.' Henning fears that the city's Metropolitan Police Department is under 'undue pressure' to boost arrests and 'put numbers on the board,' she told The Independent. 'That pressure is going to be there, whether they admit it or not,' she said.
The Guardian
7 minutes ago
- The Guardian
New Orleans clergy abuse survivors begin voting on church bankruptcy deal
A two-month voting period for clergy abuse survivors and other creditors in the New Orleans Catholic archdiocese's bankruptcy to accept or reject the church's plan to settle has started after a federal bankruptcy judge recently approved the plan. It has also opened a window of time when supporters and opponents of the plan can actively solicit votes. Two-thirds of the voting claimants must approve the plan for the church to end its expensive and contentious five-year-long bankruptcy. Judge Meredith Grabill has stated that if the plan is not approved, she will dismiss the archdiocese's bankruptcy, and the church could end up having to defend itself against claims individually in state courts. The deadline for claimants to cast their votes is 29 October at 11.59pm central time, although the proponents of the plan can extend that deadline without court approval, according to Grabill's order. The judge set a hearing to confirm or reject the settlement plan starting 12 November. The first statement backing the plan was issued by Pat Moody, chair of a committee of survivors who negotiated a settlement that could pay as little as $180m to the church's creditors and as much as $235m. 'This bankruptcy plan is a good outcome for abuse survivors, providing just and prompt compensation. If survivors vote to approve the Plan, they can expect to start getting payments within 3-4 months after approval. If survivors vote to reject the plan, I fear survivors won't see any money for another 3-5 years, if ever,' Moody said. 'And, very importantly, approval of the plan will ensure unprecedented child protection measures and public access to the documents showing the history of abuse in the archdiocese of New Orleans. For many of us, this structural reform is as important as financial compensation, and will only happen if the plan is approved.' A bloc of as many as 200 survivors are represented by attorneys who want the bankruptcy dismissed and have said in court that the deal is 'dead on arrival'. Whether enough survivors vote to approve the plan will largely depend on how each claimant can expect to be compensated. Points will be assigned to each abuse claim based on the severity of the abuse and its impact on each victim's life, but the records do not offer much clarity on how much actual money those points will be worth. Claims regarding rape by a Catholic church employee will be worth twice as much money as claims about a priest masturbating in front of someone, four times more than claims of a cleric touching someone under their clothes and seven times more than claims about being shown pornography, according to details from a settlement disclosure statement filed last week and amended this week. The survivors' committee that negotiated the settlement selected Richard Arsenault, a personal injury lawyer in Alexandria, as the abuse claims reviewer. He will consider the nature and impact of the abuse to award between zero and 100 points to each claim. Points can then be added for those who participated in criminal prosecution of the abuser, those who sued before the bankruptcy began, and those who led efforts on behalf of other survivors. More points can be awarded based on the impact the abuse had on the victim's behavior, academic achievement, mental health and loss of faith and family relationships. Points can be reduced if the claimant was over 18 and consented to the sexual contact. Sign up to Headlines US Get the most important US headlines and highlights emailed direct to you every morning after newsletter promotion Survivors won't know how much each point is worth until Arsenault is done assessing all claims. John Lousteau, a survivor who filed a lawsuit in 2021 against a Catholic religious order, recently won a $2.4m jury verdict. Although it's separate from the bankruptcy case, the Lousteau verdict is viewed by many as a benchmark for what the average survivor could get if they are willing to spend more years in court. The final plan approved by Grabill allows anyone who filed a sexual abuse claim or lawsuit against the archdiocese before 14 August to vote on the plan, even though it had previously stated that 250 claims filed after March 2021 were filed too late. Those with abuse claims against the church's parishes, schools and affiliated charities have until 15 October 2025 to file their claims to be eligible to vote. That appears to rebut arguments made by some of the church's creditors that as many as half of the abuse claims should be thrown out. Information and support for anyone affected by rape or sexual abuse issues is available from the following organizations. In the US, Rainn offers support on 800-656-4673. In the UK, Rape Crisis offers support on 0808 500 2222. In Australia, support is available at 1800Respect (1800 737 732). Other international helplines can be found at
