Americans are unhappy. Here are the 5 happiest countries in the world
The Nordic countries of Finland, Denmark, and Iceland once again topped the list of the happiest countries in the world, while the United States failed to recover from last year's historic drop out of the top 20, the Gallup World Happiness Report revealed.
The countries that rank in the upper echelons of joy are 'not surprising,' to Julie Ray, Gallup's managing editor for world news.
'Finland, in particular, has a lack of inequality,' she told Quartz. 'Strong safety nets and relatively strong economies are characteristic of the top of the list.'
A strong economy, however, is not enough to guarantee the happiness of a country's citizens. The United States, which ranked 24th in the world, was one of several wealthy, industrialized nations that has seen a decrease in overall happiness. Australia, New Zealand, Switzerland, and Canada have all experienced noticeable declines – while less affluent countries like Mexico and Costa Rica rank among the happiest in the world.
'This year's report quantifies the human elements of life that are often hard to measure,' said Jan-Emmanuel De Neve, director of Oxford's Wellbeing Research Centre, in a statement. 'These findings push us to look beyond traditional determinants like health and wealth and encourage people to get back around the table together.'
The Gallup analysis suggests that people in Latin American countries are especially happy, relative to their countries' gross domestic products, because of the close social and familial ties which exist in their cultures.
Living with four to five people and sharing meals with others, for example, are both considered optimal for overall happiness. In less affluent countries, like Mexico, bigger households are more common than in Europe or the United States – which could counterbalance a relative lack of wealth.
'Although income does play a big role in people's life evaluations, it's not just money that explains why people are happy,' Ray said.
In fact, this year's Gallup report places special emphasis on themes of 'sharing and caring' as significant factors in the overall happiness of individuals and entire countries. So-called 'deaths of despair' – which are deaths linked to suicide or drug and alcohol use – are less common in countries where people frequently engage in benevolent acts.
'If you're giving to others by donating your time, donating your money, or even helping a stranger, that improves your wellbeing,' said Ray. 'You're giving to somebody else, but you're getting happiness in return.'
Click through to see the five happiest countries in the world.
For the latest news, Facebook, Twitter and Instagram.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
5 hours ago
- Yahoo
Florida, Latin American and Caribbean styles long have infused buildings with color
Pink hues are associated with South Florida, yes, but the color is embraced elsewhere, too. Toulouse, France, is known as the Pink City for its heavy use of red-pink terracotta bricks. Jaipor, India, also is known as the Pink City for its pink buildings painted as a show of hospitality to welcome Prince Albert, Queen Victoria's husband, in 1876. There's even a law in Jaipor requiring that new buildings hew to the rose hue. And while pink sometimes is linked to politics or protest, its lasting message is mostly that of health, architects said. Even the phrase 'being in the pink' conveys a message of well-being. In Florida, Latin American and Caribbean styles long have infused buildings with color. And in the 1920s, architect Addison Mizner created his signature style of Mediterranean and Spanish influences, including reddish barrel-tiled roofs, in Boca Raton and Palm Beach. People today generally associate the color pink with women and girls. Think Barbie and the hot pink marketing blitz accompanying the 2023 release of the Barbie film, followed by the Barbiecore fashion that accompanied the hoopla. But it wasn't always so. Rocco Ceo, an architecture professor at the University of Miami, said throughout the centuries, pink has been associated with wealth and often, men. 'Color is always shifting in terms of its meaning and cultural significance,' said Ceo, who teaches seminars on color theory. In the late 1970s, an up-and-coming architecture firm called Arquitectonica designed a waterfront house in Miami Shores that became known as the Pink House. The property featured five shades of rose-tinted paint, ranging from a light pink to a red. The tower features a large cutout square filled with a palm tree, a red staircase and a giant rounded hot tub. Arquitectonica then would go on to design a new condominium for the Miami skyline: the 22-story building known as The Atlantis on Brickell Bright, bold tropical colors were used to 'draw attention to this city and its potential,' Arquitectonica co-founder Fernando Fort-Brescia said in a recent interview. It worked. The next year, Christo and Jeanne-Claude's "Surrounded Islands" installation turned Miami's Biscayne Bay into an explosion of bubble-gum pink, with 11 islands surrounded by 6.5 million square feet of floating pink fabric. Then along came a television show in 1984 featuring two stylish police detectives set in a Miami wonderland of color. Miami Vice actor Don Johnson wore suits and T-shirts that often included the color pink. Although Greater Miami's once colorful Art Deco pastels had by the early 1980s decayed and turned gritty, Miami Vice depicted a sexy tropical landscape and an aspirational notion of South Florida paradise. Such was the environment when the Phillips Point complex in West Palm Beach was built in 1985 by real estate developer Murray Goodman. Alexandra Clough is a business writer at The Palm Beach Post. You can reach her at aclough@ X: @acloughpbp. Help support our journalism. Subscribe today. This article originally appeared on Palm Beach Post: Why pink is associated with South Florida style, look
Yahoo
2 days ago
- Yahoo
Defining symbol of protests, volatile work schedules, healing power of travel: Catch up on the day's stories
👋 Welcome to 5 Things PM! Almost two-thirds of US workers struggle with volatile and inflexible work schedules, according to a new Gallup survey. It's especially common among part-time employees and those without a college degree. Here's what else you might have missed during your busy day: 1️⃣ Defining symbol: Mexico's green, white and red flag has been a common sight at the protests in Los Angeles as demonstrators express solidarity with immigrants and denounce the ICE raids. The brandishing of Latin American flags in the US has a long and complex history. 2️⃣ Dicey outlook: Global economic growth is on track for its weakest decade since the 1960s, according to a new analysis. The World Bank cited US President Donald Trump's trade war as a major factor weighing on economies worldwide. 3️⃣ $1,000 per baby: The so-called 'Trump accounts' would provide parents of newborns with money to invest on behalf of their child's future as part of a five-year pilot program. Here's how it would work and who would benefit the most. 4️⃣ World traveler: Cameron Mofid has struggled with obsessive compulsive disorder since childhood. The California man recently became one of the few people who has visited all 195 UN-recognized countries and territories. He called it 'a form of healing.' 5️⃣ Skygazing: Keep an eye out tonight for June's full strawberry moon as well as the Milky Way and multiple planets. This will be the lowest full moon visible from the Northern Hemisphere in decades due to a phenomenon called a major lunar standstill. 🌊 Undersea wreckage: Researchers from the Woods Hole Oceanographic Institution in Massachusetts captured close-up images of a World War I-era submarine that was lost at sea 108 years ago. Take a closer look. • Military mobilization around LA protests will cost roughly $134 million• Gunman opens fire in Austrian school, killing 10 and throwing country into shock• Several dead after wave of explosions hit southwest Colombia, authorities say ✈️ That's how many fewer international travelers are expected to visit New York City this year than in 2024. 🌍 Call for help: Children removing plastic waste from a lake. Tree-covered mountains behind a massive pile of trash. A billboard on parched earth where the seashore used to be. Striking images like these, showing environmental destruction, aim to 'inspire action.' 🛒 Empty shelves: Whole Foods says it's working hard to restock stores with groceries after a cyberattack knocked one of its major suppliers offline. 🚢 Which activist was detained while aboard an aid ship headed for Gaza? A. Ai WeiweiB. Jane FondaC. Greta ThunbergD. Alicia Garza⬇️ Scroll down for the answer. 👨🎨 The real deal: A family displayed a marble sculpture on top of their piano alongside photos. They thought it was 'fake' — a copy of a work of art by renowned sculptor Auguste Rodin. It just sold at auction for nearly $1 million. 👋 We'll see you tomorrow. 🧠 Quiz answer: C. Swedish climate and human rights activist Greta Thunberg departed Israel on a flight to France after being detained by Israeli forces aboard an aid ship bound for Gaza.📧 Check out all of CNN's newsletters. 5 Things PM is produced by CNN's Chris Good, Meghan Pryce, Kimberly Richardson and Morgan Severson.
Forbes
6 days ago
- Forbes
Who You Name Manager Isn't Just A Promotion. It's A Culture Decision
Human hand picking up a person from the row. Gallup's most recent workforce study uncovered a pressing concern for organizations focused on future-ready leadership. Gallup found that only 26 percent of current managers in the U.S. exhibit high natural talent for the role. This finding, based on Gallup's validated management talent screener, measures five critical dimensions: motivation to lead, drive for results, relationship-building ability, accountability, and systems thinking. This data is not just a research finding. It is a wake-up call for any organization committed to strategic talent development, succession planning and performance culture. That's why investing in high-potential talent matters. Gallup found that these managers are significantly more likely to engage in behaviors that create real value—sharing advice and ideas, mentoring others, building networks, going above and beyond, staying customer-focused, and offering meaningful feedback. And the effect multiplies when they're also engaged at work. These aren't soft perks. They're mission-critical behaviors in today's volatile, fast-changing business environment. As leadership roles evolve amid disruption, hybrid work, wellbeing demands and early-stage AI adoption, organizations must take a more intentional, evidence-based approach to selecting who leads. Right now, too many managers are being placed in roles based on tenure, technical success, or timing. And it's not working. Even among high-talent managers, only 51 percent say their current role is a great fit. That's not the average. That's the best. These are the individuals most likely to thrive. Yet nearly half feel miscast, underutilized, or disconnected from the role they've been given. It's not a lack of ambition. In fact, 42 percent say it is extremely important for them to become a senior leader or lead other managers someday. Meanwhile, 77 percent of those same high-talent managers report feeling confident in their ability to do their current job. But confidence without context is not a reliable indicator of effectiveness—especially as the role continues to shift. The core challenge is not capability, but alignment. Importantly, confidence in meeting today's expectations doesn't guarantee continued performance in a disruptive future. What's needed is a higher degree of future readiness—and that's where things get difficult. Gallup research found that only about 1 in 3 high-potential managers strongly agree they understand the gaps between what they know now and what they'll need to lead in the future. Even the most promising managers need structured guidance, focused coaching and intentional confidence building to close that gap. The question organizations must be asking is: Are we matching the right people to the right roles, at the right time and in line with what the future demands? Gallup also found that 30 percent of employees are actively seeking new roles within their current organization. Of those, 72 percent are looking for a promotion over a lateral move. This reflects a longstanding cultural narrative: advancement equals up. But that assumption can backfire—especially when management is viewed as the default step forward. Leadership is not the right next move for everyone. When employees are placed in people-leader roles based on tenure, ambition, or availability, it creates downstream risk. Teams underperform. Culture fragments. Burnout and disengagement rise. Misfit roles aren't just a hiring mistake. They're often a result of old habits. Promotions get handed out based on tenure, loyalty, or urgency to fill a gap. Sometimes it's just easier to move someone up than pause and ask if they're truly wired to lead. There's also a quiet bias at play. When someone wants to lead, we assume they can. But ambition isn't the same as ability. Without a clear look at motivation and natural talent, good people land in the wrong roles for the wrong reasons. If lateral pathways are going to become part of an internal mobility strategy, then talent must become the non-negotiable filter. Lateral movement should be designed to stretch strengths, not patch internal gaps or offer placeholder promotions — or worse pseudo-promotions — titles or roles with limited or no real authority. They are still called managers. But they do everything but manage. Gallup's findings show clear differences in why individuals pursue leadership. High-talent managers are far more likely to cite motivations like developing others, fostering team success, and creating a better work environment. Others, on the other hand, more often mention compensation, title, or organizational pressure. While all motives are human, only some are sustainable. When people step into leadership without a people-first mindset, the risk is not just poor performance. It is cultural erosion. Organizations must evaluate not just if someone can manage, but why they want to. The expectations placed on managers today are broader, more human-centered even as they are increasingly tech-driven, and more complex. Yet, managers are less engaged than before and many are looking for change. They are also struggling more than the people they lead. And even with all that they are still expected to: And yet, many selection processes are still designed around static role descriptions, past performance, or organizational convenience. Technology is accelerating this gap. Gallup reports that only 15 percent of white-collar employees use AI weekly, yet 45 percent of those who do report greater productivity and efficiency. While AI is not the main story here, it is a signal. Managers who are more naturally adaptive—those with higher leadership talent—are also more likely to engage with new tools and you still the pizza in the lead differently because of them. AI will not replace managers, but it will make clear who is learning, growing, and leading effectively in a changing environment. Here are five strategic shifts organizations can make to close the gap: Leadership should not be a thank-you for past performance. It is a specialized role requiring the right match of talent, motivation, and organizational need. Growth does not always mean promotion. Design lateral roles with intent, and use talent as the starting point—not the fallback plan. Relying on instinct or tenure leads to misalignment. Use validated assessments to understand natural leadership ability before making selection decisions. High-talent managers need challenge, mentorship, and runway. Others may need targeted support, or a different kind of growth path altogether. Focus on indicators like adaptability, systems thinking, resilience under pressure, and the ability to elevate others. These matter as much as technical skill or functional success. Managers account for as much as 70 percent of the variance in team engagement and performance. Who you choose to lead your teams has an outsized impact on your culture, your brand, and your bottom line. Right now, many managers are in roles that don't match their talent or their motivation. Others are stepping into leadership because it's the only visible form of progress. And even your highest-potential leaders may be feeling disconnected from the role they're in. That is not a pipeline problem. That is a perspective problem. It is time to replace default promotion paths with deliberate selection strategies. It is time to reward stewardship, not just ambition. And it is time to ask better questions—about who is built to lead, why they want to, and how we can help them do it well. The future of your culture depends on the choices you make today about who you trust to lead it. Disclosure: My day job is focusing on leadership development and strategy research for Gallup.
