Trump, U.S. tariffs muting Canadians' desire to move to America for their career: Survey
The survey, commissioned by human resources software company Humi, found just over half of those who have thought about working in the U.S. were less likely to consider it due to Trump's election. Around half also say the tariffs imposed by the U.S. lowered the likelihood of making a move.
The trends 'present a unique opportunity to reverse the brain drain to Canada's gain,' a media release from Humi says.
The survey found that 16 per cent of respondents had considered moving to the U.S. for their career in the past five years. The figure is higher for Gen Z (29 per cent) and millennials (23 per cent), and also higher among those with at least a university degree (21 per cent).
Among those who say they had considered moving, 31 per cent say their main motivation was higher compensation, while 29 per cent say it was lower taxes. Higher compensation stood out especially among the subset with at least a university degree, with 42 per cent citing it as the biggest motivator.
'Unfortunately, these findings don't come as a surprise as the Canadian government and companies have long struggled to reverse the trend of brain drain,' Kevin Kliman, Humi's co-founder, is quoted as saying in the release.
Although Trump's election made 52 per cent of those who had considered moving to the U.S. less likely to consider it, it also made 30 per cent more likely to consider it. The tariffs were less polarizing, causing 51 per cent to say they were less likely to consider a move but only 17 per cent to say they were more likely to do so.
Those polled were also asked about a third consideration, that is, the exchange rate between the U.S. and Canadian dollars. That factor made 42 per cent more likely to consider moving, and 29 per cent less likely to consider doing so.
In the release, Kliman says that to capitalize on the lower enthusiasm for a U.S. career move, Canadian employers 'need to focus on retaining the talent they win over, elevating their employment experience and investing in their people.'
Humi says several strategies can help Canadian businesses with these aims, including offering 'competitive benefits packages,' investing in modern, user-friendly technology and talking more openly with staff about how their career goals align with business needs.
Kliman notes that the brain drain is also a policy issue and steps must be taken at that level as well. 'As a co-founder in the Canadian employment space, I also know first-hand that some aspects driving the brain drain are out of companies' hands, so we must work alongside policymakers to drive change,' he said.
The online survey polled 1,515 Canadians who are members of the Angus Reid Forum between April 7 and 9. The release says "for comparison purposes only, a probability sample of this size would carry a margin of error of +/-2.5 percentage points, 19 times out of 20."
John MacFarlane is a senior reporter at Yahoo Finance Canada. Follow him on Twitter @jmacf.
Download the Yahoo Finance app, available for Apple and Android.

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


CBS News
10 minutes ago
- CBS News
National Guard member ticketed for running a red light after crashing into car in D.C. during Trump's deployment
A National Guard member whose military transport vehicle collided with a car this week was given a traffic ticket for running a red light in Washington, D.C. — as Guard forces deploy to the streets of the capital amid President Trump's contentious anti-crime push. The collision took place early Wednesday morning, as a convoy of five National Guard vehicles drove through D.C.'s Capitol Hill neighborhood. One of the trucks — a Mine-Resistant Ambush Protected All-Terrain Vehicle — struck a civilian car, the D.C. Guard said in a statement. The five Guard vehicles and a D.C. Metropolitan Police Department cruiser stopped to help the driver, who was transported via emergency medical services, according to the Guard. The driver sustained minor injuries, but the D.C. Fire Department used extrication tools to remove the driver from the car, department spokesperson Vito Maggiolo told CBS News. The driver of the Guard vehicle was later ticketed for running a red light during the incident, the military's D.C. Joint Task Force said Thursday. Red light tickets cost $150 in D.C. "Our priority is ensuring the well-being of all involved. We are grateful for the response of D.C. police and EMS. Safety is our top priority. We will take action based on the investigation. This type of vehicle is authorized, and safety protocols are in place," Army Col. Larry Doane, commander of the joint task force for D.C., said in a statement. National Guard personnel have been deployed in the capital city since last week, when Mr. Trump ordered the D.C. Guard — which is controlled by the president — to crack down on what he called an "epidemic of crime." Federal agents have also patrolled the city, and Mr. Trump has asserted control over the local Metropolitan Police Department. Just under 2,000 Guard personnel were activated in the capital as of Wednesday, including members of the D.C. National Guard as well as forces from six GOP-led states. The Guard members "may be armed, consistent with their training, depending on the mission, operating under civilian law enforcement," the Joint Task Force said in a statement. Guard forces and heavy military vehicles have been spotted throughout the city, including at Union Station and near the Washington Monument. The moves have drawn pushback from local officials who argue the surge is unnecessary. Violent crime in D.C. has been declining for the last year-and-a-half after spiking in 2023, according to local police data — despite Mr. Trump's claim that crime is on the Walsh contributed to this report.


The Hill
11 minutes ago
- The Hill
US says it killed top ISIS official in Syria
U.S. forces on Tuesday killed a senior ISIS official in Syria, U.S. Central Command (CENTCOM) announced in a statement Thursday. The 'successful raid' in northern Syria targeted an unnamed senior ISIS member who also served as a 'key financier who planned attacks in Syria and Iraq,' according to the CENTCOM statement. CENTCOM said the senior ISIS member had relationships in the region, 'posing a direct threat to U.S. and Coalition forces and the new Syrian Government.' 'We will continue to pursue ISIS terrorists with unwavering determination, throughout the region,' CENTCOM Commander, Adm. Brad Cooper, said in the statement. 'Together with our partners and allies, CENTCOM remains steadfast in our commitment of ensuring the lasting defeat of ISIS and the protection of the U.S. homeland,' he continued. Trump has moved to ease sanctions significantly on Syria in the wake of the ousting of Syrian dictator Bashar al-Assad in December. A delegation of Congressional members recently visited Syria and met with President Ahmed al-Sharaa and other senior officials in the administration. CENTCOM forces last month killed another senior ISIS leader, Dhiya' Zawba Muslih al-Hardani, and his two adult ISIS-affiliated sons, Abdallah Dhiya al-Hardani and Abd al-Rahman Dhiya Zawba al-Hardani. U.S. officials similarly said the ISIS members posed a threat to US and coalition forces, including the Syrian government.

11 minutes ago
'It's alarming': Education Department revokes guidance on English learning services
The U.S. Education Department has rescinded critical guidance to schools regarding how they provide English language learning services for roughly 5 million students in U.S. schools. The Education Department on Tuesday rescinded a 2015 Dear Colleague letter on its website, which served as a guide for school districts that are serving English learners to ensure they're providing adequate resources to their students under Title VI of the 1964 Civil Rights Act. In a statement to ABC News, the Education Department said the document was "overly prescriptive" and that it micro-managed states. "States have vastly different needs for this important population of students and are best equipped to determine how best to educate these students while following all applicable federal laws," the department said in the statement. The document is still available online for "historical purposes only," according to a notice. The Washington Post was the first to report the guidance had been rescinded. Advocates worry the decision removes federal oversight and accountability, which could lead to school districts opting to discriminate against English learners. Despite those concerns, removing the guidance does not strip resources from schools nor does it alter state curriculums, which are handled by state and local agencies. Roxanne Garza, director of higher education policy at the Education Trust, suggested the move could further the fears of immigrant students wary of returning to school amid the Trump administration's measures to curb illegal migration. "I think it could add to the overall feeling of fear -- like making these people, these families, feel like they don't belong in their communities." Montserrat Garibay, former assistant deputy secretary and director of the Office of English Language Acquisition (OELA) during the Biden administration, equated the now-rescinded English-learners document to the Bible for English language instructors. During her tenure, she said the letter was instrumental to her office in providing resources to the students who needed it most. Garibay, who said nearly three quarters of students in English Language Acquisition programming are U.S. citizens, argued the move could have a lasting impact if it results in scaled-back resources. "These are children who eventually are going to be paying our Medicare and Medicaid, right? Our Social Security, because they are U.S. citizens. And it's outrageous that we are not providing them with the resources that they need to be successful in the 21st century." Garibay also said lifting the long-standing guidance appears to fly in the face of an executive order Trump signed earlier this year designating English as the official language of the United States. Education advocates decried the agency's decision. ImmSchools Co-Founder Viridiana Carrizales told ABC News "It's alarming because, you know, it feels like this administration is stripping away every right, every protection, funding, access to resources etc. that are so critical for those 5 million students in the country who are learning English." Carrizales, whose organization partners with school districts to create more welcoming and safe schools for K-12 immigrant students, said the recent move is a significant shift for classroom educators because immigrant protections, overall, are "diminishing." "We're hearing a lot more concerns from educators themselves, who're trying to figure out how they can meet and support this population when their resources and protections are being taken away," she said. Anne Kelsey, senior policy analyst for disability rights at the Young Center for Immigrant Children's Rights, argued the decision will harm immigrant children and families. "Language access is a fundamental right that builds safer, smarter, and more connected communities, and ensures children can receive a full and fair education while keeping their parents actively involved," Kelsey wrote in a statement to ABC News, adding "These programs welcome parents and families fully into the school community and we know it leads to stronger educational outcomes for students." The effort to return education responsibilities and decisions to the states is arguably President Donald Trump's top K-12 education priority. Secretary of Education Linda McMahon kicked off her 50-state "Returning Education to the States" tour last week.