Democratic lawmaker introduces resolution opposing clemency for Ghislaine Maxwell
Krishnamoorthi introduced his resolution after several Republican senators warned that granting a pardon to Maxwell or reducing her 20-year prison sentence for sexually exploiting teenage girls would be a bad idea.
The Democratic resolution affirms that Maxwell's conviction and sentencing 'were more than warranted by the facts, and any receipt of a pardon, commutation, or other form of clemency by Ghislaine Maxwell would deny survivors the justice they deserve.'
The resolution formally opposes the granting of a pardon or other form of clemency.
Krishnamoorthi said in a statement that Maxwell 'enabled one of the most appalling child exploitation networks in modern history. Her conviction was not only just, it was necessary.'
'The idea that she could now bargain for clemency insults every survivor and undermines our justice system. The message must be clear: no one gets to traffic children and then negotiate their way out of accountability,' he said.
At least eight Democrats have already joined Krishnamoorthi in introducing the resolution: Reps. Emanuel Cleaver (Mo.), Lou Correa (Calif.), Nabeela Syed Ansari (Ariz.), Dan Goldman (N.Y.), Shri Thanedar (Mich.), Dina Titus (Nev.), Suhas Subramanyam (Va.) and Eric Swalwell (Calif.).
The resolution is the latest example of bipartisan concern on Capitol Hill that the Trump administration may reduce Maxwell's sentence if she testifies about which powerful and connected elites participated or did not participate in Epstein's illicit activities.
Several Republican senators told The Hill that it would be a mistake for Trump to grant Maxwell a pardon or allow his administration to reduce her sentence.
'It's ridiculous that he would consider shortening a sentence for somebody who aided and abetted sexual trafficking as she did,' said a Republican senator who requested anonymity to comment on the sensitive topic.
'She's trafficking underage children. I can't imagine anything she could say could nullify her heinous crimes,' the senator added.
Trump hasn't ruled out a pardon for Maxwell though he says that no one has approached him about the possibility.
'I'm allowed to do it, but nobody's asked me to do it,' he told Newsmax Friday. 'I know nothing about the case.'
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
27 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Nixing Tailpipe Emissions Rules Will Spike Gas Prices, Trump Admin Report Says
Nixing Tailpipe Emissions Rules Will Spike Gas Prices, Trump Admin Report Says originally appeared on Autoblog. The EPA touted savings for Americans On July 29, the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency announced that it was in the process of rescinding the landmark 2009 endangerment finding, a decision that set the course for regulations regarding greenhouse gas emissions, such as those from cars and power plants. In its announcement, the EPA noted that if its proposal is finalized, greenhouse gas emissions regulations for motor vehicles and engines would be repealed, which it claims would restore consumer choice and give Americans the ability to purchase a safe and affordable car for their families, thereby decreasing the overall cost of living. 'With this proposal, the Trump EPA is proposing to end sixteen years of uncertainty for automakers and American consumers,' EPA Administrator Lee Zeldin said in a statement. "[...] If finalized, rescinding the Endangerment Finding and resulting regulations would end $1 trillion or more in hidden taxes on American businesses and families." Revoking emissions policies will make gas expensive, the US EIA finds Despite promising $54 billion in annual savings for Americans, a new report from CBS News, using data from the EPA and the U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA), shows that one vital resource that enables everyday transportation will become more expensive over time if the EPA successfully rescinds the 2009 endangerment finding. According to EIA projections cited by both CBS and the EPA, gas prices are expected to increase over time in a scenario where emissions policies are revoked under the Trump administration, as there would be a higher demand for gas-powered cars to travel and fuel to power them. Although gas prices are subject to intense market volatility due to various factors, USEIA data indicate that gas prices would largely fall if the environmental policies of the last administration were to remain intact, and that prices would increase under a proposed rollback of environmental regulations. Under the Biden administration, the EPA set a new goal for new gas-powered cars to achieve 47.1 miles per gallon (mpg) by 2027 and then reach around 61.2 miles per gallon by 2035. Without those Biden-era policies, cars made in 2027 are only expected to meet a lower standard of 43.6 mpg, gradually increasing to 50.5 mpg by 2035. In an emailed statement to CBS News, former EIA administrator Joseph DeCarolis explained that if the EPA under the Trump administration "disincentivizes electric vehicle purchases, more consumers will purchase gasoline vehicles, resulting in higher gasoline consumption and high gasoline prices for everyone." "There's a clear causal connection between rescinding measures promoting electric vehicles, such as EPA tailpipe standards, and the projection of higher gasoline prices," he said. In an interview on CBS's The Takeout with Major Garrett, Zeldin did not address how the plan to rescind the 2009 Endangerment Finding would affect gas prices. Instead, he argued that the previous administration's policies were costing trillions of dollars, as they were heavily restricting "[…] entire sectors of our economy, and specifically our energy economy.' 'It's important that we are applying common sense," Zeldin said, "that we are cognizant of these economic demands and that, wherever possible, when we can protect the environment and grow the economy that we will choose both." Final Thoughts Be that as it may, the American consumer is already at a penny-pinching point of contention, and experts warn that these proposed EPA rollbacks would add to the already expensive operating costs of gas-powered cars. In a statement to CBS News, Peter Huether, a senior transportation research associate at the American Council for an Energy-Efficient Economy, warned that "Drivers would pay thousands of dollars more in fuel and maintenance costs over the life of a vehicle, and businesses could lose billions annually from higher trucking costs" if the Zeldin-led EPA gets its way. He added that the added cost for fuel costs "would ripple through the economy, raising prices for everyday goods and undercutting job growth." Nixing Tailpipe Emissions Rules Will Spike Gas Prices, Trump Admin Report Says first appeared on Autoblog on Aug 6, 2025 This story was originally reported by Autoblog on Aug 6, 2025, where it first appeared.
Yahoo
27 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Will pro-Trump Latinos vote Republican in the 2026 midterms? A new poll casts doubts
A quarter of Latinos who supported President Donald Trump in the November election are not guaranteed to vote for Republicans in the 2026 midterm elections, according to a new national poll by Equis, a leading research and polling group. Last week Equis, alongside progressive think tank Data for Progress, released a July memo that summarized key findings from a national poll of 1,614 registered voters, conducted between July 7 and July 17. This time frame coincides with some notable turning points in politics: namely, when Trump signed the "One Big Beautiful Bill" into law, as well as his execution of mass deportations and controversial handling of the Epstein files. Respondents were asked, "If the 2026 election for United States Congress were held today, for whom would you vote?" Only 27% replied that they would vote for a Republican candidate, marking a significant political party drop from the 45% who said they voted for Donald Trump in the 2024 presidential election. A quarter of those polled said they were not sure whom they would vote for (16%), would vote for someone else (5%), or would not vote at all (4%). This shaky political alignment comes at a critical time for Republicans, who are banking on continual Latino support in 2026 — especially as Texas Republicans plan to flip five blue seats under a newly proposed congressional map. The Equis study also found that 63% of Latinos disapproved of Trump's job as president in July, a slight uptick from polling numbers in May, when 60% disapproved. This rating seems to reflect broader sentiments regarding the state of the U.S. economy: 64% of Latinos rated the economy as "somewhat or very poor," while only 34% viewed it as "somewhat or very good." However, a disapproval of Trump does not mean Latinos have rushed to back the Democratic Party. Half the Latinos polled said Democrats care more about people like them, versus the 25% who said Republicans care more. Meanwhile, 17% said they believe that neither party cares. Swing voters — including those who Equis calls "Biden defectors," or voters who elected Biden in 2020 and Trump in 2024 — are twice as likely to say that neither party cares about people like them (38%). "Growing dissatisfaction with Trump offers Democrats an opportunity, but only if they are willing to capitalize on it," the July memo states. Overall, Trump's national approval ratings are taking a nosedive, according to aggregate polling by the New York Times, which notes that Trump's approach to the Jeffrey Epstein investigation has angered his base. On Tuesday, the House Oversight Committee subpoenaed the Justice Department for the files; lawmakers believe they could implicate Trump and other former top officials in the sex-trafficking investigation. Trump's anti-immigration policies have also likely shifted his popularity. Early July Gallup polling revealed that Americans have grown more positive toward immigration — 79% of Americans say immigration is a "good thing" for the country, which marks a 64% increase from last year and a 25-year record high. Get our Latinx Files newsletter for stories that capture the complexity of our communities. This story originally appeared in Los Angeles Times.
UPI
27 minutes ago
- UPI
Texas AG will seek to vacate congressional seats of fled Democrats
Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton on Tuesday said he will seek to remove Democrats from state Congress who fled the state over the weekend. Pool File Photo by Justin Lane/UPI | License Photo Aug. 5 (UPI) -- Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton on Tuesday announced he will ask a court to declare the seats of the absent Democratic lawmakers vacant after they fled the Lone Star State in an effort to prevent majority Republicans from adopting controversial congressional maps that critics have derided as a power grab. Legislative Democrats over the weekend left Texas for Democratic-strongholds, such as New York and Illinois, to deny Republicans the minimum number of lawmakers necessary to pass legislation, and to prevent passage of congressional maps, supported by President Donald Trump, that would reportedly lock in five GOP seats to the U.S. House of Representatives in the run up to next year's midterm elections. Critics of the maps have described them as seeking to increase Republican seats in the House through racial gerrymandering that reduces the voting power of people of color in the state. Texas Republicans have, in turn, accused the Democrats of neglecting their responsibilities as state legislators by fleeing. Texas Gov. Greg Abbott has ordered their arrest and has threatened to investigate any Democrat who solicits funds to support their effort. Texas House Speaker Dustin Burrows, a Republican, has given the Democrats until Friday to return to the House. Paxton on Tuesday said he will seek "aggressive legal action" against any who are not present at that time to remove them from office. "Democrats have abandoned their offices by fleeing Texas, and a failure to respond to a call of the House constitutes a dereliction of their duty as elected officials," Paxton said in a statement. "Starting Friday, any rogue lawmakers refusing to return to the House will be held accountable for vacating their office. The people of Texas elected lawmakers, not jet-setting runaways looking for headlines." Democrats have come out in support of their Texas colleagues, who say they stand together to protect voting rights. In a press conference Tuesday in Illinois, the state's Democratic lieutenant governor, Juliana Stratton, said they were "facing the voting rights fight of our lifetime." "Donald Trump and Texas Republicans are staging a blatant attempt to rig the next election," she said, while accusing them of diverting their attention from those suffering the effects of last month's fatal flooding to "further rigging the system to their own advantage. And there's no line they won't cross." The Democrats broadly described their actions as a bold stand against the Republicans' power grab that targets the voting power of Latino and Black voters. "This is not the Democratic Party of your grandfather, which would bring a pencil the the knife fight," Democratic National Committee chair Ken Martin said. "This is a new Democratic Party. We're bringing a knife to a knife fight." Former President Barack Obama even posted to X about the situation, stating: "Republicans in Texas are trying to gerrymander district lines to unfairly win five seats in next year's midterm elections. This is a power grab that undermines our democracy." Abbott also announced Tuesday that he has filed an emergency petition asking the Texas Superior Court to remove Texas House Democratic Caucus Chair Gene Wu over his failure to return to the state's House by the previous Sunday deadline. Wu responded by chastising the governor for seeking to redraw the congressional lines while holding onto disaster relief for the families of the 137 Texans who died in last month's floods. "My purpose has been clear from that start: to serve my constituents and fight for what's right, no matter the cost," Wu said in a statement. "You will find that my commitment to the people of Texas is unbreakable." In a surprising move late Tuesday, Paxton filed his own petition with the Texas Supreme Court, stating that Abbott does not have the authority to file the writ of quo warranto, asserting that responsibility falls to him. He has asked the court not to dismiss the case until Burrows' Friday deadline so he can consider filing a writ of quo warranto of his own.
