logo
Gang ‘followed and killed tourist after failed bag snatch'

Gang ‘followed and killed tourist after failed bag snatch'

Telegraph05-06-2025
A gang of five allegedly followed and stabbed a Greek tourist multiple times after a failed attempt to steal his bag, a court has heard.
Antonis Antoniadis, 26, was allegedly followed and attacked on a doorstep in New Cross, south-east London, on July 7 last year.
He died two weeks later from his injuries.
Four men – Shian Johnson, 25, Sofian Alliche, 20, Joshua McCorquodale, 20, and Alfie Hipple, 18 – as well as a 17-year-old youth are charged with his murder and planning to rob his personal items.
Opening their trial at the Old Bailey on Thursday, William Emlyn Jones KC, prosecuting, said the defendants tracked Mr Antoniadis across London before fatally stabbing him in the chest and thigh as he tried to defend himself on the ground, causing 'catastrophic blood loss'.
Mr Antoniadis, who travelled to London for a week's holiday with two friends, went to the 32 Portland Place nightclub in Marylebone in the early hours of July 7, jurors were told.
The trio did not leave the venue until after 8am and booked an Uber back to a friend's address in New Cross where they were staying.
'A suitable target'
Mr Emlyn Jones said: 'They had no idea that five young men had been hanging around outside that nightclub all night in a stolen car, looking for someone they could rob.
'It seems that when that group of five saw Antonis come out of the club, those robbers thought they had found a suitable target.
'So when they saw him come out and get into his Uber, they, in their stolen car, followed him.'
The defendants then followed the taxi for more than half an hour to its destination, the court heard.
As one of Antoniadis's friends struggled to find the house key upon arriving at the address, the victim 'was approached by four figures in hoods and balaclavas', with the fifth group member acting as a getaway driver, the prosecutor said.
Mr Antoniadis managed to hit one of the robbers with a brandy bottle as he struggled against the group, who appeared to want to take a bag he was carrying.
'Tragically, whether it was brave or whether it was just an instinctive response, that reaction was to cost him his life,' Mr Emlyn Jones said.
At least two of the attackers were carrying large knives, the court heard.
After he was punched and kicked by the attackers, Mr Antoniadis was then stabbed in the middle of the chest and suffered a large, deep stab wound to his right thigh, severing his femoral artery.
He also suffered cuts and bruises to his face and head and wounds to his arms, the prosecutor said.
The attackers then fled the scene in the getaway car, leaving the victim to bleed to death.
'Jointly responsible'
There was no CCTV footage of the incident, but some or all of the incident was heard or seen by a number of people, the court heard.
Antoniadis was treated at the scene and taken to hospital where attempts were made to save his life, but he later died from his injuries on July 21 last year.
Mr Emlyn Jones said: 'It is the prosecution case that the five robbers were the five young men sitting in the dock in this room, and that all five of them are jointly responsible for the murder.'
The prosecutor told jurors the group were 'clearly prepared to use really serious violence' in their efforts to rob Antoniadis's possessions.
The car allegedly used by the robbers – a stolen Kia Sportage with false number plates – was captured on CCTV on two occasions leaving the area around the nightclub and following a different car on the night of July 7, the court heard.
All five defendants, from Camden, north London, deny murder and conspiracy to commit robbery.
The trial continues.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

New-look Man City aim to bounce back amid uncertainty
New-look Man City aim to bounce back amid uncertainty

BBC News

timea few seconds ago

  • BBC News

New-look Man City aim to bounce back amid uncertainty

Manchester City head into the new season with the cloud of financial charges still hovering over them, while there are questions on how quickly their new signings will integrate into the been dominant with four successive Premier League titles, Pep Guardiola's all-conquering side endured a bitterly disappointing 2024-25 finished third in the table, failed to win a major trophy and suffered a shock last-16 exit from the Fifa Club World Cup at the hands of Saudi Arabia's will be a wounded beast, but there is uncertainty as to how they will respond to last season's struggles and whether Guardiola can build another title-winning machine."We are ready," said the Spaniard. "We had a short pre-season but a really good one and we are ready to go, to enjoy the good moments and bounce back as soon as possible."I cannot assure you, but the signs are that we can be better. Maybe we can be worse! You never know. But I think it will be better." Charges verdict rumbles on Last Sunday, the giant electronic advertising board close to Manchester United's Old Trafford stadium served a reminder it has been "246 days since Man City's FFP hearing ended".That has since ticked on to 252 days and we are no closer to knowing the outcome of City's 115 charges for allegedly breaching the Premier League's financial rules, which were first published in February hearing took place in front of an independent commission between September and December of last year, but there has been no indication as to when the findings will be have strongly denied the charges but, if found guilty, the commission could sanction a massive points deduction or the unthinkable scenario of relegation.A decision was widely expected to arrive in the first quarter of 2025 and boss Guardiola provided a timeline of "in one month" back in February, but that has now dragged into another sheer scale of charges and amount of evidence has led to October now being mooted for the time of the verdict, but there has been no official confirmation of club has declined to comment, while Premier League chief executive Richard Masters said they have "no influence" on the timing and it would be "wrong" for him to the meantime, it has been business as usual for striker Erling Haaland signed a new bumper contract which expires in 2034 and the club extended their kit partnership with Puma for a record £100m per season, making it the largest such deal in the Premier January, they have spent almost £400m on new signings as Guardiola reshaped his squad in an attempt to reclaim the Premier League trophy. Are City flying under the radar? It isn't that often Guardiola gets it wrong in the transfer market but of the four January signings, only Egypt forward Omar Marmoush can be classed as a success after scoring eight goals, including a hat-trick against defender Abdukodir Khusanov barely got a look-in after March, Brazilian centre-back Vitor Reis has now been sent on loan to Girona, while there appear doubts over whether Guardiola trusts midfielder Nico summer strategy was to bolster the squad by addressing the problem areas, bringing in Rayan Ait-Nouri from Wolves to fill the hole at left-back, while box-to-box Dutchman Tijjani Reijnders will bring much-needed energy to the legend Kevin de Bruyne and Jack Grealish left in the summer and it may fall to Frenchman Rayan Cherki to pick up the mantle of attacking creativity, while James Trafford will provide goalkeeping competition to Ederson as the Brazilian enters the final year of his desperately missed the presence of Rodri in the middle of the park during an injury-ravaged season for the club and the Spaniard is unlikely to be fully fit until September after a dressing room has lost serial winners in De Bruyne, Grealish and former captain Kyle Walker so, while Guardiola will be hoping the new boys quickly grasp his vision and settle in immediately, are City flying under the radar?Aside from the acquisition of Trafford from Burnley, City did the bulk of their transfer business in June before the Club World Cup, while signings such as Florian Wirtz for champions Liverpool and Viktor Gyokeres at Arsenal caught the sources have pointed to new captain Bernardo Silva having the experience to galvanise a side which underperformed to their previous high standards last term, when he leads them out against Wolves on Saturday (kick-off 17:30 BST).One insider said "don't count us out" and it would be foolish to do so for a side that has been champions in six of the last eight seasons. Guardiola to relight fire - or is the end near? Last season will have been a shock to Guardiola, finishing outside of the top two for only the second time in 15 seasons as manager at City, Barcelona and Bayern a 10th season with City, the 54-year-old is currently the Premier League's longest-serving boss and has said he will take a break from management once he the great Sir Alex Ferguson did over at neighbours Manchester United, Guardiola will need to show he still has the desire to re-energise himself and his team in an attempt to overthrow Arne Slot's Liverpool and return to the summit only has the playing squad been refreshed, but the coaching staff too. Jurgen Klopp's former Liverpool assistant Pep Lijnders has joined in a similar role, and set-piece coach James French has also arrived from the Reds, while Kolo Toure was promoted from the youth former City and Liverpool midfielder Dietmar Hamann has cast doubt over whether Guardiola has the ability to go again, telling BBC Radio 5 Live: "When a season starts, you've got to light a fire in a team, with the fans, and make people believe. And I'm not sure he's got that fire any more."I'm not sure they're going to win another big title under Guardiola. I'd be surprised, to be honest."Spanish football expert Guillem Balague added: "The fire that we see now - what we see in his eyes, in the jokes with his players and how he returned refreshed from the summer - can that continue until the end of the season?"He has a two-year contract until 2027 and 100% by the end of the two years he will not continue with club football. But nobody can say that may not happen earlier, that this could be his last season."Is he excited because it is his last season or is it because he really feels he has a team in his hands which he can mould and create a new Manchester City, a third version?"If he sees himself having the ability to continue then we will see a second year but we will not see a third. We are seeing the end of Pep Guardiola as a manager."

Britain is a tinderbox. This crackdown on Union flags could make it explode
Britain is a tinderbox. This crackdown on Union flags could make it explode

Telegraph

time33 minutes ago

  • Telegraph

Britain is a tinderbox. This crackdown on Union flags could make it explode

Have you ever been injured by a Union flag? Has one, for example, mugged you at knife-point for your iPhone 16? Or perhaps a gang of teenage Union flags, out of their minds on weapons-grade skunk, have ambushed you as you walk home on your own after dark? I'm relieved to say that I for one have never suffered any such misfortune. But then, I don't live in Birmingham. And it would seem that the Union flags up there are an awful lot deadlier than the ones down my way in Kent. Lately, in England's second largest city, patriotically minded residents have taken to hanging Union flags from lamp posts – in order, they say, to 'show Birmingham and the rest of the country how proud we are of our history, freedoms and achievements'. The Labour council, however, is taking the flags down – because, apparently, they're 'dangerous'. According to a spokesman, 'People who attach unauthorised items to lamp posts could be putting their lives and those of motorists and pedestrians at risk.' To me, at least, this seems a puzzling claim. Still, for the sake of argument, let us assume that these councillors mean well, and that they're motivated not by Britain-hating wokery, but by an innocent if slightly excessive desire to protect residents' safety. Even so, can they really not see how their actions could backfire? Put it like this. At the meeting where the decision was made, I'd like to think at least one councillor had the sense to say: 'Hang on a moment, comrades. Isn't there just a tiny risk that people might misinterpret this? Across the country there are protests against asylum seeker hotels, public fury about crimes committed by illegal immigrants, and a growing sense that Britain is a tinderbox that would need just the tiniest spark to go up in flames. Against that backdrop, how do we think people will react if they read that a Labour council has ordered the removal of British flags? 'Do we think they'll all nod, and say, 'Fair enough. British flags are indeed very dangerous, even when gently fluttering 25 feet above one's head'? Or will it reinforce their conviction that a) this country is run by people who despise it, and b) they now live in a two-tier society, because, in the very same week, their council has chosen to light up the Library of Birmingham first in the colours of Pakistan's flag, and then the colours of India's flag, in order to celebrate the anniversary of those two countries gaining independence from this one? 'Obviously we can't say for sure. In the current climate, though, I just think it might be wise to hold off. We may think that hanging Union flags from lamp posts is terribly dangerous. But removing them may be more dangerous still.' In defence of the graveyard 'fat tax' Then again, there are times when I feel councils should resist public pressure. Take, for example, this week's extraordinary row over a graveyard 'fat tax'. Councillors in Wolverhampton were planning to charge hundreds of pounds extra for obese people's graves – on the grounds that their burial plots have to be wider. But, after an outcry from local people, they've backed down. To me, however, the idea seemed perfectly sensible. As the Telegraph reported in November last year, Britain is running out of room for burial plots as it is. So the wider our graves become, the worse this crisis will grow. Something must be done to save space – and charging per inch would surely help. Obese people who don't wish to lumber their families with higher fees will naturally make a greater effort to lose weight. Which, in turn, will make them less likely to need a grave at all. Or at least, less likely to need one so soon. Everyone wins. Baby talk Last week the Mirror website reported that a criminal had been handed a two-year suspended sentence. The headline described the criminal as a woman. Beneath that headline, however, was a photograph, showing that the woman in question had pink hair – and a beard. These days, of course, there's nothing remotely unusual about Left-wing news outlets referring to male criminals as women, if that is how the criminals say they see themselves. The only reason I draw attention to this particular story is that the criminal, who is 46 years old, also happens to be a self-professed 'adult baby diaper-lover'. Apparently, the court was told that such people like to wear nappies not out of any medical necessity, but because they are 'regressing' to childhood, in search of a 'gentler, more carefree time'. This intrigued me. Because, if a man who chooses to dye his hair pink must be described as a woman, shouldn't a man who chooses to wear Pampers be described as a baby? For the sake of consistency, the Mirror should surely have reported that the two-year suspended sentence had been handed to a newborn baby girl. Stating that a crime committed by an adult was committed by a baby is no more absurd than stating that a crime committed by a man was committed by a woman. And anyway, it's important to be inclusive. In due course, I feel sure, our streets will be filled with placard-wielding progressives chanting that adult babies are babies, and calling for the right of every 46 year-old to enrol at his local crèche.

Premier League opener halted after Antoine Semenyo reports racist abuse
Premier League opener halted after Antoine Semenyo reports racist abuse

Sky News

time2 hours ago

  • Sky News

Premier League opener halted after Antoine Semenyo reports racist abuse

A man was ejected from Anfield after reports of racial abuse directed at Bournemouth winger Antoine Semenyo during the season's opening Premier League game against Liverpool. Match referee Anthony Taylor paused play in the 29th minute after Semenyo accused a spectator of racist abuse. An anti-discrimination message was read out to the Anfield crowd, and it is understood that police officers went into the referee's room at half-time. Merseyside Police said an investigation is under way after the 47-year-old man's identity was confirmed and he was removed from the ground. Chief Inspector Kev Chatterton, the match commander for the Liverpool v Bournemouth game, said: "Merseyside Police will not tolerate hate crime of any form. "We take incidents like this very seriously, and in cases like this we will be proactively seeking football banning orders, with the club, against those responsible." He added: "There is no place for racism and it is vital that anyone who witnesses such an offence reports it to stewards, or the police immediately, so we can take the necessary action like we did this evening. "As with all matches, we work very closely with both Liverpool and Everton FC to ensure the safety of the public, and the players." A spokesperson for Liverpool said the club was "aware of an allegation of racist abuse made during our Premier League game against Bournemouth". The Liverpool spokesperson said: "We condemn racism and discrimination in all forms, it has no place in society, or football. "The club is unable to comment further as tonight's alleged is incident is the subject of an ongoing police investigation, which we will support fully." After the incident, Semenyo scored twice in the second half to help bring Bournemouth back from two goals down at Anfield before Liverpool went on to eventually win the contest 4-2. Bournemouth captain Adam Smith told Sky Sports News afterwards: "It shouldn't be happening. I don't know how Ant's played on to be honest and come up with those goals. It's totally unacceptable. "Something needs to be done. Taking the knee isn't having an effect. We're supporting him and hopefully he'll be OK. "I wanted him to react because that's what I would have done, but this shows what type of man he come up with those goals showed the type of guy he is. "To be fair the Liverpool players were very supportive as well towards Antoine and the rest of the team. It was handled in the right way but... so angry. "I don't know what else we can do. No one's getting it. I don't know what to say anymore. I just feel for Ant... shocking." The Premier League said in a statement that its "on-field anti-discrimination protocol" had been followed and the incident "will now be fully investigated". "We offer our full support to the player and both clubs," it added. "Racism has no place in our game, or anywhere in society. We will continue to work with stakeholders and authorities to ensure our stadiums are an inclusive and welcoming environment for all." The Football Association said it was "concerned" about the allegation of racism towards Semenyo and that it would ensure "appropriate action" would be taken. The incident comes two days after Tottenham Hotspur player Mathys Tel faced racist abuse online following a missed penalty in his team's UEFA Super Cup victory over Paris Saint-Germain.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store