The little-known alternative to trusts that could help you dodge inheritance tax
Despite being less widely known than trusts, they are becoming the 'go-to' option for inheritance planning and, while they have traditionally been of interest for the ultra wealthy, you don't necessarily have to be a high net-worth individual to benefit. However, there are lots of ways these companies can be set up and the rules can be complex.
Here, Telegraph Money delves into the complex world of FICs to detail how setting up a company can prevent a huge inheritance tax bill.
What is a Family Investment Company?
How to set up a Family Investment Company?
What's the difference between a Family Investment Company and a trust?
Why is there a rise in demand for Family Investment Companies?
Do Family Investment Companies pay corporation tax?
What fees can you expect to pay?
What are the downsides of using a FIC?
What is a Family Investment Company?
A Family Investment Company is typically a private limited company designed to pool family assets. There are several ways these companies can be set up, which can each fulfil different purposes – but they can be used to pass wealth to children or other family members in a tax-efficient way.
Usually set up by parents or grandparents, the company is owned by family members. These tend to attract interest from the ultra-wealthy, however, tax advisers said it's now common for a broader £2m to invest.
One of the most common uses of a FIC is to essentially put a 'lock' on an estate's value – this may be a concern if, for example, growth could erode inheritance tax allowances.
Here, parents can set up a FIC they loan money to, and have any growth in the value of the company go to the children (note that this option may often be combined with a trust to hold the shares where the older generation wishes to retain full control of the company and who can benefit).
Alternatively, parents could establish an FIC by subscribing for shares, which they immediately give away to children or other family members. The value of the gift will fall out of the donor's estate for inheritance tax purposes, provided the donor survives the gift by at least seven years – but it's important to consider whether you are willing to relinquish control to the company's shareholders (ie, other family members).
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Independent
20 minutes ago
- The Independent
EuroMillions winning numbers for record-breaking prize revealed
The winning numbers for tonight's £210 million EuroMillions jackpot have been revealed. The National Lottery EuroMillions winning numbers are 24, 31, 34, 41 and 43. The lucky numbers are 06 and 08 . A single EuroMillions player could become the UK 's record-making National Lottery winner if the prize is claimed. The EuroMillions jackpot is capped once it has reached 250 million Euros – an estimated £210 million. If there are no winners on Tuesday, it will now stay at 250 million Euros for a further four draws until it must be won in the fifth draw. In the 'Must Be Won' draw, if no ticket matches all five main numbers and two Lucky Stars, the jackpot prize will roll down into the prize tier where there is at least one winner – likely to be five main numbers and one Lucky Star. A single UK winner would instantly become the nation's largest-ever National Lottery winner. They would knock into second place the anonymous winner of a £195 million prize in 2022. It follows an Irish family syndicate claiming a EuroMillions jackpot worth 250 million euros (£216 million) on June 17. The jackpot had reached the maximum amount on 6 June after rolling over several times. Andy Carter, senior winners' advisor at Allwyn, said: 'Tuesday's jackpot has the ability to transform not just the winner's life, but the life of the friends and family around them. 'So, make sure you get a ticket to be in with a chance of banking Britain's biggest ever win.' Here are the 10 biggest UK lottery wins to date – all from EuroMillions draws: Anonymous, £213,000,000, 18 June 2025 Anonymous, £195,707,000, 19 July 2022 Joe and Jess Thwaite, £184,262,899.10, 10 May 2022 Anonymous, £177,033,699.20, 26 November 2024 Anonymous, £171,815,297.80, 23 September 2022 Anonymous, £170,221,000, 8 October 2019 Colin and Chris Weir, £161,653,000, 12 July 2011 Adrian and Gillian Bayford, £148,656,000, 10 August 2012 Anonymous, £123,458,008, 11 June 2019 Anonymous, £122,550,350, April 2021
The Guardian
21 minutes ago
- The Guardian
High court asylum hotels ruling leaves Cooper scrambling for alternatives
Yvette Cooper, thanks to Tuesday's high court ruling, is facing potentially explosive decisions over where to house asylum seekers if courts rule that they must leave hotels. The Home Office, usually under Conservative ministers, has been struggling for five years to find an alternative to hotels so they can house a growing number of asylum seekers reaching these shores. Labour has said that it expects to empty the 200-odd hotels housing asylum seekers by 2029. Ministers may be forced to rip up that plan and move at a rapid pace because of the ruling's implications. If councils take to the high court to complain about the use of a hotel for housing asylum seekers – and many will be under immense political pressure from the public to do so – it could force officials to find alternative housing for thousands of people. Legal sources believe that there will be similar grounds to launch applications for interim injunctions from a number of councils. This case has centred on an alleged breach of planning laws by owners of the Bell hotel, who it was claimed did not get permission to switch use from a hotel to hostel-style accommodation. Other hotel owners are thought to be in similar positions to Somani Hotels Limited, which originally housed families in the Bell, but faced a legal challenge after the asylum seekers were switched to single men. Ominously for the government, the Reform UK deputy leader, Richard Tice, said his party would look at pursuing similar cases regarding hotels within the 10 council areas it controls, which include both North and West Northamptonshire councils, Doncaster, and Kent and Staffordshire county councils. And the high court rulings can require a rapid response. Epping's application for an interim was launched on 12 August. By 4pm on 12 September, all asylum seekers will have to be removed from The Bell hotel. There may yet be a lifeline for the government. They could convince the court of appeal to overturn the decision. The fact that the Home Office was not allowed to intervene in a case which was directly related to the home secretary's duties to house asylum seekers could well be seized upon by government lawyers. If they fail to overturn the decision, they will face the same dilemma as successive Tory home secretaries going back to Priti Patel, who promised and failed to find alternatives to hotels to house asylum seekers. The number of asylum hotels soared to 400 under successive Tory home secretaries because of a shortage of housing, a growing backlog in asylum applications, and a failure to establish large accommodation sites in buildings such as disused military barracks. Since coming to power, Labour has increased the speed at which applications are processed, by using more 'dispersal accommodation' such as flats and housing in the community. Questions will no doubt be asked inside the department as to why it took the Home Office until Monday to try to intervene in the case. If it had done so last week, when the case came to court, it would have stood a better chance of preventing the injunction. The political implications of the ruling will continue to unsettle Cooper and No 10. Yet again, the government has been caught flat-footed on an immigration-related issue, as it struggles with soaring numbers of small boats crossing the Channel. Anti-asylum seeker protesters will see this as a victory in response to their demonstrations across the country this summer. Reform UK and its leader, Nigel Farage, currently leading in most polls, will be buoyed by the prospect of further embarrassment for the government.
The Sun
21 minutes ago
- The Sun
Epping migrant protesters pop champagne after court victory sees asylum seekers face the boot from Bell Hotel
EPPING migrant protesters were seen popping champagne to celebrate a High Court ruling that will see asylum seekers booted out of the Bell Hotel. Just hours after the landmark ruling was handed down protesters were seen rejoicing over the news. 7 7 7 A High Court judge granted Epping Forest District Council a temporary injunction to block asylum seekers being housed in the Essex hotel. The landmark move was widely celebrated and could spell an end to every migrant hotel, which are funded by UK taxpayers. Protesters were seen rejoicing outside the hotel in Essex today, popping bottles of champagne, spraying the drink in the air and waving Union Jacks. Crowds of local families and activists gathered outside the hotel as the news was passed down that migrants would now be booted out of the premises. Families partying outside the hotel told The Sun the ruling will set a precedent for the other hotels across the UK. 'Send them home and protect our kids,' the growing crowd can be heard shouting and hundreds of cars have driven past honking their horns in support. Champagne was popped and sprayed across the hotel sign, but the protest still remained relatively peaceful. A few migrants made their way inside the hotel but not before anti- immigration protesters shouted at them to leave the area. Men, women, teens and children screamed 'pack your bags' at the blank faced migrants as they were escorted into the hotel by police officers. One jubilant protester told GB News: "I'm elated it has paid off. We've been protesting week after week and it's worked. I'm so happy. Migrants to be kicked out of hotel at centre of protests in landmark ruling after asylum seeker's 'sex attack' 'Keep us safe. That's all we ask for.' There were chants of "save our kids" as protesters waving Union Jacks and St George's Cross flags heard the ruling. Protesters held up signs and placards declaring "we want Epping safe" and "clear them out" as they celebrated what they saw as a victory. The ruling today was welcomed by Reform leader Nigel Farage, who said: "This is a victory for the parents and concerned residents of Epping. They do not want their young women being assaulted on the streets. 7 7 7 "This community stood up bravely, despite being slandered as far right, and have won. They represent the vast majority of decent people in this country. "Young, undocumented males who break into the UK illegally should NOT be free to walk the streets anywhere. They must be detained and deported. "I hope that Epping provides inspiration to others across the country." Chris Whitbread, the leader of Epping Forest District Council, said he was "delighted" with the decision and called it "great news for our residents." It comes after weeks of protests were sparked when a migrant staying at the hotel was charged with sexually assaulting a 14-year-old girl. Up to 2,000 activists had marched on the building in just one demonstration previously. Some far-Right thugs joined some of the unrest and launched themselves on riot vans, smashed windshields and ripped off wingmirrors in senseless displays of " hooliganism." A total of 28 people have been arrested in relation to disorder at the hotel, and 16 of them have been charged. The hotel housed migrants from May 2020 to March 2021, then from October 2022 to April 2024. The hotel's owners, Somani Hotels Limited, said the council never instigated any formal enforcement proceedings against this use. In court Somani had argued that contracts to house asylum seekers had been a "financial lifeline." Lawyers for the firm also argued that political views were no grounds for an injunction and branded the ruling "draconian." The local authority argued that the Bell Hotel had breached planning regulations by failing to operate the premises for its designated purpose. The ruling from Judge Mr Justice Eyre will force the owners of the Bell Hotel to remove migrants from the accommodation within 14 days. 7
