Verdict in rape case against Prajwal Revanna tomorrow
The court stated that the judgment was deferred as certain clarifications were required.
After seeking clarifications from both sides and issuing directions, the matter was adjourned. Primarily, the judge sought clarification on whether Google Maps could be considered admissible evidence in the case. A second clarification was sought regarding the seizure of a Samsung J4 mobile phone, allegedly belonging to accused Prajwal Revanna.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Economic Times
an hour ago
- Economic Times
Ex-Bihar Congress working president Ashok Ram joins JD(U) ahead of assembly polls
Synopsis In a blow to the Congress party before the Bihar elections, senior leader Ashok Ram defected to Nitish Kumar's JD(U), citing neglect of Dalits within the Congress after nearly 40 years of association. Sanjay Kumar Jha welcomed Ram, hinting at further defections from the Congress, while the Congress criticized Ram as an opportunist. Ex-Bihar Congress working president Ashok Ram joins JD(U) ahead of assembly polls In a setback for the Congress ahead of the Bihar assembly elections, its senior leader Ashok Ram on Sunday joined Chief Minister Nitish Kumar's JD(U), alleging that "Dalits were being ignored" in the party with which he had been associated for nearly four was welcomed into the JD(U) by its working president and Rajya Sabha member Sanjay Kumar Jha, who claimed that "there is a stampede in the Congress. Many of its leaders are still in touch with us". Ram, a several-term former MLA, had been a working president of the Bihar Congress."Ashok Ram has a strong influence across all sections of society. His grassroots connection will certainly prove beneficial for JD(U). The Congress party's treatment and acceptance of Dalits is well known," Jha joining the JD(U), Ram said, "Nitish Kumar is a visionary leader and he is committed to public welfare". The Congress slammed Ram for crossing over to the JD(U), claiming that he was a "rank opportunist".
The Hindu
an hour ago
- The Hindu
Offence by Prajwal Revanna could be construed as offence against society at large: Court
The Special Court of Sessions for criminal cases against former and present MPs and MLAs while awarding 'imprisonment for the remainder of his natural life' to former Hassan MP Prajwal Revanna, said that the offence in this case 'could be construed as an offence committed towards the society at large wherein women are worshiped'. In his order, judge Santosh Gajanan Bhat further said that 'the question of commission of an offence by a legislator is a serious aspect'. Terming the case, where the victim is a former help at the accused's family farm as a 'David vs Goliath' battle, Mr. Bhat said that 'committing sexual offences against a maid and other women in society by showing disdain towards them due to their economic condition is a grave offence' and that 'the act of committing forcible sexual intercourse on the victim repeatedly would be more than committing of murder'. Quoting the Sanskrit saying 'Dharmo Rakshati Rakshitaha...', the judge said that 'dharma should not be destroyed so that we may not be destroyed as a consequence thereof' and awarded the maximum punishment under Section 376(2)(n) (repeated rape on the same woman) of Indian Penal Code for Prajwal Revanna. The judgment rejects appeals for leniency by the convict's counsel on the grounds that he has to look after his former Prime Minister grandfather and aging parents and that he had no criminal antecedents, among other grounds. Victim's statement key to conviction The 480-page judgment examines the victim's statement at length and considers depositions by multiple witnesses, including her sister who was working with her and other family members, Prajwal's driver Karthik, who allegedly copied the explicit clips from the MP's phone, to corroborate the same and rejected defence's arguments that there were contradictions in the same. The defence had argued that the victim had never worked at the Gannikada farmhouse and it did not belong to the Revanna family in 2021, when the crime was committed. It further argued that the victim was unable to tell the date of the crimes. However, the court concludes that the depositions by Karthik, the victim's sister and the victim's son studying at a school in Gannikada for three years, proved that she worked there. Further, the defence's contradictory stands itself indicated that they accepted that she worked at the farm, the court concludes. Further, the farmhouse belonged to Bhavani Revanna's brother Prakash since 2015 and was bought by Suraj Revanna in October, 2021 and the family, including Prajwal was using the same, the court concludes through multiple witnesses. Regarding the dates of the two sexual assaults, the court concludes that the victim being a rustic villager, also an illiterate, though may not have told the exact dates, was consistent with the timeline of events, as during COVID-19 lockdown and four years before she lodged the complaint. The court also quotes the statement of the victim's sister who was with her when she was abused at Basavanagudi, though the victim did not confide in her then. The sister told the court that on the third day of their visit to Basavanagudi, where the victim was raped, her sister was dull and upon enquiry, she was silently uttering that they cannot do anything. The court said this 'would become relevant because of the fact of the behaviour of the victim immediately after the incident'. Corroborative evidence Apart from the victim's statement, the judgment further relies on two scientific evidences. 'The prosecution has proved beyond reasonable doubt about the commission of the incident by placing corroborative evidence of the scientific experts in the form of DNA Examination Report wherein the stains found on the sari and other clothes of the victim matched with the DNA profiling of accused Prajwal Revanna. The prosecution has also proved the digital records in the form of videos which were circulated were not edited/morphed and also the male and female voice found in the videos matched with the sample voice of accused Prajwal Revanna and the victim,' the judgment said.
NDTV
an hour ago
- NDTV
Prisoner Number 15528: How Prajwal Revanna Spent His First Night In Jail
Bengaluru: Prisoner number 15528, Prajwal Revanna, appeared visibly stressed and wept spending the first night in the jail after being sentenced to life in a rape case on Saturday, authorities have said. A day after being sentenced in the rape case, the suspended JD(S) leader Prajwal Revanna was assigned the prisoner number at Bengaluru's Parappana Agrahara Central prison, jail authorities said on Sunday. Revanna, the grandson of former Prime Minister and JDS supremo H D Deve Gowda, spent his first night in jail following Saturday's court verdict that found him guilty and awarded life term in the case. He was reportedly in tears and appeared visibly distressed. Prison doctors assessed his health late on Saturday night to ensure his medical condition was stable. "He broke down during the medical check-up and expressed his anguish to the staff," a senior official said. Prajwal has reportedly informed the staff that he has approached the High Court challenging the conviction. The former MP is currently lodged in a high-security cell and is being provided enhanced security. According to prison officials, the standard dress code for convicts is being followed, and he will be required to wear the uniform given to prisoners. He was allotted the Prisoner number 15528 on Sunday morning, they added. Prajwal was on Saturday sentenced to prison term for the remainder of his life, while the court slapped an overall fine of Rs 11.50 lakh on him, directing that Rs 11.25 lakh be paid to the victim, a domestic help of the family of the accused. A court here had convicted Prajwal Revanna (34) in one of the four sexual abuse and rape cases against him. The Special Court for MPs/MLAs Judge Santosh Gajanan Bhat pronounced the verdict on Saturday, after convicting Prajwal a day earlier. The case pertains to a 48-year-old woman who was working as a domestic help at the family's Gannikada farmhouse in Hassan district's Holenarasipura. She was allegedly raped twice -- at Hassan farm house and Bengaluru residence-- in 2021 and the act recorded by the accused on his mobile phone. Prajwal was booked under sections 376(2)(k) (being in a position of control or dominance over a woman, commits rape on such woman), 376 (2)(n) (repeated rape on the same woman), 354A (sexual harassment), 354B (assault or use of criminal force to woman with intent to disrobe), 354C (voyeurism), 506 (criminal intimidation) and 201 (disappearance of evidence) of the IPC, and Section 66E (violation of privacy) of the IT Act, by the Special Investigation Team (SIT) which probed the case. The court sentenced Prajwal Revanna to imprisonment for life and imposed Rs 5 lakh as fine, under section 376(2)(k), and imprisonment for life which shall mean remainder of natural life along with Rs 5 lakh fine under section 376(2)(n). He has been also sentenced to rigorous imprisonment for three years and Rs 25,000 fine under section 354A, rigorous imprisonment for 7 years and Rs 50,000 fine under section 354B, rigorous imprisonment for 3 years and Rs 25,000 fine under section 354C. A two year RI has also been given to Prajwal, with a fine of Rs 10,000 under section 506, imprisonment of 3 yrs and fine of Rs 25,000 under section 201, and imprisonment of 3 yrs and fine of Rs 25,000 under section 66 E of IT Act.
