
ETF Math: Risk/Reward Tactics with Direxion's Ed Egilinsky
(0:30) - Probability Training is the Antidote to Behavioral Bias
(9:45) - Direxion ETFs: You Can Learn A Lot Just By Playing the Game
(13:30) - Leverage: Rewards and Risks That Every Investor Must Study
(22:50) - Single-Stock ETFs Open a Whole New Playing Field
(30:00) - Getting Educated with Direxion on Leveraged And Inverse ETFs
(36:55) - Episode Roundup: Podcast@Zacks.com
Welcome back to Mind Over Money. I'm Kevin Cook, your field guide and storyteller for the fascinating arena of behavioral economics.
Today my guest on the podcast is Edward Egilinsky, Head of Alternative Investments for the ETF provider Direxion. In over two decades of innovation, they have created a suite of products that active traders find invaluable, like the Direxion Daily Semiconductor Bull 3X Shares SOXL and the Direxion Daily Gold Miners Index Bull 2X Shares NUGT.
Their best innovation to date, in my opinion, are the single-stock leveraged and inverse ETFs like the Direxion Daily TSLA Bull 2X Shares TSLL and the Direxion Daily TSLA Bear 1X Shares TSLS which offers a capital-efficient way to deploy a bearish view on Tesla TSLA.
They also offer single-stock leverage and inverse exposure on other Mag 7 names like Apple, Amazon, and NVIDIA.
But these leveraged and inverse ETF products carry special risks as well as rewards. That's why Ed and his team at Direxion are dedicated to education. Here are a couple of must-engage areas on their website to become more educated yourself before trading these products that can offer a double-edge sword of compounding and decay...
Understanding Leveraged & Inverse ETFs Video Series
And I think education is especially critical for investors because of the one or two-click trading available on most brokerage apps. But now there's a new obstacle to our learning. Allow me to explain.
Mathematical Literacy in the Age of ChatGPT
With the advent of large language models, or LLMs, there's a legitimate concern that people will stop doing their own "deep research."
From high school and college kids fudging on their papers... to traders and investors getting their financial education from social media.
In fact, in the conversations I have on X these days, I would say there is an epidemic of those getting their "minor in macro" from YouTube.
But you don't need a degree in economics to become a good investor or trader.
What you do need is math skills. I've said for decades that probability training is the antidote to behavioral biases that typically make our money disappear.
So imagine me at 29 years old, walking into the trading pits of the Chicago Mercantile Exchange still "allergic to algebra" like I was in high school and college.
But I was captivated by the raucous action on the trading floors where the average Joe and Jane from Chicago could play 3D chess with global markets in Japanese yen, pork bellies, and T-bill futures.
And because I wanted to stick around -- even though I was making only 6 bucks an hour as a clerk -- I hit the books. Specifically, the sacred texts of trading, Jack Schwager's Market Wizards series.
Market Wizards: Gandalf at Your Side
The one strength I brought with me into the pits was my love of reading. So I dove into the Market Wizards, which are all almost entirely based on tape-recorded interviews that Schwager did with successful commodity, futures, and currency traders of the 1970s, 1980's, and 1990s.
The interviews read like fireside war stories.
There's Richard Dennis who started in soybeans and went on to run a fund that did a big chunk of the S&P futures volume. He is probably most famous for training the Turtles.
And Paul Tudor Jones, who started trading cotton for his family on the New York Merc and is still doing global macro and appearing on CNBC.
Then we have the dynamic duo of George Soros and Stanley Druckenmiller who infamously broke the Bank of England in 1992.
There are a dozen more worth mentioning, but I've only got a few minutes here.
My main point is that after reading the first two books, I identified several common themes that I called The 6 Keys to the Kingdom:
>Psychology
>Risk Management
>Systems
>Consistency
>Discipline
>Probability
There was my Achilles heel with the last one: math.
So what did I do? I found more books. Not only was I reading about the complex connections between CME currency and interest rate futures and the global FX and bond markets, I was trying to understand the math of why soybeans, British pounds, or live cattle traded at a premium or a discount in the future.
It wasn't easy for a kid who got "queasy from equations" to grasp concepts like the "cost of carry."
Before Vegas, the Dice Were Loaded With Ignorance
More importantly, I had to learn the most basic math of probability. And I did that by reading the 375-year old story of a Renaissance gambler, the Chevalier de Mere, who knew the polymath Blaise Pascal and brought him a conundrum.
Old Antoine Gombaud (aka the Chevalier) offered wagers to daring souls with dice. And he couldn't figure out why one bet -- rolling at least ONE SIX in 4 throws of a single die -- was less likely than the second bet -- rolling at least one DOUBLE SIX in 24 throws of a pair of dice. By his calculations, they were equal.
Pascal threw himself into the challenge by engaging his mathematician friend Pierre de Fermat. And in a series of letters they exchanged in the 1650s, they solved the mystery and created the foundations of Monte Carlo and Wall Street.
This effort of mine, this work to know how probability worked, inspired me to learn basic statistics. And these were foundational for an understanding of the Black-Scholes options pricing model and volatility dynamics.
From Math Flunky to Science Junkie
And that is how I built a career for myself in the late 1990s and early 2000s. It was hard and confusing, with many accidental twists and fortuitous turns, but if I could go back, I wouldn't change a thing. It also ignited my passion for science like evolution, astrophysics, and neuroscience.
I'd always read books about these favorite topics, but now I could begin to understand the data measurements and statistics that were crucial tools for the scientists doing the work and trying to explain their findings to us.
I should add that part of my good fortune wasn't just found in books. I was also in the right place and time for two other reasons:
First, I was a clerk in a commodity options pit where I got to watch math geeks with pricing sheets work their magic making two-sided markets to paper (the incoming orders). They were primarily doing delta-neutral volatility arbitrage and I was fascinated to watch and learn in the pit and then try to simulate it on my own later.
Second, since Chicago was THE birthplace of options trading for stocks, commodities, and financial futures, we had the best teachers around. One in particular was Sheldon Natenberg, a math lover turned options trader who wrote the quintessential handbook Options Volatility & Pricing. He also taught classes at the Merc and I was lucky enough to take several.
For me it was total immersion with stories, experiences, and simulation -- just like when my Dad taught me to fly an airplane at 15 years old. In fact, I give him credit for teaching me how to think in terms of planning and contingency long before I applied those skills to markets.
AI is a Message from the Future: Step Away from the Xbox
And that's why my personal mission for the rest of my days is to inspire as many kids as possible to find their passion for science and math. The world is changing very fast, and we can't be sure what jobs will still be here a decade from now or what new industries will be created.
But having basic agility with science and math concepts will always be crucial to navigate these shifting landscapes. Since the US still graduates 75% of high schoolers below proficiency in math, I know there are lots of kids out there like I was.
Many just need a different way to learn the material. Imagine all the kids who might actually love science and math if only their internal spark of curiosity were ignited with alternatives to text books full of equations -- like VR and AR driven by AI. I actually pitched this idea to the National Science Foundation (NSF) in 2017. Some have said I was channeling ChatGPT before any of us knew what an LLM was.
In a sense, we are all like the Turtles of Richard Dennis when we first start out -- able to learn anything with the right instruction.
I ask almost every parent and teen I meet if they play video games. Then I ask them to consider how much smarter they would become if they put down the video controller for 1 or 2 hours a week and learn how an NVIDIA GPU actually works to create those cool graphics.
Here is one of my introductory articles about making science and math come alive for teens...
Curiosity Solves Everything: How the Wright Brothers Changed History
And you can find my 2017 proposal to the NSF for a youth STEM Learning Design Engine using AI, VR, and AR at the pinned post on my X feed @KevinBCook.
Okay enough of my sermon on math, and learning, and trading. My guest today is someone who probably knows more than I do about all three. And he's definitely met more real-life Market Wizards than I have.
Go listen to Ed explain the ins and outs of trading leveraged and inverse ETFs.
Two More for the Road
And here are two more good education resources for learning about Direxion tools and tactics for managing your risk/reward...
Leveraged and Inverse ETF Education Center
Trading the Ups and Downs of NVDA
Kevin Cook is a Senior Stock Strategist for Zacks Investment Research where he runs the TAZR Trader portfolio and makes studying NVIDIA AI a full-time job.
Zacks Names #1 Semiconductor Stock
It's only 1/9,000th the size of NVIDIA which skyrocketed more than +800% since we recommended it. NVIDIA is still strong, but our new top chip stock has much more room to boom.
With strong earnings growth and an expanding customer base, it's positioned to feed the rampant demand for Artificial Intelligence, Machine Learning, and Internet of Things. Global semiconductor manufacturing is projected to explode from $452 billion in 2021 to $803 billion by 2028.
See This Stock Now for Free >>
Want the latest recommendations from Zacks Investment Research? Today, you can download 7 Best Stocks for the Next 30 Days. Click to get this free report
Tesla, Inc. (TSLA): Free Stock Analysis Report
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Globe and Mail
25-04-2025
- Globe and Mail
GM Q1 Earnings Preview: Should You Buy the Stock Before the Results?
General Motors GM is slated to release first-quarter 2025 results on April 29, before the opening bell. The Zacks Consensus Estimate for the to-be-reported quarter's earnings and revenues is pegged at $2.66 per share and $42.37 billion, respectively. The consensus estimate for the to-be-reported quarter's earnings has moved north by 2 cents over the past seven days. The bottom-line projection indicates a modest year-over-year uptick of 1.5%. The Zacks Consensus Estimate for quarterly revenues, however, suggests a year-over-year decrease of 1.5%. For 2025, the Zacks Consensus Estimate for GM's revenues is pegged at $179.3 billion, implying a contraction of 4.3% year over year. The consensus mark for 2025 EPS is pegged at $11.21, implying growth of around 6% on a year-over-year basis. In the trailing four quarters, this U.S. legacy automaker surpassed earnings estimates on all occasions, with the average earnings surprise being 15.81%. General Motors Company Price and EPS Surprise General Motors Company price-eps-surprise | General Motors Company Quote Q1 Earnings Whispers for GM Stock Our proven model predicts an earnings beat for General Motors this time around as well. The combination of a positive Earnings ESP and a Zacks Rank #1 (Strong Buy), 2 (Buy) or 3 (Hold) increases the odds of an earnings beat. You can uncover the best stocks to buy or sell before they're reported with our Earnings ESP Filter. GM has an Earnings ESP of +7.40% and a Zacks Rank #3. You can see the complete list of today's Zacks #1 Rank stocks here. (See the Zacks Earnings Calendar to stay ahead of market-making news.) Factors Shaping General Motors' Q1 Results General Motors sold 693,363 units in the first quarter of 2025, up 17% year over year. It posted double-digit gains across its key brands— Chevrolet (up 13.7%), GMC (up 17.6%), Cadillac (17.8%) and Buick (39.3%). The company dominated the U.S. auto industry for the quarter, leading in total, retail and fleet sales. Meanwhile, GM's closest peer Ford F saw its sales drop 1.3% in the quarter ending March. GM's retail sales surged 15%, marking its best first-quarter since 2018. Electric vehicle (EV) sales were up 94% to 31,887 units, with General Motors being the #2 seller of EVs in the country, trailing only Tesla TSLA. In the quarter to be reported, General Motors delivered 442,000 vehicles in China, nearly flat year over year but down 26.3% sequentially. However, its new energy vehicle sales jumped 53.2% year over year. The Buick GL8 led the premium multi-purpose vehicle segment with 24,000 units sold, while the Wuling Hong Guang MINIEV retained its popularity. LaCrosse and Envision Plus models saw strong gains. Additionally, Chevrolet Tahoe deliveries began under GM's Durant Guild platform in March. Our estimate for wholesale vehicle sales volumes of the GMNA (General Motors North America) segment is 807,000 units, suggesting year-over-year growth of 1.9%. We project revenues from the GMNA segment to be $36.46 billion, implying an increase of 1%. Operating income from the unit is estimated at $3.9 billion, implying growth of 2%. On the flip side, we expect wholesale volumes from the GMI unit (excluding China JV) to be down roughly 2% in the quarter to be reported to 102,000 units. Our projections call for a contraction of 17% in revenues year over year. However, we expect operating income of $58.3 million against a loss of $10 million in the year-ago period. GM's Price Performance & Valuation Year to date, shares of General Motors have declined 12%, outperforming the auto sector. It has also performed better than Tesla, whose shares have plunged 36% so far in 2025. Meanwhile, Ford has gained 1.6% in the same timeframe. YTD Price Performance Comparison From a valuation perspective, General Motors is trading relatively cheap. Going by its price/sales ratio, the company is trading at a forward sales multiple of 0.26, below the industry's 2.19. The company has a Value Score of A. Meanwhile, Tesla looks too pricey at a forward sales multiple of 7.6, whereas Ford's P/S of 0.24 is slightly lower than GM's. GM's P/S Vs. F & TSLA How to Play General Motors Pre-Q1 Earnings General Motors is the top-selling automaker in the United States. It is advancing well in its electrification journey. GM exited 2024 with several wins. Its EV portfolio became 'variable profit positive' in the last quarter of 2024, with 189,000 electric vehicles produced during the year and a goal to ramp up to 300,000 units in 2025. The company expects EV losses to shrink by $2 billion this year, reflecting growing operational efficiency and scale. Meanwhile, cost discipline has been another bright spot. GM met its $2 billion cost-cutting goal and is unlocking another $1 billion in annual savings after pulling back from robotaxi development. GM's China operations are starting to look more promising. Its restructuring efforts in the region are showing early signs of a turnaround, with the company aiming to return to profitability this year. Financially, GM remains sturdy. The automaker ended 2024 with $35.5 billion in automotive liquidity and returned $7.6 billion to shareholders via dividends and buybacks. A 25% dividend hike and a fresh $6 billion repurchase authorization (including a $2 billion ASR) fuel confidence. However, near-term headwinds remain. GM expects a slight dip in internal combustion engine vehicle volumes in North America and forecasts a 1-1.5% decline in vehicle pricing, which could weigh on margins. Also, macro uncertainties and tariff troubles could cloud the company's near-term prospects. GM looks like a solid long-term play. However, for new investors, it may be wise to stay on the sidelines until the company outlines how it plans to navigate ongoing tariff tensions and pricing pressure. So, instead of jumping to buy the stock ahead of results, it's better to exercise patience and wait for more clarity. Only $1 to See All Zacks' Buys and Sells We're not kidding. Several years ago, we shocked our members by offering them 30-day access to all our picks for the total sum of only $1. No obligation to spend another cent. Thousands have taken advantage of this opportunity. Thousands did not - they thought there must be a catch. Yes, we do have a reason. We want you to get acquainted with our portfolio services like Surprise Trader, Stocks Under $10, Technology Innovators, and more, that closed 256 positions with double- and triple-digit gains in 2024 alone. See Stocks Now >> Ford Motor Company (F): Free Stock Analysis Report General Motors Company (GM): Free Stock Analysis Report Tesla, Inc. (TSLA): Free Stock Analysis Report


Globe and Mail
24-04-2025
- Globe and Mail
ETF Math: Risk/Reward Tactics with Direxion's Ed Egilinsky
(0:30) - Probability Training is the Antidote to Behavioral Bias (9:45) - Direxion ETFs: You Can Learn A Lot Just By Playing the Game (13:30) - Leverage: Rewards and Risks That Every Investor Must Study (22:50) - Single-Stock ETFs Open a Whole New Playing Field (30:00) - Getting Educated with Direxion on Leveraged And Inverse ETFs (36:55) - Episode Roundup: Podcast@ Welcome back to Mind Over Money. I'm Kevin Cook, your field guide and storyteller for the fascinating arena of behavioral economics. Today my guest on the podcast is Edward Egilinsky, Head of Alternative Investments for the ETF provider Direxion. In over two decades of innovation, they have created a suite of products that active traders find invaluable, like the Direxion Daily Semiconductor Bull 3X Shares SOXL and the Direxion Daily Gold Miners Index Bull 2X Shares NUGT. Their best innovation to date, in my opinion, are the single-stock leveraged and inverse ETFs like the Direxion Daily TSLA Bull 2X Shares TSLL and the Direxion Daily TSLA Bear 1X Shares TSLS which offers a capital-efficient way to deploy a bearish view on Tesla TSLA. They also offer single-stock leverage and inverse exposure on other Mag 7 names like Apple, Amazon, and NVIDIA. But these leveraged and inverse ETF products carry special risks as well as rewards. That's why Ed and his team at Direxion are dedicated to education. Here are a couple of must-engage areas on their website to become more educated yourself before trading these products that can offer a double-edge sword of compounding and decay... Understanding Leveraged & Inverse ETFs Video Series And I think education is especially critical for investors because of the one or two-click trading available on most brokerage apps. But now there's a new obstacle to our learning. Allow me to explain. Mathematical Literacy in the Age of ChatGPT With the advent of large language models, or LLMs, there's a legitimate concern that people will stop doing their own "deep research." From high school and college kids fudging on their papers... to traders and investors getting their financial education from social media. In fact, in the conversations I have on X these days, I would say there is an epidemic of those getting their "minor in macro" from YouTube. But you don't need a degree in economics to become a good investor or trader. What you do need is math skills. I've said for decades that probability training is the antidote to behavioral biases that typically make our money disappear. So imagine me at 29 years old, walking into the trading pits of the Chicago Mercantile Exchange still "allergic to algebra" like I was in high school and college. But I was captivated by the raucous action on the trading floors where the average Joe and Jane from Chicago could play 3D chess with global markets in Japanese yen, pork bellies, and T-bill futures. And because I wanted to stick around -- even though I was making only 6 bucks an hour as a clerk -- I hit the books. Specifically, the sacred texts of trading, Jack Schwager's Market Wizards series. Market Wizards: Gandalf at Your Side The one strength I brought with me into the pits was my love of reading. So I dove into the Market Wizards, which are all almost entirely based on tape-recorded interviews that Schwager did with successful commodity, futures, and currency traders of the 1970s, 1980's, and 1990s. The interviews read like fireside war stories. There's Richard Dennis who started in soybeans and went on to run a fund that did a big chunk of the S&P futures volume. He is probably most famous for training the Turtles. And Paul Tudor Jones, who started trading cotton for his family on the New York Merc and is still doing global macro and appearing on CNBC. Then we have the dynamic duo of George Soros and Stanley Druckenmiller who infamously broke the Bank of England in 1992. There are a dozen more worth mentioning, but I've only got a few minutes here. My main point is that after reading the first two books, I identified several common themes that I called The 6 Keys to the Kingdom: >Psychology >Risk Management >Systems >Consistency >Discipline >Probability There was my Achilles heel with the last one: math. So what did I do? I found more books. Not only was I reading about the complex connections between CME currency and interest rate futures and the global FX and bond markets, I was trying to understand the math of why soybeans, British pounds, or live cattle traded at a premium or a discount in the future. It wasn't easy for a kid who got "queasy from equations" to grasp concepts like the "cost of carry." Before Vegas, the Dice Were Loaded With Ignorance More importantly, I had to learn the most basic math of probability. And I did that by reading the 375-year old story of a Renaissance gambler, the Chevalier de Mere, who knew the polymath Blaise Pascal and brought him a conundrum. Old Antoine Gombaud (aka the Chevalier) offered wagers to daring souls with dice. And he couldn't figure out why one bet -- rolling at least ONE SIX in 4 throws of a single die -- was less likely than the second bet -- rolling at least one DOUBLE SIX in 24 throws of a pair of dice. By his calculations, they were equal. Pascal threw himself into the challenge by engaging his mathematician friend Pierre de Fermat. And in a series of letters they exchanged in the 1650s, they solved the mystery and created the foundations of Monte Carlo and Wall Street. This effort of mine, this work to know how probability worked, inspired me to learn basic statistics. And these were foundational for an understanding of the Black-Scholes options pricing model and volatility dynamics. From Math Flunky to Science Junkie And that is how I built a career for myself in the late 1990s and early 2000s. It was hard and confusing, with many accidental twists and fortuitous turns, but if I could go back, I wouldn't change a thing. It also ignited my passion for science like evolution, astrophysics, and neuroscience. I'd always read books about these favorite topics, but now I could begin to understand the data measurements and statistics that were crucial tools for the scientists doing the work and trying to explain their findings to us. I should add that part of my good fortune wasn't just found in books. I was also in the right place and time for two other reasons: First, I was a clerk in a commodity options pit where I got to watch math geeks with pricing sheets work their magic making two-sided markets to paper (the incoming orders). They were primarily doing delta-neutral volatility arbitrage and I was fascinated to watch and learn in the pit and then try to simulate it on my own later. Second, since Chicago was THE birthplace of options trading for stocks, commodities, and financial futures, we had the best teachers around. One in particular was Sheldon Natenberg, a math lover turned options trader who wrote the quintessential handbook Options Volatility & Pricing. He also taught classes at the Merc and I was lucky enough to take several. For me it was total immersion with stories, experiences, and simulation -- just like when my Dad taught me to fly an airplane at 15 years old. In fact, I give him credit for teaching me how to think in terms of planning and contingency long before I applied those skills to markets. AI is a Message from the Future: Step Away from the Xbox And that's why my personal mission for the rest of my days is to inspire as many kids as possible to find their passion for science and math. The world is changing very fast, and we can't be sure what jobs will still be here a decade from now or what new industries will be created. But having basic agility with science and math concepts will always be crucial to navigate these shifting landscapes. Since the US still graduates 75% of high schoolers below proficiency in math, I know there are lots of kids out there like I was. Many just need a different way to learn the material. Imagine all the kids who might actually love science and math if only their internal spark of curiosity were ignited with alternatives to text books full of equations -- like VR and AR driven by AI. I actually pitched this idea to the National Science Foundation (NSF) in 2017. Some have said I was channeling ChatGPT before any of us knew what an LLM was. In a sense, we are all like the Turtles of Richard Dennis when we first start out -- able to learn anything with the right instruction. I ask almost every parent and teen I meet if they play video games. Then I ask them to consider how much smarter they would become if they put down the video controller for 1 or 2 hours a week and learn how an NVIDIA GPU actually works to create those cool graphics. Here is one of my introductory articles about making science and math come alive for teens... Curiosity Solves Everything: How the Wright Brothers Changed History And you can find my 2017 proposal to the NSF for a youth STEM Learning Design Engine using AI, VR, and AR at the pinned post on my X feed @KevinBCook. Okay enough of my sermon on math, and learning, and trading. My guest today is someone who probably knows more than I do about all three. And he's definitely met more real-life Market Wizards than I have. Go listen to Ed explain the ins and outs of trading leveraged and inverse ETFs. Two More for the Road And here are two more good education resources for learning about Direxion tools and tactics for managing your risk/reward... Leveraged and Inverse ETF Education Center Trading the Ups and Downs of NVDA Kevin Cook is a Senior Stock Strategist for Zacks Investment Research where he runs the TAZR Trader portfolio and makes studying NVIDIA AI a full-time job. Zacks Names #1 Semiconductor Stock It's only 1/9,000th the size of NVIDIA which skyrocketed more than +800% since we recommended it. NVIDIA is still strong, but our new top chip stock has much more room to boom. With strong earnings growth and an expanding customer base, it's positioned to feed the rampant demand for Artificial Intelligence, Machine Learning, and Internet of Things. Global semiconductor manufacturing is projected to explode from $452 billion in 2021 to $803 billion by 2028. See This Stock Now for Free >> Want the latest recommendations from Zacks Investment Research? Today, you can download 7 Best Stocks for the Next 30 Days. Click to get this free report Tesla, Inc. (TSLA): Free Stock Analysis Report

Globe and Mail
20-03-2025
- Globe and Mail
Dozens of Tesla vehicles damaged outside Hamilton dealership, police say
Police say as many as 80 Tesla TSLA-Q vehicles parked outside a Hamilton dealership were found with deep scratches, punctured tires and other damage. Hamilton police say they were called Wednesday to the Tesla dealership on Upper Wentworth Street for a report of damage to some of the vehicles in the store's inventory. They say officers discovered upwards of 80 damaged vehicles parked outside. Police say they are reviewing surveillance footage and are asking anyone with information to contact them. Police in London, Ont., have also said they are investigating a suspicious fire that seriously damaged a Tesla vehicle Monday night. In that case, a 2025 four-door black Tesla S sustained significant damage, but there were no reported injuries. The incidents come as authorities in the U.S. have reported a spate of arson attacks and vandalism against Tesla vehicles in recent months. Tesla showrooms, vehicle lots, charging stations and cars have been targeted since U.S. President Donald Trump appointed Tesla owner Elon Musk to oversee a new Department of Government Efficiency to cut government spending. With files from The Associated Press