'SMEs are being squeezed from every side': ISME urges National Minimum Wage reset
ISME has published its pre-Budget submission, which calls for a reset of the National Minimum Wage, saying it is not the solution to the cost-of-living crisis.
The business group, representing small and medium businesses, listed five issues to be addressed by the Budget in October.
In relation to business costs, they said there are structural and statistical issues with the calculation of the minimum wage here. They said public sector wages exceed those in the private sector and with Ireland at full employment, they expect the matter to be reversed.
They also said that SMEs in particular experience the 'crowding out' effects of the FDI sector in wage pressures, accommodation pressures, and pressures for access to water, sewerage and energy infrastructure. ISME said it was seeking a report within six months specifying why the components of Ireland's consumer and energy costs are the highest pre-tax prices in the EU.
Neil McDonnell, Chief Executive of ISME, said: "SMEs are being squeezed from every side on energy, insurance, regulation, housing and wages. This Budget needs to stop the rot. We need policies that back Irish businesses, not just foreign multinationals. If we don't address this imbalance in the economy now, we will pay the price in jobs and lost investment.
"We cannot continue with business as usual. If we want thriving towns, competitive employers and a balanced economy, we need to put Irish SMEs at the centre of policy, not on the sidelines."
The group also made recommendations in relation to the public finances saying the State's current spending profile is unsustainable and is propped up by unreliable corporation tax receipts.
"ISME considers it unwise to divert so much of this excess yield into core recurring expenditure. We must stop untargeted something-for-everyone spending and focus on right-now deficits in infrastructure, energy and security."
They also called for changes to social protection and said supports must not encourage lower work intensity. "Everyone, including workers earning below €352pw, should pay into the social protection system," the submission states.
Housing
ISME said the prime driver of wage demand growth was the cost of housing, and that many medium and large companies have become the new local landlords.
"The rapid decline in our available stock of accommodation post great financial crash is due to tax and regulation policy. These must be reversed."
"We also need to understand the impact on housing stock that the influx of large numbers of foreign students attending our universities creates. Students should not be competing with families and adults for access to housing, and require a dedicated stock of accommodation," ISME said.
They said planning laws have become the greatest impediment to the delivery of housing, commercial property and infrastructure and while the Planning and Development Act 2024 is intended to speed this process up, it will only impact new applications.
"Government must consider strategies to expedite necessary applications that are already in the system," ISME said.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Irish Times
33 minutes ago
- Irish Times
Ireland cannot base its economic strategy on the ‘Taco' theory – Trump Always Chickens Out
The Trump tariff story rolls on and on. Even over the past week or so, we have had threats of 50 per cent tariffs on the EU to apply from this weekend, then a postponement of this deadline till July , then a court ruling that the US president did not have the authority to impose such blanket tariffs at all, followed by an appeal court decision which put a stay on this decision. Confused? Well, join the club. Even the finest legal and political minds are struggling to keep up and identify where, exactly, we are now and what might happen next. The financial markets have been operating on the basis of what has been dubbed the 'Taco trade' – with analysts arguing that investors should keep buying shares because 'Trump always chickens out' on his tariff threats. We can hope this continues and that the worst does not happen. But it would be most unwise to base Ireland's economic strategy on the Taco theory and the hope that all the transatlantic trouble will be sorted quickly. Donald Trump could as easily lash out as chicken out. We just don't know. The odds are that the rocky period we are now seeing is not going to end any time soon. Trump's talk of doing strings of trade 'deals' is based more on Maga promo than reality, judging by the flimsy details which have emerged to date. Treasury secretary Scott Bessent's comment late on Thursday that talks with China are 'stalled' is also significant. READ MORE And the negotiations with the EU do not seem to have made much progress, as a Brussels hierarchy driven by process meets the chaos of Washington. Smarter minds in Dublin worry that the EU may be in a dangerous place, being late in the queue of countries trying to reach some kind of accommodation with Trump. The extent to which Trump can use his tariffs weapons is now in question, after the federal trade court decision that he exceeded his powers with blanket tariffs. But he will appeal – and still has the legal option to use tariffs in specific sectors on national security grounds, like tech and, important for Ireland, pharma . His new budget bill also gives the US the power to target companies and individuals from countries seen to treat US companies unfairly with penal extra taxes. Tax wars could yet join trade wars. So where does this leave Ireland? The Government cannot be hypnotised into inaction by the White House and the risks from what Trump does next. It needs to be seen to get on with it and send out a message that it is going about its business amid the international chaos. And here the next couple of months will be crucial. A review of Ireland's massive State investment plan – the National Development Programme (NDP) – is due for publication over the summer. So is the so-called Summer Economic Strategy, which sets out the game plan for the Budget. After a shaky start, the Coalition needs to use these to try to shape a new narrative. The Government can't remove the uncertainty that has spread through the economy and is now stalling investment and, increasingly, hiring. But it can try to underpin confidence by focusing on doing a few important things. One is approaching the budget in a sane and strategic way – unlike last year's pre-election giveaway – and building Ireland's leeway for a possible hit to corporate tax revenues and what seems now an inevitable general economic slowdown. [ Truth Social diplomacy, a shock court ruling and fashion magnate advice: A week inside the EU-US tariff talks Opens in new window ] This will require a summer battle between the budget ministers Paschal Donohoe and Jack Chambers and the rest of the Cabinet, who will see extra billions and want to spend them. And, for now, extra billions are indeed likely. Ireland's growth figures, and quite possibly corporate tax revenues, are about to get another boost from huge exports to the US so far this year, as pharma and other sectors try to get product across the Atlantic there before tariffs hit. On paper, Ireland's economic boom is about to get boomier. In reality, this is a classic once-off boost which will reverse, sooner rather than later. The other key challenge for Ministers is to start to get to grips with the big infrastructural blockages facing the economy and building some kind of positive narrative, rather than continued talk of failure and a seeming inability to progress anything. This is now urgent. Big US investors here have projects on hold due to the tariff uncertainty. Sooner or later they will have to make a call on where to invest next. Ireland cannot control the impact of whatever Trump does on these decisions. But the State's infrastructural shortcomings are now a big factor in what they do next and here the mood music is poor. This will take years to fix, but the Government needs to get out the message that it has a plan and, crucially, that it can execute it. Of course, it also has to cope as best it can with swings of the Trump-driven agenda. The ongoing exceptionalism of Irish economic data – set to repeat this year – unfortunately keeps the State in the spotlight. There will be tricky territory to negotiate as the focus intensifies on the extent of pharma exports by US companies from their Irish bases to the American market – a big factor in the US trade deficit with the EU – and the tax boost Ireland gets from this, at the expense of Uncle Sam. And as the OECD corporate tax deal, which Ireland hoped would lead to some peace in this area, gradually falls apart, putting a lot back into play in another vital area for Ireland. [ Donald Trump's tariffs setback: the president's policies continue to unravel Opens in new window ] In turbulent times, you always look for the pressure points. Pharma and corporate tax are the key ones for Ireland. But it also has some economic and budgetary strengths to help in trying to pick a way through all this. Relying on a 'Taco' strategy and hoping the transatlantic threat falls away in the months ahead looks unrealistic. But the Government cannot just sit back and be hypnotised by what is happening in the White House – it needs to be seen to get on with it.
RTÉ News
37 minutes ago
- RTÉ News
Poland's presidential election set for tight vote
Tomorrow, Polish voters will cast their ballots in a decisive second-round vote to decide whether centrist Rafal Trzaskowski or conservative Karol Nawrocki will become their next president. The past two weeks of campaigning have delivered a tight contest between two candidates from Poland's largest political camps: the centre-right Civic Platform and the nationalist-conservative Law and Justice (PiS) party. But it was always likely to be that way. Both parties have dominated Polish politics for more than 20 years and there is no love lost between them. Polls yesterday showed both candidates tied on 47% each, or a one percentage point advantage for either. The result will be very close. At stake is whether the current pro-EU coalition government can pursue its reform agenda with a centrist ally in Warsaw's presidential palace, or face continued political gridlock until the next parliamentary election in 2027 with another conservative president in office. Outgoing President Andrzej Duda, an ally of PiS, has vetoed or deferred some two dozen bills passed by Donald Tusk's coalition government in the past 18 months, blocking its efforts to reverse the changes made to the judiciary during PiS's time in power from 2015 to 2023. The coalition has also held off on proposing the liberalisation of abortion laws knowing that Mr Duda would likely block it. Left, liberal and centrist voters see a Nawrocki presidency as presenting more of the same, if not worse. Poland's president holds a largely ceremonial role but can veto bills passed by parliament. A 60% majority can overturn the veto but Mr Tusk's government is short of those numbers. The president is also the commander-in-chief of Poland's armed forces and oversees security and defence policy so the office holder wields power. The campaign, which began in January, has been "99% ideological and maybe 1% issue-based", Andrzej Bobinski, managing director of Polityka Insight, told RTÉ News. Mr Trzaskowski, the centrist mayor of Warsaw who narrowly lost the previous presidential election in 2020 to Mr Duda, has been the frontrunner throughout. But he saw his lead almost disappear in the first round. Mr Trzaskowski and his team have since focused on mobilising more left and hard left voters, and particular young female voters, many of whom feel disappointed at the ruling coalition's lack of progress on liberalising Poland's strict abortion laws. "Women hardly believe that even with the President from the same political spectrum, anything will change," said Magdalena Jakubowska, vice-president of think tank Res Publica Foundation in Warsaw. At rallies in the past two weeks, Mr Trzaskowski's wife, Malgorzata Trzaskowska, has often taken centre stage to emphasise that her husband is the candidate who supports women's rights. He supports the liberalisation of current abortion laws but he has not put the issue at the front of his campaign as he did in 2020. Doing so would hamper his efforts to appeal to conservative voters from small town and rural Poland. Mr Nawrocki, who has taken on the mantle of the challenger in this race, is a historian and social conservative. But he has no political experience. He is currently the head of Poland's Institute of National Remembrance, a state body that oversees official Polish history, and was previously the director of the Museum of the Second World War in his native Gdansk. Though officially running as an independent candidate, he has the full backing and support of PiS's political machine. Mr Nawrocki's campaign has been dogged by scandals as much as anything else, namely accusations that he purchased a flat in the late 2000s from an elderly man in his home city of Gdansk for a small sum in return for a promise to look after the pensioner. Polish media later reported that the elderly man now lives in a care facility and not in the apartment. Mr Nawrocki repeatedly denied any wrongdoing and said he continued to help the elderly man financially. He has also been linked to football ultras in his youth. However, these allegations have not damaged his campaign as he has managed to secure the support of the PiS electorate. "Karol Nawrocki basically has to work to the right and to the extreme right. He has to mobilise his voter base and to mobilise everybody who's to the right of Law and Justice," said Mr Bobinski. Mr Trzaskowski, he added, "is trying to build a coalition of people who don't want Law and Justice to get back to power". The big political development in this campaign has been the increase in support for far-right candidates. In the first round vote, 21% of Polish voters cast their ballots for one of two far-right candidates. Last week, the more popular of the two, Slawomir Mentzen, who won 15% of votes in the first round, invited both Mr Trzaskowski and Mr Nawrocki to discuss election issues on his YouTube channel. Mr Mentzen presented eight demands that he wanted them to agree so that his 2.9 million voters could decide who to support in the second round. The interviews made for interesting viewing but, by themselves, may not make a massive impact on the final result. During his grilling, Mr Nawrocki came across as weak and fawned over the far-right leader's eight demands in a bid to win the support of his voters. He signed all eight of Mr Mentzen's demands, one of which was a commitment to oppose Ukraine's membership of NATO in the future. It was a point that Mr Trzaskowski would not agree to. Mr Trzaskowski fared better and may have won over the libertarians among Mr Mentzen's voters - they like his low tax agenda, rather than his ultra-nationalism. Also, both men went for a beer together after their YouTube debate which did the rounds on Polish social media. Videos of them having a pint in Mr Mentzen's craft beer pub, along with Polish foreign minister Radoslaw Sikorski, were the stuff of PR gold and could translate into a few more votes for Warsaw's mayor. In the end, Mr Mentzen decided not to endorse either of the two candidates. The whole thing looked like an exercise in self-promotion for the far-right leader who wants to break Poland's long-standing political duopoly. However, a sizeable number of far-right voters could just vote for the conservative candidate tomorrow knowing that he aligns more closely with their nationalist and socially conservative views. A lively debate on the Polish public broadcaster and two mass rallies by both candidates in the capital last weekend did not result in a swing towards either candidate. Those who are committed Trzaskowski or Nawrocki supporters are not going to change sides at this stage. Instead, younger voters who opted for more radical, anti-establishment parties in the first round, are more likely to sway the result for one candidate or the other. If far-right supporters turn out in large numbers for Mr Nawrocki, then he may win. Whereas, if Mr Trzaskowski successfully mobilises more left and liberal voters, particularly women, the result could favour him. Whatever the outcome, it looks set to be very close. "I'm expecting that there will be very little difference between the two candidates. It will be really 50-50, and 200, 300,000 votes may really change the situation," said Ms Jakubowska.
RTÉ News
37 minutes ago
- RTÉ News
Growing political pressure for firm Govt action on Gaza
All day Wednesday and late into the evening on the street facing Leinster House, demonstrators sang a stinging song urging politicians to find their "backbone" and to enact the Occupied Territories Bill. The same sentiment echoed through the Dáil chamber. Some within the Government bristled over what they believe is a shocking failure to take into account its outspoken voice on Gaza. Words that have been matched by deeds, including €87 million in funding for people in Palestine since 2023, recognising the State of Palestine, supporting South Africa's case against Israel at the International Court of Justice, and leading the way in requesting a review of the EU-Israel Association Agreement. The Taoiseach even claimed there is a battle under way domestically for moral superiority on what has become one of the most emotive issues in Irish politics. The language denouncing Israel's actions has become sharper too with both Taoiseach Micheál Martin and Tánaiste Simon Harris repeatedly using the word genocide this week. All remaining ambiguity and lingering diplomatic niceties have now been cast aside. The Taoiseach believes the single more effective next step is to try to persuade the EU and the US to "pull their support for the State of Israel". But it is the requirement for further direct interventions by this State rather than words alone which is fueling immense political tension. A significant political act was about to unfold It was evident as the bells were clanging around Leinster House just after 6pm on Wednesday when the weekly votes were called. A significant political act was about to unfold before the business concluded. Reporters watched from the Dáil gallery as Dublin Bay-North TD Barry Heneghan took his seat to vote on a Sinn Féin Bill. It was a piece of legislation that would prevent the Central Bank from retaining its technical role in approving the prospectus which allows Israel sell bonds in the EU. Israel has made it clear that these bonds are used to fund its war in Gaza. Sinn Féin's legal advice stated that a Member State is entitled as a matter of EU law to unilaterally restrict access to its financial services. It can do so on public policy grounds that are rooted in Ireland's fundamental interest in pursuing its international law obligations, the legal opinion concluded. The Government argued that the Bill did not provide a legal mechanism to allow the Central Bank of Ireland set aside its obligations under the EU Prospectus Regulation. It argued this was an EU competence, and the Central Bank can only refuse the approval of a prospectus where it has a legal basis to do so. The advice circulated to ministers added that it is legally required to issue prospectuses that are complete, legally sound, and comprehensible. For Barry Heneghan, who had supported the Government in every vote up to this point, this was a matter of conscience, and he believed Ireland shouldn't facilitate the sale of bonds that help fund the devastation in Gaza. He left Leinster House around 9pm on Wednesday, long after the bells had ceased ringing, certain in the knowledge that he had made the right decision. Generally, there was little political alarm triggered by his vote within Government. Some whispered that "Barry can be difficult to manage", and that it was simply a "flexing of muscles". But it did unquestionably show that those Independents, who occupy a liminal position within the Coalition, are perhaps a more fragile bloc of votes than first suspected. This was further illustrated by the actions of Meath-East TD Gillian Toole. Before 9pm she was on a bus back home to Ratoath having also voted against the Government on the Bill. Regarded as a deep-thinker and a conscientious politician, Gillian Toole cited the lack of detailed briefings from the Government as an influence on her decision. The two TDs are still aligned to the Coalition, their jump overboard is a temporary one, and the Government's majority is not shattered. 'Call out the narrative for what it is' It is emblematic though of the growing pressure on the Government to accompany its increasingly strident rhetoric on Gaza with firm actions. The acerbic exchange between the Tánaiste and Independent TD Catherine Connolly in the Dáil on Thursday morning typified the fractiousness which has built around this issue. The Galway West TD made an impassioned call on Government to do more, saying: "It's time we led. Call out the narrative for what it is. Israel is a rogue state; it is not a democratic state. Stand up, stand up and account for what you're going to do." In a charged atmosphere, Simon Harris accused her of expressing "vitriol and dislike for Fine Gael and Fianna Fáil" and of refusing to acknowledge the major steps taken by the Government. It all suggests that the Government will now be pursued relentlessly by protesters, the Opposition, and perhaps by some Independent TDs supporting the Coalition, to pass the Occupied Territories Bill quickly. The Foreign Affairs Committee, chaired by Fianna Fáil TD John Lahart, has already singalled that it will sit throughout June to progress this legislation swiftly. The speed of its passage through the Oireachtas after this committee work has concluded will be the measure of the Government's strong words on Gaza this week.
