logo
House And Senate Propose Form 1099 Reporting Relief For Gig Workers And Those Who Use Payment Apps Like PayPal For Business

House And Senate Propose Form 1099 Reporting Relief For Gig Workers And Those Who Use Payment Apps Like PayPal For Business

Forbes17-06-2025
Payment apps like PayPal and Venmo must now report transactions to the IRS—will Congress change the reporting threshold?
Republicans on the Senate Finance Committee have unveiled their version of the 'One Big Beautiful Bill Act' which tackle President Donald Trump's domestic agenda. While there are some significant differences between the Senate version and the version passed by the House earlier this year, both packages address unpopular reporting requirements: Forms 1099.
The House and Senate versions of the bill would both increase the reporting threshold for Forms 1099-K and 1099-NEC, which means that fewer taxpayers would receive those forms at tax time.
For years, taxpayers who provided certain goods or services worth more than $600 were required to issue Form 1099-MISC. That changed slightly in 2012 with the new Form 1099-K.
Form 1099-K introduced a requirement for reporting payment transactions, defined as transactions made with a payment card or through a third-party network. Payment card transactions include accepting a card—such as a gift card, credit card, or debit card—for goods or services. A third-party network transaction is one that is settled through a third-party payment network, such as PayPal. For the most part, think payment apps or online marketplaces.
While the reporting threshold for Form 1099-MISC had been $600, Form 1099-K required reporting when payments totaled more than $20,000 and more than 200 transactions were settled through a third-party network. No threshold applies to payment card transactions, which include credit, debit, or stored value cards, such as gift cards.
The gap between the "old" Form 1099-MISC reporting threshold of $600 and the Form 1099-K reporting threshold of $20,000 was a cause for concern for some who worried about a lack of reporting compliance. The fix from Congress in 2021 was a lower $600 threshold amount for Form 1099-K set to take effect in the 2022 tax year, meaning forms that would be distributed in early 2023. However, under pressure from business groups and an IRS that wasn't yet prepared to deal with the volume, 2022, 2023, 2024, and 2025 were treated as transitional years. Without any changes, for the 2025 tax year, the reporting threshold is $2,500.
Starting in 2020, there was another yet change to Form 1099-MISC. The IRS brought back Form 1099-NEC, Nonemployee Compensation, to report payments of nonemployee compensation (NEC) previously reported in box 7 on Form 1099-MISC. That means that independent contractors and gig workers now receive Form 1099-NEC, not Form 1099-MISC.
(Form 1099-MISC is still used to report attorney payments, royalties, prizes and awards, and some rents.)
The reason for the change in reporting threshold has been touted as increased compliance. According to the IRS, tax gap studies have consistently demonstrated that third-party income reporting significantly raises voluntary compliance with tax laws. For example, computerized document matching in the early 1980s—where the IRS matched data reported by third-party financial institutions to data reported by taxpayers—significantly reduced underreporting of dividend and interest income. And the 1987 requirement that taxpayers supply Social Security numbers for dependent children resulted in a marked difference in the numbers of dependents claimed on returns—seven million fewer dependent children were claimed than in the previous year.
For the 2025 tax year, the IRS requires third-party networks, such as payment apps and online marketplaces, to issue Form 1099-K if the aggregate payments received by a payee exceed $2,500, regardless of the number of transactions. That's a step towards the $600 threshold created under the American Rescue Plan Act of 2021—that's slated to take effect in 2026. It's still the case that no threshold applies to payment card transactions—payment cards include credit, debit, or stored value cards such as gift cards.
Also, for the 2025 tax year, the IRS requires those who pay independent contractors $600 or more to file Form 1099-NEC, Nonemployee Compensation, to report those payments.
(The $600 threshold has never been adjusted for inflation. However, if cost-of-living adjustments had been made each year since 1954—the year that section 6041 of the tax code was introduced—the $600 threshold would now be over $7,170.)
Both the House of Representatives and the Senate propose repealing the $600 reporting threshold for Form 1099-K introduced by the American Rescue Plan Act in 2021. That move would restore the previous threshold of $20,000 and 200 transactions for Form 1099-K reporting.
And, both the House of Representatives and the Senate propose increasing the $600 reporting threshold for independent contractors or certain other payments reported on Form 1099-NEC to $2,000, adjusted for inflation.
House Ways and Means Committee Chairman Jason Smith (MO-08) said, about the change, 'The current IRS subcontract labor reporting requirements are as out-of-date as they come. Increasing the threshold at which small businesses have to file a form with the IRS will be a potent regulatory relief for Main Street.'
The Coalition for 1099-K Fairness, an organization founded by eBay, Etsy, Mercari, OfferUp, Poshmark, Reverb and Tradesy in response to the changes in the American Rescue Plan Act of 2021, said about the change, 'The Coalition for 1099-K Fairness strongly supports the Senate Finance package's inclusion of language to raise the 1099-K reporting threshold. This commonsense provision would increase the threshold to over $20,000 in total payments and more than 200 transactions per calendar year—effectively stopping the implementation of a burdensome $600 threshold, regardless of transaction count, scheduled to take effect in 2026 under the American Rescue Plan Act (ARP).'
If the reporting rules change, that should mean fewer forms for taxpayers. In 2023, the IRS estimated there could be up to 44 million Forms 1099-K sent to taxpayers (the official IRS projections—released in September 2024—suggested that the numbers were much smaller because of the delayed implementation of the $600 reporting threshold).
The U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics reports that the number of self-employed individuals is around 16.5 million, representing approximately 10.4% of the total workforce. That doesn't necessarily translate into 16.5 million Forms 1099-NEC since some self-employed workers don't receive any forms while others may receive multiple forms. But it's clear that changing the reporting threshold will impact millions of taxpayers.
Regardless of the reporting threshold, all taxable income, including income earned through payment apps and online marketplaces and income earned from side gigs and contracting jobs, must be reported on your tax return.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Democrats frustrated over lack of a heads-up from Hakeem Jeffries on delaying Trump's spending bill
Democrats frustrated over lack of a heads-up from Hakeem Jeffries on delaying Trump's spending bill

Fox News

time16 minutes ago

  • Fox News

Democrats frustrated over lack of a heads-up from Hakeem Jeffries on delaying Trump's spending bill

Democrats were flustered that they didn't get a heads-up that Minority Leader Hakeem Jeffries would delay President Donald Trump's "Big, Beautiful Bill" on Thursday with an hours-long speech on the House floor. "No one is upset Hakeem wanted to do this, but to not tell members, 'be prepared, book multiple flights, be flexible,'" a House Democrat told Axios, who was reportedly upset about the challenge of rebooking flights so close to the Fourth of July. Another House Democrat told Axios that a "heads up would have been nice." On Thursday afternoon, Jeffries beat the record for a House floor speech, speaking for eight hours and 44 minutes, starting before 4 a.m. and ending around 1:30 p.m. Jeffries went over the record previously held by former House Speaker Kevin McCarthy, R-Calif., which was eight hours and 32 minutes. During his remarks, the minority leader read from a binder that he said had stories of people who could lose their Medicaid coverage under Trump's spending bill that were compiled from constituents of states that have Republican lawmakers. "I think it's important for the American people to process… SNAP on average provides $6 per day," Jeffries said. "At the same time, Elon Musk, his federal contracts, as we understand it, amount to $8 million per day. Mr. Speaker, if Republicans were really serious about targeting waste, fraud and abuse in the United States of America, start there – $8 million per day, start right there." Trump's "Big, Beautiful Bill," which passed the House on Thursday afternoon after Jeffries yielded the floor and now awaits the president's signature, advances his border security measures and permanently extends the income tax brackets lowered by his 2017 Tax Cuts Jobs Act (TCJA).

After House Republicans ignored her appeals, Lisa Murkowski's vote looks even worse
After House Republicans ignored her appeals, Lisa Murkowski's vote looks even worse

Yahoo

time17 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

After House Republicans ignored her appeals, Lisa Murkowski's vote looks even worse

Three Senate Republicans balked at their party's domestic policy megabill — the inaptly named One Big Beautiful Bill Act — but opponents of the far-right package needed a fourth. They thought Sen. Lisa Murkowski of Alaska would rescue the nation from the consequences of the radical legislation, but GOP leaders offered a series of carve-outs and schemes that would help shield her home state from the effects of the party's agenda. But after Murkowski cast the deciding vote, she did something unexpected. In fact, she took two unexpected steps. First, the Alaskan trashed the reconciliation package shortly after voting for it, which was every bit as odd as it sounds. 'Do I like this bill? No,' she told NBC News. The senator added, by way of social media: '[L]et's not kid ourselves. ... While we have worked to improve the present bill for Alaska, it is not good enough for the rest of our nation — and we all know it.' Second, Murkowski effectively asked the Republican-led House not to pass the bill she had just voted for. 'My sincere hope is that this is not the final product,' she wrote online. 'This bill needs more work across chambers and is not ready for the president's desk. We need to work together to get this right.' That came on the heels of related comments the GOP senator made to reporters on Capitol Hill. 'We do not have a perfect bill by any stretch of the imagination. My hope is that the House is going to look at this and recognize that we're not there yet.' Not only did House Republican leaders ignore Murkowski's appeals, they never even considered the possibility. Politico reported: House GOP holdouts who wanted a last-minute rewrite of President Donald Trump's megabill never had a chance, Majority Leader Steve Scalise said in an interview Thursday. 'For a long time, there were members that really thought there was a chance the bill was going to get opened up again to amendment,' the Louisiana Republican said as the House neared a final vote on the bill. 'It became clear from the president's meeting at the White House to further conversations later that, for all the back and forth, you know, the bill's closed, there's going to be no more amendments to the bill.' And that, of course, makes Murkowski's decision look even worse. The Alaska Republican not only had an opportunity to derail the most regressive proposal in at least a generation, she also had an opportunity to use her considerable leverage to make it better. Instead, Murkowski passed the buck, hoping the House might help clean up the mess. These misguided wishes led her to vote for a bill that, by her own admission, 'is not good enough' for the nation and 'not ready' to be signed into law. Too many GOP lawmakers somehow convinced themselves that the party's megabill had real merit and would deliver great results. Murkowski, however, knew better — and she chose to advance it anyway. History will not be kind. This article was originally published on

If the Job Market's So Good, Why Do We Feel So Bad?
If the Job Market's So Good, Why Do We Feel So Bad?

Bloomberg

time17 minutes ago

  • Bloomberg

If the Job Market's So Good, Why Do We Feel So Bad?

This is Bloomberg Opinion Today, the churn and growth opportunities that we expect from Bloomberg Opinion's opinions. Sign up here. Today was Jobs Day, which is weird, because it's not the first Friday of the month. It's the first Thursday of the month, but since tomorrow is a federal holiday — happy 249th birthday, Uncle Sam! — we got the data a day early. Jonathan Levin — and nearly every other Fed-watcher on the planet — was pleasantly surprised by June's unemployment rate of 4.1%, a number that he says is 'just about as good as it gets.'

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store