logo
‘A little problem': Why Trump fell out of love with Apple CEO Tim Cook

‘A little problem': Why Trump fell out of love with Apple CEO Tim Cook

The Age3 days ago

'It has put Apple at a disadvantage because every move, including a potential concession from Trump, is scrutinised,' Wexler said. Because Trump didn't 'have much incentive to either go easy on Apple or cut a deal on tariffs,' he said, 'the incentive to crack down is much stronger'.
Apple did not provide comment. The White House declined to comment on the Middle East trip.
Trump's new tariff threat followed a report by The Financial Times that Apple's supplier Foxconn would spend $US1.5 billion ($2.3 billion) on a plant in India for iPhones. The president said the tariffs would begin at the end of June and affect all smartphones made abroad, including Samsung's devices.
Last week, Cook visited Washington for a meeting with Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent. During an appearance on Fox News on Friday, Bessent said the administration considered overseas production of semiconductors and electronics components 'one of our greatest vulnerabilities', which Apple could help address.
'President Trump has been consistently clear about the need to reshore manufacturing that is critical to our national and economic security, including for semiconductors and semiconductor products,' said Kush Desai, a White House spokesperson. He added that the administration 'continues to have a productive relationship with Apple'.
The timing of the White House's new tariff plan couldn't be worse for Cook, who has led Apple for nearly 14 years.
Loading
Last month, the company suffered a stinging defeat in an App Store trial. The judge in the trial rebuked Apple executives, saying they had 'outright lied under oath' and that 'Cook chose poorly', and ruled that Apple had to change how it operates the App Store. Jony Ive, Apple's former chief designer who became estranged from Cook and left the company in 2019, joined OpenAI last week to build an iPhone competitor. Its Vision Pro mixed reality headset, released in January 2024 to fanfare, has been a disappointment. And in March, Apple postponed its promised release of a new Siri, raising fresh doubts about its ability to compete in the industry's race to adopt artificial intelligence.
Still, Apple's market value has increased by more than $US2.5 trillion under his leadership, or about $US505 million a day since 2011. And Apple remains a moneymaking machine, generating an annual profit of nearly $US100 billion.
With Trump's reelection, Cook appeared to be in a strong position to help Apple navigate the new administration. In 2019, Trump said Cook was a 'great executive because he calls me and others don't'.
Cook still occasionally pushed back on the president's agenda. During an appearance at a conference for Fortune magazine in late 2017, Cook explained that the company would love to make things in the United States but that China had more engineers and better skills. He appeared before a live audience on MSNBC a few months later and criticised the president's policy on immigration.
This year, their warm relations have run cold. Trump is more determined to quickly move manufacturing to the United States, which has made Apple a primary target.
On other administration priorities like dismantling diversity initiatives, Cook has tried to take a diplomatic position. At its annual general shareholder meeting in February, he said that Apple remained committed to its 'North Star of dignity and respect for everyone' and would continue to 'create a culture of belonging', but that it might need to make changes to comply with a changing legal landscape.
The bigger problem has been trade. Apple has stopped short of committing to making the iPhone, iPad or Mac laptops in the United States. Instead, the company has moved to assemble more iPhones in India.
Apple has tried to head off Trump's criticisms of its overseas manufacturing by promising to spend $US500 billion in the United States over the next four years. Cook also has emphasised that the company will source 19 billion chips from the United States this year and will start making AI servers in Houston.
Loading
Servers haven't satisfied Trump. He wants iPhones made in the United States badly enough to create what amounts to an iPhone tariff. It would increase the cost of shipping an iPhone from India or China to the United States by 25 per cent. The costs aren't so staggering that they would damage Apple's business, but Trump could always ratchet up the levies until he gets his wish.
'If they're going to sell it in America, I want it to be built in the United States,' Trump said Friday. 'They're able to do that.'

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

'Unjustified': PM-Trump talks push after tariff hike
'Unjustified': PM-Trump talks push after tariff hike

West Australian

timean hour ago

  • West Australian

'Unjustified': PM-Trump talks push after tariff hike

Pressure is again mounting for Prime Minister Anthony Albanese to personally meet with Donald Trump amid fresh alarm over the US president's "unjustified" tariff hike on steel imports. Mr Trump on Saturday announced plans to increase tariffs on foreign imports of steel from 25 to 50 per cent to "further secure the steel industry in the United States". The latest decision could impact Australia's industry, which exported more than $414 million worth of iron and steel to the US in 2024. Trade Minister Don Farrell says the tariffs are unjustified and not the act of a friend. "They are an act of economic self-harm that will only hurt consumers and businesses who rely on free and fair trade," Mr Farrell said on Saturday. "We will continue to engage and advocate strongly for the removal of the tariffs." Opposition trade spokesman Kevin Hogan said the latest move was concerning for Australian jobs and the coalition expected the US to honour its obligations under both nations' free trade agreement. "The Albanese government needs to double its efforts to protect our steel industry and local jobs for our steel workers," he said in a statement. "This is why it is imperative that the Australian prime minister personally meets with President Trump ... to develop a personal rapport with the United States president and protect Australian industries." The US imported 289 product categories in 2024, costing $US147 billion ($A229 billion), with nearly two-thirds of those aluminium and one-third steel, according to Census Bureau data from the US International Trade Commission. The 25 per cent tariffs on steel and aluminium were among the earliest implemented following Mr Trump's return to the White House in January and came into effect in March. Australia will continue to push for Mr Trump to drop his tariffs after a US federal court blocked his Liberation Day taxes on imported goods from going into effect. Goods from Australia are subject to a 10 per cent baseline tariff, while all steel and aluminium imports to the US face 25 per cent tariffs before Mr Trump's latest announcement. The New York-based Court of International Trade found the US president had overstepped his authority by imposing the tariffs. The administration launched an appeal, decrying "unelected judges" should not decide how to address a "national emergency". Labor has sought to temper expectations on whether it can land a deal with the US to remove the tariffs.

'Unjustified': PM-Trump talks push after tariff hike
'Unjustified': PM-Trump talks push after tariff hike

Perth Now

timean hour ago

  • Perth Now

'Unjustified': PM-Trump talks push after tariff hike

Pressure is again mounting for Prime Minister Anthony Albanese to personally meet with Donald Trump amid fresh alarm over the US president's "unjustified" tariff hike on steel imports. Mr Trump on Saturday announced plans to increase tariffs on foreign imports of steel from 25 to 50 per cent to "further secure the steel industry in the United States". The latest decision could impact Australia's industry, which exported more than $414 million worth of iron and steel to the US in 2024. Trade Minister Don Farrell says the tariffs are unjustified and not the act of a friend. "They are an act of economic self-harm that will only hurt consumers and businesses who rely on free and fair trade," Mr Farrell said on Saturday. "We will continue to engage and advocate strongly for the removal of the tariffs." Opposition trade spokesman Kevin Hogan said the latest move was concerning for Australian jobs and the coalition expected the US to honour its obligations under both nations' free trade agreement. "The Albanese government needs to double its efforts to protect our steel industry and local jobs for our steel workers," he said in a statement. "This is why it is imperative that the Australian prime minister personally meets with President Trump ... to develop a personal rapport with the United States president and protect Australian industries." The US imported 289 product categories in 2024, costing $US147 billion ($A229 billion), with nearly two-thirds of those aluminium and one-third steel, according to Census Bureau data from the US International Trade Commission. The 25 per cent tariffs on steel and aluminium were among the earliest implemented following Mr Trump's return to the White House in January and came into effect in March. Australia will continue to push for Mr Trump to drop his tariffs after a US federal court blocked his Liberation Day taxes on imported goods from going into effect. Goods from Australia are subject to a 10 per cent baseline tariff, while all steel and aluminium imports to the US face 25 per cent tariffs before Mr Trump's latest announcement. The New York-based Court of International Trade found the US president had overstepped his authority by imposing the tariffs. The administration launched an appeal, decrying "unelected judges" should not decide how to address a "national emergency". Labor has sought to temper expectations on whether it can land a deal with the US to remove the tariffs.

US court won't lift block on Trump's govt overhaul
US court won't lift block on Trump's govt overhaul

Perth Now

time2 hours ago

  • Perth Now

US court won't lift block on Trump's govt overhaul

A US appeals court has refused to pause a judge's ruling blocking President Donald Trump's administration from carrying out mass layoffs of federal workers and a restructuring of government agencies as part of a sweeping government overhaul. The decision on Friday by the San Francisco-based 9th US Circuit Court of Appeals means that, for now, the Trump administration cannot proceed with plans to shed tens of thousands of federal jobs and shutter many government offices and programs. US District Judge Susan Illston in San Francisco on May 22 blocked large-scale layoffs at about 20 federal agencies, agreeing with a group of unions, non-profits and municipalities that the president may only restructure agencies when authorised by Congress. A three-judge 9th Circuit panel on Friday denied the Trump administration's bid to stay Illston's decision pending an appeal, which could take months to resolve. The administration will likely now ask the US Supreme Court to pause the ruling. The White House did not immediately respond to a request for comment. "The Ninth Circuit's decision today rightfully maintains the block on the Trump-Vance administration's unlawful, disruptive, and destructive reorganisation of the federal government," said a statement from the coalition of plaintiffs. The court said the administration had not provided any evidence it would suffer an irreparable injury if the lower court order remained in place and said plaintiffs were likely to prevail. "The executive order at issue here far exceeds the president's supervisory powers under the Constitution," said the majority opinion from Judge William Fletcher, who was appointed by Democratic President Bill Clinton. He was joined by Judge Lucy Koh, who was appointed by Democratic President Joe Biden. Illston's ruling was the broadest of its kind against the government overhaul that was spearheaded by Trump ally Elon Musk, the world's richest person and CEO of electric vehicle maker Tesla. Along with blocking layoffs, Illston barred the Department of Government Efficiency from ordering job cuts or reorganisation at federal agencies. Dozens of lawsuits have challenged DOGE's work on various grounds, including claims that it violated labour and privacy laws and exceeded its authority, with mixed results. Two judges had separately ordered the Trump administration to reinstate thousands of probationary employees, who are typically newer hires and were fired en masse in February, but appeals courts paused those rulings.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store