
Chandler Unified Board votes for $271.5M bond ask
That number is about 56% of the $487.5 million that voters rejected by more than seven points in the November 2024 election.
The CUSD Governing Board on June 11 also authorized asking voters to extend for another seven years a 15% override of its maintenance and operation budget in the same Nov. 4 election.
CUSD board member Kurt Rohrs voted against the $271.5 million bond question. He argued for a strategy of asking for less money, and returning to voters every three years to ask for more.
'I think I like about the whole process is going to a three-year cycle instead of a five-year cycle,' Rohrs said. 'It's more likely to pass at $199 (million) than it is at $271 (million).'
Traditionally, CUSD returns to voters about every five years to seek new bond authorizations to cover its capital needs. Rohrs moved to seek bond authorization for $199.4 million, which was option 3 from the citizen bond committee. That motion died for lack of a second.
Rohrs also argued voters may be overwhelmed by ballot questions this election.
In addition to the two that CUSD is putting on the ballot, City of Chandler voters will be considering six questions from the city, four of which total a $475 million bond request.
The other two questions deal with amending the City Charter.
Board Member Ryan Heap made the motion to ask for $271.5 million.
'In considering the difference between (options) two and three, what I noted … is there's opportunities to do reimagining (projects),' Heap said.
The district has been reimagining education spaces at some of its older schools. Heap said he recently toured some of those spaces and was impressed by the changes and how they are getting students motivated to learn.
Heap said he wants to make sure the right schools are being reimagined, meaning schools that face competition from nearby charter schools.
Board member Barb Mozdzen said the deciding factor for her was the technology budget. She said she saw a noticeable difference between what was offered in the $271.5 million option over what they would get in the $199.4 million option.
'We have not kept up with our technology or device refreshes and a lot of the infrastructure that is needed in these … schools to have adequate bandwidth for all students being on their devices and all teachers being on their devices during the school day,' Mozdzen said.
Board President Patti Serrano said the deciding factor for her was that the larger amount helps the district's Title I schools. Those are schools that receive federal funding to support low-income families.
'That was something that really caught my attention,' Serrano said. 'We are putting ourselves accountable to what we need to do for our Title I schools to provide the appropriate support, driving — and I want to emphasize this — every decision we make is in good faith driving our student outcomes.'
Another reason she pointed to was that there is money to reimagine Santan Junior High School in the larger option. She said that's important because a new housing development has been approved near Perry High School. Once built, those families would be in the Santan Junior High area.
Board member Claudia Mendoza did not make any comments explaining why she preferred the higher option.
Lana Berry, the district's chief financial officer, said they heard from voters and why they rejected the bond request last year. She said a key factor is that they want any money borrowed to be used in the classroom.
The $271.5 million would be split in three categories. There is $4 million for transportation, $80.7 million for furniture, equipment and technology for instructional purposes and $186.8 million for maintenance, improvements and renovations to school facilities, including security enhancements, acquisition of land and new construction.
No money would go to furniture, equipment and technology for non-instructional purposes.
The board did not consider a fourth option that the citizen bond committee gave it, which was essentially a duplicate of the $199.4 million option with one major difference. It did not include the rebuild of Hartford Elementary School, CUSD's second oldest campus.
That option was for $154.4 million.
Residents within CUSD's boundary pay back the money borrowed through bonds with their property taxes. The district says their tax rate will not increase.
If they vote to authorize the 15% override, they will also pay that money through their property taxes.
Voters approved the override in the 2021 election. District voters have only rejected it twice in 10 elections. Those came in 1988 and 2012. In both cases, they approved it the following year.
The override is good for seven years, but begins to lose value in Year 6. For that reason, the district asks voters to renew the override authorization every four years. That gives them the ability to ask again the following year if it fails.
If it fails two straight years, then the district will lose a third of that money in Year 6, and two-thirds in Year 7.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles

Miami Herald
4 days ago
- Miami Herald
Court ruling against the city of Miami protects voters' rights. That's good news
City of Miami residents are fed up with backroom deals and insiders controlling our democratic process at city hall — and they are being heard with the help of the local courts. On Thursday, the Third District Court of Appeal upheld an earlier ruling by Miami-Dade Circuit Court Judge Valerie Manno Schurr declaring that the city of Miami had no legal authority to postpone its November until 2026 without voter approval. The ruling is a win for democracy and the rule of law. The appellate court ruling came following a lawsuit filed by mayoral candidate Emilio González, who sued last month after the Miami City Commission voted 3-2 to postpone the election to 2026 via an ordinance, rather than through a ballot referendum. Politicians can not change election dates or their term length without voter approval. That power rests with the people. The court's finding that the ordinance was an unlawful change to the City Charter made without the electorate's approval reinforces what we've been saying all along: Miami residents deserve better representation. We were troubled by these attempts to give term-limited politicians more time on the dais, circumventing the will of voters who enacted term limits in the first place. This moment presents an opportunity to strengthen our democracy through the proper channels: an election. The Stronger Miami amendment campaign underway now ( offers three essential reforms to strengthen our city's democracy and ensure more inclusive, accountable leadership: Align city elections with state and national elections to increase voter participation and reduce costs. Miami's current odd-year election cycle depresses turnout, creating opportunities for special interests to dominate. Moving to even-year elections will boost participation and save taxpayers money. Make commissioners more responsive and accountable to the neighborhoods they serve. Expanding the commission from five to nine commissioners will create smaller, more manageable districts, allowing residents to know and easily reach their elected representatives. Establish proper redistricting standards so that city districts serve communities, not special interests. These changes will strengthen our community and make politicians more responsive to our city's needs, not just their interests. The Stronger Miami initiative empowers voters, allowing them to have a meaningful impact on decisions that affect our everyday lives. These reforms aim to create a more accountable and accessible system that reflects our city's evolving needs. The commission's recent vote to extend the terms of existing politicians without voter approval is exactly why Stronger Miami was formed, and it speaks to the critical work we are doing to achieve community-driven reforms. Judge Manno Schurr's ruling — and the appeals court's confirmation — ensures that these vital initiatives can be considered by the voters, not buried by backroom political maneuvering. The November election must proceed as scheduled, allowing citizens to exercise their right to vote for the leaders of their choice for a mayor, city commissioner and referendum questions. Democracy works when the people's voices are heard. This significant ruling ensures it stays that way in Miami. Elena V. Carpenter is a member of the board of directors of One Grove Alliance, which has united with the ACLU Florida, Engage Miami, Florida Rising and Miami Freedom Project to create Stronger Miami, a grassroots coalition dedicated to improving democratic participation and representation in Miami.


Business Wire
5 days ago
- Business Wire
KBRA Assigns AA Rating, Stable Outlook to Los Angeles Department of Water and Power Water System Revenue Bonds
NEW YORK--(BUSINESS WIRE)--KBRA assigns a long-term rating of AA to the Department of Water and Power of the City of Los Angeles (LADWP or the Department) Water System Revenue Bonds, 2025 Series A and 2025 Series B. Concurrently, KBRA affirms the AA rating on the Department's Water System Revenue Bonds, approximately $5.79 billion of which were outstanding as of August 1, 2025. The rating Outlook on all Water System debt is Stable. LADWP is the nation's largest municipal utility, operating as a proprietary, self-supporting department of the City of Los Angeles (the City). Governed by a five-member Board, the Department maintains full rate-setting authority per City Charter. All revenues from Water System operations are deposited into the Water Revenue Fund, which is maintained separately from the Power System. Water System Revenue Bonds are secured by the Water Revenue Fund. The Master Resolution includes a sum-sufficient rate covenant, and internal Board policy targets a minimum 1.70x debt service coverage (DSC), debt-to-capitalization under 65%, and at least 150 days of operating cash. The 2025 Series A and B Bonds are not backed by a debt service reserve fund. An Additional Bonds Test requires adjusted net income of at least 1.25x maximum annual debt service. FY 2024 net revenues of $950.5 million provided 2.19x DSC. DSC is projected to decline through FY 2030 with implementation of the $7.74 billion Water System Capital Plan, roughly two-thirds of which will be funded by existing and future Water System Revenue Bonds and parity obligations. Inverse condemnation claims related to the January 2025 Los Angeles wildfires, along with rising insurance premiums, are expected to necessitate water rate increases and may contribute to elevated Water System leverage, reduced liquidity, and delayed capital spending. While full litigation exposure may not be known for years, various wildfire-specific financial mitigants are available. In KBRA's view, spreading any uninsured inverse condemnation judgment or settlements over multiple years would likely result in only a modest surcharge to water bills, keeping average rates within affordability limits. As of July 9, 2025, 57 cases involving approximately 1,455 individual plaintiffs and two putative class actions have been filed against LADWP's Water System. The Department also faces hundreds of additional civil claims with indeterminate ultimate loss severity. No dollar amounts have been pled, and the cases remain too early in proceedings to estimate potential financial exposure to LADWP or the City. KBRA will continue to monitor the potential financial impact, if any, the resolution of these legal actions may ultimately have on the Department's Water System credit. Additional information pertaining to the LADWP Water System can be found in prior KBRA reports, the most recent of which is dated May 7, 2025. Key Credit Considerations The ratings reflect the following key credit considerations: Credit Positives Established water system serving one of the nation's largest metropolitan areas, with a primarily residential customer base. Rate structure incorporates several pass-through adjustments that effectively decouple revenue generation from changes in customer demand. Water rates remain competitive and affordable considering the relatively wealthy service base, despite having increased annually since 2019 at a compound annual growth rate of 5.9%. Credit Challenges The strict liability standards imposed by California's inverse condemnation law subject the Department to contingent liability risks relating to the 2025 wildfire and future wildfires. Legal challenges relating to Proposition 218 have the potential to constrain the Department's ability to implement future water rate increases. System leverage, calculated as the ratio of long-term debt to net fixed assets, remains high at 66.5% for FY 2024. Leverage has steadily improved over the last eight years, given substantial increases in net utility plant. A large share of the $7.74 billion Water System Capital Plan includes federal and state-mandated water-quality compliance projects with hard, legally enforceable deadlines and little scheduling discretion. The Stable Outlook reflects our view that cost recovery through rate adjustments, ample liquidity and other financial mitigants will continue to allow for sound debt service coverage and stable financial metrics as the Department addresses potential judgement or settlement costs associated with the 2025 wildfires, achieves compliance with EPA safe drinking water program mandates, replaces aging infrastructure, and expands local water supplies through the implementation of its ambitious capital program. Rating Sensitivities For Upgrade Favorable resolution of existing and future inverse condemnation claims or the Department's ability to address such claims without significant negative impacts to leverage, liquidity, and rate affordability. Sustained reduction in Water System leverage and maintenance of strong debt service coverage. For Downgrade Potential adverse litigation outcomes relating to the 2025 wildfire or to future wildfires which pressure the Department's ability to meet the related liability exposure. Inadequate or delayed rate recovery that causes a sustained decline in debt service coverage below existing Board established coverage metrics and historical averages. To access ratings and relevant documents, click here. Department of Water and Power of the City of Los Angeles Water System Methodologies Public Finance: U.S. Municipal Retail Utility Revenue Bond Rating Methodology ESG Global Rating Methodology Disclosures A description of all substantially material sources that were used to prepare the credit rating and information on the methodology(ies) (inclusive of any material models and sensitivity analyses of the relevant key rating assumptions, as applicable) used in determining the credit rating is available in the Information Disclosure Form(s) located here. Information on the meaning of each rating category can be located here. Further disclosures relating to this rating action are available in the Information Disclosure Form(s) referenced above. Additional information regarding KBRA policies, methodologies, rating scales and disclosures are available at About KBRA Kroll Bond Rating Agency, LLC (KBRA), one of the major credit rating agencies (CRA), is a full-service CRA registered with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission as an NRSRO. Kroll Bond Rating Agency Europe Limited is registered as a CRA with the European Securities and Markets Authority. Kroll Bond Rating Agency UK Limited is registered as a CRA with the UK Financial Conduct Authority. In addition, KBRA is designated as a Designated Rating Organization (DRO) by the Ontario Securities Commission for issuers of asset-backed securities to file a short form prospectus or shelf prospectus. KBRA is also recognized as a Qualified Rating Agency by Taiwan's Financial Supervisory Commission and is recognized by the National Association of Insurance Commissioners as a Credit Rating Provider (CRP) in the U.S. Doc ID: 1010578


Los Angeles Times
26-07-2025
- Los Angeles Times
L.A.'s bid to rewrite its City Charter starts off with a spicy leadership battle
Good morning, and welcome to L.A. on the Record — our City Hall newsletter. It's David Zahniser, with an assist from Julia Wick, giving you the latest on city and county government. Here you thought charter reform would be boring. A 13-member citizens commission is just getting started on the painstaking, generally unsexy work of poring through the Los Angeles City Charter, the city's governing document, and coming up with strategies for improving it. Yet already, the commission has had a leadership battle, heard allegations of shady dealings and fielded questions about whether it's been set up to fail. But first, let's back up. Mayor Karen Bass, City Council President Marqueece Harris-Dawson and former Council President Paul Krekorian chose a collection of volunteers to serve on the Charter Reform Commission, which is charged with exploring big and small changes to the City Charter. The commission is part of a much larger push for reform sparked by the city's 2022 audio leak scandal and a string of corruption cases involving L.A. officials. The list of potential policy challenges the commission faces is significant. Good government types want the new commission to endorse ranked-choice voting, with Angelenos selecting their elected officials by ranking candidates in numerical order. Advocacy groups want to see a much larger City Council. Some at City Hall want clarity on what to do with elected officials who are accused of wrongdoing but have not been convicted. 'You are not one of those commissions that shows up every few years to fix a few things here or there,' said Raphael Sonenshein, who served nearly 30 years ago as executive director of the city's appointed Charter Reform Commission, while addressing the new commission last week. 'You actually have a bigger responsibility than that.' The real work began on July 16, when the commission took up the question of who should be in charge. Many thought the leadership post would immediately go to Raymond Meza, who had already been serving as the interim chair. Instead, the panel found itself deadlocked. Meza is a high-level staffer at Service Employees International Union Local 721, the powerful public employee union that represents thousands of city workers and has been a big-money spender in support of Bass and many other elected city officials. Meza, who was appointed by Bass earlier this year, picked up five votes. But so did Ted Stein, a real estate developer who has served on an array of city commissions — planning, airport, harbor — but hadn't been on a volunteer city panel in nearly 15 years. Faced with a stalemate, charter commissioners decided to try again a few days later, when they were joined by two additional members. By then, some reform advocates were up in arms over Stein, arguing that he was bringing a record of scandal to the commission. They sent the commissioners news articles pointing out that Stein had, among other things, resigned from the airport commission in 2004 amid two grand jury investigations into whether city officials had tied the awarding of airport contracts to campaign contributions. Stein denied those allegations in 2004, calling them 'false, defamatory and unsubstantiated.' Last week, before the second leadership vote, he shot back at his critics, noting that two law enforcement agencies — the U.S. attorney's office and the L.A. County district attorney's office — declined to pursue charges against him. The Ethics Commission also did not bring a case over his airport commission activities. 'I was forced to protect my good name by having to hire an attorney and having to spend over $200,000 in legal fees [over] something where I had done nothing wrong,' he told his fellow commissioners. The city reimbursed Stein for the vast majority of those legal costs. Stein accused Meza of orchestrating some of the outside criticism — which Meza later denied. And Stein spent so much time defending his record that he had little time to say why he should be elected. Still, the vote was close, with Meza securing seven votes and Stein picking up five. Meza called the showdown 'unfortunate.' L.A. voters, he said, 'want to see the baton passed to a new generation of people.' The 40-year-old Montecito Heights resident made clear that he supports an array of City Charter changes. In an interview, Meza said he's 'definitely in favor' of ranked-choice voting, arguing that it would increase voter turnout. He also supports an increase in the number of City Council members but wouldn't say how many. And he wants to ensure that vacant positions are filled more quickly at City Hall, calling it an issue that 'absolutely needs to be addressed.' That last item has long been a concern for SEIU Local 721, where Meza works as deputy chief of staff. Nevertheless, Meza said he would, to an extent, set aside the wishes of his union during the commission's deliberations. 'On the commission, I am an individual resident of the city,' he said. Stein, for his part, told The Times that he only ran for the leadership post out of concern over the commission's tight timeline. The commission must submit its proposal to the council next spring — a much more aggressive schedule than the one required of two charter reform commissions nearly 30 years ago. Getting through so many complex issues in such a brief period calls for an experienced hand, said Stein, who is 76 and lives in Encino. Stein declined to say where he stands on council expansion and ranked-choice voting. He said he's already moved on from the leadership vote and is ready to dig into the commission's work. Meza, for his part, said he has heard the concerns about the aggressive schedule. But he remains confident the commission will be successful. 'I don't think we have the best conditions,' he said. 'But I do not believe we've been set up to fail. I'm very confident the commissioners will do what's needed to turn in a good product.' — STRICTLY BUSINESS: A group of L.A. business leaders launched a ballot proposal to repeal the city's much-maligned gross receipts tax, saying it would boost the city's economy and lower prices for Angelenos. The mayor and several other officials immediately panned the idea, saying it would deprive the city's yearly budget of $800 million, forcing cuts to police, firefighters and other services. — INCHING FORWARD: Meanwhile, another ballot proposal from the business community — this one backed by airlines and the hotel industry — nudged closer to reality. Interim City Clerk Petty Santos announced that the proposed referendum on the $30-per-hour tourism minimum wage had 'proceeded to the next step,' with officials now examining and verifying petition signatures to determine their validity. — GRIM GPS: The Los Angeles County Fire Department had only one truck stationed west of Lake Avenue in Altadena at a critical moment during the hugely destructive Eaton fire, according to vehicle tracking data analyzed by The Times. By contrast, the agency had dozens of trucks positioned east of Lake. All but one of the deaths attributed to the Eaton fire took place west of Lake. — CHANGE OF PLANS: On Monday, Bass nominated consultant and Community Coalition board member Mary Lee to serve on the five-member Board of Police Commissioners. Two days later, in a brief email, Lee withdrew from consideration. Reached by The Times, Lee cited 'personal reasons' for her decision but did not elaborate. (The mayor's office had nothing to add.) Lee would have replaced former commissioner Maria 'Lou' Calanche, who is running against Councilmember Eunisses Hernandez in the June 2026 election. — SEMPER GOODBYE: The Pentagon announced Monday that the roughly 700 Marines who have been deployed to the city since early June would be withdrawing, a move cheered by Bass and other local leaders who have criticized the military deployment that followed protests over federal immigration raids. About 2,000 National Guard troops remain in the region. — HALTING HEALTHCARE: L.A. County's public health system, which provides care to the region's neediest residents, could soon face brutal budget cuts. The 'Big Beautiful Bill,' enacted by President Trump and the Republican-led Congress, is on track to carve $750 million per year out of the Department of Health Services, which oversees four public hospitals and roughly two dozen clinics. At the Department of Public Health, which is facing its own $200-million cut, top executive Barbara Ferrer said: 'I've never actually seen this much disdain for public health.' — HOMELESS HIRE: The commission that oversees the Los Angeles Homeless Services Authority selected Gita O'Neill, a career lawyer in the city attorney's office, to serve as the agency's interim CEO. O'Neill will replace Va Lecia Adams Kellum, who stepped down Friday after more than two years in her post. — THE JURY SPEAKS: The city has been ordered by a jury to pay $48.8 million to a man who has been in a coma since he was hit by a sanitation truck while crossing a street in Encino. The verdict comes as the city struggles with escalating legal payouts — and was larger than any single payout by the city in the last two fiscal years, according to data provided by the city attorney's office. — LOOKING FOR A LIAISON: Back in May, while signing an executive directive to support local film and TV production, L.A.'s mayor was asked whether she planned to appoint a film liaison as the City Hall point person for productions. 'Absolutely,' Bass said during the news conference, adding that she planned to do so within a few days. That was two months ago. Asked this week about the status of that position, Bass spokesperson Clara Karger touted the executive directive and said the position was 'being hired in conjunction with industry leaders.' She did not provide a timeline. That's it for this week! Send your questions, comments and gossip to LAontheRecord@ Did a friend forward you this email? Sign up here to get it in your inbox every Saturday morning.