
The environmental cost of Northern Ireland's bonfires
Beyond their political symbolism, the environmental toll of these bonfires is immense, and growing. Beneath the flickering flames lies a deeper, smouldering issue: air pollution, toxic emissions, and damage to land and water. In the face of climate change and public health challenges, questions are being raised, not just about what these bonfires stand for, but what they're doing to the environment we all share.
An Eleventh Night bonfire in Orangefield Park in east Belfast. Some of the largest structures stand more than 30 feet tall and are constructed from tens of thousands of wooden pallets, along with tyres, plastics, furniture, and household waste. These materials, when set alight, release a potent and dangerous cocktail of pollutants into the air.
Smoke signals
While often described by organisers as cultural or community events, the scale of Eleventh Night bonfires reveals a more troubling picture. Some of the largest structures stand more than 30 feet tall and are constructed from tens of thousands of wooden pallets, along with tyres, plastics, furniture, and household waste. These materials, when set alight, release a potent and dangerous cocktail of pollutants into the air.
Among the most harmful are particulate matter (PM2.5 and PM10). These are microscopic particles that can penetrate deep into the lungs and bloodstream, triggering respiratory and cardiovascular problems. Levels of these particles can spike dramatically during bonfire night, with air quality monitors in Belfast and Derry recording pollution levels comparable to those in industrial cities during smog events. For those with asthma, or heart conditions, the health risks are immediate and severe.
The burn-off also includes dioxins, benzene, carbon monoxide, and polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs), many of which are carcinogenic. These chemicals don't just disappear with the smoke; they settle in soil, seep into waterways, and linger in the air. The environmental impact, though less visible than the flames, is far more enduring.
Tyres, plastics, and the law
Despite regulations prohibiting the burning of tyres and many synthetic materials, such items continue to be a staple of many bonfires. Tyres, in particular, are a serious environmental hazard. When combusted, they emit heavy metals, volatile organic compounds, and fine particulates that are hazardous to both human and ecological health.
In theory, burning such materials is illegal under Northern Ireland's environmental laws. In practice, enforcement is weak. Councils often fund clean-ups after bonfires, some of which are built on public land, but rarely intervene in the build-up or construction stages. This tacit tolerance fuels a cycle of impunity, with local authorities caught between environmental responsibility and political sensitivities.
Land and water contamination
Once the flames die down, scorched plots of land are left behind, often heavily contaminated. Rainfall following bonfires can wash ash, chemicals, and microplastics into local rivers, drains, and soil. This runoff threatens aquatic life, degrades biodiversity, and risks entering drinking water systems.
Firefighters work to protect an electricity sub station as a Controversial bonfire at Meridi Street, off the Donegall Road in Belfast is lit. Picture: Niall Carson/PA Wire
In some cases, bonfires have been built close to schools, housing estates, and even gas tanks, raising concerns not only about pollution but about public safety. The cost of restoring damaged land, including removing burnt debris and remediating soil, falls largely on local councils, and by extension, the taxpayer. In 2022 alone, Belfast City Council reportedly spent more than £100,000 on bonfire-related clean-up and security measures.
Cultural tradition or environmental risk?
For those who build and attend them, Eleventh Night bonfires are seen as expressions of unionist history and identity. But for others, the bonfires represent an outdated and dangerous tradition.
It's worth noting that not all bonfires are equal. Some communities have made efforts in recent years to build safer, more environmentally responsible structures, using only untreated wood, excluding tyres and plastic, and even incorporating LED-light 'beacon' bonfires as symbolic alternatives. These initiatives show that cultural expression does not have to come at the cost of environmental degradation, but such examples remain the exception.
The political nature of the bonfires, combined with the fear of stoking tensions, has made open criticism difficult. Yet, in an era of climate emergency, the question must be asked, how long can we continue to burn tens of thousands of tonnes of waste each year, unchecked, in the name of tradition?
Environmental justice
There is also a broader environmental justice issue at play. The most toxic bonfires are often located in working-class areas, those same communities already disproportionately affected by air pollution, limited access to green space, and poor health outcomes. This means the people most exposed to the environmental fallout of bonfires are often the least resourced to deal with its consequences.
In this context, rethinking bonfire culture isn't simply an environment matter — it's about equity. If councils, environmental agencies, and community leaders work together, it may be possible to chart a different course.
Lighting a better path
As the flames fade and the ash settles, we are left with a choice. We can continue to allow toxic bonfires to blaze unchecked, or we can begin the difficult, necessary conversation about changing the way we mark this time of year. Cultural traditions evolve. They always have. The question is whether we have the courage, and the foresight, to evolve with them.
Until then, Northern Ireland's skies will keep filling with smoke each July, but so too will its rivers, its soil, and its lungs.

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
9 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Broncos have two major items to cross off checklist before start of training camp
Less than two weeks out from the start of training camp, the Denver Broncos have yet to sign either of their top two draft picks to contracts. The Broncos will kick off training camp ahead of the 2025 season on Friday, July 25. To this point, first-round pick Jahdae Barron and second-round pick RJ Harvey remain unsigned. While several teams have yet to sign their second-round picks to a deal, the Broncos and Cincinnati Bengals are the only teams in the league to have gotten a new deal done with neither. Advertisement Though the situation between the Broncos and Barron is nowhere near as contentious as the one between the Bengals and their first-round pick, Shemar Stewart, it would still be in the best interest of the team to get a deal done soon. It would not be ideal to open camp without Barron and Harvey under contract, as every rep is precious, but that goes double for rookies. Guaranteed money — and how much of it — seems to be the hangup with these contracts. While there is nothing to suggest that the Broncos won't get these deals done before the start of camp, it has to be considered at least slightly concerning that it hasn't happened yet. Barron is expected to be a huge part of the Denver defense in year two. While he wasn't on the radar for the Broncos by many within the draft community, he fell to the team with the No. 20 overall pick in the draft and George Paton and Sean Payton couldn't turn that down. Advertisement In the second round, the Broncos selected Harvey despite many running backs who were rated higher still being on the board. That pick was made because Payton sees something in him that he feels many other front offices are overlooking. The point is, the team was excited to get these two players on the roster, so hammer out the details, work with them on good deals in guaranteed money and get signatures on those contracts. If that doesn't happen within the next two weeks, the Broncos will open camp without them. MORE BRONCOS CONTENT Broncos predicted to sign 31-TD running back to massive free-agent deal in 2026 Advertisement Broncos have two of the worst head coaching hires of the century, but which one was worse? Broncos acquire Alvin Kamara from Saints in blockbuster trade prediction Bo Nix criminally underrated with ridiculous slot on recent NFL QB hierarchy list
Yahoo
9 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Britain's Norrie ousts Musetti to advance at DC Open
Britain's Cameron Norrie defeated Italy's seven-ranked Lorenzo Musetti to reach the third round at the ATP and WTA DC Open (Adrian Dennis) Britain's Cameron Norrie rallied to defeat world number seven Lorenzo Musetti 3-6, 6-2, 6-3 on Tuesday, reaching the third round at the ATP and WTA DC Open. Norrie, seeking his sixth ATP title, captured his first victory over a top-10 player in 2 1/2 years by eliminating the second seed at the first hardcourt tuneup for the US Open. Advertisement Seven-time Grand Slam singles champion Venus Williams will make her return to singles after a 16-month hiatus later, the 45-year-old American to face compatriot Peyton Stearns. Japan's Naomi Osaka, a four-time Grand Slam champion, meets Yulia Putintseva of Kazakhstan in another later match. Musetti, who had a first-round bye, reached three semi-finals and a final on clay earlier this year, falling to eventual champion Carlos Alcaraz in a French Open semi-final. But he dropped his opener at Wimbledon and suffered his third loss in a row at Washington. Norrie managed only three winners in the first set, two of them on aces, but dominated the second set to force a third. Norrie saved five break points to hold in the fifth game of the final set then broke Musetti on his fourth chance in the sixth game, grabbing a 4-2 lead on an errant backhand by the Italian. Advertisement Musetti fought off two match points in the final game, one on a Norrie double fault, but fell to the 29-year-old left-hander by sending a backhand beyond the baseline after two hours and seven minutes. Chinese qualifier Wu Yibing beat France's Gael Monfils 6-3, 6-1 for his first tour-level triumph since last year at Shanghai after the Frenchman ran into a clock at the rear corner of the court in the first set, hitting it with his right ankle. "I saw him falling down there," Wu said. I don't know what happened but after I asked him. He said his foot actually maybe stuck under the clock. "Hopefully he's OK. I didn't feel any difference (in his game). He was still reaching balls and good rallies." js/nr
Yahoo
9 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Euro 2025 semifinals: England reaches final on controversial extra-time penalty goal vs. Italy
How did England win that match? (REUTERS/Denis Balibouse) England reached the final of the 2025 Women's Euro with a miracle and a controversy. The Lionesses beat Italy in the semifinal on Tuesday via a last-minute goal in stoppage time, then a questionably penalty that gave them the winning goal in extra time. They will face the winner of Wednesday's Germany-Spain match on Sunday. Advertisement The winning goal: Here's how England vs. Italy went down at Yahoo Sports: