logo
Analysis: PKK recalibrates from armed struggle to politics in Turkiye

Analysis: PKK recalibrates from armed struggle to politics in Turkiye

Yahoo19-07-2025
'We voluntarily destroy our weapons … as a step of goodwill and determination,' said senior Kurdistan Workers' Party (PKK) leader Bese Hozat, speaking in front of a gathering of the group's fighters.
The footage, filmed last Friday in the northern Iraqi city of Sulaimaniyah, then shows the fighters – about 30 of them – placing their weapons inside a cauldron, where they were set alight.
The ceremony may have been symbolic, but it capped what might be one of the most consequential periods in Turkiye's recent political history. It wraps up a carefully planned sequence of gestures and messages, and shows that both sides are not just coordinating symbolically, but are also politically aligned in their intent to move from armed conflict to political dialogue.
The choreography of the build-up to the ceremony unfolded with remarkable precision, revealing both political coordination and calculated restraint. Such an alignment would have been impossible without mutual recognition between the PKK and Turkiye of the importance of what was about to happen, as well as the consequences of any failure.
On July 7, Turkish President Recep Tayyip Erdogan received his country's pro-Kurdish DEM Party delegation for the second time in four months. A smiling group photo from the meeting was widely circulated, signalling both the normalisation of dialogue and the symbolic approval of the process at the highest level.
Two days later, on July 9, Abdullah Ocalan – the imprisoned PKK leader and founder – appeared in a seven-minute video released by ANF, the PKK's affiliated media outlet. It marked his first public visual appearance in 26 years and carried a simple but historic message: The time for arms has ended.
In it, Ocalan emphasised that the movement's original aim, the recognition of Kurdish identity, had been achieved, and that political engagement must now replace armed resistance. The message was as much to the PKK as it was to the public.
Lastly, on July 13, Erdogan addressed the governing AK Party's retreat, reaffirming his commitment to the disarmament process and announcing that a parliamentary commission would be established to address its legal framework. His message aimed to reassure the broader public, especially his supporters, that the process would strengthen national untiy and benefits all of Turkiye's citizens, whatever their ethnicity.Message to the Kurdish public
Ocalan's rare video message aimed to reassure his Kurdish supporters that this was not a defeat, but a recalibration: a shift from armed struggle to political engagement. The message was carefully measured and stripped of triumphalism; it sought to redefine the past, rather than glorify it.
The dignified tone of the weapons-burning ceremony allowed both the PKK and state narratives to coexist. It did not alienate those who had sacrificed for the PKK's struggle – activists, politicians in prison or exile, and the families of the disappeared. Instead, it signalled that their voices had been heard.
Despite his years of isolation, Ocalan's words still carry weight. Not only because of his symbolic authority, but because his message reflects what many Kurds now seek: dignity without martyrdom, a voice without violence, and a future beyond armed struggle.
Public support for disarmament is growing, even among those long sceptical of the state's intent. Recent surveys show that more than 90 percent of DEM voters, as well as those who identify as Kurdish or Zaza (a Kurdish-adjacent minority group) in Turkiye, support the process. Belief that the PKK will fully disarm is also significantly higher than the national average.
The PKK's decision to disarm is not a retreat but a recalibration.
Since its founding in 1978, the group has waged a protracted armed struggle against the Turkish state, demanding autonomy and rights for Kurds. But after decades of rebellion, the regional landscape has changed.
In northern Iraq and Syria, the PKK's operational space has altered. While the Syrian Democratic Forces (SDF), a key PKK-linked actor, remains active in northeastern Syria, its future hinges on shifting US commitments and delicate understandings with the new government in Damascus, an ally of Turkiye.
At the same time, Iran's weakening regional influence, sustained Turkish military pressure, and a quiet but growing preference among Western actors for a stable Turkiye have all contributed to reshaping the group's strategic calculus.
Crucially, this recalibration does not conflict with the United States and Israel's core interests in curbing Iranian influence and maintaining a manageable status quo in Syria.
Against this backdrop, a disarmed and politically engaged Kurdish movement in Turkiye is not an isolated anomaly. In this context, the PKK has opted to step off the battlefield and into the political arena. As Ocalan expressed in his July 9 message, 'I believe in the strength of peace, not the force of arms.'
The weapons-burning ceremony is not the end of the disarmament process. A Turkish parliamentary commission is expected to define the conditions for the reintegration of PKK fighters into civilian and political life in Turkiye, while a verification mechanism involving the Turkish Armed Forces and intelligence agency will monitor disarmament and issue a report to guide further steps.
Hozat, the PKK senior leader, framed the ceremony as a political milestone, and reaffirmed the group's ambition to enter civilian politics, expressing an aim to become 'pioneers of democratic politics in Amed [Diyarbakir], Ankara, and Istanbul' – a deliberate reference to key centres of Kurdish representation in Turkiye and national political power.
Yet this transition hinges on comprehensive legal reforms and credible guarantees that are both socially and politically viable, and civil society groups and humanitarian organisations in Turkiye are likely to play an active role in the forthcoming stages of full disarmament.Turkish political support
In Turkiye, there is broad buy-in for the peace process with the PKK from across the political spectrum.
This is largely because the process benefits nearly all political actors by reducing the securitised political climate, easing judicial pressure, and offering a chance to reset deeply polarised governance.
With 'terrorism' charges having been used expansively in recent years, even members of the opposition Republican People's Party (CHP) have found themselves entangled in legal problems. In this context, a de-escalation appeals to many, including party leaders such as Ozgur Ozel and Ekrem Imamoglu, even if many remain wary of the AK Party's intentions. For many CHP supporters, what they view as the contradiction of a reconciliation effort with the PKK unfolding alongside a clampdown on opposition mayors is hard to ignore.
Other Turkish parties have been supportive, despite coming from different political traditions. The DEM Party has, of course, been a central part of the negotiations and the messaging that a page has been turned on the past.
It is notable that the group that the Nationalist Movement Party (MHP) – perhaps the Turkish political party most opposed to the DEM Party and long a staunch opponent of any rapprochement with Kurdish nationalist groups – has also publicly backed the process, and indeed has also been heavily involved in the choreography in the past few months.
Its leader, Devlet Bahceli, has been front and centre in the process, formally inviting Ocalan to dissolve the PKK and reaching out to DEM members of parliament. His pragmatic stance has stemmed from his belief that the end of the PKK's armed campaign aligns with national interests. In fact, delays in the process were ultimately overcome with the aid of the MHP leader.
And the AK Party has steered the peace process through some of its central figures, including Efkan Ala, a former interior minister and one of Erdogan's most-trusted political allies. Erdogan has personally taken on the task of normalising the discourse of making peace with the PKK.
Still, not everyone in the party may be on board. Years of conflict with the PKK and attacks from the group, securitised rhetoric, the criminalisation of DEM-aligned actors, and the stigma surrounding any cooperation with the DEM Party have left deep internal reservations. Stepping away from that position is not easy, even if Erdogan has set a clear tone, signalling firm commitment from the very top of the Turkish establishment.Potential pitfalls
This is not a conventional peace process, nor is it a one-sided act of capitulation.
Rather, it marks a convergence – tenuous, complex, and partial – between two longstanding adversaries.
Spoilers exist – within the state, among political factions, and across the border – but so far, none has derailed the process.
But those tied to the war economy, ideological hardliners, or actors who thrive in a securitised climate might yet try, even if the process has already weathered a lot of potential pitfalls, including the Turkish military bombing PKK positions in March and regional turbulence in the form of the war between Israel and Iran.
However, that does not mean that no future problems could arise. What lies ahead may be even harder. Without meaningful political reforms or guarantees, the space opened up by disarmament may quickly narrow again.
On the Kurdish political side, many questions also still remain.
DEM Co-Chair Tuncer Bakirhan, speaking in an interview with the Kurdish media outlet Rudaw last Wednesday, emphasised that symbolic gestures must be followed by institutional action.
'We have submitted our proposals to the speaker of parliament,' he noted, including mechanisms for reintegrating former militants into political and civilian life. 'We don't need to dwell on the details — those will follow. But there must be clarity: What happens to those who disarm? Where do they go? What protections will they have? These are not trivialities; they are the foundation of a credible peace.'
He is right to point out that disarmament alone is not enough; it is merely the starting point. The real question is what comes next.
What will happen to those imprisoned on 'terror' charges, whether for political reasons or past involvement in armed struggle?
What about the fighters still in the mountains, the families stranded and the political figures exiled in Iraq, Europe or elsewhere? And what about the broader ecosystem: civil society actors, journalists, and others long caught in the grey zones of criminalisation?
For the PKK's disarmament to reach this point, the right domestic and geopolitical conditions had to align, and today, they have.
Weapons will be burned, and the armed chapter, potentially including the Syrian front, as hinted by ongoing but difficult negotiations between the SDF and Damascus, will come to a close within Turkiye's borders. But from this point on, representative politics, diplomacy, and public deliberation will matter more than ever.
It marks a historic threshold. What follows will depend not on symbols, but on substance: on the courage to legislate, to decentralise power, and to trust society's readiness for coexistence.
No one can fully predict how the region will evolve, and most actors are likely preparing for multiple scenarios, not a single roadmap.
The long-term impact of this move remains unclear and perhaps deliberately so.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Pegah Banihashemi: What possibility is there for true reform in Iran?
Pegah Banihashemi: What possibility is there for true reform in Iran?

Chicago Tribune

time5 hours ago

  • Chicago Tribune

Pegah Banihashemi: What possibility is there for true reform in Iran?

A few weeks after the 12-day war between Israel and Iran, several published statements have called for a referendum and a transition beyond the Islamic Republic. One of these, signed by 800 domestic and international activists, was issued by Mir Hossein Mousavi, formerly the prime minister during the Iran-Iraq war. Mousavi was also the leader of the Green Movement, running as a presidential candidate in 2009 against Mahmoud Ahmadinejad. After alleging electoral fraud, he was placed under house arrest along with his wife, Zahra Rahnavard, where they remain to this day. Once close to Ayatollah Ruhollah Khomeini, Mousavi later became politically aligned with Iran's reformist camp — and now, he is calling for a complete transition away from the Islamic Republic, explicitly demanding a referendum. At the same time, prominent activists — all either imprisoned or under security surveillance outside prison — have issued a statement. Signatories such as Nobel Peace Prize laureate Narges Mohammadi and human rights lawyer Nasrin Sotoudeh are longtime fighters who have spent years moving between prison and freedom. Both statements express worry and a fear of worsening conditions. Meanwhile, some political officials have told the state-owned Press TV: 'Our intelligence indicates Washington seeks talks to prepare for war, not peace. If so, we see no reason to waste time and would rather focus on preparing for conflict.' One member of the Iranian parliament claimed on national television that the United States and Israel had already suffered heavy blows from Iran's military and insisted it is America — not Iran — that stands on the brink of collapse. He went on to mock the performance of the U.S. B-2 bomber and ridicule its military capabilities. On the other hand, ordinary Iranians — still in shock from the outbreak of war — believe the conflict may not be over and that the risk of the ceasefire collapsing is high. Tehran, a megacity of nearly 10 million people, faces daily crises such as electricity and water cuts. The dams around Tehran are running dry, and many residents in recent weeks have gone days without water or adequate water pressure. This situation is echoed in many other parts of yearslong energy crisis, worsened by government mismanagement, has led the government spokesperson to urge Tehran residents to travel out of the city; to ease the crisis, the government has even announced an extra holiday to encourage people to leave Tehran. In the midst of all these hardships, the issuing of these statements seeks to provide people with a sliver of hope for change. Former professor Hatam Ghaderi says that while he does not support a referendum — since, in his view, demanding a referendum is unrealistic when the regime remains firmly in power — he sees such calls as a means to apply pressure on the government, signal that public discontent exists and open up political thinking among the public. However, the majority of Iranians look at any prospect of political change with skepticism and doubt. The reality is that some are so stunned by the war and fearful of foreign domination over Iran that they avoid any political movement. Others, on social media, openly say they wish Israel had finished the job — that the war should have continued until at least it led to the removal of the regime's leaders. Meanwhile, some are staunch supporters of the current regime, participating in state-organized rallies to demonstrate their full backing of the government. Abroad, supporters of Reza Pahlavi, the exiled crown prince of Iran, are also active. Yet none of the political parties or groups, inside or outside Iran, seem to have enough weight to attract the majority needed to drive major and fundamental political change, as happened in the 1979 revolution that toppled the monarchy and established the Islamic Republic. The Iranian regime, at every political juncture, has brutally suppressed peaceful protests, killing, imprisoning or executing thousands. Yet the core of Iran's civil society continues to show its presence through these statements, signaling that there is still a faint flame to be kindled, still an invitation to converge and unify. Although various media outlets have covered these statements, there has been no tangible movement from the public beyond that. Still, while continuing along the path of past civil society efforts, it is also necessary to seek new solutions. Over the past decades, the political faction known as the 'Reformists' — those loyal to the Islamic Republic but critical from within — have been part of the system and at times have held government positions. Figures such as Mousavi and many of the signatories of both statements come from this reformist camp. Although people have voted for reformist candidates to prevent hard-line loyalists to the supreme leader from gaining power, today, there is little optimism even toward the reformists. In fact, the civil society seems to prefer complete silence over any political reaction. Contrary to some predictions that Israel's attacks would spark political protests, no demonstrations have taken place. So what might awaken this silence into movement? In my view as a scholar of democracy and constitutional law, the answer lies in forging a new coalition — one that unites seasoned reformist insiders, well versed in the mechanics of power, with independent, battle-tested figures who have risked and sacrificed in pursuit of genuine change. This New Reformists movement must ambitiously seek to draw in academics, intellectuals, professionals and independent entrepreneurs — and, crucially, extend its reach to a broad spectrum of elite voices. Should it succeed in forging even a tentative alliance with monarchist factions, the political momentum it could unleash could prove formidable. Such a coalition has the potential to galvanize the public, revitalize civic engagement and chart a path toward profound transformation in the Islamic Republic — a transformation not born of war or foreign interference, but of domestic resolve and reimagined purpose. In such a moment, the long-silent majority may rediscover its agency, restoring fragile public trust and reigniting a spirit of collective action, under the banner of the New Reformists, untethered from the burdens and betrayals of the past.

The Labor Department has suddenly stopped funding a senior job training program
The Labor Department has suddenly stopped funding a senior job training program

CNN

timea day ago

  • CNN

The Labor Department has suddenly stopped funding a senior job training program

Job market Federal agenciesFacebookTweetLink Follow Goodwill, Easterseals and other nonprofit organizations say thousands of low-income seniors could soon be unemployed because funding hasn't come through for a decades-old federal job training and placement program. The Department of Labor has yet to release more than $300 million in funds for national grantees of the Senior Community Service Employment Program, which was created in 1965 to help low-income, out-of-work adults 55 and older — especially veterans, rural residents and people with disabilities — return to the workforce. On July 1, the Department of Labor released about $86 million in funds to state recipients, but the national grantees' funds were not released (something that's typically done in May), several of the longtime participating nonprofit organizations told CNN. The funding pause of the program that serves about 40,000 seniors was first reported by Bloomberg Law. As a result, those organizations say they've had to furlough seniors participating in the program, as well as their own employees. These moves are coming at a time when hiring activity has continued to slow in the broader US labor market. 'This is an intrinsically American program, when you think about it: people who want to work, who want to be contributing members of society, people who want to be able to support themselves, who want to be a part of a community,' Kendra Davenport, president and chief executive officer of Easterseals, which provides services to children and adults with disabilities. But the uncertainty extends beyond the current year's funding, as the program itself is feared to be on borrowed time: The proposed 2026 fiscal year budget for the Labor Department proposes eliminating the SCSEP and a slew of other longtime job training programs and replacing them with a block grant to be distributed to states and local communities. Such potential cuts couldn't be coming at a worse time, Davenport said. 'If you look at a macro level at what is impacting these seniors, there are Medicaid cuts, so their health care might go away,' she said. 'There are massive [Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program] cuts. Many of these folks are dependent on SNAP for food assistance; that's going away. And now SCSEP is taking away their opportunity to work.' She added: 'We're putting people who really do want to help themselves in a terrible position.' A Labor Department spokeswoman said the agency will 'provide an update soon' on the remaining $307 million in 2025 funding for the national grant recipients. 'The Department has given all SCSEP grantees a one-month period of performance extension, so that if grantees have funding available from their Program Year 2024 grant, they can still use these funds to continue program operations,' Christine Feroli, a Labor Department spokeswoman, wrote via email to CNN. 'The Employment and Training Administration is preparing to award grants shortly after state and territorial grantees submit their required budget documents. The department will support grantees in their operations and services to participants.' Organizations such as the National Asian Center on Aging are sounding the alarm over the funding delays. 'This funding delay is not just a bureaucratic issue, it's a crisis for tens of thousands of older adults who depend on SCSEP to survive,' Clayton Fong, president and CEO of the organization that provides employment programs and caregiving services for older adults, said in a statement earlier this month. In an emailed statement to CNN, Fong called on the Labor Department to fully fund the program to support a 'meaningful pathway to economic stability' for low-income seniors. 'SCSEP is a job training program that restores dignity and a sense of purpose to seniors who want to continue working but are often overlooked in the workforce,' Fong said. 'This funding pause has painful consequences for jobseekers who are trying to build skills and take care of themselves and their families.' Fong's organization has furloughed more than 800 senior workers. At Goodwill Industries, more than 400 program participants were placed on leave of absence status; and if funds are not released by July 31, additional furloughs could impact more than 1,500 of its older workers, the nonprofit said in an emailed statement to CNN. 'Goodwill is urging the Department of Labor to quickly provide the allocations needed for this important program to continue and calls upon Congress to continue to invest in SCSEP, providing essential support for older workers,' according to the statement.

The Labor Department has suddenly stopped funding a senior job training program
The Labor Department has suddenly stopped funding a senior job training program

CNN

timea day ago

  • CNN

The Labor Department has suddenly stopped funding a senior job training program

Goodwill, Easterseals and other nonprofit organizations say thousands of low-income seniors could soon be unemployed because funding hasn't come through for a decades-old federal job training and placement program. The Department of Labor has yet to release more than $300 million in funds for national grantees of the Senior Community Service Employment Program, which was created in 1965 to help low-income, out-of-work adults 55 and older — especially veterans, rural residents and people with disabilities — return to the workforce. On July 1, the Department of Labor released about $86 million in funds to state recipients, but the national grantees' funds were not released (something that's typically done in May), several of the longtime participating nonprofit organizations told CNN. The funding pause of the program that serves about 40,000 seniors was first reported by Bloomberg Law. As a result, those organizations say they've had to furlough seniors participating in the program, as well as their own employees. These moves are coming at a time when hiring activity has continued to slow in the broader US labor market. 'This is an intrinsically American program, when you think about it: people who want to work, who want to be contributing members of society, people who want to be able to support themselves, who want to be a part of a community,' Kendra Davenport, president and chief executive officer of Easterseals, which provides services to children and adults with disabilities. But the uncertainty extends beyond the current year's funding, as the program itself is feared to be on borrowed time: The proposed 2026 fiscal year budget for the Labor Department proposes eliminating the SCSEP and a slew of other longtime job training programs and replacing them with a block grant to be distributed to states and local communities. Such potential cuts couldn't be coming at a worse time, Davenport said. 'If you look at a macro level at what is impacting these seniors, there are Medicaid cuts, so their health care might go away,' she said. 'There are massive [Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program] cuts. Many of these folks are dependent on SNAP for food assistance; that's going away. And now SCSEP is taking away their opportunity to work.' She added: 'We're putting people who really do want to help themselves in a terrible position.' A Labor Department spokeswoman said the agency will 'provide an update soon' on the remaining $307 million in 2025 funding for the national grant recipients. 'The Department has given all SCSEP grantees a one-month period of performance extension, so that if grantees have funding available from their Program Year 2024 grant, they can still use these funds to continue program operations,' Christine Feroli, a Labor Department spokeswoman, wrote via email to CNN. 'The Employment and Training Administration is preparing to award grants shortly after state and territorial grantees submit their required budget documents. The department will support grantees in their operations and services to participants.' Organizations such as the National Asian Center on Aging are sounding the alarm over the funding delays. 'This funding delay is not just a bureaucratic issue, it's a crisis for tens of thousands of older adults who depend on SCSEP to survive,' Clayton Fong, president and CEO of the organization that provides employment programs and caregiving services for older adults, said in a statement earlier this month. In an emailed statement to CNN, Fong called on the Labor Department to fully fund the program to support a 'meaningful pathway to economic stability' for low-income seniors. 'SCSEP is a job training program that restores dignity and a sense of purpose to seniors who want to continue working but are often overlooked in the workforce,' Fong said. 'This funding pause has painful consequences for jobseekers who are trying to build skills and take care of themselves and their families.' Fong's organization has furloughed more than 800 senior workers. At Goodwill Industries, more than 400 program participants were placed on leave of absence status; and if funds are not released by July 31, additional furloughs could impact more than 1,500 of its older workers, the nonprofit said in an emailed statement to CNN. 'Goodwill is urging the Department of Labor to quickly provide the allocations needed for this important program to continue and calls upon Congress to continue to invest in SCSEP, providing essential support for older workers,' according to the statement.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store