Jailed MP Engineer Rashid allowed to attend Parliament session in custody
While rejecting Sheikh's plea for interim bail to discharge his parliamentary duties, Additional Sessions Judge Chander Jit Singh of the Patiala House Court directed that the MP can attend the session between July 24 and August 4 with a police escort.
The Parliament session began on Monday and will conclude on August 21, with a break between August 12 and August 18.
The court, however, imposed conditions and costs on the custody parole, the newspaper reported.
Sheikh, who is popularly known as Engineer Rashid, has been in jail since August 2019 in connection with a terror-funding case filed by the National Investigation Agency. He has been held under the Unlawful Activities Prevention Act.
The National Investigation Agency had opposed his interim bail plea, contending that if he is allowed to attend Parliament in custody, he should bear the cost of travel.
Sheikh's lawyers argued that he should be granted bail or alternatively not be made to bear the cost since he was seeking to fulfil a public duty.
In July 2024, Sheikh was granted custody parole for two hours to take oath in Parliament. He had contested and won the 2024 Lok Sabha election from Baramulla while in jail, defeating National Conference leader Omar Abdullah.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
NDTV
33 minutes ago
- NDTV
Shashi Tharoor Snubbed Congress On Op Sindoor Debate: The Inside Story
New Delhi: Shashi Tharoor - at a crossroads in his relationship with the Congress - has refused to toe the party line during the Parliament debate on the Pahalgam terror attack and Operation Sindoor, sources told NDTV Monday morning. Mr Tharoor said he would not contradict himself "for the sake of party messaging". Shashi Tharoor had been asked to lead the Congress' (and the opposition's) attacks on the ruling Bharatiya Janata Party as part of a high-profile, 16-hour debate on the Pahalgam and Op Sindoor, India's military response, as well as the nearly 100-hour armed conflict with Pakistan that followed. Sources said Mr Tharoor had been approached by Rahul Gandhi's office. But the request was turned down. Mr Tharoor and the Congress have been at odds since he led a government delegation to the United States - on Pahalgam and India's anti-terror doctrine - and praised Prime Minister Narendra Modi. That rift was evident again today after Mr Tharoor made it clear he could only speak in support of Op Sindoor and not contradict his own position for the sake of party messaging. The Congress then decided Mr Tharoor would not speak during the debate. Mr Gandhi, who is the Leader of the Opposition, and his deputy, Gaurav Gogoi, as well as Wayanad MP Priyanka Gandhi Vadra, are among those who will speak for the Congress. Earlier today, Mr Tharoor evaded a question from NDTV on this subject. The Thiruvananthapuram MP walked away. Party colleague Renuka Chowdhury responded on his behalf, and said, "... (he) is constitutionally empowered to speak anywhere..." The debate on Pahalgam and Op Sindoor - scheduled to begin at noon today in the Lok Sabha but adjourned after chaos in the House - had been demanded by an opposition. Under pressure, the government pencilled in this 16-hour debate. The opposition had also demanded Prime Minister Modi address Parliament; Mr Modi is scheduled to speak in the Lok Sabha later today and in the Rajya Sabha tomorrow. Mr Tharoor's reluctance to speak against Op Sindoor underlines the Congress' problem. His relationship with the party - uncertain since 2021, when he joined a group of 'dissenters', i.e., the G-23, and questioned the Gandhis' leadership after a string of election defeats - has taken a sharp downturn over the past few months. The Congress expressed its unease over positive comments about Mr Modi and the BJP, comments amplified after he was handpicked as one of the few opposition MPs chosen to brief 'partner nations' on the Pahalgam attack and India's military response. READ | Tharoor Calls PM "Prime Asset For India" In New Provocation For Congress Mr Tharoor has acknowledged differences between himself and the Congress; he even met Rahul Gandhi, but nothing seemed to come of that meeting. Speaking to NDTV last month, he played down, again, any talk of friction with the party, calling such incidents "differences of opinion... with only some elements of leadership". When NDTV asked him how he would define his relationship with the Congress today, he pointed out he had been loyal to the party and its ideology for the last 16 years. Mr Tharoor has also firmly denied any talk of a switch to the BJP, a move that could re-align and re-shape India's political lanscape. "It is not a sign of my leaping to join the Prime Minister's party... as some people have been implying..." he said after his remarks about Mr Modi's "dynamism".
Hans India
40 minutes ago
- Hans India
Congress MP Employs Cryptic Response Amid Parliamentary Debate Speculation
As Parliament prepares for a critical discussion on the Pahalgam terror incident and the subsequent military response Operation Sindoor, considerable uncertainty surrounds the potential participation of senior Congress parliamentarian Shashi Tharoor in the forthcoming debate. The Thiruvananthapuram representative has become the subject of intense political speculation regarding his role in the opposition's strategy. When approached by media personnel outside Parliament on Monday regarding his possible involvement in the debate, Tharoor delivered an enigmatic two-word response: "Maunvrat, Maunvrat," referencing the concept of observing silence. He declined to provide any elaboration or entertain additional questions from the assembled reporters, leaving his intentions deliberately ambiguous. This cryptic communication has intensified discussions within political circles about whether the veteran parliamentarian will be deployed by the Congress party during the high-stakes debate. Tharoor's recent leadership of a parliamentary delegation to the United States and other nations has positioned him as a potentially significant voice in discussions involving international relations and security matters. The uncertainty surrounding Tharoor's participation stems from his increasingly complex relationship with the Congress party leadership in recent months. His apparent endorsement of the government's rapid response to the Pahalgam attack has reportedly created tension within party ranks, where criticism of governmental actions typically forms the cornerstone of opposition strategy. The Congress party leadership has yet to officially confirm whether Tharoor will be included among the designated speakers for the parliamentary discussion, adding to the intrigue surrounding his potential role. This silence from party officials has fueled further speculation about internal disagreements regarding the appropriate approach to the debate. The Monsoon session experienced significant disruptions during its initial week, with repeated interruptions preventing substantive legislative work. Monday's session, which commenced at 11 AM, witnessed immediate adjournment following disturbances created by opposition party members, highlighting the charged political atmosphere surrounding these discussions. As the Congress party prepares to challenge the BJP-led central government over Operation Sindoor, party leadership has emphasized their insistence that Prime Minister Narendra Modi must be physically present in Parliament when the Pahalgam-Operation Sindoor issues are formally addressed. This demand reflects the opposition's desire to ensure direct governmental accountability for the military operation and its aftermath. The Congress party has persistently advocated for comprehensive debate on these matters since the monsoon session's commencement last week. Jairam Ramesh, the party's general secretary responsible for communications, has been particularly vocal in criticizing the Prime Minister's international travel schedule, arguing that it demonstrates neglect of pressing domestic security concerns. Ramesh recently characterized the Prime Minister as a "Super Premium Frequent Flyer," suggesting that another planned foreign visit would disappoint the people of Manipur and other regions affected by security challenges. This criticism came in the context of Modi's recent four-day diplomatic mission to the United Kingdom and the Maldives, where he successfully concluded a significant free trade agreement with the UK. The Congress communications chief has been particularly critical of what he perceives as the Prime Minister's limited parliamentary presence, noting that Modi typically addresses Parliament only once annually during the Motion of Thanks to the President's Address. Ramesh argued that the gravity of the Pahalgam-Operation Sindoor situation, combined with international implications involving former US President Trump's claims, necessitates the Prime Minister's direct participation in parliamentary discussions. The political dynamics surrounding this debate reflect broader tensions between the ruling party and opposition regarding transparency, accountability, and the appropriate governmental response to security challenges. The Congress party's strategy appears focused on challenging both the operational aspects of the military response and the diplomatic communications surrounding the incident. The timing of these discussions coincides with ongoing questions about intelligence failures, operational effectiveness, and international diplomatic coordination in response to cross-border terrorism. Opposition parties have consistently argued that such matters require thorough parliamentary scrutiny and direct governmental accountability. Tharoor's enigmatic response and uncertain participation status highlight the complex internal dynamics within opposition parties when addressing national security matters. The tension between maintaining party unity and individual conscience becomes particularly pronounced when dealing with military operations and international relations. The parliamentary debate represents a crucial moment for both governmental accountability and opposition strategy, with the potential to influence public perception of the administration's security policies and diplomatic approach to regional challenges.
Hans India
an hour ago
- Hans India
Congress MP Maintains Strategic Silence Amid Parliamentary Debate On Military Operation
Congress parliamentarian Shashi Tharoor employed deliberate silence as his response strategy Monday, repeatedly invoking "maun vrat" (vow of silence) when journalists questioned his participation in the forthcoming Operation Sindoor parliamentary discussion. His cryptic response upon arriving at Parliament has intensified speculation regarding his position on the contentious military operation. The Thiruvananthapuram representative's calculated avoidance of media queries occurred as political circles eagerly anticipated the opposition party's approach during the crucial debate. Rather than providing substantive commentary, Tharoor consistently referenced the concept of voluntary silence, effectively sidestepping all inquiries about his involvement in the proceedings. Internal party sources have indicated that Tharoor will likely abstain from the parliamentary discussion entirely. According to established procedures, members of Parliament must formally submit speaking requests to the Congress Parliamentary Party office, a step Tharoor has reportedly not undertaken. Party insiders suggest this omission reflects his reluctance to participate in the debate framework. The situation has deeper roots in Tharoor's ideological divergence from his party's official position. Sources within the party hierarchy revealed that both the Leader of Opposition's office and the deputy leadership approached Tharoor to contribute to the Operation Sindoor discussion. However, he declined these overtures, explicitly stating his inability to align with the party's critical assessment of the government's military response. Tharoor reportedly maintained his consistent position that Operation Sindoor represented a successful governmental action, expressing his intention to continue supporting this evaluation regardless of party expectations. He allegedly informed party leadership that any public statements would remain consistent with his previously articulated views on the matter. When party officials clarified expectations that speakers must adhere to the Congress party's critical stance toward the government, Tharoor chose complete withdrawal from the debate rather than compromise his stated principles. He characterized this decision as maintaining ideological integrity despite organizational pressure. The Congress party has finalized its speaker lineup with Gaurav Gogoi designated to initiate Monday's discussion, followed by contributions from Priyanka Gandhi Vadra, Deependra Hooda, Praneeti Shinde, Saptagiri Ulaka, and Bijendra Ola. Opposition Leader Rahul Gandhi is scheduled to deliver his remarks during Tuesday's session. Tharoor's conspicuous absence from the speaker roster reflects his increasingly strained relationship with party leadership over recent months. The tension stems from his participation in a government-organized international delegation addressing the India-Pakistan conflict, an action perceived as contradicting established Congress positions. His public endorsement of governmental policies and support for the temporary cessation of hostilities created significant friction with party colleagues who maintain critical perspectives toward the administration's approach. This ideological disagreement has positioned Tharoor at odds with mainstream party sentiment. The parliamentary discussion represents the culmination of negotiations between government and opposition parties, resulting in an agreed 16-hour debate format spanning both legislative chambers. The focus centers on governmental responses to the April 22 Pahalgam terror incident, which resulted in 26 civilian fatalities and numerous injuries. Opposition leadership, particularly Rahul Gandhi and allied party leaders, has consistently challenged the administration over alleged intelligence deficiencies surrounding the attack. They have also questioned claims by US President Donald Trump regarding American mediation efforts between India and Pakistan, assertions that the Indian government has categorically rejected. The broader political context encompasses ongoing tensions regarding national security policies, diplomatic strategies, and the appropriate governmental response to cross-border terrorism. Tharoor's position represents a significant departure from traditional opposition unity, highlighting internal disagreements within the Congress party regarding foreign policy and security matters. This development underscores the complex dynamics within opposition politics, where individual conscience and party discipline intersect with national security considerations and public accountability measures.
