Stark County school superintendents, Canton mayor to host rally against Ohio funding cuts
Government and education leaders are hosting a Rally for Public Education at 6 p.m. June 10 in the Canton Memorial Civic Center at 1101 Market Ave. N in Canton to discuss how the proposed state funding changes will affect local students and communities. The event is free and open to the public. Doors open at 5:30 p.m.
The rally will include a panel discussion among Stark County superintendents.
Canton Mayor William V. Sherer II, who is spearheading the event, said he felt compelled to get involved after local school superintendents told him about how devastating the proposed cuts could be for public schools.
'Public education is the foundation of strong communities and a strong future,' said Sherer, who has invited every Stark County mayor, trustee and state representative to the event. 'As leaders, we have a responsibility to ensure our schools are fully funded and our students are fully supported.'
During a presentation to Canton City Council last month, Canton City Schools Superintendent Jeff Talbert and Plain Local Superintendent Brent May listed multiple ways the state budget proposals would reduce the resources they can provide for students.
According to the superintendents, the Ohio House's school funding plan would cut at least $4 million from their annual state funding starting in 2028. The Ohio Senate unveiled its plan on June 3 that provides for more funding for schools overall, but a district-by-district breakdown wasn't immediately available.
Talbert said Canton City Schools also would lose another $12 million under a proposed cap on school districts' rainy day funds. The Ohio House plan caps the carryover balance at 30% of a school district's annual operating cost and gives any overages to homeowners through future property tax discounts.
The Ohio Senate's budget proposal would cap the carryover balance at 50% of a district's annual operating cost.
Talbert said the district has been setting aside money since 2020 to better navigate the years when state lawmakers decide to hold funding flat or significantly reduce it.
Talbert said his district also would be impacted by a proposal that would require public schools to sell school buildings that are under 60% capacity at use value – not market value – to charter schools inside and outside the community.
"So basically we're going to take all the students at the Timken campus and evict them out of their school so we can sell it to someone outside this community," Talbert said.
The superintendents said the proposed losses, coupled with the recent federal funding cuts, continued unfunded state mandates and higher energy and equipment prices, will force them to reduce services that are not required but vital to students and families, such as mental health services, food and clothing essentials, school resource officers and clinical counselors.
'If our funding goes away, we're not going to be able to provide those resources,' May said. 'It's a tragedy for our community.'
May, whose district spends roughly $3,000 less per pupil than the state average, said the funding burden likely will shift to local taxpayers as districts will be forced to seek higher property tax levies to cover the loss.
"I think it's going to take every school district in Stark County – with their boards, their administrators, teachers and local elected officials – to stand up and make enough noise for people to listen," May said. "It's the only way it's going to get done."
State lawmakers must pass the budget by July 1.
Reach Canton Repository staff writer Kelli Weir at 330-580-8339 or kelli.weir@cantonrep.com.
This article originally appeared on The Repository: Rally for Public Education unites Stark schools, governments
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Gizmodo
4 days ago
- Gizmodo
Ohio Wants to Create a Database of People Who Skip Job Interviews
The job market is tough at the moment for prospective employees, and Ohio has plans to make it even tougher. A bill recently introduced by Republicans in the Ohio House of Representatives would create an online registry of people who fail to show up for a job interview. The proposal, introduced as H.B. 395, specifically targets job applicants who are recipients of unemployment benefits and are required to seek employment in order to continue receiving the limited compensation provided to them. It would give employers the ability to report a person for failing to show up to a scheduled job interview, potentially costing the person access to their unemployment benefits and, if that information is shared among employers, making it more difficult for them to find work. Republican Brian Lorenz, a co-sponsor on the bill, claims that the bill is needed because his constituents are reporting that ghosting job interviews is becoming more frequent. 'The bill rewards professionalism. If you value employers' time, this process is going to value you,' he told NBC4i in Ohio. 'And it just modernizes the employment process and it holds applicants accountable and it helps employers thrive.' The bill makes no effort to delineate between what is an appropriate and inappropriate reason to miss a job interview, which surely would not be weaponized by petty employers seeking to punish people for 'wasting their time.' Under the text of the proposal, it would fall on the Director of Job and Family Services to determine which complaints are legitimate and which ones are frivolous, which definitely seems like a good use of that person's time. Ohio isn't exactly getting hammered at the moment with unemployment claims—at least no moreso than anywhere else in the country. Ohio saw its first month of job loss all year in June, and its most recent unemployment data showed a decline in continued claims compared to the previous weeks. The state's unemployment rate of 4.9% sits higher than the national average of 4.1%, but it also has better overall labor force participation rates, with 62.7% of adults actively working or looking for work compared to the national average of 62.3%. Regardless, the idea that the employer is getting screwed by a person's no-show doesn't exactly pass the sniff test. Sure, there are resources expended by a business in the job interview process. But at the end of the day, they still have the rest of the potential employee pool to draw from to fill that role. Meanwhile, getting ghosted by a prospective employer has simply become part of the process for most job seekers. A recent report found that 61% of US job seekers reported being ghosted by an employer after a job interview, never receiving follow-up, and a survey of hiring managers conducted by ResumeGenius found that 80% admitted to ghosting potential employees. Wonder if Lorenz has any concerns about that. Surely he represents a lot more job seekers than employers.
Yahoo
24-07-2025
- Yahoo
What does the Ohio House property tax override mean?
COLUMBUS, Ohio (WCMH) — The Ohio House pushed for property tax relief this week, but legislators disagree on whether removing some property tax authority will help Ohioans' pocketbooks. Gov. Mike DeWine signed Ohio's 2026-2027 budget into law on June 30, but vetoed 67 provisions within the several thousand page document. On Monday, the Ohio House held a rare out-of-season session to override one of the budget vetoes in an attempt to provide property tax relief. During the vote, politicians on both sides of the aisle said Ohio's tax system is too complex to be productive, so NBC4 is breaking this issue down. Olentangy coach resigns amid investigation into inappropriate text messages What happened? On Monday, 89 of the House's 99 members met and voted to override DeWine's veto on school district property tax levy restrictions. The move needed 60 votes, and it successfully passed 61-28. The House originally planned to vote on three overrides, but leaders said they did not think they had the votes due to absences. See previous coverage in the video player above. It is now up to the Senate to decide if they will also vote on the override, but they have not yet announced plans to vote. The override is not official unless 20 of Ohio's 33 Senators concur. What could change? If the Senate concurs the veto override, Ohio would change what type of property tax levies schools and other services could place on the ballot. The changes stop schools and political subdivisions, like fire departments or libraries, from introducing replacement and emergency levies. This change also stops school districts from asking for operating levies if it has too much money left over in their general funds. Replacement levies occur when a levy is expiring, and can either keep the same levy in place or, more commonly, replace it with a higher tax rate. Emergency levies are used when funding is crucial to keep operating, and they expire after a set number of years. These are all operating levies, meaning they are used to pay for daily necessities like supplies, utilities and salaries. These funds typically cannot be used for permanent improvement projects, like building a new high school or fire department. House members in favor of the changes said words like 'emergency' and 'replacement' can influence people to vote for property tax increases they may not want. They hope removing these levy options will promote transparency in levy requests. Bobcats, bald eagles and bears, oh my! Species seeing population growth in Ohio What does this mean for schools? This would limit how public school districts are allowed to ask for public money by removing several levy options. Schools would still be allowed to request other property tax levies. The Ohio Education Association (OAE) said these levies are crucial for school districts' long-term financial stability. Replacement levies are frequently used to help districts keep up with inflation, so having to always seek new levies brings a more complicated request to taxpayers. According to the OAE, this change could force Ohio schools to increase class sizes and cut programming. Schools will also no longer be allowed to ask for certain levies if they carry over more than 100% of their expenditures in their general funds from school year to school year. School districts say this is an important protection for long-term financial planning, as they cannot ask for more money even if they say they need more. House Republicans who voted in favor of the override said it will encourage districts to be more fiscally responsible. Proponents of the change say this is not taking money from schools, as voters will still have the opportunity to approve levies. Opponents, like Rep. Ismail Mohamed (D-Columbus), said the veto would limit the choices Ohioans have at the ballot. What does this mean for local services? Although the change affects school districts immensely, it also affects political subdivisions like local governments, fire departments, libraries and parks. All of these services rely on property taxes, and many of them use replacement levies to stay afloat. For instance, Franklin Township had two replacement levies fail in the past year, leading them to have to close one of their two fire stations. Legislators and advocates who disagree with the possible property tax change say examples like this prove Ohioans already have control over whether or not to pass a levy. Like local schools, this could make it more difficult to pass levies, or just complicate how these services are asking for funding. House Democrats say these services will have to choose between more frequent levy requests or making budget cuts. House Republicans largely say this will protect taxpayers from overreach and encourage local services to be better stewards of tax dollars. Three months later, still no updates in OSU investigation of hidden cameras in dorm bathroom What does this mean for my taxes? Even if the Senate concurs this veto override, this change does not guarantee a different property tax rate for Ohioans. The change reduces how many types of levies subdivisions can ask for, but fewer levies may not correlate with fewer levy requests. Proponents say this will help provide transparency at the ballot and prevent tax hikes that voters may not expect. The change would go into effect Jan. 1, 2026, so it would not change tax laws until after the November election. Proponents say this is a proactive change to help future overreach. Opponents say it is unlikely this will provide meaningful property tax relief because it does not address immediate pressures. They said it could even add financial pressure for taxpayers as local governments and schools try to find other revenue sources. Ohio leaders say property tax reform is coming, regardless of whether the override stands. Gov. Mike DeWine has tasked a property tax reform work group with analyzing concerns and generating solutions by Sept. 30. Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed. Solve the daily Crossword
Yahoo
08-07-2025
- Yahoo
State Rep. Phil Plummer seeks Ohio Senate seat in 2026
Previous coverage on Rep. Phil Plummer above. DAYTON, Ohio (WDTN) – State Rep. Phil Plummer (R – Butler Twp.) announced he is running for Ohio's 5th Senate District in the 2026 election. This district includes both western and northern Montgomery County – as well as all of Miami and Preble – and parts of Darke and Butler Counties. Plummer said he is committed to public safety, economic growth and conservative values. He highlighted his three decades of law enforcement experience and a legislative record. Formerly, he was a Montgomery County Sheriff. Senate passes President Trump's sweeping 'One Big, Beautiful Bill' He said he will continue working to lower taxes, fight fentanyl trafficking and defend the Second Amendment. 'I'm running because results and integrity matter. The citizens of the 5th Senate District deserve no less,' said Plummer. He said that he will stand with President Donald J. Trump and work to make America safer. 'There's more work to be done to grow jobs, stabilize our economy and reduce burdensome property taxes,' said Plummer. 'Americans decisively elected President Trump and gave him a mandate to restore America, in the Ohio Senate I will continue to stand with him in making our country safe and prosperous again.' The announcement, in its entirety, can be read here. Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
