A headless torso has been identified 44 years later. Police now seek woman's killer
A headless torso has been identified 44 years later. Police now seek woman's killer In 1981, railroad workers stumbled upon a headless torso in an empty field in San Jose, California. A pair of Christian medallions lay nearby.
Show Caption
Hide Caption
Ted Bundy, Jack the Ripper and DNA: New tech solving murders
From Ted Bundy to Jack the Ripper, new DNA technology is solving murder mysteries, finding serial killers, and exonerating innocents.
Just the FAQs, USA TODAY
Nearly 44 years after two California railroad workers stumbled upon a headless torso in a field in San Jose, detectives have identified the victim as an Oakland grandmother.
It was just before 10 a.m. on the morning of July 11, 1981, when the workers made their grisly discovery in an empty field, the San Francisco Examiner reported at the time. The site now harbors a commuter rail transit center and parking structure.
The dismembered and decomposing torso, with multiple stab wounds to the chest and no legs or arms, was wrapped in plastic. Nearby lay a pair of Christian medallions, one featuring Saint Christopher and the other the Virgin Mary.
'Vivian Moss was her name,' said Santa Clara District Attorney Jeff Rosen in a news release May 27 announcing the development. 'My office knows it. I know it. Her family knows it. And now our community knows it.'
The district attorney's cold case unit identified Moss through DNA using forensic genealogy and hope the information will help unveil her killer.
Moss, a native of Arkansas, was a 54-year-old grandmother who may have worked at an elementary school in Oakland before her disappearance, the DA's office said.
Family members told investigators that Moss was 'close' to preacher Louis H. Narcisse, the late founder of Oakland's Mt. Zion Spiritual Church and a renowned vocalist.
How investigators identified Moss
In 2023, the Santa Clara DA's office partnered with forensic genealogists at Virginia-based Parabon NanoLabs, who suggested the remains were likely that of Vivian Moss.
Cold case unit investigators in 2024 tracked down Moss' granddaughter, who recalled waiting as a young girl in the 1980s for her grandmother to pick her up for an overnight stay at her house. However, the woman said Moss failed to show, and she never saw her grandmother again.
The DA's office concluded that the remains were those of Moss based on Parabon's testing comparing the granddaughter's DNA to evidence at the crime scene. Her case was featured in an October 2023 video showcasing the work of the DA's office cold case unit.
'One day soon, I hope we will know the depraved person who took her life and left her in a field, hoping she would be forgotten,' Rosen said. 'If her murderer is still alive, they will know that we don't forget in Santa Clara County.'
A close association with preacher
A photograph posted on social media by the American Museum of Paramusicology said the Mt. Zion preacher she was close with, Narcisse, was known for his collaborations with gospel singer Mahalia Jackson.
According to SFGate.com, Narcisse, whose congregants called him "His Grace," wore robes and a crown and carried a staff. He launched churches nationwide and hosted a syndicated Sunday radio show.
A profile by British music writer Opal Louis Nations describes Narcisse, who died in 1989, as enthralled with the British monarchy, a man thought by some to work miracles as he spread the gospel in his parish. However, Nations wrote, "others saw him as a devil, con artist and clever snake-oil salesman" with "a darker, exploitative side" who "bled his parishioners dry."
The church no longer operates and last posted on social media in November 2023.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Boston Globe
an hour ago
- Boston Globe
Discrimination cases unravel as Trump scraps core civil rights tenet
The Justice Department now is reviewing its entire docket and has already dismissed or terminated 'many' cases that were 'legally unsupportable' and a product of 'weaponization' under the Biden administration, said Harmeet Dhillon, who heads the Justice Department's Civil Rights Division. Get Starting Point A guide through the most important stories of the morning, delivered Monday through Friday. Enter Email Sign Up 'We will fully enforce civil rights laws in a way that satisfies the ends of justice, not politicization,' she said in a statement to The Washington Post. Advertisement The review includes cases and reform agreements forged after years-long investigations that the administration says lacked justification. Civil rights experts estimate that dozens of discrimination cases involving banks, landlords, private employers, and school districts could face similar action. 'What we're seeing is an attempt by the Trump administration to really dismantle a lot of the core tools that we use to ensure equality in the country,' said Amalea Smirniotopoulos, senior policy counsel and comanager of the Equal Protection Initiative at the Legal Defense Fund, a nonprofit that has long advocated for the civil rights of Black Americans and other minorities. Advertisement At the center of this effort is 'disparate impact analysis,' which holds that neutral policies can have discriminatory outcomes even if there was no intent to discriminate. The legal standard stems from Griggs v. Duke Power, the landmark 1971 Supreme Court decision that became a staple of civil rights litigation. In that case, attorneys relied on statistical evidence to show how standardized testing prevented Black employees in North Carolina from advancing at the energy company. The legal theory has been consistently recognized by the Supreme Court, written into federal regulations and enshrined into employment law by Congress. But President Trump declared it unconstitutional in April, issuing an executive order that kicked off an intense review of civil rights regulations, enforcement actions, and settled cases. Now, government agreements and orders that relied on disparate impact in pursuing sex, race, and disability discrimination cases are being undone. On May 23, for example, the Justice Department terminated an agreement with Patriot Bank, a Tennessee-based lender accused of failing to lend in predominantly Black and Latino neighborhoods in Memphis, from 2015 to 2020. Prosecutors used statistical evidence to show disparities in the bank's lending practices alongside evidence of intentional discrimination, such as targeting most of its advertising in majority-white neighborhoods. A three-year agreement to reform its lending practices had been in place for a little over a year before Trump's Justice Department moved to end it, noting the bank was in compliance with the reform agreement. Patriot declined to comment. Civil rights advocates worry about the future of similar enforcement. Advertisement Disparate impact has long been anathema to conservatives, who say it can result in quotas and deny equal opportunity to white people. But past Republican administrations opted not to take this issue on, partly because of Supreme Court precedent and partly because it might prove politically unpopular. 'What changed is just political will,' said Kenneth L. Marcus, who headed the Education Department's Office for Civil Rights during both George W. Bush's administration and Trump's first term. 'The second Trump administration is more willing to take on potentially contentious civil rights issues than any Republican administration this century.' Trump issued a slew of executive orders to eradicate diversity, equity and inclusion, or DEI, programs - calling them 'illegal and immoral' days after he returned to the White House in January - and ordered the government to close diversity offices and fire staff. His administration has since launched investigations into corporations, law firms and colleges over their diversity initiatives, while going to battle with Harvard University for its refusal to comply with a set of demands to alter its governance, admissions, and hiring practices. When Trump set his sights on disparate impact in April, he called it a 'pernicious movement' that ignores 'individual strengths, effort or achievement.' He ordered federal agencies to review any cases and reform agreements that rely on the theory - and terminate them as they see fit. The actions are long overdue, said Dan Morenoff, executive director at the American Civil Rights Project, a nonprofit law firm that opposes the use of disparate impact and diversity initiatives. He contends that the government's use of disparate impact has been, in many cases, legally dubious, adding that its assumptions are fundamentally flawed. Advertisement 'The people who most appreciate disparate impact appear, usually, to be deeply wed to the idea that any discrepancies are best explained by discrimination,' he said. The Supreme Court most recently upheld the use of disparate impact analysis in a 2015 housing case. But that decision was decided on a 5-4 vote in an opinion written by Justice Anthony M. Kennedy, now retired. Some conservatives believe the court's current conservative supermajority might give them their wished-for outcome. 'It's clear what the Trump administration is aiming for is to get this question to the Supreme Court in hopes the Supreme Court will take that tool away,' said Smirniotopoulos of the Legal Defense Fund. The rollbacks are already underway. In 2023, the Justice Department alleged that Atlanta-based Ameris Bank avoided providing home loans to Black and Latino home buyers in Jacksonville, Florida, in a practice known as redlining. The bank almost exclusively advertised in majority-White neighborhoods and made little effort to do business in majority Black and Latino neighborhoods, according to its lawsuit. Only 2.7 percent of Ameris's mortgages went to borrowers in Black and Latino communities from 2016 to 2021, the complaint said, while its competitors issued more than three times as many loans during that window. Ameris knew about the disparities but failed to correct them, the government alleged. Though it admitted no wrongdoing, Ameris quickly settled the case, agreeing to a set of measures whose progress would be monitored by the court. Then, on May 19, the Justice Department moved to unwind the settlement, saying that the bank has 'demonstrated a commitment to remediation' while freeing it from its legal obligations to implement the reforms. The bank did not object to the move. Prosecutors did note that Ameris had disbursed the entirety of a $7.5 million loan subsidy fund for borrowers in Black and Latino neighborhoods. Advertisement A judge granted the request a day later. Ameris declined to comment. The government moved to terminate cases involving two banks in Alabama and Tennessee that had agreed to court-monitored reforms tied to allegations of discriminatory lending practices. It also moved to dismiss a case in Kinloch, Mo., against property managers accused of refusing to rent to prospective Black tenants at disproportionate rates. There are at least eight other housing and lending cases across seven states that are similarly candidates for dismissal, according to a review. While the administration blamed the Biden administration for mishandling these cases, it has also dismissed cases going back decades. It did not directly concern disparate impact, but the Justice Department in April dismissed a 1966 consent order with a Louisiana school district concerning its desegregation efforts.
Yahoo
2 hours ago
- Yahoo
WiSpa Suspect Not Guilty on All Nine Counts of Indecent Exposure
WiSpa Suspect Not Guilty on All Nine Counts of Indecent Exposure originally appeared on L.A. Mag. The not guilty verdict for Darren Merager was read aloud to an audience of one in the Los Angeles courtroom gallery. Gone were the leftist activists and black clad 'SoCal Antifa' militants who attacked conservative demonstrators outside WiSpa in the name of 'smashing transphobia.' Gone were the Christian conservatives and self-identifying trans-exclusionary feminists who found common cause, protesting for traditional women's spaces in July of 2021. Gone were all the other reporters. There were bombshells throughout the 4 week jury trial. An email from a WiSpa manager named Mr. Suh was entered into evidence. It instructed 'managers on duty' not to admit customer Darren Merager, the now 55-year-old heterosexual male who also identifies as transgender (referred to as he/him and she/her on the record). The ignored email referred to a customer only by an ID number. The prosecution submitted that the communication predated the night in 2021 that the embattled bather sat nude on the edge of the spa jacuzzi tub, legs akimbo, until female patrons complained… and then filed police reports weeks later. A woman recorded a viral video that night, objecting to a penis on the women's side of the 24 hour Korean spa. The public firestorm was followed by felony criminal charges. 'They let the defendant in,' the jury foreman commented after the final day of the four-week trial in May of 2025, which cleared Merager of indecent exposure charges at both the WiSpa near LA's Koreatown and a similar incident at the West Hollywood Aquatic Center in 2018. The author of the viral WiSpa video, a woman named Christina R. who went by 'cubana angel' online, did not even testify for the prosecution. It would have meant entering the selfie-video of Christina complaining at WiSpa into evidence. The defense wanted the video played– so the jury could hear the colorful reactions from those set against Merager that night. What's more, absent from the extended video was any mention of the key claim that might prove sexual intent: an alleged erection. Judge Joseph Burghardt ruled to the dismay of the defense that only a short section of the WiSpa kerfuffle could be played sans audio. Pronoun discipline was a Herculean task throughout the month of the trial. The defense attorney and judge constantly shifted between referring to Merager as 'he' and 'she' and Merager's attributes as 'his penis' and 'her penis.' Deputy Prosecutor Karen Montoya only slipped up once over the 4 week ordeal and quickly apologized, correcting herself after straying from genderless terminology. Merager was unoffended, as the defendant accepts being referred to by both sets of pronouns. The jury was asked to decide, by official language, if the defendant exposed 'himself/herself' with the intent of sexual gratification. Jurors came to a 'not guilty' decision in less than an hour and a half. The foreman summed up the prosecution's case to me in three simple words: 'It wasn't enough.' Testimony of an alleged erection was inconsistent, yet, a previous judge had ruled that the claim was sufficient pre-trial evidence to go forward. One woman, a mother at the spa with her two teenage daughters, changed her characterization of Merager over the years. The defense seized on the witness's account differing from the police report to the preliminary hearing and then at the trial. The woman's testimony escalated to claims of the defendant's 'hand on his thigh'– to then, via the court Spanish language interpreter, insinuations of more animated activity. A witness that jurors told me they found to be one of the most credible appeared on behalf of the defense. She was a psychiatric nurse practitioner who was also in the nude area of the spa with her two daughters. She admitted to concern over Merager's presence– but also could see Merager for the better part of a half hour through the window of the sauna, as the defendant remained at the jacuzzi pool. Doctor Natarajan testified Merager's demeanor was 'pleasant' and that there was no erection. Jurors told me that they were suspicious that two WiSpa complainants said they just happened to show up at the same time at an LA police station to file police reports, weeks after the WiSpa incident. Another prosecution witness dramatically took the stand at the very last minute. A woman named Tamra was upset that her autistic daughter had to bear witness to Merager's manhood in the women's showers of a Sherman Oaks pool. She offered up a litany of choice words in court and admitted to telling Merager 'I'll drag you out by your hair.' Jury members told me that the highly charged witness testimony did not help the prosecution. Amazingly, the Sherman Oaks incident took place during the actual trial, on what should have been the third day of jury selection at the end of April. Merager had gone to the ER to get physical ailments checked out. As a result, court proceedings were cancelled for the day. Then, Merager went to the Sherman Oaks pool where yet another incident of controversy played out. It all spectacularly came to the court's attention, as a sister of a jury candidate happened to be there. The juror researched and reported back to the court what she had learned (and was removed from the jury pool, naturally). If anything, the defendant was consistent, continuing to bathe in the women's section of pools and spas in LA, Orange County and Palm Springs, even after the headline-grabbing WiSpa incident of 2021. Merager seized on the right to do so as California's legislature passed gender self-identification in 2018. The Gender Recognition Act was brought forward by California legislators Scott Wiener and Toni Atkins before being signed into law by Governor Jerry Brown in 2019. The first week that the law went into effect, Merager, who has an extensive rap sheet in Southern California from incidents of indecent exposure to motor vehicle theft to spearheading a multimillion-dollar art heist caper, registered with the DMV as female. Per the new law, no medical documentation was necessary. Merager acknowledged having had quite enough of male spaces following stints in men's prisons. Merager's origin story or 'gender journey' began with a 2017 car accident, after which a therapist brought up the possibility that Darren might lose his lower extremities. And– had Merager ever considered gender fluidity? 'It all clicked,' Merager characterized his first epiphany that he/she was androgynous male and female, a transgender designation Merager considers distinct from 'non binary.' But none of Merager's 'gender journey' or sexuality were part of the case. The jury was told it could consider Merager's 2003 plea deal for a public masturbation charge. But the jury could not convict on priors alone. So it didn't. Merager's driver's license with a female marker was projected on screen in the courtroom by Defense Attorney Elliot Tiomkin during the opening remarks. Deputy Prosecutor Montoya matched Tiomkin every step of the way, arguing that the driver's license had come into existence only after the West Hollywood incident, which upset parents of a girls' swim team. Two of the children at the public pool, now adults, testified that they were 'shocked' by Merager showering in the buff, no curtain drawn, while fellow swim team members giggled and scurried away in their swimsuits. Yet, jurors decided that Merager hadn't actually done anything except what others were doing. Merager showered, toweled off and changed clothes. He didn't stare at others or solicit their attention verbally. So it would all come down to the penis– an organ shrouded in reasonable doubt. Witness descriptions varied from 'slightly lifted' to 'not flat' to '45 degrees', as the prosecution interpreted an Eastern European mother's shape made with her hands to indicate the alleged offending angle. The women who were minors at the time of the incidents varied in their descriptions as well. But one summed up her emotional state on the stand by saying simply, 'I knew I shouldn't have been seeing that.' Merager's reaction? 'I'm relieved,' the defendant told me after the verdict was read, as the felony charges could have led to serious jail time given Merager's history. Merager plans to continue to use the women's side at facilities and says he still calls in advance to confirm the policy for transgender patrons. 'I'm something of a pioneer,' Merager marveled of his status, now innocent of all charges. That said, Merager is considering a possible move to Europe to live in a country with more 'evolved' attitudes towards nudity. Defense attorney Tiomkin evoked Clarence Darrow in his opening statements, casting Merager among the unjustly 'damned' given the multiple felony charges. Here in tolerant California, there had been much ado, with jurors deciding in the end that Darren Merager simply was behaving like any other woman in a shower, spa or changing room. One female juror approached Merager at the end of the trial that had taken up 4 weeks of her and everybody else's lives. 'You are a guest in a woman's space,' she told Merager. She then offered some words of advice for the now exonerated defendant, given his male attributes. 'You should please cover up,' she said. This story was originally reported by L.A. Mag on Jun 1, 2025, where it first appeared.
Yahoo
3 hours ago
- Yahoo
CODI alert issued for missing 13-year-old girl: VSP
ROANOKE, Va. (WAVY) – Virginia State Police have issued a CODI alert for a missing 13-year-old girl on behalf of the Roanoke City Police Department (RCPD). Brooklyn Gloria Walker was last seen Sunday, around 8:45 a.m., on 17th Street SE in Roanoke. She is 4'11, 125 pounds, with brown hair and blue eyes. She is believed to be on foot and her disappearance poses a credible threat to her safety. Those with information are encouraged to call RCPD at 540-853-2212. Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
