U.S. pediatricians' new COVID-19 vaccine recommendations differ from CDC advice
The group's new COVID-19 recommendations — released Tuesday — come amid a tumultuous year for public health, as vaccine skeptics have come into power in the new Trump administration and government guidance has become increasingly confusing.
This isn't going to help, acknowledged Dr. James Campbell, vice chair of the AAP infectious diseases committee.
'It is going to be somewhat confusing. But our opinion is we need to make the right choices for children to protect them,' he added.
The AAP is strongly recommending COVID-19 shots for children ages 6 months to 2 years. Shots also are advised for older children if parents want their kids vaccinated, the AAP said.
That differs from guidance established under U.S. Health Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr., which doesn't recommend the shots for healthy children of any age but says kids may get the shots in consultation with physicians.
Children ages 6 months to 2 years are at high risk for severe illness from COVID-19, and it was important that recommendations continue to emphasize the need for them to get vaccinated, said Campbell, a University of Maryland infectious diseases expert.
Vaccinations also are recommended for older children who have chronic lung diseases or other conditions that put them at higher risk for severe disease, the AAP said.
In a statement, Department of Health and Human Services spokesperson Andrew Nixon said 'the AAP is undermining national immunization policymaking with baseless political attacks.'
He accused the group of putting commercial interests ahead of public health, noting that vaccine manufacturers have been donors to the AAP's Friends of Children Fund. The fund is currently paying for projects on a range of topics, including health equity and prevention of injuries and deaths from firearms.
The 95-year-old Itasca, Illinois-based organization has issued vaccination recommendations for children since the 1930s. In 1995, it synced its advice with recommendations made by the federal government's Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.
There have been a few small differences between AAP and CDC recommendations since then. For example, the AAP has advised that children get HPV vaccinations starting at age 9; the CDC says that's OK but has emphasized vaccinations at ages 11 and 12.
But in 30 years, this is the first time the recommendations have differed 'in a significant or substantial way,' Campbell said.
Until recently, the CDC — following recommendations by infectious disease experts — has been urging annual COVID-19 boosters for all Americans ages 6 months and older.
But in May, U.S. Health Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. announced that COVID-19 vaccines are no longer recommended for healthy children and pregnant women. A few days later, the CDC issued language that healthy children may get the shots, but that there was no longer a 'should' recommendation.
The idea that healthy older kids may be able to skip COVID-19 boosters has been brewing for some time among public health experts. As the COVID-19 pandemic has waned, experts have increasingly discussed the possibility of focusing vaccination efforts on people 65 and older — who are among those most as risk for death and hospitalization.
A CDC expert panel in June was set to make recommendations about the fall shots. Among the options the panel was considering was whether suggest shots for high-risk groups but still giving lower-risk people the choice to get vaccinated.
But Kennedy bypassed the group, and also decided to dismiss the 17-member panel and appoint his own, smaller panel, that included vaccine skeptics. Kennedy also later excluded the AAP, the American Medical Association and other top medical organizations from working with the advisers to establish vaccination recommendations.
Kennedy's new vaccine panel has yet to vote on COVID-19 shot recommendations.
The panel did endorse continuing to recommend fall flu vaccinations, but also made a decision that led to another notable difference with the AAP.
The new advisory panel voted that people should only get flu vaccines that are packaged as single doses and do not contain the preservative thimerosal.
The AAP said there is no evidence of harm from the preservative, and recommended doctors use any licensed flu vaccine product that's appropriate for the patient.
Stobbe writes for the Associated Press.
The Associated Press Health and Science Department receives support from the Howard Hughes Medical Institute's Science and Educational Media Group and the Robert Wood Johnson Foundation. The AP is solely responsible for all content.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Time Magazine
an hour ago
- Time Magazine
The Clashing Advice Over COVID-19 Shots for Kids
Should you give your baby a COVID-19 shot? The answer isn't as straightforward or as much of a consensus as it used to be: In an unusual move, the American Academy of Pediatrics (AAP) is recommending a different approach to childhood vaccination than the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). Both groups agree that families should make individual decisions in consultation with their doctors about whether kids should be vaccinated. But the AAP has a stricter stance for the youngest eligible children in the U.S., recommending that all of them get COVID-19 shots. The CDC stopped recommending COVID-19 vaccines for healthy children older than six months following guidance from the Secretary of the Department of Health and Human Services, Robert F. Kennedy Jr., in May. The CDC does, however, recommend the shot for children who are moderately or severely immunocompromised. A day after the AAP released its recommendations, Kennedy fired back at the organization on social media, accusing them of allowing pharmaceutical-company donors to guide their recommendations. AAP maintains that its recommendations are based on science. Here's what to know about the clashing advice regarding COVID-19 vaccines for kids. What does the AAP recommend in terms of COVID-19 shots for children? Whether most children should get a COVID-19 vaccine should be based on their particular risk, the AAP says—taking into account their underlying conditions, such as asthma, obesity, or diabetes, as well as whether they live in a household with people at high risk for developing severe disease. That risk is higher for the youngest eligible age group—ages 6 months to 23 months—which is why the AAP recommends that all kids in this age group get vaccinated. 'For the youngest kids, the hospitalization rate is similar to that for adults 50 to 64 years old,' says Dr. Sean O'Leary, chair of the AAP Committee on Infectious Diseases. 'It's not nothing. And that's for something that can be prevented by a vaccine, which has been better studied than any medical product in our history. We have a very strong level of confidence in the safety of the vaccine.' HHS did not respond to TIME's request for comment. Why are the recommendations different? Generally, the CDC sets the schedule for which vaccines people should get and at which ages. The CDC makes its decision based on advice from its Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices (ACIP). ACIP is made up of independent experts who volunteer to review data, discuss their findings, and make recommendations to help guide the CDC. But Kennedy—a longtime vaccine-skeptic who now oversees the CDC as head of HHS—fired all members of ACIP in June, accusing them of following industry interests. Kennedy replaced them days later with people he had selected, 'many of them with strong anti-vaccine views,' says O'Leary. Read More: How Having a Baby Is Changing Under Trump After ACIP was replaced, AAP—which typically works closely with the advisory committee and other liaison groups in setting vaccination schedules—decided not to attend ACIP's first meeting under the new administration in the spring. 'We saw from that meeting that ACIP has gone off the rails, essentially, in terms of the way they are operating and the messaging from the new members, which is very much around sowing distrust about vaccines and not making evidence-based vaccine recommendations,' says O'Leary. Weeks later, the AAP and other liaison groups were asked to discontinue their participation in ACIP work groups, O'Leary says. 'We received an email un-inviting us,' he says. The reason provided, he says, was that the organizations represented 'special interest groups,' which O'Leary says is a 'poor interpretation of the rules. All of the organizations at the table have expertise, and there are a lot of reasons to have representation from professional societies.' Which advice will doctors and pharmacists follow? O'Leary says pediatricians are anticipating having to have more conversations with families about the conflicting vaccine advice, and that the AAP is providing guidance to help inform those discussions on its website and via emails to its members. 'Politics has entered the exam room in a way that it never has before,' he says. 'These discussions will be contextual, depending on how well the pediatrician knows the family, what relationship they have, and how frank they can be with them in the discussion.' Ultimately, he says, the message from pediatricians should be this: 'We are committed to the health of children, and our recommendations are based on the best available science.' Read More: What the New COVID-19 Vaccine Guidance Means For You Pharmacists must take a slightly different approach, since they are only allowed to vaccinate according to the CDC's recommendations, while doctors can vaccinate outside of strictly approved conditions or populations in so-called 'off-label' use. Since current CDC recommendations say that families should make their own decisions about whether their children receive the shot, pharmacists will vaccinate kids if parents want them to have the shots, but won't specifically recommend that people get them. 'Our guidance is to always follow what the CDC or HHS recommends,' says Rick Gates, chief pharmacy officer at Walgreens. If families come in with questions about whether their child should get the COVID-19 shot, pharmacists will probably refer them back to their pediatrician or family physician. Will insurance cover COVID-19 vaccines for kids if the CDC doesn't recommend them? It's still not clear how insurers will respond to the differing recommendations. 'This is a real concern,' says Dr. David Higgins, an infectious-disease expert at AAP. Traditionally, a recommendation from ACIP means that a shot will be covered, since any vaccines recommended by the committee have to be reimbursed by insurers under the Affordable Care Act. It's not clear how insurers will interpret the individual choice of families when it comes to vaccinating children. The AAP is urging insurers to continue covering the COVID-19 vaccine for infants six to 23 months, despite the fact that ACIP does not recommend the vaccine for all kids in this age group. 'The AAP is already engaging with private insurers and policymakers to ensure our evidence-based recommendations are covered,' Higgins says, 'and we will continue to advocate to make vaccines accessible to every child in every community.'
Newsweek
an hour ago
- Newsweek
America is Aging—and It's Not Ready, Researchers Warn
Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources. Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content. As the population of the United States grows older, a new study warns that the country lacks the infrastructure and policy direction to meet the needs of its aging citizens. The research by Northeastern University analyzes access to essential services for older adults across the U.S. Researchers found that while some communities offer decent access, others face stark deficiencies—in some states like Arizona, up to 70% of high-aging communities lack sufficient services tailored to seniors. "We predict that without a significant policy shift, many of the demands for the aging population in the society will not be met," Ryan Wang, associate professor and vice chair for research of civil and environmental engineering at Northeastern, said in a press release. Stock image: Young and senior people holding hands. Stock image: Young and senior people holding hands. Photo by Eda Hoyman / Getty Images In an email, Wang told Newsweek said the inspiration for the research "really hits close to home" for the professor. "I would watch my own older relatives, my grandparents and now my parents, navigate their daily lives, and I saw firsthand how a simple trip to the doctor or the grocery store could become a major logistical challenge," Wang said. "It made me realize that it's not just about whether a service exists nearby, but about the real-world, often invisible, barriers to getting there: the distance, the safety of the walk, the transportation options. "I saw how these small, daily hurdles could chip away at their independence and well-being." Why It Matters The country's demographic transformation is not a distant concern. As early as 2040, more than 20% of Americans will be 65 or older, according to federal projections. Without proactive urban planning and expanded services, seniors will face growing challenges accessing daily essentials, according to Northeastern's findings. The problem is not uniform—some states like Florida, with established aging policies, perform better. "Florida demonstrates a consistently stronger and more positive association between its ageing population and access to essential services," Wang told Newsweek. "I think this can be attributed to Florida's long-standing infrastructure and policy efforts targeted at older populations (they of course have a growing population of seniors) may be having a positive effect." However, some states—including California and Arizona—reveal inconsistent service access, even among similar high-aging populations. In Arizona alone, 70% of high-aging communities were found to lack aging-specific services like nursing care or home health support, according to Wang. "Another challenge is that many current policies are reactive rather than proactive," Wang told Newsweek. "Our projections show that the accessibility advantages some high-ageing communities currently enjoy are likely to decline by 2030 and 2060 as the elderly population grows. "This indicates a potential for widening disparities if we don't plan for the future. Without forward-looking policies that anticipate demographic shifts, we risk falling behind and failing to meet the increasing demand for services." What to Know While the study surprisingly found no significant disparities in national-level service accessibility between older and younger communities, localized gaps are pronounced. Wang said that city design will play a central role in any solution, citing the "15-minute city" model—where daily needs are reachable within a 15-minute walk or ride—as one approach. What People Are Saying "At this stage, we are not ready for the aging population," Wang said in the release. "Population aging is not a critical social issue at this point in the U.S. compared to some other countries—Korea, Japan some European countries—but that does not mean that it will stay like this. "We predict that without a significant policy shift, many of the demands for the aging population in the society will not be met." What's Next As the population continues to age, service deserts could become more widespread unless addressed through policy and planning. "It is important to know: 'Longevity-ready cities aren't about helping the elderly—they are about ensuring every one of us can move, thrive and survive," Wang told Newsweek. "Policies that improve walkability, access to health care and community services create a more livable and equitable environment for people of all ages. Everyone needs mobility to maintain their physical, mental and neurological health."
Miami Herald
an hour ago
- Miami Herald
Thousands of Americans Told to Stop Driving
Thousands of Americans have been urged to avoid driving amid concerns over high air pollution levels. The National Weather Service (NWS) issued air quality alerts in Colorado, Arizona, Wyoming and Florida on Thursday. The warnings mean ground-level ozone and particulate concentrations are forecast to reach dangerous levels. In some areas, the pollution comes from drifting wildfire smoke. The NWS warned that the general public as well as sensitive groups-children, seniors and individuals with preexisting respiratory or heart conditions-might experience health effects linked to poor air quality in the affected regions. "Increasing likelihood of respiratory symptoms and breathing discomfort in active children and adults and people with lung disease, such as asthma," the agency said. "Active children and adults, and people with lung disease, such as asthma, should reduce prolonged or heavy outdoor exertion." In Colorado, an Ozone Action Day alert is in effect for the Front Range Urban Corridor until 4 p.m. on Thursday. Hot and stagnant weather will allow conditions to become unhealthy for sensitive groups, according to the NWS. The Colorado Department of Public Health and Environment told residents in affected areas, "If possible, please help us reduce ozone pollution by limiting driving gas and diesel-powered vehicles until at least 4 p.m." Smoke from the Derby fire is also affecting central Colorado, including the towns of Aspen and Vail. In Arizona, an ozone high pollution advisory has been issued for the Phoenix metro area. This means that ozone concentrations are forecast to pose a health risk throughout the day, according to the NWS. The Arizona Department of Environmental Quality told residents in the affected region: "You are urged to car pool, telecommute or use mass transit. The use of gasoline-powered equipment should be reduced or done late in the day." In Wyoming, an air quality alert for wildfire smoke has been issued for parts of the Bighorn Basin, Owl Creek, Bridger Mountains and Wind River Basin until 1 p.m. "Smoke from various wildfires across the region, including the Red Canyon Fire, will continue to spread across the region today and overnight tonight," the NWS said. Meanwhile in Florida, the Broward County Natural Resources Division has issued an air quality alert for fine particulates until 9 a.m. on Thursday. The Colorado Department of Public Health and Environment said: "If smoke is thick or becomes thick in your neighborhood you may want to remain indoors. This is especially true for those with heart disease, respiratory illnesses, the very young, and older adults. "Consider limiting outdoor activity when moderate to heavy smoke is present. Consider relocating temporarily if smoke is present indoors and is making you ill. If visibility is less than 5 miles in smoke in your neighborhood, smoke has reached levels that are unhealthy." The Wyoming Department of Health said: "The Wyoming Department of Health recommends that the elderly, young children, and individuals with respiratory problems avoid excessive physical exertion and minimize outdoor activities during this time. Wildfire smoke is made up of a variety of pollutants, including particulate matter and ozone, which can cause respiratory health effects. Although these people are most susceptible to health impacts, the Department of Health also advises that everyone should avoid prolonged exposure to poor air quality conditions." The Arizona Department of Environmental Quality said: "Ozone is an air contaminant which can cause breathing difficulties for children, older adults, as well as persons with respiratory problems. A decrease in physical activity is recommended." The air quality warnings are set to remain in force until Thursday morning in Florida, Thursday afternoon in Wyoming and Colorado, and all day in Arizona. Regular updates regarding air pollution levels are issued on the NWS website and on the Environmental Protection Agency's AirNow interactive map. Related Articles Millions To Face 'Dangerous' Weather Threat in 3 StatesNew Tropical Storm Fernand Likely to Form Behind Hurricane ErinHundreds of Thousands Told to Move Vehicles to Higher Ground 2025 NEWSWEEK DIGITAL LLC.
